Yichen Lin, Lu Shi, Molly Beinfeld, Renee Campbell, James Chambers
{"title":"US commercial health plan use of corticosteroids in step therapy protocols: Frequency and clinical appropriateness.","authors":"Yichen Lin, Lu Shi, Molly Beinfeld, Renee Campbell, James Chambers","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2026.32.7.773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Commercial health plans may include corticosteroids in step therapy protocols for specialty drugs as part of use management. However, alignment with regulatory and clinical guidance is not well characterized.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess how corticosteroids are incorporated into plan-imposed step therapy protocols and evaluate alignment with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeling, clinical guidelines, and pivotal trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed coverage policies from 18 large US commercial health plans in the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database, reflecting policies active as of August 2024. We identified drug-indication pairs for which at least 1 plan included corticosteroids in step therapy. For each drug-indication pair, we reviewed FDA labeling to determine whether prior corticosteroid failure was consistent with FDA-recommended use. When corticosteroid use was not specified by FDA labels, we examined pivotal clinical trials and clinical guidelines to assess support for corticosteroid use in step therapy. We also examined how health plans operationalized corticosteroid use (eg, systemic vs local use, single vs multiple steps, etc).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 201 specialty drug-indication pairs and 2,767 corresponding coverage policies for which at least 1 plan included corticosteroids in step therapy. Of these drug-indication pairs, 33 (16.4%) had an FDA label indication recommending prior corticosteroids use, whereas 168 (83.6%) did not. Among 2,210 coverage policies for the 168 pairs without FDA label-indicated prior corticosteroid use, 952 (43.1%) included corticosteroids in step therapy protocols. In 21% (200/952) of these policies, corticosteroid use was a mandatory step, whereas the remaining 79% (752/952) allowed patients to meet the requirement by failing alternative agents (eg, immunomodulators). In total, 63.8% (607/952) specified the use of corticosteroids to be systemic. Few protocols defined dosage requirements (7.9%, 75/952) or treatment failure criteria (3.8%, 36/952). Among policies in which FDA labeling did not specify prior corticosteroid use, plans were significantly more likely to include corticosteroids in step therapy when corticosteroid use was an eligibility criterion in pivotal clinical trials (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> [1, N = 2,198] = 31.2; <i>P</i> < .001) or strongly recommended in clinical guidelines (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> [1, N = 1,434] = 128.0; <i>P</i> < .001). Inclusion also varied across plans, ranging from 15% to 74% of policies without FDA label-indicated corticosteroid use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Commercial health plans frequently include corticosteroids in step therapy, including when not specified in FDA labeling. Substantial variation in implementation highlights opportunities to improve transparency and consistency.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"32 7","pages":"773-781"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13294546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2026.32.7.773","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Commercial health plans may include corticosteroids in step therapy protocols for specialty drugs as part of use management. However, alignment with regulatory and clinical guidance is not well characterized.
Objective: To assess how corticosteroids are incorporated into plan-imposed step therapy protocols and evaluate alignment with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeling, clinical guidelines, and pivotal trials.
Methods: We analyzed coverage policies from 18 large US commercial health plans in the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database, reflecting policies active as of August 2024. We identified drug-indication pairs for which at least 1 plan included corticosteroids in step therapy. For each drug-indication pair, we reviewed FDA labeling to determine whether prior corticosteroid failure was consistent with FDA-recommended use. When corticosteroid use was not specified by FDA labels, we examined pivotal clinical trials and clinical guidelines to assess support for corticosteroid use in step therapy. We also examined how health plans operationalized corticosteroid use (eg, systemic vs local use, single vs multiple steps, etc).
Results: We identified 201 specialty drug-indication pairs and 2,767 corresponding coverage policies for which at least 1 plan included corticosteroids in step therapy. Of these drug-indication pairs, 33 (16.4%) had an FDA label indication recommending prior corticosteroids use, whereas 168 (83.6%) did not. Among 2,210 coverage policies for the 168 pairs without FDA label-indicated prior corticosteroid use, 952 (43.1%) included corticosteroids in step therapy protocols. In 21% (200/952) of these policies, corticosteroid use was a mandatory step, whereas the remaining 79% (752/952) allowed patients to meet the requirement by failing alternative agents (eg, immunomodulators). In total, 63.8% (607/952) specified the use of corticosteroids to be systemic. Few protocols defined dosage requirements (7.9%, 75/952) or treatment failure criteria (3.8%, 36/952). Among policies in which FDA labeling did not specify prior corticosteroid use, plans were significantly more likely to include corticosteroids in step therapy when corticosteroid use was an eligibility criterion in pivotal clinical trials (χ2 [1, N = 2,198] = 31.2; P < .001) or strongly recommended in clinical guidelines (χ2 [1, N = 1,434] = 128.0; P < .001). Inclusion also varied across plans, ranging from 15% to 74% of policies without FDA label-indicated corticosteroid use.
Conclusions: Commercial health plans frequently include corticosteroids in step therapy, including when not specified in FDA labeling. Substantial variation in implementation highlights opportunities to improve transparency and consistency.
期刊介绍:
JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.