Brief health information leaflets in general practice: A cross-sectional survey on usage, common topics and sources in Austria

IF 1.5 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-08 DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2026.05.010
Laura Plotho, Nicole Posch, Christina Radl-Karimi, Ulrike Spary-Kainz, Klaus Jeitler, Andrea Siebenhofer
{"title":"Brief health information leaflets in general practice: A cross-sectional survey on usage, common topics and sources in Austria","authors":"Laura Plotho,&nbsp;Nicole Posch,&nbsp;Christina Radl-Karimi,&nbsp;Ulrike Spary-Kainz,&nbsp;Klaus Jeitler,&nbsp;Andrea Siebenhofer","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2026.05.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Health information materials are widely available, yet their reliability is often uncertain. General practitioners remain a trusted source of information for patients, and written materials such as leaflets are common in general practice. The topics that are potentially relevant for general practitioners have not yet been sufficiently researched. This study examined the use of brief health information leaflets in Austrian general practice, focusing on their topics, sources, and preferred formats.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An online survey was distributed to Austrian general practitioners between November 2023 and January 2024. Data were analysed descriptively, and chi-square tests were applied to assess associations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 4,053 invited general practitioners 891 responded (22.0%) and 501 completed the survey (12.4%). Among respondents, 41.3% reported using health information leaflets. Of the 272 respondents who provided more detailed information, 35.7% used only self-produced materials. External materials most often came from providers of pharmaceuticals and other medical products. In general, 54.1% prefer paper-only formats, while 29.2% prefer a mix of paper and digital formats. Health information on endocrine and metabolic diseases, nutrition, and infectious diseases proved to be particularly relevant – both in terms of current use and demand.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Health information leaflets are widely used, with self-produced materials playing a greater role than previously reported. At the same time, there is a clear need for additional materials. It is interesting to note that the demand for health information focuses on the same topics as the materials that are already most frequently used.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results indicate a high demand for health information materials. The reasons for this demand remain unclear and warrant further research. Understanding these factors and the topics sought by GPs can help improve the development of short, evidence-based materials that are more frequently used in primary care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"205 ","pages":"Pages 24-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921726001200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Health information materials are widely available, yet their reliability is often uncertain. General practitioners remain a trusted source of information for patients, and written materials such as leaflets are common in general practice. The topics that are potentially relevant for general practitioners have not yet been sufficiently researched. This study examined the use of brief health information leaflets in Austrian general practice, focusing on their topics, sources, and preferred formats.

Methods

An online survey was distributed to Austrian general practitioners between November 2023 and January 2024. Data were analysed descriptively, and chi-square tests were applied to assess associations.

Results

Of 4,053 invited general practitioners 891 responded (22.0%) and 501 completed the survey (12.4%). Among respondents, 41.3% reported using health information leaflets. Of the 272 respondents who provided more detailed information, 35.7% used only self-produced materials. External materials most often came from providers of pharmaceuticals and other medical products. In general, 54.1% prefer paper-only formats, while 29.2% prefer a mix of paper and digital formats. Health information on endocrine and metabolic diseases, nutrition, and infectious diseases proved to be particularly relevant – both in terms of current use and demand.

Discussion

Health information leaflets are widely used, with self-produced materials playing a greater role than previously reported. At the same time, there is a clear need for additional materials. It is interesting to note that the demand for health information focuses on the same topics as the materials that are already most frequently used.

Conclusion

The results indicate a high demand for health information materials. The reasons for this demand remain unclear and warrant further research. Understanding these factors and the topics sought by GPs can help improve the development of short, evidence-based materials that are more frequently used in primary care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一般做法中的简短卫生信息传单:奥地利关于使用情况、共同主题和来源的横断面调查。
导言:卫生信息材料广泛可得,但其可靠性往往不确定。全科医生仍然是患者可信赖的信息来源,诸如传单之类的书面材料在全科医生中很常见。可能与全科医生相关的主题尚未得到充分的研究。这项研究调查了奥地利普通医疗中简要卫生信息传单的使用情况,重点是其主题、来源和首选格式。方法:于2023年11月至2024年1月对奥地利全科医生进行在线调查。对数据进行描述性分析,并采用卡方检验来评估相关性。结果:4053名被邀请的全科医生中,回复891人(22.0%),完成调查的501人(12.4%)。在答复者中,41.3%报告使用健康信息传单。在272名提供更详细信息的受访者中,35.7%的人仅使用自产材料。外部材料通常来自药品和其他医疗产品的提供者。总的来说,54.1%的人更喜欢纸质格式,而29.2%的人更喜欢纸质和数字格式的混合。事实证明,关于内分泌和代谢疾病、营养和传染病的健康信息,无论就目前的使用情况还是需求而言,都是特别相关的。讨论:卫生宣传单张被广泛使用,自产材料的作用比以前报道的更大。同时,显然还需要额外的材料。值得注意的是,对卫生信息的需求集中在与已经最常用的材料相同的主题上。结论:卫生信息资料需求量大。这种需求的原因尚不清楚,需要进一步研究。了解这些因素和全科医生所寻求的主题可以帮助改进在初级保健中更频繁使用的以证据为基础的简短材料的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
期刊最新文献
Reduktion von Verordnungsfehlern bei onkologischen Systemtherapien durch Einführung einer softwaregestützten Therapieplanung Sex matters?! – Berücksichtigung von Geschlechts- und Vielfältigkeitsunterschieden in der (bio-)medizinischen Forschung Vergleich von Kaiserschnittraten auf Klinikebene mittels Robson-Klassifikation: Retrospektive Kohortenanalyse an einem universitären Perinatalzentrum Level 1 (2019–2021) Wegbereiter sein: Die Rolle der Landesfachstellen Demenz in der regionalen und lokalen Vernetzung bei Demenz – eine qualitative Studie Prevalence of thirst and xerostomia and their associated factors in patients with chronic heart failure in Germany: A multicenter cross-sectional study
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1