The effect of impaction energy and bone quality on cementless femoral implant fixation and femoral periprosthetic fracture risk.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Bone & Joint Research Pub Date : 2026-07-17 DOI:10.1302/2046-3758.157.BJR-2025-0532.R1
M Abdulhadi Alagha, Rishabh Gupta, Chloe Jordan, Geoffrey Ng, Justin Cobb
{"title":"The effect of impaction energy and bone quality on cementless femoral implant fixation and femoral periprosthetic fracture risk.","authors":"M Abdulhadi Alagha, Rishabh Gupta, Chloe Jordan, Geoffrey Ng, Justin Cobb","doi":"10.1302/2046-3758.157.BJR-2025-0532.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Cementless fixation is the predominant method used in hip arthroplasty worldwide; however, seating implants via impaction remains a balancing act - too much energy may cause fracture, and too little may not seat the implant adequately. Currently, the optimal energy level required for femoral implant fixation is unknown, which adversely affects the variability of long-term implant stability. This study investigated how varying impaction energies affect strain behaviour, fracture risk, and implant fixation in synthetic bone models using cementless femoral implants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A standardized surgical technique was used to prepare a total of 20 synthetic bone models (Sawbones) - 12 healthy and eight osteoporotic - for femoral impaction. The implants were impacted at three different energy levels (low, medium, and high) using a validated in vitro rig simulator for soft-tissue compliance, with four specimens tested at each velocity and bone type. Strain behaviour and fracture risk, measured as peak strain, were analyzed using digital image correlation with two high-speed cameras. Implant stability was assessed via pull-out fixation tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher impaction energy increased fracture risk but did not significantly increase implant stability. In healthy bone models, mean tensile peak strain was 0.31, 0.69, and 0.97 for low, medium, and high energy strikes, respectively. Osteoporotic models showed the greatest difference between the low and medium energies during the initial two strikes, with peak strains of 0.42 to 0.46 versus 0.79 to 0.84, with subsequent strikes resulting in minimal variation between the two velocities. Implant pull-out forces were similar among the different impaction energy levels within each group (healthy p = 0.10<u>5</u>, osteoporotic p = 0.686), and consistently lower in osteoporotic bones across all energy levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These biomechanical findings on synthetic bones confirm that multiple lower-energy strikes lead to similar implant fixation outcomes with lower risk of periprosthetic fracture (lower peak strain).</p>","PeriodicalId":9074,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Research","volume":"15 7","pages":"892-902"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13377574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.157.BJR-2025-0532.R1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Cementless fixation is the predominant method used in hip arthroplasty worldwide; however, seating implants via impaction remains a balancing act - too much energy may cause fracture, and too little may not seat the implant adequately. Currently, the optimal energy level required for femoral implant fixation is unknown, which adversely affects the variability of long-term implant stability. This study investigated how varying impaction energies affect strain behaviour, fracture risk, and implant fixation in synthetic bone models using cementless femoral implants.

Methods: A standardized surgical technique was used to prepare a total of 20 synthetic bone models (Sawbones) - 12 healthy and eight osteoporotic - for femoral impaction. The implants were impacted at three different energy levels (low, medium, and high) using a validated in vitro rig simulator for soft-tissue compliance, with four specimens tested at each velocity and bone type. Strain behaviour and fracture risk, measured as peak strain, were analyzed using digital image correlation with two high-speed cameras. Implant stability was assessed via pull-out fixation tests.

Results: Higher impaction energy increased fracture risk but did not significantly increase implant stability. In healthy bone models, mean tensile peak strain was 0.31, 0.69, and 0.97 for low, medium, and high energy strikes, respectively. Osteoporotic models showed the greatest difference between the low and medium energies during the initial two strikes, with peak strains of 0.42 to 0.46 versus 0.79 to 0.84, with subsequent strikes resulting in minimal variation between the two velocities. Implant pull-out forces were similar among the different impaction energy levels within each group (healthy p = 0.105, osteoporotic p = 0.686), and consistently lower in osteoporotic bones across all energy levels.

Conclusion: These biomechanical findings on synthetic bones confirm that multiple lower-energy strikes lead to similar implant fixation outcomes with lower risk of periprosthetic fracture (lower peak strain).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
撞击能量和骨质量对无骨水泥股骨假体固定及股骨假体周围骨折风险的影响。
目的:无骨水泥固定是世界范围内髋关节置换术的主要方法;然而,通过内嵌固定植入物仍然是一种平衡行为——过多的能量可能导致骨折,而过少的能量可能无法充分固定植入物。目前,股骨内固定所需的最佳能量水平尚不清楚,这对长期内固定稳定性的可变性产生了不利影响。本研究探讨了不同的撞击能量如何影响使用无水泥股骨植入物的合成骨模型的应变行为、骨折风险和植入物固定。方法:采用标准化的手术技术,共制备20个合成骨模型(Sawbones),其中12个健康骨模型和8个骨质疏松骨模型用于股骨嵌塞。植入物在三种不同的能量水平(低、中、高)下撞击,使用经过验证的软组织顺应性体外钻机模拟器,在每种速度和骨类型下测试四个标本。应变行为和断裂风险,测量峰值应变,使用数字图像相关分析与两个高速摄像机。通过拔出固定试验评估种植体稳定性。结果:较高的撞击能量增加了骨折的风险,但没有显著增加种植体的稳定性。在健康骨模型中,低、中、高能冲击的平均拉伸峰值应变分别为0.31、0.69和0.97。骨质疏松模型显示,在最初的两次撞击中,低能量和中能量之间的差异最大,峰值应变为0.42至0.46,而随后的撞击导致两种速度之间的变化最小。各组内不同嵌套能量水平的种植体拔出力相似(健康组p = 0.105,骨质疏松组p = 0.686),骨质疏松组在所有能量水平下均较低。结论:这些合成骨的生物力学结果证实,多次低能撞击导致相似的假体固定结果,假体周围骨折的风险较低(峰值应变较低)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Research
Bone & Joint Research CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
23.90%
发文量
156
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The gold open access journal for the musculoskeletal sciences. Included in PubMed and available in PubMed Central.
期刊最新文献
A novel strategy for reconstruction of AORI type III proximal tibial defects : surface-type knee reconstruction following defect reconstruction with 3D-printed extension-stem augment. Asymmetric metaphyseal cones versus medial modular block augment with central cone for medial tibial defects : a biomechanical comparison in varying bone quality. BIRC3 facilitates osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells via NGFR/β-catenin signalling axis. Reported outcomes for patients following postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures : a systematic review. Differences in the collagen of semitendinosus tendon in patients with and without general joint laxity.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1