Digital doppelgangers in psychiatry.

Khaled Elbarbary, Sheikh Shoib
{"title":"Digital doppelgangers in psychiatry.","authors":"Khaled Elbarbary, Sheikh Shoib","doi":"10.1007/s44192-026-00517-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital doppelgangers are individualized, continuously updated digital representations of a person constructed from behavioral, physiological, and contextual data streams, including smartphone metadata, wearable sensor outputs, social media activity, and environmental sensors. Whereas conventional digital twins in physical medicine primarily replicate anatomical structures and physiological parameters, psychiatric digital doppelgangers are designed to capture dynamic mental states, emotional trajectories, and behavioral pathways through aggregated multimodal digital traces. Preliminary research suggests potential clinical utility across several domains, including earlier detection of depressive and bipolar episodes, risk stratification for suicidal crises, and individualized treatment planning; however, most applications remain at the feasibility and proof-of-concept stage and have not yet achieved prospective clinical validation. Implementation raises substantive challenges, including informed-consent complexity under fluctuating decisional capacity, algorithmic bias arising from non-representative training datasets, diagnostic ambiguity in the interpretation of behavioral signals, inequitable access to required technology infrastructure, and the risk of reconfiguring the therapeutic relationship into a surveillance mechanism. Responsible development requires interdisciplinary collaboration among clinicians, technologists, ethicists, regulators, and patient communities, alongside robust ethical frameworks, prospective validation regimes, and genuine patient partnership throughout the development cycle. Digital doppelgangers represent a conceptually distinct but adjacent framework to digital twins, digital phenotyping, and AI-driven cognitive science models; their trajectory in psychiatry depends on whether technological ambition is matched by equally rigorous governance and a primary commitment to patient welfare.</p>","PeriodicalId":72827,"journal":{"name":"Discover mental health","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13396074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-026-00517-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital doppelgangers are individualized, continuously updated digital representations of a person constructed from behavioral, physiological, and contextual data streams, including smartphone metadata, wearable sensor outputs, social media activity, and environmental sensors. Whereas conventional digital twins in physical medicine primarily replicate anatomical structures and physiological parameters, psychiatric digital doppelgangers are designed to capture dynamic mental states, emotional trajectories, and behavioral pathways through aggregated multimodal digital traces. Preliminary research suggests potential clinical utility across several domains, including earlier detection of depressive and bipolar episodes, risk stratification for suicidal crises, and individualized treatment planning; however, most applications remain at the feasibility and proof-of-concept stage and have not yet achieved prospective clinical validation. Implementation raises substantive challenges, including informed-consent complexity under fluctuating decisional capacity, algorithmic bias arising from non-representative training datasets, diagnostic ambiguity in the interpretation of behavioral signals, inequitable access to required technology infrastructure, and the risk of reconfiguring the therapeutic relationship into a surveillance mechanism. Responsible development requires interdisciplinary collaboration among clinicians, technologists, ethicists, regulators, and patient communities, alongside robust ethical frameworks, prospective validation regimes, and genuine patient partnership throughout the development cycle. Digital doppelgangers represent a conceptually distinct but adjacent framework to digital twins, digital phenotyping, and AI-driven cognitive science models; their trajectory in psychiatry depends on whether technological ambition is matched by equally rigorous governance and a primary commitment to patient welfare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神病学中的数字二重身。
数字分身是一种个性化的、不断更新的数字表现形式,它由行为、生理和上下文数据流构建而成,包括智能手机元数据、可穿戴传感器输出、社交媒体活动和环境传感器。在物理医学中,传统的数字双胞胎主要复制解剖结构和生理参数,而精神病学的数字二重身旨在通过聚合的多模态数字痕迹捕捉动态的精神状态、情感轨迹和行为路径。初步研究表明,该方法在多个领域具有潜在的临床应用价值,包括抑郁症和双相情感障碍发作的早期检测、自杀危机的风险分层和个性化治疗计划;然而,大多数应用仍处于可行性和概念验证阶段,尚未达到前瞻性临床验证。实施带来了实质性挑战,包括决策能力波动下的知情同意复杂性、非代表性训练数据集产生的算法偏差、行为信号解释中的诊断模糊性、获得所需技术基础设施的不公平机会,以及将治疗关系重新配置为监测机制的风险。负责任的开发需要临床医生、技术专家、伦理学家、监管机构和患者社区之间的跨学科合作,以及在整个开发周期中健全的伦理框架、前瞻性验证制度和真正的患者伙伴关系。数字二重身代表了与数字双胞胎、数字表型和人工智能驱动的认知科学模型在概念上不同但相邻的框架;他们在精神病学上的发展轨迹取决于技术野心是否与同样严格的管理和对患者福利的主要承诺相匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Suicide among children and adolescents in India as a public mental health priority. Suicide risk and suicidal ideation among physicians in Iran from an integrated motivational volitional perspective. A narrative review of school-based preventive interventions on mental disorders and addictions. Correction: Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic exposure among teachers in post-war communities. Psychosocial and cultural dynamics shaping substance use and internet fraud among Nigerian youths.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1