Suspected remimazolam formulation-associated peri-induction anaphylaxis: two cases highlighting diagnostic complexity - Two case reports.

IF 3.6 Anesthesia and pain medicine Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-23 DOI:10.17085/apm.26622
Hyun-Seong Lee, Min Woo Lee, Daeseok Oh
{"title":"Suspected remimazolam formulation-associated peri-induction anaphylaxis: two cases highlighting diagnostic complexity - Two case reports.","authors":"Hyun-Seong Lee, Min Woo Lee, Daeseok Oh","doi":"10.17085/apm.26622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reports of remimazolam formulation-associated anaphylaxis are increasing as its use expands. Between 2023 and 2025, we identified two severe reactions among 1,592 patients who received remimazolam at our institution.</p><p><strong>Case: </strong>A 65-year-old man with end-stage renal disease developed profound hypotension without cutaneous signs after induction with 10 mg of remimazolam and peri-induction cefazedone administration. Surgery was cancelled due to persistent hypotension. Serum tryptase at 6 h was 38.0 μg/L; however, delayed skin testing was negative. Subsequent propofol-based anesthesia without cefazedone re-administration was uneventful. A 50-year-old woman developed hypotension and facial flushing within 2 min of receiving 10 mg of remimazolam. Although serum tryptase levels remained within the normal range, delayed skin testing for remimazolam was positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diagnosis of remimazolam formulation-associated hypersensitivity may remain inconclusive when based on a single diagnostic test. Accurate evaluation requires integrating timed tryptase, delayed skin testing, and exposure history.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":" ","pages":"368-374"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13444177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.26622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reports of remimazolam formulation-associated anaphylaxis are increasing as its use expands. Between 2023 and 2025, we identified two severe reactions among 1,592 patients who received remimazolam at our institution.

Case: A 65-year-old man with end-stage renal disease developed profound hypotension without cutaneous signs after induction with 10 mg of remimazolam and peri-induction cefazedone administration. Surgery was cancelled due to persistent hypotension. Serum tryptase at 6 h was 38.0 μg/L; however, delayed skin testing was negative. Subsequent propofol-based anesthesia without cefazedone re-administration was uneventful. A 50-year-old woman developed hypotension and facial flushing within 2 min of receiving 10 mg of remimazolam. Although serum tryptase levels remained within the normal range, delayed skin testing for remimazolam was positive.

Conclusions: Diagnosis of remimazolam formulation-associated hypersensitivity may remain inconclusive when based on a single diagnostic test. Accurate evaluation requires integrating timed tryptase, delayed skin testing, and exposure history.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疑似雷马唑仑制剂相关的诱导期过敏反应:两例突出诊断复杂性-两例报告。
背景:雷马唑仑处方相关过敏反应的报告随着其使用的扩大而增加。在2023年至2025年间,我们在我院接受雷马唑仑治疗的1592例患者中发现了两例严重反应。病例:一名65岁终末期肾病患者(美国麻醉医师身体状况学会[ASA PS] III)在诱导期给予10mg雷马唑仑和头孢酮诱导后出现无皮肤体征的深度低血压。由于持续低血压,手术取消。事件发生后6 h血清胰蛋白酶为38.0 μg/L;然而,延迟皮肤测试呈阴性。随后以异丙酚为基础的麻醉没有再给头孢酮。一名50岁女性(ASA PS I)在接受10mg雷马唑仑后2分钟内出现低血压和面部潮红。虽然血清胰蛋白酶水平保持在正常范围内(5.3和5.1 μg/L),但延迟皮肤试验对雷马唑仑呈阳性。结论:诊断雷马唑仑制剂相关的超敏反应可能仍然是不确定的,当基于单一的诊断试验。准确的评估需要整合定时胰蛋白酶、延迟皮肤试验和仔细评估暴露史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Paradoxical bradycardia from occult venous hemorrhage mimicking vasovagal syncope - A case report. Oliceridine for acute pain management: pharmacology, clinical efficacy, safety, and future perspectives: a narrative review. Comparison of patient preference for and interpretability of video-based pain-expression scenarios and the numerical rating scale for postoperative pain assessment: a prospective observational study. Safety and recovery of rocuronium and sugammadex versus cisatracurium or atracurium and pyridostigmine in surgical patients with chronic kidney disease: a multi-center retrospective propensity score-matched study. Phrenic-sparing approaches in the interscalene block for shoulder surgery: a narrative review.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1