Evaluation of a multisensory hypnosis mask during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: Results of a randomized controlled trial.

Brigitte Cortes, Hélène Béhal, Julien Labreuche, Isabelle Grit, Philippe Puech, Jonathan Olivier
{"title":"Evaluation of a multisensory hypnosis mask during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: Results of a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Brigitte Cortes, Hélène Béhal, Julien Labreuche, Isabelle Grit, Philippe Puech, Jonathan Olivier","doi":"10.1016/j.fjurol.2026.103167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether the Hypnos Pro® mask - a multisensory hypnosis-based device combining light stimulation, auditory guidance, and hypnotic narration - reduces pain and anxiety during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial compared TRUS-Bx performed with or without the Hypnos Pro® mask. Initially designed to include 172 patients, the study was prematurely stopped after randomization of 99 participants due to changes in clinical practice (Hypnos Pro® group, n=49; control group, n=50). Pain intensity was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 20minutes after probe removal. Anxiety was measured using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-YA). Secondary outcomes included procedure characteristics, patient willingness to repeat the biopsy, and staff satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-eight patients were analyzed (Hypnos Pro®: n=45; control: n=43). Median pain VAS scores were significantly higher in the Hypnos Pro® group than in controls (2.2 [1.2-4.8] vs. 1.4 [0.5-3.2]; P=0.038). After stratified analysis adjusting for prior biopsy history and education level, this difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.10). Changes in STAI-YA scores did not differ significantly between groups (-5.1±9.0 vs. -6.6±8.8; P=0.56). Procedure duration and number of biopsy cores were comparable between groups. Willingness to repeat the procedure was similar (84% vs. 91%; P=0.40).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of the Hypnos Pro® mask did not reduce pain or anxiety during TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Pain scores were higher in the mask group in the unadjusted analysis, but this difference did not remain significant after adjustment for baseline imbalance. These findings do not support the routine use of multisensory hypnosis devices during prostate biopsy. Further studies are warranted to clarify the impact of sensory isolation devices on patient comfort during prostate biopsy.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>level 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":516865,"journal":{"name":"The French journal of urology","volume":" ","pages":"103167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The French journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fjurol.2026.103167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess whether the Hypnos Pro® mask - a multisensory hypnosis-based device combining light stimulation, auditory guidance, and hypnotic narration - reduces pain and anxiety during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx).

Methods: This randomized controlled trial compared TRUS-Bx performed with or without the Hypnos Pro® mask. Initially designed to include 172 patients, the study was prematurely stopped after randomization of 99 participants due to changes in clinical practice (Hypnos Pro® group, n=49; control group, n=50). Pain intensity was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 20minutes after probe removal. Anxiety was measured using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-YA). Secondary outcomes included procedure characteristics, patient willingness to repeat the biopsy, and staff satisfaction.

Results: Eighty-eight patients were analyzed (Hypnos Pro®: n=45; control: n=43). Median pain VAS scores were significantly higher in the Hypnos Pro® group than in controls (2.2 [1.2-4.8] vs. 1.4 [0.5-3.2]; P=0.038). After stratified analysis adjusting for prior biopsy history and education level, this difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.10). Changes in STAI-YA scores did not differ significantly between groups (-5.1±9.0 vs. -6.6±8.8; P=0.56). Procedure duration and number of biopsy cores were comparable between groups. Willingness to repeat the procedure was similar (84% vs. 91%; P=0.40).

Conclusion: The use of the Hypnos Pro® mask did not reduce pain or anxiety during TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Pain scores were higher in the mask group in the unadjusted analysis, but this difference did not remain significant after adjustment for baseline imbalance. These findings do not support the routine use of multisensory hypnosis devices during prostate biopsy. Further studies are warranted to clarify the impact of sensory isolation devices on patient comfort during prostate biopsy.

Level of evidence: level 3.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经直肠超声引导前列腺活检中多感觉催眠面罩的评价:一项随机对照试验的结果。
目的:评估Hypnos Pro®面罩——一种结合光刺激、听觉引导和催眠叙述的多感官催眠设备——是否能减轻经直肠超声引导前列腺活检(truss - bx)期间的疼痛和焦虑。方法:这项随机对照试验比较了在使用或不使用Hypnos Pro®面罩时进行的TRUS-Bx。最初设计纳入172名患者,由于临床实践的变化,99名参与者被随机分配后过早停止研究(Hypnos Pro®组,n=49;对照组,n=50)。在取出探针20分钟后用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛强度。使用Spielberger状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI-YA)测量焦虑。次要结局包括手术特点、患者重复活检的意愿和工作人员满意度。结果:共分析88例患者(Hypnos Pro®:n=45;对照组:n=43)。Hypnos Pro®组疼痛VAS评分中位数显著高于对照组(2.2 [1.2-4.8]vs 1.4 [0.5-3.2]; p=0.038)。经分层分析调整既往活检史和教育水平后,差异无统计学意义(p=0.10)。STAI-YA评分在两组间无显著差异(-5.1±9.0 vs -6.6±8.8;p=0.56)。两组间的手术时间和活检芯数具有可比性。重复手术的意愿相似(84% vs 91%; p=0.40)。结论:在超声引导下前列腺活检时,使用Hypnos Pro®面罩并不能减轻疼痛或焦虑。在未调整的分析中,口罩组的疼痛评分更高,但在调整基线不平衡后,这种差异并不显着。这些发现不支持在前列腺活检中常规使用多感觉催眠装置。需要进一步的研究来阐明感觉隔离装置对前列腺活检患者舒适度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation and Health-Related Quality of Life in Women Aged >50 Years with Urolithiasis. Decarbonizing urology: are we there yet? Male infertility remains underrepresented on French assisted reproduction center websites. Early catheter removal after TURP: from feasibility to long term functional outcomes. Perilesional Biopsy: Better Characterisation of the Index Lesion Rather Than Wider Sampling of the Gland.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1