Understanding circularity knowledge across the general public–expert spectrum: Instrument development and cross-national evidence from six European countries

IF 6.1 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Cleaner and Responsible Consumption Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-15 DOI:10.1016/j.clrc.2026.100468
Jeroen Dikken, Rengin Aslanoğlu, Qiuxian Li, N. Cihan Kayaçetin, Małgorzata Świąder, Grzegorz Chrobak, Aleksandra Lubańska, Jan K. Kazak, Loredana Ivan, Gabriele Masera, Carlo Andrea Biraghi, Francesco Pittau, Evgenii Mateichik, Joost van Hoof, Chiara Piccardo
{"title":"Understanding circularity knowledge across the general public–expert spectrum: Instrument development and cross-national evidence from six European countries","authors":"Jeroen Dikken,&nbsp;Rengin Aslanoğlu,&nbsp;Qiuxian Li,&nbsp;N. Cihan Kayaçetin,&nbsp;Małgorzata Świąder,&nbsp;Grzegorz Chrobak,&nbsp;Aleksandra Lubańska,&nbsp;Jan K. Kazak,&nbsp;Loredana Ivan,&nbsp;Gabriele Masera,&nbsp;Carlo Andrea Biraghi,&nbsp;Francesco Pittau,&nbsp;Evgenii Mateichik,&nbsp;Joost van Hoof,&nbsp;Chiara Piccardo","doi":"10.1016/j.clrc.2026.100468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Circular Economy is increasingly recognized as a multidimensional transition necessary for resource efficiency in the built environment; however, its implementation is hindered by fragmentation. This study investigates the dynamics of circularity knowledge across the public-expert spectrum using a psychometrically validated instrument supported by Item Response Theory. Empirical data were collected from the Netherlands, Belgium, Poland, Türkiye, Romania, and Italy, representing diverse regulatory, educational, and economic settings. The results demonstrate that circularity knowledge is not a binary paradigm but a layered, permeable continuum. While professional participation and advanced higher education are significant determinants of higher circularity literacy, the study reveals a knowledge ladder effect where entry-level higher education provides limited benefits relative to the general public's knowledge levels. The instrument demonstrates robust targeting across the population, evidenced by a strong correlation (r = 0.812) between latent proficiency and raw scores, which pinpoints a significant transition threshold at 43.3 points that separates academic preparation from verified expert-level circularity literacy. It shows that although experts are well-calibrated, groups with lower knowledge initially exhibit significantly overconfidence, which only corrects after evaluation-focused reflection. Cross-country analysis confirms structural validity of the tool as a transferable latent construct and demonstrates that specialised curriculum integration leads to knowledge convergence regardless of national origin. It concludes that systemic curriculum integration, practice-based learning, and the use of diagnostic tools to harmonize stakeholder contributions in participatory settings (e.g., Urban Living Labs) are critical levers for accelerating the transition to a circular built environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34617,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100468"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784326000823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Circular Economy is increasingly recognized as a multidimensional transition necessary for resource efficiency in the built environment; however, its implementation is hindered by fragmentation. This study investigates the dynamics of circularity knowledge across the public-expert spectrum using a psychometrically validated instrument supported by Item Response Theory. Empirical data were collected from the Netherlands, Belgium, Poland, Türkiye, Romania, and Italy, representing diverse regulatory, educational, and economic settings. The results demonstrate that circularity knowledge is not a binary paradigm but a layered, permeable continuum. While professional participation and advanced higher education are significant determinants of higher circularity literacy, the study reveals a knowledge ladder effect where entry-level higher education provides limited benefits relative to the general public's knowledge levels. The instrument demonstrates robust targeting across the population, evidenced by a strong correlation (r = 0.812) between latent proficiency and raw scores, which pinpoints a significant transition threshold at 43.3 points that separates academic preparation from verified expert-level circularity literacy. It shows that although experts are well-calibrated, groups with lower knowledge initially exhibit significantly overconfidence, which only corrects after evaluation-focused reflection. Cross-country analysis confirms structural validity of the tool as a transferable latent construct and demonstrates that specialised curriculum integration leads to knowledge convergence regardless of national origin. It concludes that systemic curriculum integration, practice-based learning, and the use of diagnostic tools to harmonize stakeholder contributions in participatory settings (e.g., Urban Living Labs) are critical levers for accelerating the transition to a circular built environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解一般公共-专家范围内的循环知识:来自六个欧洲国家的工具开发和跨国证据
循环经济越来越被认为是建筑环境资源效率所必需的多维转型;然而,它的实现受到碎片化的阻碍。本研究利用项目反应理论支持的心理测量学验证工具,调查了公共-专家范围内循环知识的动态。实证数据来自荷兰、比利时、波兰、捷克、罗马尼亚和意大利,代表了不同的监管、教育和经济环境。结果表明,循环知识不是一个二元范式,而是一个分层的,可渗透的连续体。虽然专业参与和高等教育是提高循环素养的重要决定因素,但研究揭示了一种知识阶梯效应,即入门级高等教育相对于普通公众的知识水平提供的好处有限。该工具在整个人群中显示出强大的目标,潜在熟练程度和原始分数之间的强相关性(r = 0.812)证明了这一点,这表明了一个重要的过渡阈值为43.3分,将学术准备与经过验证的专家级循环素养分开。它表明,尽管专家们都经过了很好的校准,但知识水平较低的群体最初表现出明显的过度自信,这种过度自信只有在以评估为中心的反思之后才会得到纠正。跨国分析证实了该工具作为一种可转移的潜在结构的结构有效性,并证明了专业课程整合导致知识趋同,无论其国籍如何。报告的结论是,系统的课程整合、基于实践的学习以及使用诊断工具来协调参与式环境(如城市生活实验室)中利益相关者的贡献,是加速向循环建筑环境过渡的关键杠杆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
99 days
期刊最新文献
Structural heterogeneity in the innovation–sustainability nexus: A global segmentation approach using interpretable machine learning Eudaimonic and hedonic well-being orientations motivate ethical buying in Switzerland and Japan Determinant model of green creative network capability of family farms: An exploration based on grounded theory Voluntary carbon offsetting among consumers: Part of environmentally sustainable lifestyles or a license to pollute? Consumer value systems' role in sustainable behaviour: Insights from a configurational approach
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1