Guardians of the Archive and the Memory of War in Soviet Films After the Thaw

IF 0.8 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY Journal of Modern European History Pub Date : 2026-08-18 DOI:10.1177/16118944261463977
Violeta Davoliūtė
{"title":"Guardians of the Archive and the Memory of War in Soviet Films After the Thaw","authors":"Violeta Davoliūtė","doi":"10.1177/16118944261463977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article identifies a sub-genre of the Soviet war film: a quartet of feature films released between 1964 and 1967 ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Enemy of the State</jats:italic> , <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">I Want to Believe</jats:italic> , <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Someone Else</jats:italic> ' <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">s Name</jats:italic> , and <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Dissenting Opinion</jats:italic> ) that centre on unmasking former Nazi collaborators. Produced in the USSR's western borderlands during the pivotal transition from the Khrushchev Thaw to Brezhnev-era conservatism, these films served as a cultural arena for negotiating the memory of the Great Patriotic War. They introduce a new cinematic hero: the investigator as a guardian of the archive. This figure – whether a male KGB officer, journalist, or prosecutor – embodies the post-Stalinist security apparatus's methodological shift from crude terror towards more sophisticated, prophylactic modes of social control. Using sincerity and forensic reason as strategic tools, these protagonists reinforce the state's authority as the ultimate arbiter of historical truth. The analysis traces how this archetype evolves across the four films, from an infallible state avenger to a professional who corrects bureaucratic errors and ensures that historical justice prevails. While these films helped inaugurate the Brezhnevite cult of victory, they simultaneously reveal the very anxieties they sought to quell regarding flawed archives, state fallibility and the unresolved legacy of wartime collaboration.","PeriodicalId":44275,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern European History","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern European History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16118944261463977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article identifies a sub-genre of the Soviet war film: a quartet of feature films released between 1964 and 1967 ( Enemy of the State , I Want to Believe , Someone Else ' s Name , and Dissenting Opinion ) that centre on unmasking former Nazi collaborators. Produced in the USSR's western borderlands during the pivotal transition from the Khrushchev Thaw to Brezhnev-era conservatism, these films served as a cultural arena for negotiating the memory of the Great Patriotic War. They introduce a new cinematic hero: the investigator as a guardian of the archive. This figure – whether a male KGB officer, journalist, or prosecutor – embodies the post-Stalinist security apparatus's methodological shift from crude terror towards more sophisticated, prophylactic modes of social control. Using sincerity and forensic reason as strategic tools, these protagonists reinforce the state's authority as the ultimate arbiter of historical truth. The analysis traces how this archetype evolves across the four films, from an infallible state avenger to a professional who corrects bureaucratic errors and ensures that historical justice prevails. While these films helped inaugurate the Brezhnevite cult of victory, they simultaneously reveal the very anxieties they sought to quell regarding flawed archives, state fallibility and the unresolved legacy of wartime collaboration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
档案守护者与解冻后苏联电影中的战争记忆
本文确定了苏联战争电影的一个亚类型:1964年至1967年间发行的四部故事片(《国家的敌人》、《我要相信》、《别人的名字》和《反对意见》),主要讲述了揭露前纳粹合作者的故事。在从赫鲁晓夫的解冻到勃列日涅夫时代的保守主义的关键过渡时期,这些电影在苏联西部边境地区制作,成为了讨论卫国战争记忆的文化舞台。他们引入了一个新的电影英雄:作为档案守护者的调查员。这个人物——无论是男性克格勃官员、记者还是检察官——体现了后斯大林时代安全机构的方法论转变,即从粗暴的恐怖主义转向更复杂、预防性的社会控制模式。这些主人公将真诚和司法理性作为战略工具,强化了国家作为历史真相最终仲裁者的权威。分析追踪了这个原型是如何在四部电影中演变的,从一个绝对可靠的国家复仇者到一个纠正官僚错误并确保历史正义获胜的专业人士。虽然这些电影有助于开启勃列日涅夫对胜利的崇拜,但它们同时也揭示了他们试图平息的焦虑,这些焦虑涉及有缺陷的档案、国家的不可靠以及战时合作遗留下来的未解决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Erratum to “Between Forensic Design and Staged Metaphor: Displaying German Documents in Early Post-War Poland” Tax Guidebooks and Their Narratives in the Second Half of the 20th Century Tax Lawyers of the World, Unite! Mitchell B. Carroll (1898–1987), Transnational Legal Networks and International Capital Loophole Capitalism: Theorizing the History of Tax Havens and the Offshore Economy The Wisdom of Hanna Silver: Jewish Survival and Social-Democratic Faith in Holocaust-Era Berlin
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1