Same sample, different result: Variation in clozapine assay measurement in four UK laboratories.

IF 5 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2026-08-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20451253261473111
Matthew Atkins, James Fritz, Mary Rose Hilaire, David Taylor
{"title":"Same sample, different result: Variation in clozapine assay measurement in four UK laboratories.","authors":"Matthew Atkins, James Fritz, Mary Rose Hilaire, David Taylor","doi":"10.1177/20451253261473111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laboratory measurement of clozapine blood concentrations is central to safe and effective treatment and is commonly assumed to be accurate and reproducible across providers. Chromatographic assays require batch-specific setup and are performed using different equipment and techniques, which may introduce error or variability. However, systematic evaluation of inter-provider consistency is limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the analytical accuracy and reproducibility of clozapine and norclozapine blood concentration measurements across four UK laboratories providing routine therapeutic drug monitoring.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Laboratory-based analytical accuracy and repeatability study.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A panel of 15 spiked plasma samples covering a clinically relevant concentration range for clozapine and norclozapine (74-1443 ng/mL) was distributed to four UK laboratories providing routine therapeutic drug monitoring. Each laboratory analysed the same samples on two separate occasions. Analytical accuracy relative to known values and intra-laboratory consistency were assessed using regression and agreement analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All laboratories demonstrated strong linearity between measured and known concentrations (r = 0.932-0.999). Laboratories A and C showed slopes close to unity (0.94-0.99), minimal mean bias (-28 to +22 ng/mL), and narrow limits of agreement for clozapine (-89 to +51 ng/mL) and norclozapine (-71 to +71 ng/mL) across both rounds. In contrast, laboratories B and D showed reduced agreement on repeat testing, with increased slopes, positive bias, and widened limits of agreement in the second round. For laboratory B, the clozapine slope increased from 0.99 to 1.33, with limits of agreement widening to -320 to +673 ng/mL. Laboratory D showed greater deviation, with the clozapine slope increasing from 1.18 to 1.59 and mean bias rising to +349 ng/mL, with very wide limits of agreement (-354 to +1053 ng/mL).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laboratory assays of clozapine using LC-MS and HPLC are not always accurate or reproducible over time. Some laboratories show a significant bias, reporting measured concentrations much higher than the true value.</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":"16 ","pages":"20451253261473111"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13478647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253261473111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laboratory measurement of clozapine blood concentrations is central to safe and effective treatment and is commonly assumed to be accurate and reproducible across providers. Chromatographic assays require batch-specific setup and are performed using different equipment and techniques, which may introduce error or variability. However, systematic evaluation of inter-provider consistency is limited.

Objectives: To assess the analytical accuracy and reproducibility of clozapine and norclozapine blood concentration measurements across four UK laboratories providing routine therapeutic drug monitoring.

Design: Laboratory-based analytical accuracy and repeatability study.

Method: A panel of 15 spiked plasma samples covering a clinically relevant concentration range for clozapine and norclozapine (74-1443 ng/mL) was distributed to four UK laboratories providing routine therapeutic drug monitoring. Each laboratory analysed the same samples on two separate occasions. Analytical accuracy relative to known values and intra-laboratory consistency were assessed using regression and agreement analyses.

Results: All laboratories demonstrated strong linearity between measured and known concentrations (r = 0.932-0.999). Laboratories A and C showed slopes close to unity (0.94-0.99), minimal mean bias (-28 to +22 ng/mL), and narrow limits of agreement for clozapine (-89 to +51 ng/mL) and norclozapine (-71 to +71 ng/mL) across both rounds. In contrast, laboratories B and D showed reduced agreement on repeat testing, with increased slopes, positive bias, and widened limits of agreement in the second round. For laboratory B, the clozapine slope increased from 0.99 to 1.33, with limits of agreement widening to -320 to +673 ng/mL. Laboratory D showed greater deviation, with the clozapine slope increasing from 1.18 to 1.59 and mean bias rising to +349 ng/mL, with very wide limits of agreement (-354 to +1053 ng/mL).

Conclusion: Laboratory assays of clozapine using LC-MS and HPLC are not always accurate or reproducible over time. Some laboratories show a significant bias, reporting measured concentrations much higher than the true value.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相同的样品,不同的结果:在四个英国实验室氯氮平测定的变化。
背景:氯氮平血药浓度的实验室测量是安全有效治疗的核心,通常被认为是准确和可重复的。色谱分析需要特定批次的设置,并使用不同的设备和技术进行,这可能会引入误差或可变性。然而,对供应商间一致性的系统评价是有限的。目的:评估四个提供常规治疗药物监测的英国实验室氯氮平和去氯氮平血药浓度测量的分析准确性和可重复性。设计:基于实验室的分析准确性和可重复性研究。方法:一组15份加标血浆样本,覆盖氯氮平和去氯氮平临床相关浓度范围(74-1443 ng/mL),分发给四个提供常规治疗药物监测的英国实验室。每个实验室在两个不同的场合分析相同的样本。使用回归分析和一致性分析评估相对于已知值的分析准确性和实验室内一致性。结果:所有实验室的测定浓度与已知浓度线性关系良好(r = 0.932 ~ 0.999)。实验室A和C显示斜率接近统一(0.94-0.99),最小的平均偏差(-28至+22 ng/mL),两轮氯氮平(-89至+51 ng/mL)和去氯氮平(-71至+71 ng/mL)的一致性限制较窄。相比之下,实验室B和D对重复测试的一致性降低,斜率增加,正偏倚,第二轮协议的范围扩大。对于实验室B,氯氮平斜率从0.99增加到1.33,一致性范围扩大到-320到+673 ng/mL。实验室D显示出更大的偏差,氯氮平斜率从1.18增加到1.59,平均偏差上升到+349 ng/mL,一致性范围很广(-354到+1053 ng/mL)。结论:液相色谱-质谱和高效液相色谱法测定氯氮平的准确性和重复性不高。一些实验室显示出明显的偏差,报告的测量浓度远远高于真实值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of psychopharmacology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in psychopharmacology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of ecopipam for Tourette syndrome: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Consent beyond the written form: Implications for ketamine trials in the Philippines. Informing the patient of the placebo option: an ethical necessity likely to reduce inappropriate psychotropic prescriptions? Real-world clinical practice, effectiveness and safety of esketamine nasal spray in major depressive disorder patients: a French prospective cohort (ELLIPSE study). Clinical response to clozapine in Black people with psychosis: A secondary analysis of an open-label clinical trial.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1