Mathematics Policy Across the United States: A Landscape Analysis

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Learning Disabilities Research & Practice Pub Date : 2026-07-31 DOI:10.1177/09388982261465446
Grace P. Douglas,Sarah R. Powell,Sarah A. Benz
{"title":"Mathematics Policy Across the United States: A Landscape Analysis","authors":"Grace P. Douglas,Sarah R. Powell,Sarah A. Benz","doi":"10.1177/09388982261465446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, evidence-based reading instruction has gained in popularity, and states have enacted legislation to require their use. To help move legislation into practice, states have created guidance documents. More recently, legislative attention is being paid to mathematics. This review analyzed mathematics legislation and guidance documents published from 2004 to May 2025. Across the 50 states and the District of Columbia, 93 mathematics legislation and guidance documents were found to exist in 54% of states. Such documents include information for core mathematics instruction, intervention, and implementation. In core instruction, states most frequently require the use of representations and a focus on problem solving. For mathematics intervention specifically, requirements for monitoring student progress are most common. To support the uptake of these practices, states rely on professional development or adoption of new curricular materials. These new requirements demonstrate a shift towards evidence-based mathematics efforts across the country, but policies related to reading still remain more common.","PeriodicalId":47426,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice","volume":"37 1","pages":"298-313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09388982261465446","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, evidence-based reading instruction has gained in popularity, and states have enacted legislation to require their use. To help move legislation into practice, states have created guidance documents. More recently, legislative attention is being paid to mathematics. This review analyzed mathematics legislation and guidance documents published from 2004 to May 2025. Across the 50 states and the District of Columbia, 93 mathematics legislation and guidance documents were found to exist in 54% of states. Such documents include information for core mathematics instruction, intervention, and implementation. In core instruction, states most frequently require the use of representations and a focus on problem solving. For mathematics intervention specifically, requirements for monitoring student progress are most common. To support the uptake of these practices, states rely on professional development or adoption of new curricular materials. These new requirements demonstrate a shift towards evidence-based mathematics efforts across the country, but policies related to reading still remain more common.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
横跨美国的数学政策:景观分析
近年来,以证据为基础的阅读教学越来越受欢迎,各州已颁布立法要求使用这种教学方法。为了帮助将立法付诸实践,各州制定了指导文件。最近,立法机构开始关注数学。本文分析了2004年至2025年5月颁布的数学立法和指导文件。在50个州和哥伦比亚特区,54%的州存在93项数学立法和指导文件。这些文件包括核心数学教学、干预和实施的信息。在核心教学中,状态最常要求使用表征和关注解决问题。对于具体的数学干预,最常见的要求是监控学生的进步。为了支持这些实践,各州依靠专业发展或采用新的课程材料。这些新要求表明,全国各地都在向以证据为基础的数学努力转变,但与阅读相关的政策仍然更为普遍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Cognitive Flexibility as a Mediator of Academic Behavior in Students With Specific Learning Disorders Interference Sensitivity in Multiplication Learning: Effects of a Digital Intervention for Children With Learning Disabilities Language Comprehension Interventions for English Learners With or at Risk for Reading Difficulties: A Research Synthesis Using Text Reading Fluency to Identify Students at Risk for Reading Comprehension Difficulties Across Grades 4, 7, and 9 Building Variable Understanding: A Pilot Study of a Supplemental Algebra Tutoring Intervention
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1