Health system strategies for adaptation to drought: A global scoping review

IF 4.5 The journal of climate change and health Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.joclim.2026.100742
Ahmadreza Khosravifar, Hamidreza Aghababaeian, Ali Bakhtiyari, Mohammad Esmaeil Motlagh, Ali Asgary, Carolyn Stephens, Forozan Bahari Babadi, Fateme Yazdi, Abbas Ostadtaghizadeh
{"title":"Health system strategies for adaptation to drought: A global scoping review","authors":"Ahmadreza Khosravifar,&nbsp;Hamidreza Aghababaeian,&nbsp;Ali Bakhtiyari,&nbsp;Mohammad Esmaeil Motlagh,&nbsp;Ali Asgary,&nbsp;Carolyn Stephens,&nbsp;Forozan Bahari Babadi,&nbsp;Fateme Yazdi,&nbsp;Abbas Ostadtaghizadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2026.100742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Drought poses substantial risks to population health and to the capacity, continuity, and performance of health systems. This scoping review aimed to systematically identify, map, and categorize the available evidence on health-system adaptation strategies for drought and to highlight major gaps in the evidence base.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following JBI guidance for scoping reviews and the PRISMA-ScR reporting guideline, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and selected gray-literature sources were searched without date restrictions up to March 2025. Two reviewers independently screened records and full-text sources against predefined eligibility criteria. Data were charted using a standardized form and analyzed through inductive qualitative content analysis and thematic categorization. Critical appraisal was conducted to describe the methodological characteristics of the included evidence and support cautious interpretation; appraisal findings were not used as exclusion criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 7,334 records identified, 36 evidence sources met the eligibility criteria and were included. The evidence base comprised peer-reviewed studies and reviews, a book chapter, an institutional report, and gray-literature documents. Thematic categorization identified ten domains: assessment and monitoring; mental health and social support; water-resource management; food security and agriculture; health-infrastructure resilience; intersectoral coordination and governance; education and awareness; emergency response and crisis management; innovation and technology; and economic support and policy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review provides a structured map of reported health-system adaptation strategies for drought and demonstrates the breadth and multidimensional nature of the available evidence. However, evidence regarding implementation, effectiveness, scalability, and applicability in low-resource settings remains limited.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100742"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278226000908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Drought poses substantial risks to population health and to the capacity, continuity, and performance of health systems. This scoping review aimed to systematically identify, map, and categorize the available evidence on health-system adaptation strategies for drought and to highlight major gaps in the evidence base.

Methods

Following JBI guidance for scoping reviews and the PRISMA-ScR reporting guideline, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and selected gray-literature sources were searched without date restrictions up to March 2025. Two reviewers independently screened records and full-text sources against predefined eligibility criteria. Data were charted using a standardized form and analyzed through inductive qualitative content analysis and thematic categorization. Critical appraisal was conducted to describe the methodological characteristics of the included evidence and support cautious interpretation; appraisal findings were not used as exclusion criteria.

Results

Of the 7,334 records identified, 36 evidence sources met the eligibility criteria and were included. The evidence base comprised peer-reviewed studies and reviews, a book chapter, an institutional report, and gray-literature documents. Thematic categorization identified ten domains: assessment and monitoring; mental health and social support; water-resource management; food security and agriculture; health-infrastructure resilience; intersectoral coordination and governance; education and awareness; emergency response and crisis management; innovation and technology; and economic support and policy.

Conclusion

This review provides a structured map of reported health-system adaptation strategies for drought and demonstrates the breadth and multidimensional nature of the available evidence. However, evidence regarding implementation, effectiveness, scalability, and applicability in low-resource settings remains limited.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
适应干旱的卫生系统战略:全球范围审查
干旱对人口健康以及卫生系统的能力、连续性和绩效构成重大风险。这次范围审查的目的是系统地确定、绘制和分类卫生系统适应干旱战略的现有证据,并突出证据基础中的主要差距。方法按照JBI的范围综述指南和PRISMA-ScR报告指南,检索Web of Science、PubMed、Scopus、谷歌Scholar和选定的灰色文献来源,检索日期截止至2025年3月,无日期限制。两名审稿人根据预定义的资格标准独立筛选记录和全文来源。数据采用标准化形式绘制图表,并通过归纳定性内容分析和专题分类进行分析。进行了批判性评估,以描述纳入证据的方法学特征,并支持谨慎的解释;评估结果不作为排除标准。结果在7334份记录中,有36份证据来源符合入选标准。证据基础包括同行评议的研究和评论、一本书章节、一份机构报告和灰色文献文件。专题分类确定了十个领域:评估和监测;心理健康和社会支持;的水资源管理;粮食安全和农业;卫生韧性;部门间协调和管理;教育和意识;应急和危机管理;创新与科技;以及经济支持和政策。本综述提供了已报告的卫生系统干旱适应策略的结构图,并展示了现有证据的广度和多维性。然而,关于在低资源环境下的实施、有效性、可扩展性和适用性的证据仍然有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The journal of climate change and health
The journal of climate change and health Global and Planetary Change, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
期刊最新文献
The influence of temperature on suicidality in youth: The role of insomnia Modeling extreme heat-induced neonatal mortality and inequities in relative vulnerabilities in Ghana: distributed lag panel analysis with counterfactual risk estimation; 2008–2025 Assessing the effect of climatic factors on the childhood diarrhea burden in four districts of Nepal Towards circular healthcare: A qualitative exploration of approaches and implementation factors in Dutch hospitals Advancing climate and health policies in Kenya: Insights from national policy stakeholders
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1