Gut microbiota beta-diversity and genus-level differential abundance in GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY: A pilot study

IF 0.3 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.cnd.2026.08.015
Érika Duarte Ostemberg, Jullyanne Gil, Luma de Sousa Silva, Maria Fernanda Pessoa Maia, Gabriella de Medeiros Abreu, Eliane Lopes Rosado, Mário Campos Junior
{"title":"Gut microbiota beta-diversity and genus-level differential abundance in GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY: A pilot study","authors":"Érika Duarte Ostemberg,&nbsp;Jullyanne Gil,&nbsp;Luma de Sousa Silva,&nbsp;Maria Fernanda Pessoa Maia,&nbsp;Gabriella de Medeiros Abreu,&nbsp;Eliane Lopes Rosado,&nbsp;Mário Campos Junior","doi":"10.1016/j.cnd.2026.08.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate differences in gut microbiota (GM) beta-diversity and genus-level differential abundance between individuals with glucokinase-maturity-onset diabetes of the young (GCK-MODY) and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-alpha (HNF1A-MODY).</div></div><div>To investigate differences in gut microbiota (GM) beta-diversity and genus-level differential abundance between individuals with glucokinase-maturity-onset diabetes of the young (GCK-MODY) and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-alpha (HNF1A-MODY).</div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This observational study included 33 individuals with genetically confirmed MODY caused by pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the GCK (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->16) and HNF1A (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->17) genes, classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Participants had a mean age of 38.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->14.7 years. Blood samples were collected for genetic analysis, and fecal samples were obtained using a swab-based stool collection kit for DNA extraction and <em>16S rRNA</em> gene sequencing. GM beta-diversity was assessed using Bray–Curtis, Jaccard, unweighted UniFrac, and weighted UniFrac distance metrics. Differential abundance analyses at the genus level were performed using LinDA, limma-voom, and MaAsLin2. Statistical analyses were conducted in R version 4.2.1, with <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05 considered statistically significant. The study received ethical approval from HUCFF/UFRJ (CAAE 04232512.4.0000.5257), IPPMG/UFRJ (Approval No. 6.126.045), and IOC/FIOCRUZ (CAAE 44726720.4.0000.5248).</div></div><div>This observational study included 33 individuals with genetically confirmed MODY caused by pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the GCK (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->16) and HNF1A (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->17) genes, classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Participants had a mean age of 38.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->14.7 years. Blood samples were collected for genetic analysis, and fecal samples were obtained using a swab-based stool collection kit for DNA extraction and <em>16S rRNA</em> gene sequencing. GM beta-diversity was assessed using Bray–Curtis, Jaccard, unweighted UniFrac, and weighted UniFrac distance metrics. Differential abundance analyses at the genus level were performed using LinDA, limma-voom, and MaAsLin2. Statistical analyses were conducted in R version 4.2.1, with <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05 considered statistically significant. The study received ethical approval from HUCFF/UFRJ (CAAE 04232512.4.0000.5257), IPPMG/UFRJ (Approval No. 6.126.045), and IOC/FIOCRUZ (CAAE 44726720.4.0000.5248).</div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences in beta-diversity were observed between groups. Weighted UniFrac analysis suggested differences in GM community structure between GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY individuals (PERMANOVA, R<sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.078, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.014), although statistical significance was not maintained after multiple-testing correction (adjusted <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.072). Differential abundance analyses did not identify any genera that remained significant after false discovery rate correction. However, Enterorhabdus, Anaerotruncus, and Collinsella consistently showed higher abundance in HNF1A-MODY across analytical approaches. The strongest association was observed for an uncultured genus identified by MaAsLin2 (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0004; FDR-adjusted <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.071). These taxa have been implicated in metabolic and inflammatory processes including glucose and lipid metabolism.</div></div><div>No significant differences in beta-diversity were observed between groups. Weighted UniFrac analysis suggested differences in GM community structure between GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY individuals (PERMANOVA, R<sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.078, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.014), although statistical significance was not maintained after multiple-testing correction (adjusted <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.072). Differential abundance analyses did not identify any genera that remained significant after false discovery rate correction. However, Enterorhabdus, Anaerotruncus, and Collinsella consistently showed higher abundance in HNF1A-MODY across analytical approaches. The strongest association was observed for an uncultured genus identified by MaAsLin2 (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0004; FDR-adjusted <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.071). These taxa have been implicated in metabolic and inflammatory processes including glucose and lipid metabolism.</div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although no genera remained significantly different after multiple-testing correction, weighted UniFrac analysis and consistent abundance patterns across multiple analytical methods suggest potential differences in GM composition between GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY individuals. These preliminary findings support further investigation to better characterize GM profiles associated with distinct MODY subtypes.</div></div><div>Although no genera remained significantly different after multiple-testing correction, weighted UniFrac analysis and consistent abundance patterns across multiple analytical methods suggest potential differences in GM composition between GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY individuals. These preliminary findings support further investigation to better characterize GM profiles associated with distinct MODY subtypes.</div>","PeriodicalId":43722,"journal":{"name":"CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE","volume":"61 ","pages":"Page e9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000799602600091X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate differences in gut microbiota (GM) beta-diversity and genus-level differential abundance between individuals with glucokinase-maturity-onset diabetes of the young (GCK-MODY) and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-alpha (HNF1A-MODY).
To investigate differences in gut microbiota (GM) beta-diversity and genus-level differential abundance between individuals with glucokinase-maturity-onset diabetes of the young (GCK-MODY) and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-alpha (HNF1A-MODY).

Methods

This observational study included 33 individuals with genetically confirmed MODY caused by pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the GCK (n = 16) and HNF1A (n = 17) genes, classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Participants had a mean age of 38.3 ± 14.7 years. Blood samples were collected for genetic analysis, and fecal samples were obtained using a swab-based stool collection kit for DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. GM beta-diversity was assessed using Bray–Curtis, Jaccard, unweighted UniFrac, and weighted UniFrac distance metrics. Differential abundance analyses at the genus level were performed using LinDA, limma-voom, and MaAsLin2. Statistical analyses were conducted in R version 4.2.1, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The study received ethical approval from HUCFF/UFRJ (CAAE 04232512.4.0000.5257), IPPMG/UFRJ (Approval No. 6.126.045), and IOC/FIOCRUZ (CAAE 44726720.4.0000.5248).
This observational study included 33 individuals with genetically confirmed MODY caused by pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the GCK (n = 16) and HNF1A (n = 17) genes, classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Participants had a mean age of 38.3 ± 14.7 years. Blood samples were collected for genetic analysis, and fecal samples were obtained using a swab-based stool collection kit for DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. GM beta-diversity was assessed using Bray–Curtis, Jaccard, unweighted UniFrac, and weighted UniFrac distance metrics. Differential abundance analyses at the genus level were performed using LinDA, limma-voom, and MaAsLin2. Statistical analyses were conducted in R version 4.2.1, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The study received ethical approval from HUCFF/UFRJ (CAAE 04232512.4.0000.5257), IPPMG/UFRJ (Approval No. 6.126.045), and IOC/FIOCRUZ (CAAE 44726720.4.0000.5248).

Results

No significant differences in beta-diversity were observed between groups. Weighted UniFrac analysis suggested differences in GM community structure between GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY individuals (PERMANOVA, R2 = 0.078, P = 0.014), although statistical significance was not maintained after multiple-testing correction (adjusted P = 0.072). Differential abundance analyses did not identify any genera that remained significant after false discovery rate correction. However, Enterorhabdus, Anaerotruncus, and Collinsella consistently showed higher abundance in HNF1A-MODY across analytical approaches. The strongest association was observed for an uncultured genus identified by MaAsLin2 (P = 0.0004; FDR-adjusted P = 0.071). These taxa have been implicated in metabolic and inflammatory processes including glucose and lipid metabolism.
No significant differences in beta-diversity were observed between groups. Weighted UniFrac analysis suggested differences in GM community structure between GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY individuals (PERMANOVA, R2 = 0.078, P = 0.014), although statistical significance was not maintained after multiple-testing correction (adjusted P = 0.072). Differential abundance analyses did not identify any genera that remained significant after false discovery rate correction. However, Enterorhabdus, Anaerotruncus, and Collinsella consistently showed higher abundance in HNF1A-MODY across analytical approaches. The strongest association was observed for an uncultured genus identified by MaAsLin2 (P = 0.0004; FDR-adjusted P = 0.071). These taxa have been implicated in metabolic and inflammatory processes including glucose and lipid metabolism.

Conclusion

Although no genera remained significantly different after multiple-testing correction, weighted UniFrac analysis and consistent abundance patterns across multiple analytical methods suggest potential differences in GM composition between GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY individuals. These preliminary findings support further investigation to better characterize GM profiles associated with distinct MODY subtypes.
Although no genera remained significantly different after multiple-testing correction, weighted UniFrac analysis and consistent abundance patterns across multiple analytical methods suggest potential differences in GM composition between GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY individuals. These preliminary findings support further investigation to better characterize GM profiles associated with distinct MODY subtypes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GCK-MODY和HNF1A-MODY的肠道微生物群β -多样性和属级丰度差异:一项初步研究
目的探讨葡萄糖激酶成熟型糖尿病(GCK-MODY)和肝细胞核因子1- α (HNF1A-MODY)患者肠道微生物群(GM) β -多样性和属级丰度差异。研究葡萄糖激酶成熟型糖尿病(GCK-MODY)和肝细胞核因子1- α (HNF1A-MODY)患者之间肠道微生物群(GM) β -多样性和属级丰度差异。方法本观察性研究纳入33例经遗传学证实由GCK (n = 16)和HNF1A (n = 17)基因致病性或可能致病性变异引起的MODY患者,根据美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院指南进行分类。参与者的平均年龄为38.3±14.7岁。采集血样进行基因分析,粪便样本采用拭子粪便采集试剂盒进行DNA提取和16S rRNA基因测序。采用Bray-Curtis、Jaccard、un加权UniFrac和加权UniFrac距离指标评估转基因β多样性。采用LinDA、limma- oom和MaAsLin2进行属水平的差异丰度分析。R版本4.2.1进行统计学分析,P <; 0.05认为有统计学意义。该研究获得了huff /UFRJ (CAAE 04232512.4.0000.5257)、IPPMG/UFRJ(批准号6.126.045)和IOC/FIOCRUZ (CAAE 44726720.4.0000.5248)的伦理批准。本观察性研究纳入了33例经遗传学证实由GCK (n = 16)和HNF1A (n = 17)基因致病性或可能致病性变异引起的MODY患者,根据美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院指南进行分类。参与者的平均年龄为38.3±14.7岁。采集血样进行基因分析,粪便样本采用拭子粪便采集试剂盒进行DNA提取和16S rRNA基因测序。采用Bray-Curtis、Jaccard、un加权UniFrac和加权UniFrac距离指标评估转基因β多样性。采用LinDA、limma- oom和MaAsLin2进行属水平的差异丰度分析。R版本4.2.1进行统计学分析,P <; 0.05认为有统计学意义。该研究获得了huff /UFRJ (CAAE 04232512.4.0000.5257)、IPPMG/UFRJ(批准号6.126.045)和IOC/FIOCRUZ (CAAE 44726720.4.0000.5248)的伦理批准。结果各组间β -多样性无显著差异。加权UniFrac分析显示,GCK-MODY个体与HNF1A-MODY个体的GM群落结构存在差异(PERMANOVA, R2 = 0.078, P = 0.014),但经多重检验校正后,差异无统计学意义(调整后P = 0.072)。差异丰度分析没有发现任何在错误发现率校正后仍然显著的属。然而,Enterorhabdus、Anaerotruncus和Collinsella在各种分析方法中一致显示出更高的HNF1A-MODY丰度。用MaAsLin2鉴定的非培养属的相关性最强(P = 0.0004,经fdr校正P = 0.071)。这些分类群涉及代谢和炎症过程,包括葡萄糖和脂质代谢。各组间β -多样性无显著差异。加权UniFrac分析显示,GCK-MODY个体与HNF1A-MODY个体的GM群落结构存在差异(PERMANOVA, R2 = 0.078, P = 0.014),但经多重检验校正后,差异无统计学意义(调整后P = 0.072)。差异丰度分析没有发现任何在错误发现率校正后仍然显著的属。然而,Enterorhabdus、Anaerotruncus和Collinsella在各种分析方法中一致显示出更高的HNF1A-MODY丰度。用MaAsLin2鉴定的非培养属的相关性最强(P = 0.0004,经fdr校正P = 0.071)。这些分类群涉及代谢和炎症过程,包括葡萄糖和脂质代谢。结论经过多次检验校正后,虽然没有属间存在显著差异,但加权UniFrac分析和多种分析方法间一致的丰度模式提示GCK-MODY和HNF1A-MODY个体间转基因成分存在潜在差异。这些初步发现支持进一步的研究,以更好地表征与不同MODY亚型相关的GM谱。尽管经过多次检验校正后,没有属存在显著差异,但加权UniFrac分析和多种分析方法一致的丰度模式表明,GCK-MODY和HNF1A-MODY个体之间的转基因成分存在潜在差异。这些初步发现支持进一步的研究,以更好地表征与不同MODY亚型相关的GM谱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE
CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
55
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Les Cahiers de nutrition et de diététique sont le lieu de communication reconnu pour les médecins spécialistes de la nutrition, les diététiciens, les professionnels et les chercheurs de agro-alimentaire, les enseignants et les étudiants. Les Cahiers de nutrition et de diététique abordent les sujets se rapportant à la biologie générale, à la médecine et à la nutrition, aux aliments, aux comportements alimentaires, à la diététique pratique, ainsi que des thèmes variés : activité physique, apports nutritionnels conseillés, dénutrition, alcool, obésité de enfant, aliments à effet santé, plaisir alimentaire, restauration collective, goûters et collations, allergies alimentaires...
期刊最新文献
Editorial Editorial Board Nutrigenomics and nutritional approach in trauma neurobiology: Epigenetic mechanisms, accessible biomarkers and precision nutrition – A systematic review Association between the A49P polymorphism (TAS2R38) and chili consumption in Mexican adult population Fish oil from regional river waste mitigates hepatic steatosis and dyslipidemia in Wistar rats fed high-fat diets
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1