Composable logical gate error in approximate quantum error correction: reexamining gate implementations in Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes

IF 5.3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Quantum Pub Date : 2026-10-08 DOI:10.22331/q-2026-10-08-2230
Lukas Brenner, Beatriz Dias, Robert Koenig
{"title":"Composable logical gate error in approximate quantum error correction: reexamining gate implementations in Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes","authors":"Lukas Brenner, Beatriz Dias, Robert Koenig","doi":"10.22331/q-2026-10-08-2230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantifying the accuracy of logical gates is paramount in approximate error correction, where perfect implementations are often unachievable with the available set of physical operations. To this end, we introduce a single scalar quantity we call the (composable) logical gate error. It captures both the deviation of the logical action from the desired target gate as well as leakage out of the code space. It is subadditive under successive application of gates, providing a simple means for analyzing circuits. We show how to bound the composable logical gate error in terms of matrix elements of physical unitaries between (approximate) logical computational basis states. In the continuous-variable context, this sidesteps the need for computing energy-bounded norms.<br/> As an example, we study the composable logical gate error for linear optics implementations of Paulis and Cliffords in approximate Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) codes. We find that the logical gate error for implementations of Paulis depends linearly on the squeezing parameter. This implies that their accuracy improves monotonically with the amount of squeezing. For some Cliffords, however, linear optics implementations which are exact for ideal GKP codes fail in the approximate case: they have a constant logical gate error even in the limit of infinite squeezing. This is consistent with previous results about the limitations of certain gate implementations for approximate GKP codes. It shows that findings applicable to ideal GKP codes do not always translate to the realm of physically realizable approximate GKP codes.","PeriodicalId":20807,"journal":{"name":"Quantum","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantum","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2026-10-08-2230","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantifying the accuracy of logical gates is paramount in approximate error correction, where perfect implementations are often unachievable with the available set of physical operations. To this end, we introduce a single scalar quantity we call the (composable) logical gate error. It captures both the deviation of the logical action from the desired target gate as well as leakage out of the code space. It is subadditive under successive application of gates, providing a simple means for analyzing circuits. We show how to bound the composable logical gate error in terms of matrix elements of physical unitaries between (approximate) logical computational basis states. In the continuous-variable context, this sidesteps the need for computing energy-bounded norms.
As an example, we study the composable logical gate error for linear optics implementations of Paulis and Cliffords in approximate Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) codes. We find that the logical gate error for implementations of Paulis depends linearly on the squeezing parameter. This implies that their accuracy improves monotonically with the amount of squeezing. For some Cliffords, however, linear optics implementations which are exact for ideal GKP codes fail in the approximate case: they have a constant logical gate error even in the limit of infinite squeezing. This is consistent with previous results about the limitations of certain gate implementations for approximate GKP codes. It shows that findings applicable to ideal GKP codes do not always translate to the realm of physically realizable approximate GKP codes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近似量子纠错中的可组合逻辑门错误:重新检查Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill码中的门实现
在近似误差校正中,对逻辑门的准确性进行量化是至关重要的,因为在近似误差校正中,使用一组可用的物理操作通常无法实现完美的实现。为此,我们引入一个单一的标量,我们称之为(可组合的)逻辑门误差。它捕获逻辑动作与期望的目标门之间的偏差,以及代码空间外的泄漏。在门的连续应用下,它是次加性的,为分析电路提供了一种简单的方法。我们展示了如何根据(近似)逻辑计算基态之间的物理酉的矩阵元素来约束可组合逻辑门误差。在连续变量上下文中,这避免了计算能量有界范数的需要。作为例子,我们研究了Paulis和clifford在近似Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP)码下线性光学实现的可组合逻辑门误差。我们发现Paulis实现的逻辑门误差与压缩参数呈线性关系。这意味着它们的精度随着压缩量的增加而单调地提高。然而,对于某些clifford,对于理想GKP码精确的线性光学实现在近似情况下失败:即使在无限压缩的极限下,它们也有恒定的逻辑门误差。这与先前关于近似GKP码的某些门实现的局限性的结果一致。它表明,适用于理想GKP码的发现并不总是转化为物理上可实现的近似GKP码的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quantum
Quantum Physics and Astronomy-Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Quantum is an open-access peer-reviewed journal for quantum science and related fields. Quantum is non-profit and community-run: an effort by researchers and for researchers to make science more open and publishing more transparent and efficient.
期刊最新文献
Interactive proofs for verifying (quantum) learning and testing Reliable Entropy Estimation from Observed Statistics for Device-Independent Quantum Cryptography Asymptotically good bosonic Fock state codes Rare Event Simulation of Quantum Error-Correcting Circuits Approach to optimal quantum transport via states over time
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1