Machine Learning-Based Recurrence and Survival Prediction in a Large Institutional Upper Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Cohort.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2026-10-12 DOI:10.1002/jso.70422
Kameel Khabaz, Nicole J Newman-Hung, Ruiwen Ding, Derek Pham, Nicholas J Jackson, William Hsu, Nicholas M Bernthal, Lauren E Wessel
{"title":"Machine Learning-Based Recurrence and Survival Prediction in a Large Institutional Upper Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Cohort.","authors":"Kameel Khabaz, Nicole J Newman-Hung, Ruiwen Ding, Derek Pham, Nicholas J Jackson, William Hsu, Nicholas M Bernthal, Lauren E Wessel","doi":"10.1002/jso.70422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Upper extremity soft tissue sarcomas (UE STS) present unique management challenges; existing prognostic nomograms were developed from mixed anatomic cohorts. This study develops anatomically specific machine learning (ML) models to predict UE-STS outcomes and benchmarks them against established tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Time-to-event models for local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM), and overall survival (OS) were developed in 188 patients treated at a single sarcoma center, treating death as a competing risk. Five survival algorithms were compared within a nested cross-validation framework. Discrimination was benchmarked against the Sarculator, PERSARC, and MSKCC nomograms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five-year event rates were 24% (LR), 20% (DM), and 13% (death) over a median follow-up of 3.9 years. Best-performing models achieved competing-risks concordance indices of 0.79 (LR), 0.67 (DM), and 0.75 (OS). Parsimonious models performed comparably. Discrimination was similar to Sarculator and PERSARC and higher than the MSKCC nomogram for LR (C-index 0.90 vs. 0.68). Predicted-risk groups separated clearly on cumulative-incidence and survival curves (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results demonstrate the feasibility and potential value of anatomy-specific, time-to-event risk modeling in UE STS, achieving discrimination comparable to established nomograms despite a smaller cohort. Multicenter cohorts and multidimensional data may strengthen future efforts. External validation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70422","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Upper extremity soft tissue sarcomas (UE STS) present unique management challenges; existing prognostic nomograms were developed from mixed anatomic cohorts. This study develops anatomically specific machine learning (ML) models to predict UE-STS outcomes and benchmarks them against established tools.

Methods: Time-to-event models for local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM), and overall survival (OS) were developed in 188 patients treated at a single sarcoma center, treating death as a competing risk. Five survival algorithms were compared within a nested cross-validation framework. Discrimination was benchmarked against the Sarculator, PERSARC, and MSKCC nomograms.

Results: Five-year event rates were 24% (LR), 20% (DM), and 13% (death) over a median follow-up of 3.9 years. Best-performing models achieved competing-risks concordance indices of 0.79 (LR), 0.67 (DM), and 0.75 (OS). Parsimonious models performed comparably. Discrimination was similar to Sarculator and PERSARC and higher than the MSKCC nomogram for LR (C-index 0.90 vs. 0.68). Predicted-risk groups separated clearly on cumulative-incidence and survival curves (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: These results demonstrate the feasibility and potential value of anatomy-specific, time-to-event risk modeling in UE STS, achieving discrimination comparable to established nomograms despite a smaller cohort. Multicenter cohorts and multidimensional data may strengthen future efforts. External validation is warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的上肢软组织肉瘤复发和生存预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Understanding Patient Expectations in Goldilocks-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Qualitative Study Using the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Conditional Recurrence-Free Survival After Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Time-Dependent Prognostic Relevance of Liver Metastasis Number. Hepatic Adenomas in Men: Diagnostic Considerations and Management in the Modern Era. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Musculoskeletal Oncology: Current Concepts, Barriers, and the Future. Combined Incisions in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Surgery: Safe Access Without Added Morbidity in a Single Center Retrospective Analysis.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1