{"title":"Post-enrollment academic support and perceived learning effectiveness among international students in Chinese universities.","authors":"Homa Bahmani, Yibin Ao, Jianjun Zhao, Abdussalam Khattak, Akeredolu Richard Joshua","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1937334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As international student mobility expands beyond traditional Anglophone destinations, universities increasingly need to understand how perceived academic support relates to students' participation, adaptation, confidence, and learning effectiveness after enrollment. Less attention has been given to the relationship between academic support conditions and perceived learning effectiveness in non-Anglophone higher education contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study tested an educational psychology framework linking selected background characteristics, perceived academic support conditions, and perceived learning effectiveness among 218 international students in Chinese universities. Data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis, follow-up confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling with bootstrapping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Student support services and academic quality, safety, and career preparedness showed significant positive associations with perceived learning effectiveness, whereas gender, funding type, and prior GPA showed no significant direct associations. Funding type was associated with academic and administrative reliability and learning environment quality but was not directly associated with perceived learning effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings highlight the relevance of post-enrollment academic support conditions for international students' perceived learning effectiveness, with implications for advising, communication support, counseling access, and career-related guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1937334"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13662131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1937334","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: As international student mobility expands beyond traditional Anglophone destinations, universities increasingly need to understand how perceived academic support relates to students' participation, adaptation, confidence, and learning effectiveness after enrollment. Less attention has been given to the relationship between academic support conditions and perceived learning effectiveness in non-Anglophone higher education contexts.
Methods: This study tested an educational psychology framework linking selected background characteristics, perceived academic support conditions, and perceived learning effectiveness among 218 international students in Chinese universities. Data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis, follow-up confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling with bootstrapping.
Results: Student support services and academic quality, safety, and career preparedness showed significant positive associations with perceived learning effectiveness, whereas gender, funding type, and prior GPA showed no significant direct associations. Funding type was associated with academic and administrative reliability and learning environment quality but was not directly associated with perceived learning effectiveness.
Discussion: The findings highlight the relevance of post-enrollment academic support conditions for international students' perceived learning effectiveness, with implications for advising, communication support, counseling access, and career-related guidance.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.