{"title":"Immune composition and adenosine-associated transcription in non-small-cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade.","authors":"Li-Zhen Chen, Run-Nan Chen, Guolin Alexander Wen","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2026.101499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), high metabolic gene expression during immunotherapy can reflect either more infiltrating cells or altered cellular activity. We tested whether separating cell abundance from cell-intrinsic transcription clarifies incomplete tumour clearance after neoadjuvant programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using cross-dataset triangulation, we analysed 1173,843 post-treatment immune cells from 224 patients (103 non-major pathological response [non-MPR], 40 major response, and 81 complete response) via patient-level regressions adjusted for clinical covariates, cell proportions, and library size. Findings were compared across recurrence follow-up (n = 154), spatial profiling (n = 40), three bulk cohorts (n = 78), population data (n = 3045), and 7224 genetic tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Non-MPR tumours had higher regulatory T-cell (Treg) proportions (+3.91% FOXP3+, +3.07% CCR8+) and elevated lymphoid glycolysis, exhaustion, Treg, and adenosine scores (all false-discovery rate q ≤ 1.09 × 10<sup>-7</sup>). Notably, adjusting for cell composition and depth abolished broad glycolysis and exhaustion differences, whereas adenosine-associated transcription persisted (difference 0.044, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.020-0.068; q = 0.0046), peaking in terminally exhausted CD8+ T cells (0.449, 95% CI 0.328-0.571; q = 1.29 × 10<sup>-10</sup>). Paired spatial biopsies localized HK2, LDHB, and SLC16A1 to tumour regions (q ≤ 0.0057) and CTLA4 to stroma (q = 5.14 × 10<sup>-5</sup>) without response interactions. A six-component score discriminated non-MPR (apparent area under the curve [AUC] 0.791, 95% CI 0.724-0.851) and recurrence (hazard ratio 1.41, 95% CI 1.04-1.93), attenuating after pathology adjustment, but failed in pre-treatment bulk cohorts (AUCs 0.091-0.517); no genetic test passed correction (q ≥ 0.9934).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incomplete response involves Treg accumulation and cell-intrinsic adenosine transcription, offering exploratory, hypothesis-generating insights for prospective validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":"49 ","pages":"101499"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2026.101499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), high metabolic gene expression during immunotherapy can reflect either more infiltrating cells or altered cellular activity. We tested whether separating cell abundance from cell-intrinsic transcription clarifies incomplete tumour clearance after neoadjuvant programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade.
Methods: Using cross-dataset triangulation, we analysed 1173,843 post-treatment immune cells from 224 patients (103 non-major pathological response [non-MPR], 40 major response, and 81 complete response) via patient-level regressions adjusted for clinical covariates, cell proportions, and library size. Findings were compared across recurrence follow-up (n = 154), spatial profiling (n = 40), three bulk cohorts (n = 78), population data (n = 3045), and 7224 genetic tests.
Results: Non-MPR tumours had higher regulatory T-cell (Treg) proportions (+3.91% FOXP3+, +3.07% CCR8+) and elevated lymphoid glycolysis, exhaustion, Treg, and adenosine scores (all false-discovery rate q ≤ 1.09 × 10-7). Notably, adjusting for cell composition and depth abolished broad glycolysis and exhaustion differences, whereas adenosine-associated transcription persisted (difference 0.044, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.020-0.068; q = 0.0046), peaking in terminally exhausted CD8+ T cells (0.449, 95% CI 0.328-0.571; q = 1.29 × 10-10). Paired spatial biopsies localized HK2, LDHB, and SLC16A1 to tumour regions (q ≤ 0.0057) and CTLA4 to stroma (q = 5.14 × 10-5) without response interactions. A six-component score discriminated non-MPR (apparent area under the curve [AUC] 0.791, 95% CI 0.724-0.851) and recurrence (hazard ratio 1.41, 95% CI 1.04-1.93), attenuating after pathology adjustment, but failed in pre-treatment bulk cohorts (AUCs 0.091-0.517); no genetic test passed correction (q ≥ 0.9934).
Conclusions: Incomplete response involves Treg accumulation and cell-intrinsic adenosine transcription, offering exploratory, hypothesis-generating insights for prospective validation.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.