Intraperitoneal hydrostatic pressure and volume in peritoneal dialysis patients.

V Di Lauro, F Luccio, M Colaluca, F De Francesco, A Pintauro
{"title":"Intraperitoneal hydrostatic pressure and volume in peritoneal dialysis patients.","authors":"V Di Lauro,&nbsp;F Luccio,&nbsp;M Colaluca,&nbsp;F De Francesco,&nbsp;A Pintauro","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-6686.1999.tb00023.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dialysate Intraperitoneal Volume (IPV) represents one of the major determinants of Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) efficiency, but most adult patients are currently treated with the same standard IPV, regardless of body size. In order to evaluate the tolerability of different IPV, we adapted the current connection in use at our Institution to produce a simple method to directly measure Intraperitoneal Hydrostatic Pressure (IPP). We studied the relationship between IPV and IPP in 30 adult (age 19-77 years) patients (19 males) of various body sizes, on PD between 17 +/- 17 months. Mean end-inspiratory and end-expiratory IPP with different IPV were measured in each patient in the IPV range of clinical interest. A total of 210 individual measurements showed a statistically significant positive relationship between BSA-normalised IPV and IPP (r = 0.355, p < 0.001). Interpatient variability was high, thus suggesting that individualization of IPV according to body size is not accurate, IPP being often higher in larger body size. Direct IPP measurement with different IPV in the single patient is a simple, safe and reproducible procedure, allowing an individually tailored IPV prescription which should optimise PD efficiency while monitoring for IPP related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":79589,"journal":{"name":"EDTNA/ERCA journal (English ed.)","volume":"25 2","pages":"16-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1755-6686.1999.tb00023.x","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDTNA/ERCA journal (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6686.1999.tb00023.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Dialysate Intraperitoneal Volume (IPV) represents one of the major determinants of Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) efficiency, but most adult patients are currently treated with the same standard IPV, regardless of body size. In order to evaluate the tolerability of different IPV, we adapted the current connection in use at our Institution to produce a simple method to directly measure Intraperitoneal Hydrostatic Pressure (IPP). We studied the relationship between IPV and IPP in 30 adult (age 19-77 years) patients (19 males) of various body sizes, on PD between 17 +/- 17 months. Mean end-inspiratory and end-expiratory IPP with different IPV were measured in each patient in the IPV range of clinical interest. A total of 210 individual measurements showed a statistically significant positive relationship between BSA-normalised IPV and IPP (r = 0.355, p < 0.001). Interpatient variability was high, thus suggesting that individualization of IPV according to body size is not accurate, IPP being often higher in larger body size. Direct IPP measurement with different IPV in the single patient is a simple, safe and reproducible procedure, allowing an individually tailored IPV prescription which should optimise PD efficiency while monitoring for IPP related complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹膜透析患者腹膜内静水压力和容积。
透析液腹膜内容积(IPV)是腹膜透析(PD)效率的主要决定因素之一,但目前大多数成年患者无论体型大小,都使用相同的标准IPV进行治疗。为了评估不同IPV的耐受性,我们调整了目前在我们研究所使用的连接,以产生一种直接测量腹腔静水压力(IPP)的简单方法。我们研究了30例不同体型的PD患者(年龄19-77岁)(19例男性)在17 +/- 17个月之间IPV和IPP的关系。在临床感兴趣的IPV范围内测量每位患者不同IPV的平均吸气末和呼气末IPP。210个单项测量结果显示bsa标准化IPV与IPP呈正相关(r = 0.355, p < 0.001)。患者间变异性较高,提示根据体型个体化IPP并不准确,体型越大IPP往往越高。在单个患者中使用不同IPV直接测量IPP是一种简单、安全且可重复的方法,允许单独定制IPV处方,在监测IPP相关并发症的同时优化PD效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Merits and limitations of continuous blood volume monitoring during haemodialysis. Summary of the EDTNA/ERCA Journal Club discussion: Winter 2005. Why clown-doctors are needed in paediatric wards. Telephone interview with Fresenius Medical Care project leader Mr. Jonas: launch of 5008 Therapy System. The use of telemedicine to assess and advise patients regarding dietary treatment of hyperphosphataemia. The conductivity of dialysis fluid.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1