Factors Influencing Buprenorphine Prescribing among Physicians in New York State.

Journal of Addiction Pub Date : 2019-12-18 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/7832752
Leslie A Marino, Aimee N Campbell, Edward V Nunes, Lloyd I Sederer, Lisa B Dixon
{"title":"Factors Influencing Buprenorphine Prescribing among Physicians in New York State.","authors":"Leslie A Marino, Aimee N Campbell, Edward V Nunes, Lloyd I Sederer, Lisa B Dixon","doi":"10.1155/2019/7832752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing access to buprenorphine is an important strategy for curtailing the opioid epidemic. Research is needed to understand what facilitates prescribing among waivered physicians and how to increase the willingness and capacity to prescribe. This study describes prescribing patterns in a sample of buprenorphine-waivered physicians in New York (NY) in 2016 and examines factors influencing prescribing capacity among waivered providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys were mailed to a random sample of 300 physicians with DEA waivers to prescribe buprenorphine in NY which assessed demographics, practice characteristics, buprenorphine prescribing patterns, and barriers/facilitators to prescribing buprenorphine. Analyses include simple logistic regression to calculate the odds ratio, 95% confidence intervals, and <i>p</i> values, respectively, to examine differences in individual predictors among physicians that were actively prescribing buprenorphine and those that were not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>91 physicians responded to the survey, and 65% indicated they were currently prescribing buprenorphine. The mean patient census among physicians waivered to prescribe to 30 patients was 9.6 (SD = 9.7, median = 5), and to 100 patients, it was 60.5 (SD = 38.9, median = 72.5). Common facilitators included access to psychosocial referrals and better reimbursement, while inadequate resources, lack of time, and prior authorizations were the most common barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In addition to increasing the number of waivered physicians, policy-makers should provide enhanced training and implementation support for waivered physicians to start prescribing and facilitate continued and expanded prescribing among those already doing so.</p>","PeriodicalId":30499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction","volume":"2019 ","pages":"7832752"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6942852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7832752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increasing access to buprenorphine is an important strategy for curtailing the opioid epidemic. Research is needed to understand what facilitates prescribing among waivered physicians and how to increase the willingness and capacity to prescribe. This study describes prescribing patterns in a sample of buprenorphine-waivered physicians in New York (NY) in 2016 and examines factors influencing prescribing capacity among waivered providers.

Methods: Surveys were mailed to a random sample of 300 physicians with DEA waivers to prescribe buprenorphine in NY which assessed demographics, practice characteristics, buprenorphine prescribing patterns, and barriers/facilitators to prescribing buprenorphine. Analyses include simple logistic regression to calculate the odds ratio, 95% confidence intervals, and p values, respectively, to examine differences in individual predictors among physicians that were actively prescribing buprenorphine and those that were not.

Results: 91 physicians responded to the survey, and 65% indicated they were currently prescribing buprenorphine. The mean patient census among physicians waivered to prescribe to 30 patients was 9.6 (SD = 9.7, median = 5), and to 100 patients, it was 60.5 (SD = 38.9, median = 72.5). Common facilitators included access to psychosocial referrals and better reimbursement, while inadequate resources, lack of time, and prior authorizations were the most common barriers.

Conclusions: In addition to increasing the number of waivered physicians, policy-makers should provide enhanced training and implementation support for waivered physicians to start prescribing and facilitate continued and expanded prescribing among those already doing so.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响纽约州医生开具丁丙诺啡处方的因素。
背景:增加丁丙诺啡的使用机会是遏制阿片类药物流行的一项重要策略。需要开展研究以了解是什么因素促进了放弃治疗的医生开处方,以及如何提高开处方的意愿和能力。本研究描述了 2016 年纽约(NY)丁丙诺啡豁免医生样本的处方模式,并研究了影响豁免提供者处方能力的因素:向纽约州 300 名获得美国药品管理局丁丙诺啡处方豁免权的医生随机抽样邮寄了调查问卷,调查内容包括人口统计学、执业特点、丁丙诺啡处方模式以及开具丁丙诺啡处方的障碍/促进因素。分析包括简单的逻辑回归,分别计算出几率比例、95% 置信区间和 p 值,以研究积极开具丁丙诺啡处方的医生和不积极开具丁丙诺啡处方的医生之间个体预测因素的差异:91名医生对调查做出了回应,65%的医生表示他们目前正在开具丁丙诺啡处方。放弃处方的医生对 30 名患者的平均处方量为 9.6(标准差 = 9.7,中位数 = 5),对 100 名患者的平均处方量为 60.5(标准差 = 38.9,中位数 = 72.5)。常见的促进因素包括获得社会心理转介和更好的报销,而资源不足、缺乏时间和事先授权则是最常见的障碍:除了增加弃权医生的数量,政策制定者还应为弃权医生提供强化培训和实施支持,帮助他们开始开处方,并促进已经开处方的医生继续开处方和扩大开处方范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nationwide, Multioperator Self-Exclusion and Psychiatric Comorbidity in Patients with Gambling Disorder: A Retrospective Chart Review Study from a Regional Treatment Unit. Digital Dependency: How Parenting and Social Intelligence Shape Internet Addiction. Magnitude and Associated Factors of Psychoactive Substance Use among Youths at Selected Administrative Towns of North Shewa Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Internet Addiction and Its Associated Factors among Undergraduate Students in Kathmandu, Nepal. Prevalence, Reasons, Predictors, Perceived Effects, and Regulation of Alcohol Use among Children in Ghana.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1