Use of Intermittent Aortic Balloon Occlusion: Report from the ABO Trauma Registry

IF 0.1 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI:10.26676/jevtm.275
J. Buitendag, S. Variawa, Aashish Diayar, Pieter Snyders, Pieter Rademan, N. Allopi, D. McGreevy, T. Horer, G. Oosthuizen, ABO Trauma Registry Group
{"title":"Use of Intermittent Aortic Balloon Occlusion: Report from the ABO Trauma Registry","authors":"J. Buitendag, S. Variawa, Aashish Diayar, Pieter Snyders, Pieter Rademan, N. Allopi, D. McGreevy, T. Horer, G. Oosthuizen, ABO Trauma Registry Group","doi":"10.26676/jevtm.275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is a helpful adjunct in the managementof hemorrhagic shock due to bleeding in the abdomen or pelvis. Ischemia distal to the occlusion is a concern;intermittent aortic balloon inflation (i-REBOA) is a novel way to achieve decreased ischemia time.Methods: This study was conducted using data from the multinational ABO Trauma Registry. All patients enteredbetween January 2016 and December 2019 were included.Results: The sample consisted of 157 patients. There were 57 patients in the i-REBOA group (36%) and 100 in theREBOA group (64%). The groups were similar in gender (P = 0.50), age (P = 0.17), mechanism of injury (P = 0.42), andinjury severity score (P = 0.13). The levels of international normalized ratio (INR) (P < 0.01), activated partial thromboplastintime (aPTT) (P < 0.01) and lactate (P = 0.02) were higher in the i-REBOA group. Total balloon inflation times werelonger in the i-REBOA group (P < 0.01). Major complication rates did not differ between groups. Mortality rates betweengroups were similar in the Emergency Department (ED) (3.8% for i-REBOA vs 10.1%; P = 0.17), within 24 hours (43.4% fori-REBOA vs 38.2%; P = 0.54), and at 30 days (63.6% for i-REBOA vs 48.4%; P = 0.07).Conclusions: The data from this registry show that i-REBOA is currently being used and may allow for longer totalballoon inflation times without higher morbidity or mortality rates.","PeriodicalId":41233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26676/jevtm.275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is a helpful adjunct in the managementof hemorrhagic shock due to bleeding in the abdomen or pelvis. Ischemia distal to the occlusion is a concern;intermittent aortic balloon inflation (i-REBOA) is a novel way to achieve decreased ischemia time.Methods: This study was conducted using data from the multinational ABO Trauma Registry. All patients enteredbetween January 2016 and December 2019 were included.Results: The sample consisted of 157 patients. There were 57 patients in the i-REBOA group (36%) and 100 in theREBOA group (64%). The groups were similar in gender (P = 0.50), age (P = 0.17), mechanism of injury (P = 0.42), andinjury severity score (P = 0.13). The levels of international normalized ratio (INR) (P < 0.01), activated partial thromboplastintime (aPTT) (P < 0.01) and lactate (P = 0.02) were higher in the i-REBOA group. Total balloon inflation times werelonger in the i-REBOA group (P < 0.01). Major complication rates did not differ between groups. Mortality rates betweengroups were similar in the Emergency Department (ED) (3.8% for i-REBOA vs 10.1%; P = 0.17), within 24 hours (43.4% fori-REBOA vs 38.2%; P = 0.54), and at 30 days (63.6% for i-REBOA vs 48.4%; P = 0.07).Conclusions: The data from this registry show that i-REBOA is currently being used and may allow for longer totalballoon inflation times without higher morbidity or mortality rates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
间歇性主动脉球囊闭塞的使用:来自ABO创伤登记处的报告
背景:复苏性血管内球囊闭塞主动脉(REBOA)是治疗腹部或骨盆出血性休克的一种有用辅助手段。闭塞远端的缺血是一个令人担忧的问题;间歇性主动脉球囊扩张(i-REBOA)是一种缩短缺血时间的新方法。方法:本研究采用跨国ABO创伤登记处的数据进行。包括2016年1月至2019年12月期间入院的所有患者。结果:样本包括157名患者。i-REBOA组有57名患者(36%),REOA组有100名患者(64%)。两组在性别(P=0.50)、年龄(P=0.17)、损伤机制(P=0.42)和损伤严重程度评分(P=0.13)方面相似。i-REBOA组的国际标准化比值(INR)(P<0.01)、活化部分凝血活酶(aPTT)(P>0.01)和乳酸(P=0.02)水平较高。i-REBOA组的总球囊扩张时间较长(P<0.01)。主要并发症发生率在各组之间没有差异。两组之间的死亡率在急诊科(ED)相似(i-REBOA为3.8%对10.1%;P=0.17)、24小时内相似(i-REBOA为43.4%对38.2%;P=0.54),30天时(i-REBOA为63.6%,48.4%;P=0.07)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
A Pilot Study of Proactive Team REBOA to Avoid Delays to Definitive Care Damage Control Strategies For Vascular Injuries – A Report From The Amazon Endovascular Embolization of a Bleeding Liver Permissive Hypotension and Permissive Haemorrhage – Are They Necessary Evils of Trauma? Assessing the Awareness of EVTM Practices Among Emergency Medicine Physicians in Turkey
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1