Biograf, czyli kto? Spór o Kapuścińskiego non-fiction

A. Galant
{"title":"Biograf, czyli kto? Spór o Kapuścińskiego non-fiction","authors":"A. Galant","doi":"10.14746/pspsl.2019.35.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reconstructs selected problems of critical and publicistic discussion around Artur Domosławski’s book Kapuściński non-fiction concerning the status of the biographical narrative, the role and duties of the biographer and the limits of biographical disclosures. The themes discussed in this sketch made it possible to indicate current issues related to workshop deficiencies and duties of the contemporary biographer, including the exposition of issues related to modernity, subjectivity and ethics of biographical undertakings.","PeriodicalId":31050,"journal":{"name":"Poznanskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Literacka","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poznanskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Literacka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/pspsl.2019.35.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article reconstructs selected problems of critical and publicistic discussion around Artur Domosławski’s book Kapuściński non-fiction concerning the status of the biographical narrative, the role and duties of the biographer and the limits of biographical disclosures. The themes discussed in this sketch made it possible to indicate current issues related to workshop deficiencies and duties of the contemporary biographer, including the exposition of issues related to modernity, subjectivity and ethics of biographical undertakings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文对围绕阿图尔Domosławski《Kapuściński非虚构》一书的批评性和公共性讨论中的若干问题进行了重构,这些问题涉及传记叙事的地位、传记作者的角色和职责以及传记披露的局限性。本文所讨论的主题使我们有可能指出当前与研讨班的不足和当代传记作者的职责有关的问题,包括对传记事业的现代性、主体性和伦理性问题的阐述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Poznanskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Literacka
Poznanskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Literacka Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Podróże z Hanną Szumańską-Grossową „Dobra reprodukcja obrazów”. „Dzieło” Émile’a Zoli w przekładach Aleksandry Callierowej i Hanny Szumańskiej-Grossowej Angielskie strofy i polska lutnia. O przekładach „Melodii hebrajskich” George’a Gordona Byrona pióra Antoniego Edwarda Odyńca Światopogląd jako styl. „Klucze Piotrowe” Rogera Peyrefitte’a w przekładzie Hanny Szumańskiej-Grossowej jako ogniwo tradycji Hanna Szumańska-Grossowa wspomina Konstantego Ildefonsa Gałczyńskiego
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1