Conflict of Cross-Country Ethical Values: President of China and Prime Minister of Canada at G20 Indonesia

Dewi Bayu Pamungkas, I. B. P. Suamba
{"title":"Conflict of Cross-Country Ethical Values: President of China and Prime Minister of Canada at G20 Indonesia","authors":"Dewi Bayu Pamungkas, I. B. P. Suamba","doi":"10.31940/soshum.v13i1.20-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ethical conflict between the President of China and the Prime Minister of Canada at the G20 Summit in Indonesia deserves to be studied as to the causes of ethical differences between leaders. Ethical leadership, appropriate prescriptive behaviour, and promotion among staff through personal behaviour and interpersonal relationships. The focus of ethical leadership is obedience, and the content material of norms and ethical requirements varies in line with the cultural context of each country. Community members develop cognitive templates of behaviours that leaders prefer. This indicates that leaders tend to act in a manner that corresponds to their respective societal expectations of being more effective. This study uses a systematic literature review method. Ethical leadership in China is rooted in Confucian philosophy, whereas ethical leadership in Canada emphasizes performance, future orientation, and individualism. Lawrence Kohlberg on moral reasoning said that most people go through what is called the conventional cognitive level of moral development. This study provides reference material in the study of culture and cognition in ethical leadership that has not been extensively studied by researchers. This research helps people see the cultural differences that affect ethical leadership among state leaders, particularly in China and Canada. Communities can understand this difference and thus prevent conflicts in the future.","PeriodicalId":56206,"journal":{"name":"Soshum Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soshum Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31940/soshum.v13i1.20-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ethical conflict between the President of China and the Prime Minister of Canada at the G20 Summit in Indonesia deserves to be studied as to the causes of ethical differences between leaders. Ethical leadership, appropriate prescriptive behaviour, and promotion among staff through personal behaviour and interpersonal relationships. The focus of ethical leadership is obedience, and the content material of norms and ethical requirements varies in line with the cultural context of each country. Community members develop cognitive templates of behaviours that leaders prefer. This indicates that leaders tend to act in a manner that corresponds to their respective societal expectations of being more effective. This study uses a systematic literature review method. Ethical leadership in China is rooted in Confucian philosophy, whereas ethical leadership in Canada emphasizes performance, future orientation, and individualism. Lawrence Kohlberg on moral reasoning said that most people go through what is called the conventional cognitive level of moral development. This study provides reference material in the study of culture and cognition in ethical leadership that has not been extensively studied by researchers. This research helps people see the cultural differences that affect ethical leadership among state leaders, particularly in China and Canada. Communities can understand this difference and thus prevent conflicts in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨国伦理价值观的冲突:中国国家主席与加拿大总理在印尼G20峰会上的对话
中国国家主席和加拿大总理在印尼G20峰会上的道德冲突,值得研究领导人之间道德差异的原因。合乎道德的领导,适当的规范行为,并通过个人行为和人际关系促进员工。伦理型领导的重点是服从,规范和伦理要求的内容材料根据每个国家的文化背景有所不同。社区成员形成了领导者喜欢的行为认知模板。这表明领导者倾向于以一种与他们各自的社会期望相对应的方式行事,以提高效率。本研究采用系统文献回顾法。中国的伦理领导植根于儒家哲学,而加拿大的伦理领导强调绩效、未来导向和个人主义。关于道德推理的劳伦斯·科尔伯格说,大多数人都经历了所谓的传统认知水平的道德发展。本研究为伦理领导中的文化与认知研究提供了参考资料,这方面的研究尚未得到研究者的广泛研究。这项研究帮助人们看到影响国家领导人道德领导的文化差异,特别是在中国和加拿大。社区可以理解这种差异,从而防止未来的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom in Improving Students' Learning Outcomes Phonological Exploitation in Constructing Humourous Utterances Abbreviation in Social Media Account Status on Instagram - @Dasadlatif1212: A Morphological Approach Developing Customer Satisfaction Measurement Model Based on ‘CHARACTER’ Dimension in Polman Ba Best Practice Policy: The Effectiveness of Natural Gas Line Program in Lontong Neighborhood Surabaya
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1