139-OR: An Obesity-centric Approach With and Without Antiobesity Medications Compared with the Usual-Care Approach to Management of Patients with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes in an Employer Setting—A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (EMPOWER-T2D)
K. Pantalone, Bruce Rogen, James F Bena, Huijun Xiao, Gretchen Barnard, Elena Borukh, S. Peechakara, Marcio L. Griebeler, B. Burguera
{"title":"139-OR: An Obesity-centric Approach With and Without Antiobesity Medications Compared with the Usual-Care Approach to Management of Patients with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes in an Employer Setting—A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (EMPOWER-T2D)","authors":"K. Pantalone, Bruce Rogen, James F Bena, Huijun Xiao, Gretchen Barnard, Elena Borukh, S. Peechakara, Marcio L. Griebeler, B. Burguera","doi":"10.2337/db23-139-or","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Among patients with T2D and obesity, determine the effect of combining anti-obesity medications (AOM) with a comprehensive employer-based weight management program [obesity-centric approach (OCA) + AOM] compared with OCA alone, or usual care (UC) on weight and HbA1c.\n Methods: A 1-year open-label, randomized, pragmatic clinical trial was conducted at the Cleveland Clinic (CC). Participants were adults with T2D (HbA1c >7.5%) and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 enrolled in the CC Employee Health Plan. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to OCA+ AOM, OCA alone, or UC. Participants in the OCA+AOM group initiated treatment with 1 of 5 US FDA-approved AOMs according to standard practice. Linear mixed effect models were conducted for analysis.\n Results: A total of 74 participants were randomized (24 OCA+AOM, 26 OCA, and 24 UC). Participants were predominantly female (59%), median age 53.5 (47, 60) years, 68% Caucasian, with baseline median BMI and HbA1c of 37.4 (34.2, 42.7) and 8.8% (7.9, 10.4), respectively. At 1 year, patients that received UC, OCA alone, and OCA + AOM had their mean % weight change (90% confidence interval, CI) by -4.48% (-6.52 to -2.45), -6.68% (-8.71 to -4.65), and -8.74% (-10.64 to -6.74) and mean HbA1c change (90% CI) by -1.65% (-2.09 to -1.22), -2.22% (-2.65 to -1.79), and -2.18% (-2.61 to -1.74), respectively. Only OCA + AOM treatment was found to be non-inferior (P=0.004) to UC approach in weight loss change. OCA + AOM treatment was also found to be superior to UC approach in weight loss change (P=0.022). OCA+AOM and OCA alone were non-inferior to usual-care in HbA1c change (P <0.05), but neither was superior (P>0.05).\n Conclusion: An OCA +AOM approach to T2D treatment was associated with additional weight loss with non-inferior A1C reductions vs. UC. Larger long-term studies evaluating obesity-focused approaches to T2D management are needed.\n \n \n K.M.Pantalone: Consultant; AstraZeneca, Bayer Inc., Corcept Therapeutics, Diasome, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Research Support; Bayer Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk, Twin Health, Speaker's Bureau; AstraZeneca, Corcept Therapeutics, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk. B.Rogen: None. J.F.Bena: None. H.Xiao: None. G.Barnard: None. E.Borukh: None. S.Peechakara: None. M.L.Griebeler: None. B.Burguera: Research Support; Novo Nordisk.\n","PeriodicalId":11376,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/db23-139-or","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Among patients with T2D and obesity, determine the effect of combining anti-obesity medications (AOM) with a comprehensive employer-based weight management program [obesity-centric approach (OCA) + AOM] compared with OCA alone, or usual care (UC) on weight and HbA1c.
Methods: A 1-year open-label, randomized, pragmatic clinical trial was conducted at the Cleveland Clinic (CC). Participants were adults with T2D (HbA1c >7.5%) and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 enrolled in the CC Employee Health Plan. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to OCA+ AOM, OCA alone, or UC. Participants in the OCA+AOM group initiated treatment with 1 of 5 US FDA-approved AOMs according to standard practice. Linear mixed effect models were conducted for analysis.
Results: A total of 74 participants were randomized (24 OCA+AOM, 26 OCA, and 24 UC). Participants were predominantly female (59%), median age 53.5 (47, 60) years, 68% Caucasian, with baseline median BMI and HbA1c of 37.4 (34.2, 42.7) and 8.8% (7.9, 10.4), respectively. At 1 year, patients that received UC, OCA alone, and OCA + AOM had their mean % weight change (90% confidence interval, CI) by -4.48% (-6.52 to -2.45), -6.68% (-8.71 to -4.65), and -8.74% (-10.64 to -6.74) and mean HbA1c change (90% CI) by -1.65% (-2.09 to -1.22), -2.22% (-2.65 to -1.79), and -2.18% (-2.61 to -1.74), respectively. Only OCA + AOM treatment was found to be non-inferior (P=0.004) to UC approach in weight loss change. OCA + AOM treatment was also found to be superior to UC approach in weight loss change (P=0.022). OCA+AOM and OCA alone were non-inferior to usual-care in HbA1c change (P <0.05), but neither was superior (P>0.05).
Conclusion: An OCA +AOM approach to T2D treatment was associated with additional weight loss with non-inferior A1C reductions vs. UC. Larger long-term studies evaluating obesity-focused approaches to T2D management are needed.
K.M.Pantalone: Consultant; AstraZeneca, Bayer Inc., Corcept Therapeutics, Diasome, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Research Support; Bayer Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk, Twin Health, Speaker's Bureau; AstraZeneca, Corcept Therapeutics, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk. B.Rogen: None. J.F.Bena: None. H.Xiao: None. G.Barnard: None. E.Borukh: None. S.Peechakara: None. M.L.Griebeler: None. B.Burguera: Research Support; Novo Nordisk.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes is a scientific journal that publishes original research exploring the physiological and pathophysiological aspects of diabetes mellitus. We encourage submissions of manuscripts pertaining to laboratory, animal, or human research, covering a wide range of topics. Our primary focus is on investigative reports investigating various aspects such as the development and progression of diabetes, along with its associated complications. We also welcome studies delving into normal and pathological pancreatic islet function and intermediary metabolism, as well as exploring the mechanisms of drug and hormone action from a pharmacological perspective. Additionally, we encourage submissions that delve into the biochemical and molecular aspects of both normal and abnormal biological processes.
However, it is important to note that we do not publish studies relating to diabetes education or the application of accepted therapeutic and diagnostic approaches to patients with diabetes mellitus. Our aim is to provide a platform for research that contributes to advancing our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and processes of diabetes.