Semantic priming without association: A second look

Stephen J. Lupker
{"title":"Semantic priming without association: A second look","authors":"Stephen J. Lupker","doi":"10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90434-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It has long been known that a word (e.g., BUTTER) presented shortly after a related word (e.g., BREAD) can be processed more rapidly than when presented shortly after an unrelated word (e.g., TABLE). This phenomenon has come to be referred to as “semantic” priming. To this date, however, only I. Fischler (1977, <em>Memory &amp; Cognition</em>, <strong>5,</strong> 335–339) has provided any evidence that this phenomenon is semantically and not associatively based. In the present paper six studies were undertaken in an attempt to generalize Fischler's findings to tasks other than the simultaneous lexical decision task he used. In Experiments 1, 2, and 3 it was determined that semantic category relationships, in which the two words named members of the same semantic category (e.g., DOG-PIG) did little to facilitate naming of the second stimulus. In Experiments 4 and 6, it was determined that a semantic category relationship did nothing to augment the priming from associative relationships in naming and lexical decision tasks, respectively. However, in Experiment 5, in a replication of Fischler's results, semantic relatedness alone did produce priming in a lexical decision task. These results appear to indicate that the role of semantics in the priming process is somewhat limited. Further, these results also indicate that the amount of priming observed is somewhat task dependent. Implications for models of “semantic” priming are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":89821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior","volume":"23 6","pages":"Pages 709-733"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90434-1","citationCount":"338","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022537184904341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2004/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 338

Abstract

It has long been known that a word (e.g., BUTTER) presented shortly after a related word (e.g., BREAD) can be processed more rapidly than when presented shortly after an unrelated word (e.g., TABLE). This phenomenon has come to be referred to as “semantic” priming. To this date, however, only I. Fischler (1977, Memory & Cognition, 5, 335–339) has provided any evidence that this phenomenon is semantically and not associatively based. In the present paper six studies were undertaken in an attempt to generalize Fischler's findings to tasks other than the simultaneous lexical decision task he used. In Experiments 1, 2, and 3 it was determined that semantic category relationships, in which the two words named members of the same semantic category (e.g., DOG-PIG) did little to facilitate naming of the second stimulus. In Experiments 4 and 6, it was determined that a semantic category relationship did nothing to augment the priming from associative relationships in naming and lexical decision tasks, respectively. However, in Experiment 5, in a replication of Fischler's results, semantic relatedness alone did produce priming in a lexical decision task. These results appear to indicate that the role of semantics in the priming process is somewhat limited. Further, these results also indicate that the amount of priming observed is somewhat task dependent. Implications for models of “semantic” priming are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
没有关联的语义启动:再看
人们早就知道,一个词(例如,BUTTER)在一个相关词(例如,BREAD)之后不久出现,比在一个不相关词(例如,TABLE)之后不久出现要快得多。这种现象被称为“语义”启动。然而,到目前为止,只有I. Fischler (1977, Memory &《认知》,5,335 - 339)提供了任何证据表明这种现象是语义上的,而不是基于联想的。本文进行了六项研究,试图将费舍勒的发现推广到他所使用的同步词汇决策任务以外的任务中。在实验1、2和3中,我们确定了语义范畴关系,即两个词命名同一语义范畴的成员(如DOG-PIG)对第二个刺激的命名没有什么帮助。在实验4和实验6中,我们分别确定了语义范畴关系对命名和词汇决策任务中联想关系的启动没有增强作用。然而,在实验5中,在重复Fischler的结果中,语义相关性在词汇决策任务中确实产生了启动。这些结果似乎表明语义在启动过程中的作用是有限的。此外,这些结果还表明,观察到的启动量在一定程度上取决于任务。讨论了“语义”启动模型的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Should You Follow the Better-Hearing Ear for Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection and Isolated Sensorineural Hearing Loss? CircPLK1 sponges miR-296-5p to facilitate triple-negative breast cancer progression. Decisions and memory: Differential retrievability of consistent and contradictory evidence Prenominal adjectives and the disambiguation of anaphoric nouns Lexical expectations in sentence comprehension
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1