Guidelines to merge stranding databases: the case of franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei) in the extreme South of Brazil

Ingrid Schommer Penha, Danielle S. Monteiro, Eduardo R. Secchi, Sergio C. Estima, Paul G. Kinas
{"title":"Guidelines to merge stranding databases: the case of franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei) in the extreme South of Brazil","authors":"Ingrid Schommer Penha, Danielle S. Monteiro, Eduardo R. Secchi, Sergio C. Estima, Paul G. Kinas","doi":"10.5597/lajam00289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strandings of several species of marine mammals have been monitored over the years off the south coast of Rio Grande do Sul State, southern Brazil. A long time series of records implies extensive databases on strandings. In the region, these databases are maintained by two institutions: (i) Núcleo de Educação e Monitoramento Ambiental (NEMA) [Environmental Education and Monitoring Nucleus] and (ii) Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação da Megafauna Marinha (ECOMEGA) [Ecology and Conservation of Marine Mefagauna Laboratory] at the Federal University of Rio Grande – FURG. In order to make the time series as complete as possible and to make it a reliable source for research related to a particular species and region, the present work proposes a methodology for unifying both databases for franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei) for the period 2000 - 2020 (NEMA, n = 3,029; FURG, n = 4,629). To build the unified database, specific metrics were outlined for the species and region, in order to confirm a ‘match’ of a record. The ‘match’ variable is a subjective value that classifies the resighting of a stranded animal as excellent (1), good (2), or regular (3). With the implementation of guidelines to merge stranding databases 1,812 ‘excellent’ and 97 ‘good’ combinations were recorded. Sixty records classified as 30 ‘regular’ matches were kept in the database, as they are possibly not recounts due to large differences in our primary and secondary metrics. To characterize a reliable match between distinct databases, the general guidelines outlined here need to be adapted according to the species of interest and the specificities of each monitoring program. The methodology developed to unify the databases had as its main objective the identification of matches.","PeriodicalId":17967,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals","volume":"522 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5597/lajam00289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Strandings of several species of marine mammals have been monitored over the years off the south coast of Rio Grande do Sul State, southern Brazil. A long time series of records implies extensive databases on strandings. In the region, these databases are maintained by two institutions: (i) Núcleo de Educação e Monitoramento Ambiental (NEMA) [Environmental Education and Monitoring Nucleus] and (ii) Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação da Megafauna Marinha (ECOMEGA) [Ecology and Conservation of Marine Mefagauna Laboratory] at the Federal University of Rio Grande – FURG. In order to make the time series as complete as possible and to make it a reliable source for research related to a particular species and region, the present work proposes a methodology for unifying both databases for franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei) for the period 2000 - 2020 (NEMA, n = 3,029; FURG, n = 4,629). To build the unified database, specific metrics were outlined for the species and region, in order to confirm a ‘match’ of a record. The ‘match’ variable is a subjective value that classifies the resighting of a stranded animal as excellent (1), good (2), or regular (3). With the implementation of guidelines to merge stranding databases 1,812 ‘excellent’ and 97 ‘good’ combinations were recorded. Sixty records classified as 30 ‘regular’ matches were kept in the database, as they are possibly not recounts due to large differences in our primary and secondary metrics. To characterize a reliable match between distinct databases, the general guidelines outlined here need to be adapted according to the species of interest and the specificities of each monitoring program. The methodology developed to unify the databases had as its main objective the identification of matches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合并搁浅数据库的指南:巴西最南部的franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei)案例
多年来,人们一直在巴西南部的南海岸监测到几种海洋哺乳动物搁浅的情况。长时间的记录序列意味着大量的搁浅数据库。在该区域,这些数据库由两个机构维持:(i) Núcleo de educa o e Monitoring amento Ambiental[环境教育和监测中心]和(ii) Laboratório de Ecologia e conserva o o da Megafauna (ECOMEGA)[海洋Megafauna生态学和养护实验室],位于巴西联邦大学- FURG。为了使时间序列尽可能完整,并使其成为与特定物种和区域有关的研究的可靠来源,本工作提出了一种统一2000 - 2020年期间franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei)数据库的方法(NEMA, n = 3,029;FURG, n = 4,629)。为了建立统一的数据库,为物种和地区制定了具体的指标,以确认记录的“匹配”。“匹配”变量是一个主观值,它将搁浅动物的重新安置分为优秀(1),良好(2)或常规(3)。随着合并搁浅数据库指南的实施,记录了1,812个“优秀”和97个“良好”组合。60条记录被分类为30个“常规”比赛保存在数据库中,因为它们可能无法重新计算,因为我们的主要和次要指标存在很大差异。为了描述不同数据库之间的可靠匹配,需要根据感兴趣的物种和每个监视程序的特殊性对这里概述的一般指导原则进行调整。为统一数据库而开发的方法的主要目标是确定匹配项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Downsweep calls attributed to sei whales, Balaenoptera borealis, in Ilhabela, São Paulo, Brazil Macroscopic and histologic characteristics of sexual maturation in the Burmeister’s porpoise Phocoena spinipinnis from Peru Antillean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus) occurrence and grazing spots in three protected areas of Costa Rica Stranding reports of the Antillean manatee in the middle Magdalena Basin, Colombia 2011 to 2023 Quantifying minimum survey effort to reliably detect Amazonian manatees using an unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV) at an ex situ soft-release site
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1