Digital piracy: the issue of knowledge of the institution of copyright law

IF 0.7 Q4 ECONOMICS Ekonomia i Prawo-Economics and Law Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI:10.12775/eip.2023.005
{"title":"Digital piracy: the issue of knowledge of the institution of copyright law","authors":"","doi":"10.12775/eip.2023.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motivation: The motivation for considering the familiarity of Polish people with copyright law came from previous studies signalling that familiarity to possibly be low. If this conjecture proves true, it will affect the correct interpretation of what digital piracy is by Poles. This, in turn, can lead to problems in designing surveys to measure digital piracy.Aim: The article adopted two research objectives. The first is factual, the second methodical. The first objective is to try to confirm the claim of low knowledge of the institution of copyright law among Poles. The second objective is to try to establish the usefulness of the heuristic Importance Index and the method of clustering similar averages for determining significant differences in the distributions of the evaluations of illegality regarding the forms of copying due to demographic characteristics.Results: As a result, the survey showed that the claim that Poles demonstrate low level of knowledge regarding the copyright law is valid. While not all situations involving the copying of information goods are interpreted incorrectly, the public is overwhelmingly unable to determine whether particular forms of copying are legal or illegal. The study also found that the social group that most harshly labels particular forms of copying as illegal are those with a university education. At the same time, their harsh judgment does not mean that they correctly interpreted the forms of copying in question as illegal.","PeriodicalId":51956,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomia i Prawo-Economics and Law","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomia i Prawo-Economics and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/eip.2023.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motivation: The motivation for considering the familiarity of Polish people with copyright law came from previous studies signalling that familiarity to possibly be low. If this conjecture proves true, it will affect the correct interpretation of what digital piracy is by Poles. This, in turn, can lead to problems in designing surveys to measure digital piracy.Aim: The article adopted two research objectives. The first is factual, the second methodical. The first objective is to try to confirm the claim of low knowledge of the institution of copyright law among Poles. The second objective is to try to establish the usefulness of the heuristic Importance Index and the method of clustering similar averages for determining significant differences in the distributions of the evaluations of illegality regarding the forms of copying due to demographic characteristics.Results: As a result, the survey showed that the claim that Poles demonstrate low level of knowledge regarding the copyright law is valid. While not all situations involving the copying of information goods are interpreted incorrectly, the public is overwhelmingly unable to determine whether particular forms of copying are legal or illegal. The study also found that the social group that most harshly labels particular forms of copying as illegal are those with a university education. At the same time, their harsh judgment does not mean that they correctly interpreted the forms of copying in question as illegal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字盗版:知识产权制度的著作权法问题
动机:考虑波兰人民对版权法的熟悉程度的动机来自先前的研究,表明熟悉程度可能很低。如果这个猜想被证明是正确的,它将影响波兰人对数字盗版的正确理解。这反过来又会导致在设计调查以衡量数字盗版时出现问题。目的:本文采用两个研究目标。第一种是事实,第二种是方法。第一个目标是试图证实波兰人对版权法制度的了解程度较低。第二个目标是试图确定启发式重要性指数和相似平均数聚类方法的有用性,以确定由于人口特征而导致的关于复制形式的非法性评价分布的显著差异。结果:调查结果表明,波兰人对版权法的知识水平较低的说法是正确的。虽然并非所有涉及复制信息产品的情况都被错误地解释,但公众绝大多数无法确定特定形式的复制是合法的还是非法的。研究还发现,最严厉地将某些形式的复制视为非法的社会群体是那些受过大学教育的人。与此同时,他们严厉的判断并不意味着他们正确地将问题中的复制形式解释为非法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Navigating an Unforeseen Situation: Lessons from the Indian Higher Judiciary’s Approach to Social Action Litigation during the Pandemic The Use of a Spanish-Translated PrEP Stigma Scale among the Latino Sample of the UNITE Cohort Study. Savings natural resource funds: effectiveness of the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global Objectives of the ESG bonds issues Unstable government revenues in uncertain times: which taxes are especially volatile?
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1