了解公众对英国直接面向消费者的药物基因组学测试的看法:一项定性研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Pharmacogenomics Journal Pub Date : 2026-07-25 DOI:10.1038/s41397-026-00425-1
Amy Mathieson, Lisa Brunton, Stephanie Gillibrand, Ramona Moldovan, John H. McDermott
{"title":"了解公众对英国直接面向消费者的药物基因组学测试的看法:一项定性研究。","authors":"Amy Mathieson, Lisa Brunton, Stephanie Gillibrand, Ramona Moldovan, John H. McDermott","doi":"10.1038/s41397-026-00425-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Direct-to-consumer (DTC) pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is expanding rapidly in the UK, yet no dedicated regulatory framework currently governs these services. Although a 2021 parliamentary inquiry recommended stronger safeguards and clearer technical standards for genomic testing, these proposals have not been applied to PGx. This study explores public attitudes toward DTC PGx testing, focusing on expectations for pre-test information, quality standards, and NHS data use. We conducted focus groups with members of the public, both with and without prior experience of purchasing DTC PGx tests, or other online health tests. Focus groups were audio-recorded with consent, transcribed, and analysed thematically. We identified three themes: (mis)understanding towards and awareness of DTC PGx testing; altruistic motivation and equity concerns; and (mis)trust. Participants were generally enthusiastic about PGx testing, as long as issues of equity, data protection, and regulation were addressed, with data sharing concerns being particularly prominent.","PeriodicalId":54624,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacogenomics Journal","volume":"26 4","pages":"31-"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13401518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding public perspectives on direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing in the UK: a qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Amy Mathieson, Lisa Brunton, Stephanie Gillibrand, Ramona Moldovan, John H. McDermott\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41397-026-00425-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Direct-to-consumer (DTC) pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is expanding rapidly in the UK, yet no dedicated regulatory framework currently governs these services. Although a 2021 parliamentary inquiry recommended stronger safeguards and clearer technical standards for genomic testing, these proposals have not been applied to PGx. This study explores public attitudes toward DTC PGx testing, focusing on expectations for pre-test information, quality standards, and NHS data use. We conducted focus groups with members of the public, both with and without prior experience of purchasing DTC PGx tests, or other online health tests. Focus groups were audio-recorded with consent, transcribed, and analysed thematically. We identified three themes: (mis)understanding towards and awareness of DTC PGx testing; altruistic motivation and equity concerns; and (mis)trust. Participants were generally enthusiastic about PGx testing, as long as issues of equity, data protection, and regulation were addressed, with data sharing concerns being particularly prominent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacogenomics Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"31-\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13401518/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacogenomics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41397-026-00425-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacogenomics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41397-026-00425-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直接面向消费者(DTC)的药物基因组学(PGx)检测在英国迅速扩张,但目前还没有专门的监管框架来管理这些服务。尽管2021年的一项议会调查建议加强基因组检测的保障措施和更明确的技术标准,但这些建议并未适用于PGx。本研究探讨了公众对DTC PGx检测的态度,重点关注对检测前信息、质量标准和NHS数据使用的期望。我们对有或没有购买DTC PGx测试或其他在线健康测试经验的公众进行了焦点小组讨论。在征得同意的情况下,对焦点小组进行录音、转录并进行主题分析。我们确定了三个主题:(错误)对DTC PGx测试的理解和认识;利他动机与公平关切;和(mis)的信任。参与者通常对PGx测试充满热情,只要公平、数据保护和监管问题得到解决,数据共享问题尤其突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding public perspectives on direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing in the UK: a qualitative study
Direct-to-consumer (DTC) pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is expanding rapidly in the UK, yet no dedicated regulatory framework currently governs these services. Although a 2021 parliamentary inquiry recommended stronger safeguards and clearer technical standards for genomic testing, these proposals have not been applied to PGx. This study explores public attitudes toward DTC PGx testing, focusing on expectations for pre-test information, quality standards, and NHS data use. We conducted focus groups with members of the public, both with and without prior experience of purchasing DTC PGx tests, or other online health tests. Focus groups were audio-recorded with consent, transcribed, and analysed thematically. We identified three themes: (mis)understanding towards and awareness of DTC PGx testing; altruistic motivation and equity concerns; and (mis)trust. Participants were generally enthusiastic about PGx testing, as long as issues of equity, data protection, and regulation were addressed, with data sharing concerns being particularly prominent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacogenomics Journal
Pharmacogenomics Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pharmacogenomics Journal is a print and electronic journal, which is dedicated to the rapid publication of original research on pharmacogenomics and its clinical applications. Key areas of coverage include: Personalized medicine Effects of genetic variability on drug toxicity and efficacy Identification and functional characterization of polymorphisms relevant to drug action Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic variations and drug efficacy Integration of new developments in the genome project and proteomics into clinical medicine, pharmacology, and therapeutics Clinical applications of genomic science Identification of novel genomic targets for drug development Potential benefits of pharmacogenomics.
期刊最新文献
Amplicon-based long-read sequencing for accurate CYP2D6 gene deletion and duplication detection using CYP2D7 as a reference gene. Association between CYP2D6 genotype and treatment effectiveness and safety in 99 hospitalized patients with major depressive disorder a retrospective cohort study CYP2D6 genotype and antidepressant response. Large-scale analysis demonstrates the influence of CYP2C19 genotype on specific SSRI side effects Effects of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 genetic variants on tacrolimus metabolism during the early period after kidney transplantation Understanding public perspectives on direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing in the UK: a qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1