Restriction

Nigel Nicholson, Nathan R. Selden
{"title":"Restriction","authors":"Nigel Nicholson, Nathan R. Selden","doi":"10.1093/med/9780190457488.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 4 examines the physician’s relationship to the broader political life of the community. The Hippocratic corpus mostly frames health in terms of an individual and seems to exclude physicians from involvement in policy and politics. Yet some physicians sought to establish a less restrictive understanding of their work that would not inhibit political engagement. Modern professionals increasingly recognize a broad range of social determinants of healthcare, with a scope that exceeds the purview of traditional physicians. Accordingly, medicine should be recognized as a profession that has real relevance to public service and qualifies its practitioners for political office.","PeriodicalId":387948,"journal":{"name":"The Rhetoric of Medicine","volume":"164 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Rhetoric of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190457488.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 4 examines the physician’s relationship to the broader political life of the community. The Hippocratic corpus mostly frames health in terms of an individual and seems to exclude physicians from involvement in policy and politics. Yet some physicians sought to establish a less restrictive understanding of their work that would not inhibit political engagement. Modern professionals increasingly recognize a broad range of social determinants of healthcare, with a scope that exceeds the purview of traditional physicians. Accordingly, medicine should be recognized as a profession that has real relevance to public service and qualifies its practitioners for political office.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
限制
第4章考察了医生与更广泛的社会政治生活的关系。希波克拉底语料库主要从个人的角度来构建健康,似乎将医生排除在政策和政治之外。然而,一些医生试图对他们的工作建立一种不那么限制的理解,以免妨碍政治参与。现代专业人士越来越多地认识到医疗保健的广泛的社会决定因素,其范围超出了传统医生的权限。因此,应该承认医学是一种与公共服务真正相关的职业,并使其从业人员有资格担任政治职务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Body Restriction Mentoring Competition Conclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1