PEOPLE’S REASONS NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN COMMUNITY GARDENS IN DISADVANTAGED NEIGHBORHOODS OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA

Sinan Kordon, Patrick Mi̇ller
{"title":"PEOPLE’S REASONS NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN COMMUNITY GARDENS IN DISADVANTAGED NEIGHBORHOODS OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA","authors":"Sinan Kordon, Patrick Mi̇ller","doi":"10.57165/artgrid.1332871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although community gardening provides numerous environmental, economic, health, and social benefits, public involvement and support are still not at the desired level for their permanency in cities. While there are numerous studies regarding people’s motivations to participate in community gardening, empirical research is very limited for people’s reasons not to participate in community gardening. For increased involvement and public support, knowledge about people’s reasons not to participate in community gardening is important. Using a survey instrument, this research identified people’s primary reasons that negatively influence their participation in community gardening in five disadvantaged neighborhoods of Roanoke, Virginia. Descriptive statistics, T-test, and factor analysis procedures were used at a 95% significance level. Results showed that the statements associated with “theft and damage”, “difficult access”, “too much effort”, and “no personal interest” were the main reasons not to participate in community gardening. Based on these, this research brings design and maintenance recommendations for the increase of more successful community garden projects. In the long term, this can contribute to the long-term survival of these landscapes in cities by providing higher public involvement and support for community garden projects.","PeriodicalId":349642,"journal":{"name":"ArtGRID - Journal of Architecture Engineering and Fine Arts","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ArtGRID - Journal of Architecture Engineering and Fine Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57165/artgrid.1332871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although community gardening provides numerous environmental, economic, health, and social benefits, public involvement and support are still not at the desired level for their permanency in cities. While there are numerous studies regarding people’s motivations to participate in community gardening, empirical research is very limited for people’s reasons not to participate in community gardening. For increased involvement and public support, knowledge about people’s reasons not to participate in community gardening is important. Using a survey instrument, this research identified people’s primary reasons that negatively influence their participation in community gardening in five disadvantaged neighborhoods of Roanoke, Virginia. Descriptive statistics, T-test, and factor analysis procedures were used at a 95% significance level. Results showed that the statements associated with “theft and damage”, “difficult access”, “too much effort”, and “no personal interest” were the main reasons not to participate in community gardening. Based on these, this research brings design and maintenance recommendations for the increase of more successful community garden projects. In the long term, this can contribute to the long-term survival of these landscapes in cities by providing higher public involvement and support for community garden projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在弗吉尼亚州罗阿诺克的弱势社区,人们不参与社区花园的原因
虽然社区园艺提供了许多环境、经济、健康和社会效益,但公众的参与和支持仍然没有达到他们在城市中永久存在的理想水平。虽然有很多关于人们参与社区园艺的动机的研究,但对于人们不参与社区园艺的原因的实证研究非常有限。为了增加参与和公众支持,了解人们不参与社区园艺的原因是很重要的。使用调查工具,本研究确定了在弗吉尼亚州罗阿诺克的五个弱势社区中,人们参与社区园艺的主要原因。采用描述性统计、t检验和因子分析程序,显著性水平为95%。结果显示,与“盗窃和损坏”、“难以进入”、“太费力”和“没有个人兴趣”相关的陈述是不参加社区园艺的主要原因。在此基础上,本研究为更多成功的社区花园项目提供了设计和维护建议。从长远来看,这可以通过为社区花园项目提供更高的公众参与和支持,从而有助于这些景观在城市中的长期生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PEOPLE’S REASONS NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN COMMUNITY GARDENS IN DISADVANTAGED NEIGHBORHOODS OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA BIOECONOMY: A NEW IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISM FOR SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT? REKREASYON ALANLARINDA ENGELLİ KULLANIMI AÇISINDAN ERİŞİLEBİLİRLİK: İZMİR İLİ BUCA İLÇESİ ÖRNEĞİ KURAKÇIL PEYZAJ TASARIMININ YEDİ BASAMAĞI: ARİZONA EYALET ÜNİVERSİTESİ KAMPÜSÜ PANDEMİ SÜRECİNDE YEŞİL ALTYAPI BİLEŞENLERİ OLARAK KONUT YEŞİL ALANLARININ SOSYAL AÇIDAN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1