The faces of failure: understanding students’ affective experiences with failure in introductory chemistry laboratory learning activities

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Chemistry Education Research and Practice Pub Date : 2025-10-17 DOI:10.1039/D5RP00297D
Shauna Schechtel and Amanda Bongers
{"title":"The faces of failure: understanding students’ affective experiences with failure in introductory chemistry laboratory learning activities","authors":"Shauna Schechtel and Amanda Bongers","doi":"10.1039/D5RP00297D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Failure is recognized as valuable to learning in the classroom and research contexts. While interventions incorporating failure into learning have been explored in science education, the affective experience of failure is less understood. From an affective experience lens, failure is stigmatized and not accounted for in learning and assessment. This study explores introductory chemistry students’ affective experiences with failure through qualitative semi-structured interviews framed from an interpretivist lens. Students shared that failure is overwhelming, shapes their beliefs, is not accounted for in course design, and is defined by the learning and assessment outcomes. Asking students to fail as a part of their learning is much more nuanced than previously discussed interventions where failure is part of the design. This study explores the idea that not all failures are created equal and provides insight into laboratory activities and assessments that ask students to fail. Paying attention to students’ experiences can change your mindset as an educator and offer pathways to creating learning environments that reduce judgment, allow instructors to share their own failures, and offer feedback to help students move forward with their failures.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 1","pages":" 479-493"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2026/rp/d5rp00297d","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Failure is recognized as valuable to learning in the classroom and research contexts. While interventions incorporating failure into learning have been explored in science education, the affective experience of failure is less understood. From an affective experience lens, failure is stigmatized and not accounted for in learning and assessment. This study explores introductory chemistry students’ affective experiences with failure through qualitative semi-structured interviews framed from an interpretivist lens. Students shared that failure is overwhelming, shapes their beliefs, is not accounted for in course design, and is defined by the learning and assessment outcomes. Asking students to fail as a part of their learning is much more nuanced than previously discussed interventions where failure is part of the design. This study explores the idea that not all failures are created equal and provides insight into laboratory activities and assessments that ask students to fail. Paying attention to students’ experiences can change your mindset as an educator and offer pathways to creating learning environments that reduce judgment, allow instructors to share their own failures, and offer feedback to help students move forward with their failures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面对失败:了解学生在化学实验室入门学习活动中面对失败的情感体验
在课堂和研究环境中,失败被认为是有价值的。虽然在科学教育中已经探索了将失败纳入学习的干预措施,但对失败的情感体验却知之甚少。从情感体验的角度来看,失败是耻辱的,在学习和评估中没有考虑到。本研究以解释主义视角,透过定性半结构化访谈,探讨入门化学学生面对失败的情感体验。学生们认为,失败是压倒性的,塑造了他们的信念,在课程设计中没有考虑到失败,而是由学习和评估结果决定的。要求学生将失败作为学习的一部分,比之前讨论的将失败作为设计的一部分的干预措施要微妙得多。这项研究探讨了并非所有失败都是平等的这一观点,并提供了对要求学生失败的实验室活动和评估的见解。关注学生的经历可以改变你作为教育者的心态,并为创造学习环境提供途径,减少判断,允许教师分享他们自己的失败,并提供反馈,帮助学生从失败中前进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
期刊最新文献
From prompt engineering to modeling: secondary science teachers' use of generative AI to engineer sweetener molecules. Correction: Students’ epistemological resources and framing of stoichiometry assessment items across linguistic backgrounds: insights for equitable design To be or not to be a model? Exploring chemistry students’ ideas about general and specific meta-modeling knowledge regarding reaction mechanisms in organic chemistry An AI-supported modeling approach for teaching metal bonding: design and implementation of a teacher education program integrating model-based learning and the 5E learning cycle Students’ meaning-making of nonverbal communication as representational scaffolding in UK chemistry education: Chinese students’ cross-cultural perspectives
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1