Timothy D Nelin, Julianne R McGlynn, Rachel G Greenberg, Jonathan L Slaughter, Sharon A McGrath-Morrow, Nicolas A Bamat
{"title":"What is the role of diuretics in the prevention and management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia?","authors":"Timothy D Nelin, Julianne R McGlynn, Rachel G Greenberg, Jonathan L Slaughter, Sharon A McGrath-Morrow, Nicolas A Bamat","doi":"10.1007/s40746-025-00347-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review critically examines the role of furosemide and chlorothiazide in the prevention and management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). We describe their common use, pharmacotherapeutic mechanisms, and summarize evidence from clinical trials and cohort studies evaluating their effects on diuresis and respiratory outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Most evidence comes from studies in the 1980s that generalize poorly to contemporary neonatal care. However, a trial in 80 extremely preterm infants was published in 2025, reporting no certain effect of furosemide on death or BPD or on adverse effects other than electrolyte imbalances. The trial was not designed to address BPD prevention. Two recent large observational studies reported associations between greater diuretic exposure and lower risk of death or BPD but are limited by potential confounding. Earlier trials suggest diuretics may offer short-term improvements in urine output, pulmonary mechanics and gas exchange.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The role of diuretics in the prevention and management of BPD remains uncertain. While transient, modest improvements in diuresis and respiratory function are likely, existing evidence does not convincingly support either clinically meaningful benefit or harm. In the absence of robust evidence-based guidance, minimizing routine diuretic use and considering short-term, selective treatment with measurable individualized goals is prudent. Addressing the disconnect between widespread use and limited supporting evidence will require well-designed studies that consider optimal patient selection, timing, dosing and duration in the context of current diuretic practice patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":37445,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13001725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40746-025-00347-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: This review critically examines the role of furosemide and chlorothiazide in the prevention and management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). We describe their common use, pharmacotherapeutic mechanisms, and summarize evidence from clinical trials and cohort studies evaluating their effects on diuresis and respiratory outcomes.
Recent findings: Most evidence comes from studies in the 1980s that generalize poorly to contemporary neonatal care. However, a trial in 80 extremely preterm infants was published in 2025, reporting no certain effect of furosemide on death or BPD or on adverse effects other than electrolyte imbalances. The trial was not designed to address BPD prevention. Two recent large observational studies reported associations between greater diuretic exposure and lower risk of death or BPD but are limited by potential confounding. Earlier trials suggest diuretics may offer short-term improvements in urine output, pulmonary mechanics and gas exchange.
Summary: The role of diuretics in the prevention and management of BPD remains uncertain. While transient, modest improvements in diuresis and respiratory function are likely, existing evidence does not convincingly support either clinically meaningful benefit or harm. In the absence of robust evidence-based guidance, minimizing routine diuretic use and considering short-term, selective treatment with measurable individualized goals is prudent. Addressing the disconnect between widespread use and limited supporting evidence will require well-designed studies that consider optimal patient selection, timing, dosing and duration in the context of current diuretic practice patterns.
期刊介绍:
Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics aims to review the most important, recently published research on treatment in the field of pediatrics. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care of children of all ages.We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas covering all the major medical and surgical disciplines in pediatrics. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive treatment-focused review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also occasionally provided.