“It's Not the Climate, Stupid”: Exploring Nonideal Scenarios for Solar Geoengineering Development

IF 1.8 3区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS Ethics & International Affairs Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/s089267942400025x
Duncan McLaren
{"title":"“It's Not the Climate, Stupid”: Exploring Nonideal Scenarios for Solar Geoengineering Development","authors":"Duncan McLaren","doi":"10.1017/s089267942400025x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As part of the “Solar Geoengineering: Ethics, Governance, and International Politics” roundtable, this essay examines dilemmas arising in exploring nonideal scenarios of solar geoengineering deployment. Model-based knowledge about solar geoengineering tells us little about possible climatic responses to malicious, self-interested, or competing deployments, and even less about political or cultural responses outside of the climate system. The essay argues that policy for governing solar geoengineering in a world of multiple states and uneven power relations requires a broader base for solar geoengineering knowledge, beyond that offered by modeling, and a better understanding of nonideal scenarios, especially those motivated by logics beyond reducing climate impacts. It highlights the interests of military and security actors in such knowledge, and the potential for it to facilitate securitization and further reduce the prospect of multilateral collaborative governance of geoengineering in the public interest. The essay concludes that further research can be ethically justified but must be comprehensively governed.","PeriodicalId":11772,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & International Affairs","volume":"38 3","pages":"255-274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/5C1BF840C9B7120F24AB5338DE5E9386/S089267942400025Xa.pdf/div-class-title-it-s-not-the-climate-stupid-exploring-nonideal-scenarios-for-solar-geoengineering-development-div.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s089267942400025x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract As part of the “Solar Geoengineering: Ethics, Governance, and International Politics” roundtable, this essay examines dilemmas arising in exploring nonideal scenarios of solar geoengineering deployment. Model-based knowledge about solar geoengineering tells us little about possible climatic responses to malicious, self-interested, or competing deployments, and even less about political or cultural responses outside of the climate system. The essay argues that policy for governing solar geoengineering in a world of multiple states and uneven power relations requires a broader base for solar geoengineering knowledge, beyond that offered by modeling, and a better understanding of nonideal scenarios, especially those motivated by logics beyond reducing climate impacts. It highlights the interests of military and security actors in such knowledge, and the potential for it to facilitate securitization and further reduce the prospect of multilateral collaborative governance of geoengineering in the public interest. The essay concludes that further research can be ethically justified but must be comprehensively governed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“这不是气候,笨蛋”:探索太阳能地球工程发展的非理想情况
作为“太阳能地球工程:伦理、治理和国际政治”圆桌会议的一部分,本文探讨了在探索太阳能地球工程部署的非理想情况下出现的困境。关于太阳能地球工程的基于模型的知识几乎没有告诉我们恶意的、自私自利的或竞争性的部署可能造成的气候反应,更没有告诉我们气候系统之外的政治或文化反应。本文认为,在一个多国家和权力关系不平衡的世界中,管理太阳能地球工程的政策需要更广泛的太阳能地球工程知识基础,而不仅仅是建模提供的知识,还要更好地理解非理想情况,特别是那些由减少气候影响以外的逻辑驱动的情况。它强调了军事和安全行为者在这些知识中的利益,以及它促进安全的潜力,并进一步降低了出于公共利益的地球工程多边合作治理的前景。这篇文章的结论是,进一步的研究在伦理上是合理的,但必须得到全面的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
A.S. Pushkin and Diplomats: On the Occasion of the Poet's 225th Birth Anniversary “It's Not the Climate, Stupid”: Exploring Nonideal Scenarios for Solar Geoengineering Development Accountability for the Taking of Human Life with LAWS in War Toward a Balanced Approach: Bridging the Military, Policy, and Technical Communities How to End a War: Essays on Justice, Peace, and Repair, Graham Parsons and Mark A. Wilson, eds. (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2023), 207 pp., cloth $110, eBook $110.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1