Understanding considerations and priorities in health behaviours: A multi-dimensional risk-benefit perspective.

IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY British journal of psychology Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-24 DOI:10.1111/bjop.70085
Yiyun Shou, Joey Elizabeth Yeo, Alexander Shao-Rong Pang
{"title":"Understanding considerations and priorities in health behaviours: A multi-dimensional risk-benefit perspective.","authors":"Yiyun Shou, Joey Elizabeth Yeo, Alexander Shao-Rong Pang","doi":"10.1111/bjop.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health behaviours and decisions are complex and involve different dimensions of individuals' lives. The current study aimed to investigate considerations and their priorities in health decision and behaviour adoption via a risk-benefit framework unifying elements of mainstream models of health behaviour. We aimed to explore the core dimensions of the outcomes being considered by people and individual differences in perceived importance across dimensions. Two studies were conducted among U.S. adult residents. Study 1 (N = 295) involved eliciting qualitative responses of the health decisions or behaviours that participants encounter in their everyday life, and ratings of the associated dimensions. Study 2 (N = 400) assessed participants' ratings of the importance of outcomes and dimensions across various health decisions and behaviours. Both studies revealed that people considered dimensions beyond health risk and benefit. The dimensions varied their priorities, with health and emotional outcomes being the top considerations. Participants also showed asymmetric considerations of benefit and risk within each dimension. The latent profile analyses in Study 2 also revealed two distinct groups of individuals in risk and benefit considerations across dimensions. The findings highlight that acknowledging individual differences in the weighting and evaluation of outcomes across domains is essential for more tailored health communication and interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1657-1672"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13655933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health behaviours and decisions are complex and involve different dimensions of individuals' lives. The current study aimed to investigate considerations and their priorities in health decision and behaviour adoption via a risk-benefit framework unifying elements of mainstream models of health behaviour. We aimed to explore the core dimensions of the outcomes being considered by people and individual differences in perceived importance across dimensions. Two studies were conducted among U.S. adult residents. Study 1 (N = 295) involved eliciting qualitative responses of the health decisions or behaviours that participants encounter in their everyday life, and ratings of the associated dimensions. Study 2 (N = 400) assessed participants' ratings of the importance of outcomes and dimensions across various health decisions and behaviours. Both studies revealed that people considered dimensions beyond health risk and benefit. The dimensions varied their priorities, with health and emotional outcomes being the top considerations. Participants also showed asymmetric considerations of benefit and risk within each dimension. The latent profile analyses in Study 2 also revealed two distinct groups of individuals in risk and benefit considerations across dimensions. The findings highlight that acknowledging individual differences in the weighting and evaluation of outcomes across domains is essential for more tailored health communication and interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解健康行为中的考虑因素和优先事项:多维风险-利益视角。
健康行为和决定很复杂,涉及个人生活的不同方面。本研究旨在通过统一主流健康行为模式要素的风险-收益框架,调查健康决策和行为采用中的考虑因素及其优先事项。我们的目的是探索人们正在考虑的结果的核心维度以及各个维度的感知重要性的个体差异。在美国成年居民中进行了两项研究。研究1 (N = 295)涉及对参与者在日常生活中遇到的健康决定或行为的定性反应,以及相关维度的评级。研究2 (N = 400)评估了参与者对各种健康决策和行为的结果和维度的重要性评分。两项研究都表明,人们会考虑健康风险和益处之外的因素。他们的优先级各不相同,健康和情感结果是最重要的考虑因素。参与者还在每个维度中表现出对利益和风险的不对称考虑。研究2中的潜在剖面分析也揭示了两组不同的个体在风险和利益方面的考虑。研究结果强调,承认跨领域结果的权重和评估中的个体差异对于更有针对性的卫生沟通和干预至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British journal of psychology
British journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychology publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognition; health and clinical psychology; developmental, social and occupational psychology. For information on specific requirements, please view Notes for Contributors. We attract a large number of international submissions each year which make major contributions across the range of psychology.
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of implementation intentions in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Correction to 'Explainability increases trust resilience in intelligent agents'. Task-specific associations between holistic processing and individual differences in face memory. Understanding considerations and priorities in health behaviours: A multi-dimensional risk-benefit perspective. Between solitude and self-harm: A mixed-methods study on loneliness, emotional regulation and the buffering role of social interaction in university students.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1