Undergraduate chemistry students’ sensemaking in a laboratory setting: the interplay of knowledge gaps and epistemic emotions

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Chemistry Education Research and Practice Pub Date : 2026-05-21 DOI:10.1039/D5RP00443H
Zubeyde Demet Kirbulut Gunes, Nurcan Turan-Oluk, Sinem Gencer, Hakkı Kadayıfçı, Burcu Işık, Halil Tümay, Funda Ekici, Sevinç Nihal Yeşiloğlu and Dilay Dincdemir
{"title":"Undergraduate chemistry students’ sensemaking in a laboratory setting: the interplay of knowledge gaps and epistemic emotions","authors":"Zubeyde Demet Kirbulut Gunes, Nurcan Turan-Oluk, Sinem Gencer, Hakkı Kadayıfçı, Burcu Işık, Halil Tümay, Funda Ekici, Sevinç Nihal Yeşiloğlu and Dilay Dincdemir","doi":"10.1039/D5RP00443H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study investigates how undergraduate chemistry students engage in sensemaking during an inquiry-based Boyle's law laboratory activity, focusing on how different types of knowledge gaps and associated epistemic emotions guide their sensemaking trajectories. A holistic multiple-case study design was employed, with sensemaking episodes serving as the unit of analysis. Two student groups were purposefully selected to represent contrasting sensemaking trajectories. Group 1 exhibited a sustained sensemaking trajectory and completed the activity, whereas Group 2 exhibited a disengaging sensemaking trajectory and ultimately withdrew from the task without arriving at a coherent resolution. Data were collected through audio and video recordings, activity sheets, and epistemic emotion diaries, and were analyzed thematically. The results revealed clear differences between the groups. Group 1 primarily encountered procedural knowledge gaps. These gaps involved relatively low element interactivity and were resolved through collaborative reasoning. By contrast, Group 2 encountered conceptual and epistemic gaps that required the coordination of multiple abstract constructs, imposed high cognitive demands, and remained unresolved. Epistemic emotions also diverged markedly across the two groups. Both began the activity with curiosity and surprise, yet Group 1 sustained positive emotions that helped them manage confusion productively. Group 2 experienced increasing frustration and boredom, reflecting a trajectory of hopeless confusion that hindered sustained sensemaking. The interaction of unresolved gaps and negative epistemic emotions seemed to be associated with Group 2's disengagement. The findings suggest the instructional relevance of attending to both cognitive demands and epistemic emotions, particularly in moments when students encounter persistent knowledge gaps during laboratory sensemaking.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 3","pages":" 1154-1171"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2026/rp/d5rp00443h?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2026/rp/d5rp00443h","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates how undergraduate chemistry students engage in sensemaking during an inquiry-based Boyle's law laboratory activity, focusing on how different types of knowledge gaps and associated epistemic emotions guide their sensemaking trajectories. A holistic multiple-case study design was employed, with sensemaking episodes serving as the unit of analysis. Two student groups were purposefully selected to represent contrasting sensemaking trajectories. Group 1 exhibited a sustained sensemaking trajectory and completed the activity, whereas Group 2 exhibited a disengaging sensemaking trajectory and ultimately withdrew from the task without arriving at a coherent resolution. Data were collected through audio and video recordings, activity sheets, and epistemic emotion diaries, and were analyzed thematically. The results revealed clear differences between the groups. Group 1 primarily encountered procedural knowledge gaps. These gaps involved relatively low element interactivity and were resolved through collaborative reasoning. By contrast, Group 2 encountered conceptual and epistemic gaps that required the coordination of multiple abstract constructs, imposed high cognitive demands, and remained unresolved. Epistemic emotions also diverged markedly across the two groups. Both began the activity with curiosity and surprise, yet Group 1 sustained positive emotions that helped them manage confusion productively. Group 2 experienced increasing frustration and boredom, reflecting a trajectory of hopeless confusion that hindered sustained sensemaking. The interaction of unresolved gaps and negative epistemic emotions seemed to be associated with Group 2's disengagement. The findings suggest the instructional relevance of attending to both cognitive demands and epistemic emotions, particularly in moments when students encounter persistent knowledge gaps during laboratory sensemaking.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本科化学学生在实验室环境下的意义建构:知识差距与认知情绪的相互作用
本研究调查了本科化学学生如何在基于探究式的Boyle’s法律实验室活动中进行语义构建,重点关注不同类型的知识差距和相关的认知情绪如何引导他们的语义构建轨迹。采用整体的多案例研究设计,以意义建构情节作为分析单元。有目的地选择两个学生组来代表不同的语义生成轨迹。第一组表现出持续的语义轨迹并完成了活动,而第二组表现出脱离的语义轨迹并最终退出了任务,没有达到连贯的解决方案。通过音频和视频记录、活动表和认知情绪日记收集数据,并对其进行主题分析。结果显示了两组之间的明显差异。第一组主要遇到程序性知识空白。这些差距涉及相对较低的元素交互性,并通过协作推理解决。相比之下,第二组遇到了概念和认知上的差距,这些差距需要协调多个抽象结构,对认知提出了很高的要求,并且仍然没有得到解决。认知情绪在两组之间也有明显的差异。两个人都带着好奇和惊讶开始了活动,但第一组保持了积极的情绪,帮助他们有效地管理困惑。第二组经历了越来越多的沮丧和无聊,反映出一种无望的困惑轨迹,阻碍了持续的意义构建。未解决的差距和消极认知情绪的相互作用似乎与第二组的脱离有关。研究结果表明,同时关注认知需求和认知情绪的教学相关性,特别是在学生在实验室语义构建过程中遇到持续的知识空白时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
期刊最新文献
From prompt engineering to modeling: secondary science teachers' use of generative AI to engineer sweetener molecules. Correction: Students’ epistemological resources and framing of stoichiometry assessment items across linguistic backgrounds: insights for equitable design To be or not to be a model? Exploring chemistry students’ ideas about general and specific meta-modeling knowledge regarding reaction mechanisms in organic chemistry An AI-supported modeling approach for teaching metal bonding: design and implementation of a teacher education program integrating model-based learning and the 5E learning cycle Students’ meaning-making of nonverbal communication as representational scaffolding in UK chemistry education: Chinese students’ cross-cultural perspectives
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1