Brokerage, Gender, and Academic Performance in Interdisciplinary Co-Authorship Networks: A Study of Policy-Related Social Learning Publications.

IF 3 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evaluation Review Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1177/0193841X261464677
Elisa Espín-Gallardo, José Antonio Belso-Martínez, María José López-Sánchez
{"title":"Brokerage, Gender, and Academic Performance in Interdisciplinary Co-Authorship Networks: A Study of Policy-Related Social Learning Publications.","authors":"Elisa Espín-Gallardo, José Antonio Belso-Martínez, María José López-Sánchez","doi":"10.1177/0193841X261464677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brokers serve as key connectors linking academic researchers who might otherwise remain unconnected, to co-authorship networks. This study examines whether more complex interdisciplinary co-authorships yield greater scholarly impact than ties with authors from the same discipline, which are facilitated by cognitive similarity. It also tests the extent to which such collaborations influence the academic performance of female researchers. The study analyzed 594 authors and 271 papers in the field of social learning. Despite their complexity, regression analyses confirm the benefits of novel sources and combinations of interdisciplinary knowledge. The higher coordination and communication costs of interdisciplinary collaboration are offset by the potential of the new knowledge generated. Interdisciplinary collaboration is associated with higher performance among female scholars, contributing to increased recognition and reputation. This pattern suggests that collaboration strategies and institutional support should reduce coordination barriers in interdisciplinary co-authorship and facilitate women's access to high-impact brokerage opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47533,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Review","volume":" ","pages":"1060-1093"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X261464677","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brokers serve as key connectors linking academic researchers who might otherwise remain unconnected, to co-authorship networks. This study examines whether more complex interdisciplinary co-authorships yield greater scholarly impact than ties with authors from the same discipline, which are facilitated by cognitive similarity. It also tests the extent to which such collaborations influence the academic performance of female researchers. The study analyzed 594 authors and 271 papers in the field of social learning. Despite their complexity, regression analyses confirm the benefits of novel sources and combinations of interdisciplinary knowledge. The higher coordination and communication costs of interdisciplinary collaboration are offset by the potential of the new knowledge generated. Interdisciplinary collaboration is associated with higher performance among female scholars, contributing to increased recognition and reputation. This pattern suggests that collaboration strategies and institutional support should reduce coordination barriers in interdisciplinary co-authorship and facilitate women's access to high-impact brokerage opportunities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨学科合著网络中的经纪、性别与学术表现:政策相关社会学习出版物的研究。
经纪人是将学术研究人员与合作作者网络联系起来的关键纽带,否则这些研究人员可能仍然没有联系。这项研究考察了更复杂的跨学科合作是否比来自同一学科的作者产生更大的学术影响,这是由认知相似性促进的。它还测试了这种合作在多大程度上影响了女性研究人员的学术表现。这项研究分析了社会学习领域的594位作者和271篇论文。尽管它们很复杂,但回归分析证实了跨学科知识的新来源和组合的好处。跨学科合作较高的协调和沟通成本被产生的新知识的潜力所抵消。跨学科合作与女性学者的更高表现有关,有助于提高认可和声誉。这一模式表明,合作战略和机构支持应减少跨学科合作中的协调障碍,并促进妇女获得高影响力的经纪机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation Review
Evaluation Review SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Evaluation Review is the forum for researchers, planners, and policy makers engaged in the development, implementation, and utilization of studies aimed at the betterment of the human condition. The Editors invite submission of papers reporting the findings of evaluation studies in such fields as child development, health, education, income security, manpower, mental health, criminal justice, and the physical and social environments. In addition, Evaluation Review will contain articles on methodological developments, discussions of the state of the art, and commentaries on issues related to the application of research results. Special features will include periodic review essays, "research briefs", and "craft reports".
期刊最新文献
Green Policies for the Circular Economy and Entrepreneurship: International Evidence. Peer-led Support Groups for Parents Following Child Removal: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study. Brokerage, Gender, and Academic Performance in Interdisciplinary Co-Authorship Networks: A Study of Policy-Related Social Learning Publications. Under What Conditions Does Evidence Travel? Assessing Context Sensitivity and Generalizability in Cash Transfer Program Effectiveness. Insights From Developmental and Formative Evaluations: Developing and Implementing a Limited-Term Housing Mobility Program.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1