Task-Dependent Synergy between FTIR and Raman Spectroscopy for Sperm Quality Prediction

IF 7.3 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Analytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2026-10-20 Epub Date: 2026-09-15 DOI:10.1021/acs.analchem.6c04960
Beatrice Campanella, Lorenzo Birindelli, Stefano Legnaioli, Giulia Lorenzetti, Cristina Consani, Valeria Ales, Edoardo Benedetti, Maria Antonella Bertozzi, Emilia Bramanti
{"title":"Task-Dependent Synergy between FTIR and Raman Spectroscopy for Sperm Quality Prediction","authors":"Beatrice Campanella,&nbsp;Lorenzo Birindelli,&nbsp;Stefano Legnaioli,&nbsp;Giulia Lorenzetti,&nbsp;Cristina Consani,&nbsp;Valeria Ales,&nbsp;Edoardo Benedetti,&nbsp;Maria Antonella Bertozzi,&nbsp;Emilia Bramanti","doi":"10.1021/acs.analchem.6c04960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Male\r\ninfertility affects approximately 15% of couples worldwide,\r\ncontributing to 40–50% of infertility cases in Western countries.\r\nStandard semen analysis remains the cornerstone of fertility assessment,\r\nyet conventional parameters (concentration, motility, morphology)\r\nhave limited predictive value for fertilization success. Vibrational\r\nspectroscopy, particularly Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and Raman\r\nspectroscopy, offers rapid, nondestructive chemical fingerprinting\r\nof biological samples. However, optimal strategies for integrating\r\nmultimodal spectroscopic data remain unclear, and the value of fusion\r\nmay depend on the biological end point. This study systematically\r\ncompares FTIR and Raman spectroscopy, both independently and through\r\nmultiple fusion strategies, for predicting rectilinear progressive\r\nsperm motility (binary classification) and normal morphology (continuous\r\nregression) in human seminal plasma. We determine whether complementary\r\ninformation exists, when fusion provides value, and which strategy\r\noptimally leverages multimodal data. Building on Raman-derived Multivariate\r\nCurve Resolution-Alternating Least Squares (MCR-ALS) concentration\r\nprofiles, we further develop a clinical classifier based on four seminal\r\nplasma biomarkers (human serum albumin, glutathione S-transferase,\r\ntransferrin, lysophosphatidylcholine), validated by leave-one-patient-out\r\ncross-validation and Firth’s penalized logistic regression\r\nto address near-complete separation in this small-sample setting (n\r\n= 30). Our findings reveal technique-specific advantages: Raman spectroscopy\r\nsubstantially outperforms FTIR for binary motility classification,\r\nwith feature-level fusion matching but not exceeding Raman’s\r\nperformance, indicating limited complementarity. Conversely, FTIR\r\nalone achieves superior predictive accuracy for continuous morphological\r\noutcomes. The clinical classifier based on MCR-ALS-derived biomarkers\r\nachieved AUC (Area Under the ROC Curve) = 0.855, accuracy = 86.7%,\r\nand BER (Balanced Error Rate) = 0.136, with model significance confirmed\r\nby permutation testing. Elevated human serum albumin and lysophosphatidylcholine\r\nemerged as the strongest negative predictors of high motility, consistent\r\nwith seminal tract inflammation and sperm-cytotoxic phospholipid accumulation,\r\nwhile transferrin showed a positive association in line with its role\r\nin iron availability for sperm function. These results demonstrate\r\nthat optimal spectroscopic approaches depend on the biological end\r\npoint, with Raman’s structural sensitivity favoring motility\r\nassessment and FTIR’s compositional profiling better capturing\r\nmorphological variation. The biomarker-based classifier is easier\r\nto interpret and complements whole-spectrum models by bridging chemometric\r\nanalysis and biological interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":27,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry","volume":"98 41","pages":"29684–29699"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.6c04960","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Male infertility affects approximately 15% of couples worldwide, contributing to 40–50% of infertility cases in Western countries. Standard semen analysis remains the cornerstone of fertility assessment, yet conventional parameters (concentration, motility, morphology) have limited predictive value for fertilization success. Vibrational spectroscopy, particularly Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy, offers rapid, nondestructive chemical fingerprinting of biological samples. However, optimal strategies for integrating multimodal spectroscopic data remain unclear, and the value of fusion may depend on the biological end point. This study systematically compares FTIR and Raman spectroscopy, both independently and through multiple fusion strategies, for predicting rectilinear progressive sperm motility (binary classification) and normal morphology (continuous regression) in human seminal plasma. We determine whether complementary information exists, when fusion provides value, and which strategy optimally leverages multimodal data. Building on Raman-derived Multivariate Curve Resolution-Alternating Least Squares (MCR-ALS) concentration profiles, we further develop a clinical classifier based on four seminal plasma biomarkers (human serum albumin, glutathione S-transferase, transferrin, lysophosphatidylcholine), validated by leave-one-patient-out cross-validation and Firth’s penalized logistic regression to address near-complete separation in this small-sample setting (n = 30). Our findings reveal technique-specific advantages: Raman spectroscopy substantially outperforms FTIR for binary motility classification, with feature-level fusion matching but not exceeding Raman’s performance, indicating limited complementarity. Conversely, FTIR alone achieves superior predictive accuracy for continuous morphological outcomes. The clinical classifier based on MCR-ALS-derived biomarkers achieved AUC (Area Under the ROC Curve) = 0.855, accuracy = 86.7%, and BER (Balanced Error Rate) = 0.136, with model significance confirmed by permutation testing. Elevated human serum albumin and lysophosphatidylcholine emerged as the strongest negative predictors of high motility, consistent with seminal tract inflammation and sperm-cytotoxic phospholipid accumulation, while transferrin showed a positive association in line with its role in iron availability for sperm function. These results demonstrate that optimal spectroscopic approaches depend on the biological end point, with Raman’s structural sensitivity favoring motility assessment and FTIR’s compositional profiling better capturing morphological variation. The biomarker-based classifier is easier to interpret and complements whole-spectrum models by bridging chemometric analysis and biological interpretation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FTIR和拉曼光谱在精子质量预测中的任务依赖协同作用
男性不育症影响全世界约15%的夫妇,在西方国家造成40-50%的不育症病例。标准精液分析仍然是生育力评估的基石,但传统的参数(浓度、活力、形态)对受精成功的预测价值有限。振动光谱,特别是傅里叶变换红外(FTIR)和拉曼光谱,提供了快速,无损的生物样品的化学指纹。然而,整合多模态光谱数据的最佳策略仍不清楚,融合的价值可能取决于生物终点。本研究系统地比较了FTIR和拉曼光谱,无论是独立的还是通过多种融合策略,预测人类精浆中的直线渐进精子运动(二元分类)和正常形态(连续回归)。我们确定是否存在互补信息,何时融合提供价值,以及哪种策略最优地利用多模态数据。在拉曼衍生的多变量曲线分辨率-交替最小二乘法(MCR-ALS)浓度谱的基础上,我们进一步开发了一种基于四种精浆生物标志物(人血清白蛋白、谷胱甘肽s转移酶、转铁蛋白、溶磷脂酰胆碱)的临床分类器,并通过留一位患者的交叉验证和Firth的补偿逻辑回归进行验证,以解决这个小样本环境(n = 30)中近乎完全分离的问题。我们的研究结果揭示了技术特有的优势:拉曼光谱在二元运动分类方面大大优于FTIR,具有特征级融合匹配,但没有超过拉曼的性能,表明互补性有限。相反,单独使用FTIR对连续形态学结果的预测精度更高。基于mcr - als衍生生物标志物的临床分类器的AUC (Area Under ROC Curve) = 0.855,准确率= 86.7%,BER (Balanced Error Rate) = 0.136,经排列检验证实具有模型显著性。人血清白蛋白和溶血磷脂的升高是高运动能力最强的负向预测因子,与精道炎症和精子细胞毒性磷脂积累一致,而转铁蛋白则与精子功能中铁的可用性呈正相关。这些结果表明,最佳的光谱方法依赖于生物终点,拉曼的结构灵敏度有利于运动评估,FTIR的成分谱更好地捕捉形态变化。基于生物标志物的分类器更容易解释,并通过桥接化学计量分析和生物解释来补充全谱模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Analytical Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
12.20%
发文量
1949
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Analytical Chemistry, a peer-reviewed research journal, focuses on disseminating new and original knowledge across all branches of analytical chemistry. Fundamental articles may explore general principles of chemical measurement science and need not directly address existing or potential analytical methodology. They can be entirely theoretical or report experimental results. Contributions may cover various phases of analytical operations, including sampling, bioanalysis, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, microscale and nanoscale systems, environmental analysis, separations, spectroscopy, chemical reactions and selectivity, instrumentation, imaging, surface analysis, and data processing. Papers discussing known analytical methods should present a significant, original application of the method, a notable improvement, or results on an important analyte.
期刊最新文献
Issue Publication Information Issue Editorial Masthead Task-Dependent Synergy between FTIR and Raman Spectroscopy for Sperm Quality Prediction Monitoring of Doxorubicin-Mediated Mitochondria–Lysosome Crosstalk by In Situ Raman Spectroscopy: The Molecular Mechanism during Apoptosis and Implications for Cardiotoxicity Gas Sensing Based on Heterodyne Mach–Zehnder Interferometric Phase-Dispersion Spectroscopy
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1