Telepharmacological Consultation for Polypharmacy Management in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study of General Practitioners' Experiences With Cross-Sectoral Coordination

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology Pub Date : 2026-10-15 DOI:10.1111/bcpt.70325
Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen
{"title":"Telepharmacological Consultation for Polypharmacy Management in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study of General Practitioners' Experiences With Cross-Sectoral Coordination","authors":"Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen","doi":"10.1111/bcpt.70325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The telepharmacological outpatient clinic (TPOC) is a hospital service in which clinical pharmacologists and clinical pharmacists review a patient's full medication regimen and hospital record, then discuss it with the referring general practitioner (GP) by video conference. Seven GPs in the Region of Southern Denmark who had used or been introduced to the service were interviewed to explore how it was used and what prevented wider use. Interviews were semi-structured and analysed thematically. GPs described practices organised around single diagnoses, with no separate pathway for patients who are difficult because they are complex. This was the setting the service entered. Four themes were identified. Whether the service was used depended on integration into existing clinical software. Its value reached past the referred patient, as GPs applied what they had learned to patients never referred. GPs described a coordination gap for patients attending several outpatient clinics, where no clinician held an overview of the whole treatment. They wanted the intensity of the service matched to the complexity of the case. GPs who wanted to refer more often pointed to awareness and time pressure, not to doubts about the service. Uptake appears to depend on workflow integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":8733,"journal":{"name":"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":"139 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcpt.70325","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcpt.70325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The telepharmacological outpatient clinic (TPOC) is a hospital service in which clinical pharmacologists and clinical pharmacists review a patient's full medication regimen and hospital record, then discuss it with the referring general practitioner (GP) by video conference. Seven GPs in the Region of Southern Denmark who had used or been introduced to the service were interviewed to explore how it was used and what prevented wider use. Interviews were semi-structured and analysed thematically. GPs described practices organised around single diagnoses, with no separate pathway for patients who are difficult because they are complex. This was the setting the service entered. Four themes were identified. Whether the service was used depended on integration into existing clinical software. Its value reached past the referred patient, as GPs applied what they had learned to patients never referred. GPs described a coordination gap for patients attending several outpatient clinics, where no clinician held an overview of the whole treatment. They wanted the intensity of the service matched to the complexity of the case. GPs who wanted to refer more often pointed to awareness and time pressure, not to doubts about the service. Uptake appears to depend on workflow integration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健综合药房管理远程药理学咨询:全科医生跨部门协调经验的定性研究。
远程药理学门诊(TPOC)是一种医院服务,临床药理学家和临床药剂师审查患者的完整用药方案和住院记录,然后通过视频会议与转诊的全科医生(GP)讨论。我们采访了南丹麦地区的7名全科医生,他们曾经使用过或被介绍到这项服务,以探讨这项服务是如何使用的,以及是什么阻碍了这项服务的广泛使用。访谈是半结构化的,并按主题进行分析。全科医生描述了围绕单一诊断组织的实践,对于那些因为复杂而难以治疗的患者,没有单独的途径。这是服务输入的设置。确定了四个主题。是否使用该服务取决于与现有临床软件的集成。它的价值超越了转诊患者,因为全科医生将他们所学到的应用于从未转诊的患者。全科医生描述了参加几个门诊诊所的患者的协调差距,其中没有临床医生对整个治疗进行概述。他们希望服务的强度与案件的复杂性相匹配。那些想要转诊的全科医生通常都是出于意识和时间压力,而不是对服务的怀疑。摄取似乎依赖于工作流集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
126
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Basic & Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology is an independent journal, publishing original scientific research in all fields of toxicology, basic and clinical pharmacology. This includes experimental animal pharmacology and toxicology and molecular (-genetic), biochemical and cellular pharmacology and toxicology. It also includes all aspects of clinical pharmacology: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, therapeutic drug monitoring, drug/drug interactions, pharmacogenetics/-genomics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacoeconomics, randomized controlled clinical trials and rational pharmacotherapy. For all compounds used in the studies, the chemical constitution and composition should be known, also for natural compounds.
期刊最新文献
Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers and the Risk of Alzheimer's Disease Progression: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Telepharmacological Consultation for Polypharmacy Management in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study of General Practitioners' Experiences With Cross-Sectoral Coordination Evidence on Glutathione and Boosters for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Serum Concentration Relationships of Candesartan in Migraine Prevention Mechanisms of XCR1 Membrane Trafficking and Constitutive Endocytosis
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1