Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction with and without concurrent skin excision: a single-surgeon retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Hernia Pub Date : 2026-10-16 DOI:10.1007/s10029-026-03865-7
A Iqbal, M Baltatzis, R Shaban, A Tyurkylmaz, S Jamdar, A J Sheen
{"title":"Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction with and without concurrent skin excision: a single-surgeon retrospective cohort study.","authors":"A Iqbal, M Baltatzis, R Shaban, A Tyurkylmaz, S Jamdar, A J Sheen","doi":"10.1007/s10029-026-03865-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of incisional hernia repairs performed by a single surgeon, with and without concurrent skin excisions. Given the increasing prevalence of incisional hernias and the growing need for comprehensive abdominal wall reconstruction, this study aimed to determine whether the addition of skin excision significantly affects postoperative outcomes, including length of hospital stay (LOS), complication rates, and wound infection incidence. Furthermore, the study explored the influence of patient-related factors such as body mass index (BMI) and hernia size on surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 94 patients who underwent incisional hernia repairs between 2019 and 2023. These patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent hernia repair without skin excision (n = 52, 55%) and those who had skin excision as part of the procedure (n = 42, 45%). Key outcome measures included LOS, postoperative complications, and wound infection rates. Additionally, patients were stratified based on BMI (≥ 30 vs. <30) to assess its impact on surgical outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's chi-square and one-way ANOVA tests, with significance defined as p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of patients in the study cohort was 57 years (range: 24-88 years). Patients who did not undergo skin excision had a significantly shorter LOS compared to those who underwent concurrent skin excision (mean: 2.8 days vs. 6.8 days, p = 0.023). Despite the extended hospitalisation in the skin excision group, overall complication rates were comparable between the two cohorts (34% vs. 31%, p = 0.436). There was no statistically significant difference in wound infection rates between the no-skin-excision and skin-excision groups (23% vs. 16%, p = 0.441). BMI was found to be a significant factor influencing postoperative outcomes. Patients with a BMI of ≥ 30 (n = 10) exhibited a markedly higher incidence of postoperative complications and wound infections (p < 0.001), though BMI did not appear to affect LOS (p = 0.962). Additionally, the size of the hernia was an important determinant of surgical outcomes. Larger hernias (≥ 6 cm) were associated with a longer LOS compared to smaller hernias (mean: 6.4 days vs. 2.8 days, p = 0.051). While there was a trend towards a higher complication rate in larger hernia repairs, the difference did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients undergoing concurrent skin excision experienced a longer hospital stay, whereas postoperative complication and wound infection rates were comparable between groups on univariable analysis. However, without multivariable adjustment, these findings should be interpreted as associations rather than evidence of an independent effect of skin excision. Patients with BMI ≥ 30 had higher complication rates, although the small subgroup size limits definitive conclusions. Larger prospective studies are required to clarify these associations and inform clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-026-03865-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of incisional hernia repairs performed by a single surgeon, with and without concurrent skin excisions. Given the increasing prevalence of incisional hernias and the growing need for comprehensive abdominal wall reconstruction, this study aimed to determine whether the addition of skin excision significantly affects postoperative outcomes, including length of hospital stay (LOS), complication rates, and wound infection incidence. Furthermore, the study explored the influence of patient-related factors such as body mass index (BMI) and hernia size on surgical outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 94 patients who underwent incisional hernia repairs between 2019 and 2023. These patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent hernia repair without skin excision (n = 52, 55%) and those who had skin excision as part of the procedure (n = 42, 45%). Key outcome measures included LOS, postoperative complications, and wound infection rates. Additionally, patients were stratified based on BMI (≥ 30 vs. <30) to assess its impact on surgical outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's chi-square and one-way ANOVA tests, with significance defined as p < 0.05.

Results: The median age of patients in the study cohort was 57 years (range: 24-88 years). Patients who did not undergo skin excision had a significantly shorter LOS compared to those who underwent concurrent skin excision (mean: 2.8 days vs. 6.8 days, p = 0.023). Despite the extended hospitalisation in the skin excision group, overall complication rates were comparable between the two cohorts (34% vs. 31%, p = 0.436). There was no statistically significant difference in wound infection rates between the no-skin-excision and skin-excision groups (23% vs. 16%, p = 0.441). BMI was found to be a significant factor influencing postoperative outcomes. Patients with a BMI of ≥ 30 (n = 10) exhibited a markedly higher incidence of postoperative complications and wound infections (p < 0.001), though BMI did not appear to affect LOS (p = 0.962). Additionally, the size of the hernia was an important determinant of surgical outcomes. Larger hernias (≥ 6 cm) were associated with a longer LOS compared to smaller hernias (mean: 6.4 days vs. 2.8 days, p = 0.051). While there was a trend towards a higher complication rate in larger hernia repairs, the difference did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion: Patients undergoing concurrent skin excision experienced a longer hospital stay, whereas postoperative complication and wound infection rates were comparable between groups on univariable analysis. However, without multivariable adjustment, these findings should be interpreted as associations rather than evidence of an independent effect of skin excision. Patients with BMI ≥ 30 had higher complication rates, although the small subgroup size limits definitive conclusions. Larger prospective studies are required to clarify these associations and inform clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹壁重建合并和不合并皮肤切除的结果:一项单外科医生回顾性队列研究。
目的:本研究的主要目的是评估和比较由单个外科医生进行切口疝修补的临床结果,有和没有同时进行皮肤切除。鉴于切口疝的患病率日益增加,以及对全面腹壁重建的需求日益增长,本研究旨在确定皮肤切除是否会显著影响术后预后,包括住院时间(LOS)、并发症发生率和伤口感染发生率。此外,本研究还探讨了体重指数(BMI)、疝大小等患者相关因素对手术结果的影响。方法:对2019 ~ 2023年行切口疝修补术的94例患者进行回顾性分析。这些患者被分为两组:不切除皮肤的疝修补组(n = 52,55%)和同时切除皮肤的疝修补组(n = 42,45%)。主要结局指标包括LOS、术后并发症和伤口感染率。此外,根据BMI对患者进行分层(≥30 vs.结果:研究队列中患者的中位年龄为57岁(范围:24-88岁)。与同时进行皮肤切除术的患者相比,未进行皮肤切除术的患者LOS明显缩短(平均:2.8天对6.8天,p = 0.023)。尽管皮肤切除组住院时间较长,但两个队列的总并发症发生率相当(34%对31%,p = 0.436)。无皮切除组与皮切除组的伤口感染率差异无统计学意义(23%比16%,p = 0.441)。BMI是影响术后预后的重要因素。BMI≥30 (n = 10)的患者术后并发症和伤口感染的发生率明显较高(p结论:同时行皮肤切除术的患者住院时间较长,而单变量分析各组之间的术后并发症和伤口感染率具有可比性。然而,如果没有多变量调整,这些发现应该被解释为关联,而不是皮肤切除独立影响的证据。BMI≥30的患者并发症发生率较高,尽管亚组规模小限制了明确的结论。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来澄清这些关联并为临床实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hernia
Hernia SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery. Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction with and without concurrent skin excision: a single-surgeon retrospective cohort study. Who's paying? Payor status significantly affects hospital readmission rates after ventral hernia repair. Energy profile of laparoscopic TEP bilateral inguinal hernia repairs. Feasibility of automated registration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for inguinal hernia surgery : a single-centre pilot study. Macroscopic, radiologic, and microscopic analysis of explanted abdominal wall prosthesis.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1