Quantitative Indicators for Assessing the Sustainability Impacts of Frugal Innovations

IF 2.3 Q3 BUSINESS BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW Pub Date : 2026-10-27 DOI:10.1111/basr.70076
Martin Albert, Stefan Schmitz, Felix Geißler, Zhenjun Ding, David Kessler
{"title":"Quantitative Indicators for Assessing the Sustainability Impacts of Frugal Innovations","authors":"Martin Albert,&nbsp;Stefan Schmitz,&nbsp;Felix Geißler,&nbsp;Zhenjun Ding,&nbsp;David Kessler","doi":"10.1111/basr.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Frugal and social innovations are considered more likely to support sustainability than conventional innovations. However, indicators for assessing their sustainability impacts remain scarce. Although the need for such indicators, especially for frugal innovation, has been emphasized repeatedly, only a few studies address this issue, and even fewer propose quantitative measures. As a result, systematic assessment and comparison of sustainability impacts remain limited. This paper addresses this gap by analyzing existing qualitative indicators and developing corresponding quantitative ones. A systematic literature review combined with qualitative content analysis was conducted to update a previous review that identified 47 qualitative indicators. This update added 11 additional indicators, resulting in 58 qualitative indicators. These were translated into 54 quantitative indicators supported by 82 measurement instruments. The resulting framework enables more robust and comparable assessments of frugal innovation's contributions to sustainability. Furthermore, many indicators, especially those addressing social and interconnected aspects, are also applicable to social innovation. This study contributes to the literature by offering a comprehensive and operational set of indicators that can support both academic evaluation and practical implementation in assessing the social, economic, and ecological value of frugal and social innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46747,"journal":{"name":"BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW","volume":"131 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/basr.70076","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/basr.70076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Frugal and social innovations are considered more likely to support sustainability than conventional innovations. However, indicators for assessing their sustainability impacts remain scarce. Although the need for such indicators, especially for frugal innovation, has been emphasized repeatedly, only a few studies address this issue, and even fewer propose quantitative measures. As a result, systematic assessment and comparison of sustainability impacts remain limited. This paper addresses this gap by analyzing existing qualitative indicators and developing corresponding quantitative ones. A systematic literature review combined with qualitative content analysis was conducted to update a previous review that identified 47 qualitative indicators. This update added 11 additional indicators, resulting in 58 qualitative indicators. These were translated into 54 quantitative indicators supported by 82 measurement instruments. The resulting framework enables more robust and comparable assessments of frugal innovation's contributions to sustainability. Furthermore, many indicators, especially those addressing social and interconnected aspects, are also applicable to social innovation. This study contributes to the literature by offering a comprehensive and operational set of indicators that can support both academic evaluation and practical implementation in assessing the social, economic, and ecological value of frugal and social innovation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估节约型创新可持续性影响的定量指标
节俭和社会创新被认为比传统创新更有可能支持可持续发展。然而,评估其可持续性影响的指标仍然很少。尽管对这些指标的需求,特别是对节俭型创新的需求,一直被反复强调,但只有少数研究解决了这个问题,提出量化措施的研究就更少了。因此,对可持续性影响的系统评价和比较仍然有限。本文通过分析现有的定性指标和开发相应的定量指标来弥补这一差距。系统的文献综述结合定性内容分析,更新了先前的综述,确定了47个定性指标。此次更新增加了11项新的指标,共有58项定性指标。这些指标被转化为54个定量指标,由82种测量工具支持。由此产生的框架能够对节俭创新对可持续性的贡献进行更有力和可比较的评估。此外,许多指标,特别是那些涉及社会和相互联系方面的指标,也适用于社会创新。本研究提供了一套全面的、可操作的指标,可以支持学术评估和实际实施,以评估节俭和社会创新的社会、经济和生态价值,从而为文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Business and Society Review addresses a wide range of ethical issues concerning the relationships between business, society, and the public good. Its contents are of vital concern to business people, academics, and others involved in the contemporary debate about the proper role of business in society. The journal publishes papers from all those working in this important area, including researchers and business professionals, members of the legal profession, government administrators and many others.
期刊最新文献
Quantitative Indicators for Assessing the Sustainability Impacts of Frugal Innovations CSR Performance During COVID-19 in France: The Moderating Role of CSR Strategy Balancing Profit and Planet: Introducing the CARE Framework for Firms' Ethical Climate Strategy Forgetting, Remembering, and Memorializing: Cultivating Mnemonic Phronesis for AI-Mediated Learning in Business Education Beyond Certification: Vernacular Eco-Branding and Environmental Legitimacy in Post-Mining Indonesia
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1