{"title":"基于预测碰撞截面和不确定性量化的非目标筛选中的候选结构优先级","authors":"Lucas Ferrando Plo, Anneli Kruve","doi":"10.1021/acs.jcim.6c02492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Candidate structure prioritization in <span>n</span>on-<span>t</span>arget <span>s</span>creening\r\n(NTS) can be\r\nperformed using <span>c</span>ollision <span>c</span>ross-<span>s</span>ections (CCSs) predicted by a <span>m</span>achine-<span>l</span>earning (ML) model, with\r\na threshold on the relative difference between measured and <em>in silico</em> CCSs. Such thresholds generally are heuristic\r\nand lack a statistical foundation. In this context, we have constructed\r\na conformal predictive system to quantify the uncertainty of the ML-predicted\r\nCCSs and provide guarantees on the minimum percentage of prioritized\r\ntrue structures among the candidate lists of the NTS features detected\r\nin a sample. The system is designed as a wrapper around the open-source\r\nML model GraphCCS and can, in principle, be combined with any CCS\r\nmodel. Additionally, we propose the detection of the applicability\r\ndomain of the conformal predictive system based on <span>m</span>aximum <span>c</span>ommon-<span>e</span>dge <span>s</span>ubgraph (MCES) molecular distances. We showcase the\r\napplication of our tool to two independent <em>in silico</em> NTS datasets. Results on the two tested external datasets suggest\r\nthat applicability domain detection based on the MCES distance allows\r\nto maintain the guarantees on the minimum percentage of true structures\r\nprioritized. In terms of candidate structure prioritization performance,\r\non average ∼16% of incorrect candidates could be deprioritized\r\nwhile retaining 90% of all true structures. Although this constitutes\r\na modest 8% improvement over random prioritization, our tool additionally\r\noffers adaptivity of removal efficiency to the difficulty of the NTS\r\ncandidates based on quantified uncertainty. Furthermore, the framework\r\ncan potentially be combined with other analytical properties to improve\r\ncandidate structure prioritization in NTS.</p>","PeriodicalId":44,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling ","volume":"66 19","pages":"12534–12548"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Candidate Structure Prioritization in Non-Target Screening with Predicted Collision Cross-Sections and Uncertainty Quantification\",\"authors\":\"Lucas Ferrando Plo, Anneli Kruve\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jcim.6c02492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Candidate structure prioritization in <span>n</span>on-<span>t</span>arget <span>s</span>creening\\r\\n(NTS) can be\\r\\nperformed using <span>c</span>ollision <span>c</span>ross-<span>s</span>ections (CCSs) predicted by a <span>m</span>achine-<span>l</span>earning (ML) model, with\\r\\na threshold on the relative difference between measured and <em>in silico</em> CCSs. Such thresholds generally are heuristic\\r\\nand lack a statistical foundation. In this context, we have constructed\\r\\na conformal predictive system to quantify the uncertainty of the ML-predicted\\r\\nCCSs and provide guarantees on the minimum percentage of prioritized\\r\\ntrue structures among the candidate lists of the NTS features detected\\r\\nin a sample. The system is designed as a wrapper around the open-source\\r\\nML model GraphCCS and can, in principle, be combined with any CCS\\r\\nmodel. Additionally, we propose the detection of the applicability\\r\\ndomain of the conformal predictive system based on <span>m</span>aximum <span>c</span>ommon-<span>e</span>dge <span>s</span>ubgraph (MCES) molecular distances. We showcase the\\r\\napplication of our tool to two independent <em>in silico</em> NTS datasets. Results on the two tested external datasets suggest\\r\\nthat applicability domain detection based on the MCES distance allows\\r\\nto maintain the guarantees on the minimum percentage of true structures\\r\\nprioritized. In terms of candidate structure prioritization performance,\\r\\non average ∼16% of incorrect candidates could be deprioritized\\r\\nwhile retaining 90% of all true structures. Although this constitutes\\r\\na modest 8% improvement over random prioritization, our tool additionally\\r\\noffers adaptivity of removal efficiency to the difficulty of the NTS\\r\\ncandidates based on quantified uncertainty. Furthermore, the framework\\r\\ncan potentially be combined with other analytical properties to improve\\r\\ncandidate structure prioritization in NTS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling \",\"volume\":\"66 19\",\"pages\":\"12534–12548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling \",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.6c02492\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/9/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling ","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.6c02492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Candidate Structure Prioritization in Non-Target Screening with Predicted Collision Cross-Sections and Uncertainty Quantification
Candidate structure prioritization in non-target screening
(NTS) can be
performed using collision cross-sections (CCSs) predicted by a machine-learning (ML) model, with
a threshold on the relative difference between measured and in silico CCSs. Such thresholds generally are heuristic
and lack a statistical foundation. In this context, we have constructed
a conformal predictive system to quantify the uncertainty of the ML-predicted
CCSs and provide guarantees on the minimum percentage of prioritized
true structures among the candidate lists of the NTS features detected
in a sample. The system is designed as a wrapper around the open-source
ML model GraphCCS and can, in principle, be combined with any CCS
model. Additionally, we propose the detection of the applicability
domain of the conformal predictive system based on maximum common-edge subgraph (MCES) molecular distances. We showcase the
application of our tool to two independent in silico NTS datasets. Results on the two tested external datasets suggest
that applicability domain detection based on the MCES distance allows
to maintain the guarantees on the minimum percentage of true structures
prioritized. In terms of candidate structure prioritization performance,
on average ∼16% of incorrect candidates could be deprioritized
while retaining 90% of all true structures. Although this constitutes
a modest 8% improvement over random prioritization, our tool additionally
offers adaptivity of removal efficiency to the difficulty of the NTS
candidates based on quantified uncertainty. Furthermore, the framework
can potentially be combined with other analytical properties to improve
candidate structure prioritization in NTS.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling publishes papers reporting new methodology and/or important applications in the fields of chemical informatics and molecular modeling. Specific topics include the representation and computer-based searching of chemical databases, molecular modeling, computer-aided molecular design of new materials, catalysts, or ligands, development of new computational methods or efficient algorithms for chemical software, and biopharmaceutical chemistry including analyses of biological activity and other issues related to drug discovery.
Astute chemists, computer scientists, and information specialists look to this monthly’s insightful research studies, programming innovations, and software reviews to keep current with advances in this integral, multidisciplinary field.
As a subscriber you’ll stay abreast of database search systems, use of graph theory in chemical problems, substructure search systems, pattern recognition and clustering, analysis of chemical and physical data, molecular modeling, graphics and natural language interfaces, bibliometric and citation analysis, and synthesis design and reactions databases.