Social Class Differences in Parenting? Revisiting Classed Childrearing through a Video-Ethnography of Mealtime

IF 2.8 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Science Pub Date : 2026-08-25 DOI:10.15195/v13.a40
Joanne W. Golann, Karen Phelan Kozlowski, Kara Mitchell Brennan
{"title":"Social Class Differences in Parenting? Revisiting Classed Childrearing through a Video-Ethnography of Mealtime","authors":"Joanne W. Golann, Karen Phelan Kozlowski, Kara Mitchell Brennan","doi":"10.15195/v13.a40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sociological research has long established social class differences in childrearing strategies. However, recent studies suggest more heterogeneity by social class in parenting practices than previously recognized. In this article, we revisit families’ classed socialization processes by drawing from the New Jersey Families Study, a two-week, in-home video study of 21 families with young children, to examine how working-class and middle-class families interact with their children during mealtimes. Contrary to expectations, we found that social class did not neatly correspond to parenting styles, with half of families blending middle-class and working-class styles. This is one of the first sociological studies to closely observe the socialization of young children across different social classes. It is also one of few studies in sociology to use video-ethnographic data. Finally, this study challenges long-standing assumptions about class-based socialization, suggesting that in contemporary families, social class boundaries are much blurrier than previously believed when it comes to childrearing.","PeriodicalId":22029,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Science","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15195/v13.a40","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sociological research has long established social class differences in childrearing strategies. However, recent studies suggest more heterogeneity by social class in parenting practices than previously recognized. In this article, we revisit families’ classed socialization processes by drawing from the New Jersey Families Study, a two-week, in-home video study of 21 families with young children, to examine how working-class and middle-class families interact with their children during mealtimes. Contrary to expectations, we found that social class did not neatly correspond to parenting styles, with half of families blending middle-class and working-class styles. This is one of the first sociological studies to closely observe the socialization of young children across different social classes. It is also one of few studies in sociology to use video-ethnographic data. Finally, this study challenges long-standing assumptions about class-based socialization, suggesting that in contemporary families, social class boundaries are much blurrier than previously believed when it comes to childrearing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
养育子女的社会阶层差异?通过用餐时间的视频人种学重新审视班级儿童教育
社会学研究早就证实了社会阶层在育儿策略上的差异。然而,最近的研究表明,社会阶层在养育子女方面的差异比以前认识到的要大。在这篇文章中,我们从新泽西家庭研究中重新审视了家庭的分类社会化过程,这是一个为期两周的家庭视频研究,对21个有小孩的家庭进行了研究,以检查工人阶级和中产阶级家庭如何在用餐时间与他们的孩子互动。与预期相反的是,我们发现社会阶层与养育方式并不完全对应,有一半的家庭混合了中产阶级和工人阶级的方式。这是第一个密切观察不同社会阶层幼儿社会化的社会学研究之一。这也是少数几个使用视频人种学数据的社会学研究之一。最后,这项研究挑战了长期以来关于阶级社会化的假设,表明在当代家庭中,在养育孩子方面,社会阶级界限比以前认为的要模糊得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociological Science
Sociological Science Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
13
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Sociological Science is an open-access, online, peer-reviewed, international journal for social scientists committed to advancing a general understanding of social processes. Sociological Science welcomes original research and commentary from all subfields of sociology, and does not privilege any particular theoretical or methodological approach.
期刊最新文献
No Stalled Revolution: The Closing Gender Gap in Early Careers in Europe and the United States Ethnopolitical Exclusion and Resource Conflict Social Class Differences in Parenting? Revisiting Classed Childrearing through a Video-Ethnography of Mealtime Access to Higher Education and Support for Meritocracy: Effort, Skill, and Education as Components of Merit Decoupling Inequality and Stratification in the American Wealth Distribution, 1989–2022
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1