Ethnopolitical Exclusion and Resource Conflict

IF 2.8 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Science Pub Date : 2026-09-14 DOI:10.15195/v13.a42
Wali Reheman
{"title":"Ethnopolitical Exclusion and Resource Conflict","authors":"Wali Reheman","doi":"10.15195/v13.a42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why do natural resources fuel ethnic conflict in some ethnic homelands but not others? This article argues that the answer turns on the boundary between active discrimination and passive powerlessness. Among excluded groups, lootable resources raise conflict risk only where the state actively discriminates, not where groups are merely powerless; among included groups, the same resources predict lower risk. No rival account reproduces this positive/null/negative gradient. The boundary governs whether these groups fight, not what they fight over: petroleum pushes discriminated and powerless groups alike toward territorial conflict, wherever the oil sits. Two-way fixed-effects estimates on 859 ethnic groups in 150 countries (1960–2020) establish both patterns. The conflict-generating mechanism thus lies between a group and its state, so country-level resource-curse measures, averaged across the nation, can miss the within-country boundary that actually divides conflict from peace.","PeriodicalId":22029,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Science","volume":"16 1","pages":"1107-1131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15195/v13.a42","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Why do natural resources fuel ethnic conflict in some ethnic homelands but not others? This article argues that the answer turns on the boundary between active discrimination and passive powerlessness. Among excluded groups, lootable resources raise conflict risk only where the state actively discriminates, not where groups are merely powerless; among included groups, the same resources predict lower risk. No rival account reproduces this positive/null/negative gradient. The boundary governs whether these groups fight, not what they fight over: petroleum pushes discriminated and powerless groups alike toward territorial conflict, wherever the oil sits. Two-way fixed-effects estimates on 859 ethnic groups in 150 countries (1960–2020) establish both patterns. The conflict-generating mechanism thus lies between a group and its state, so country-level resource-curse measures, averaged across the nation, can miss the within-country boundary that actually divides conflict from peace.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民族政治排斥与资源冲突
为什么自然资源会在一些少数民族聚居地引发民族冲突,而在另一些则不然?本文认为,答案在于主动歧视和被动无力之间的界限。在被排斥的群体中,可掠夺的资源只在国家积极歧视的情况下才会增加冲突风险,而不是在群体仅仅无能为力的情况下;在被纳入的人群中,同样的资源预示着更低的风险。没有竞争对手账户重现这种正/null/负梯度。边界决定了这些群体是否会发生冲突,而不是他们为什么而战:无论石油在哪里,石油都将受到歧视和无能为力的群体推向领土冲突。对150个国家859个民族(1960-2020)的双向固定效应估计证实了这两种模式。因此,产生冲突的机制存在于一个群体和它的国家之间,因此,在全国范围内平均计算的国家层面的资源诅咒措施可能会错过实际区分冲突与和平的国内边界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociological Science
Sociological Science Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
13
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Sociological Science is an open-access, online, peer-reviewed, international journal for social scientists committed to advancing a general understanding of social processes. Sociological Science welcomes original research and commentary from all subfields of sociology, and does not privilege any particular theoretical or methodological approach.
期刊最新文献
No Stalled Revolution: The Closing Gender Gap in Early Careers in Europe and the United States Ethnopolitical Exclusion and Resource Conflict Social Class Differences in Parenting? Revisiting Classed Childrearing through a Video-Ethnography of Mealtime Access to Higher Education and Support for Meritocracy: Effort, Skill, and Education as Components of Merit Decoupling Inequality and Stratification in the American Wealth Distribution, 1989–2022
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1