Miguel Martínez-Ramos, Iván A. Ortíz-Rodríguez, Mariana Soto-Rueda, Ellen Andresen, Martha Bonilla-Moheno, Karina Boege, Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez, Quetzalcóalt Orozco-Ramírez, Ek del Val, Daniel Auliz-Ortíz, Susana Alejandre-Ortíz, Gladys I. Manzanero-Medina, Marco A. Vásquez-Dávila, Lúcia G. Lohmann
Annual meetings of the Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation (ATBC) provide a window into emerging research priorities, conceptual shifts, and methodological advances in tropical biology and conservation. Here, we synthesize lessons and outcomes from the 61st ATBC Annual Meeting (ATBC 2025) held in Oaxaca, México, and situate them within the broader trajectory of ATBC conferences to identify continuities, emerging directions, and gaps. ATBC 2025 convened 1161 participants from 63 countries, providing a timely platform to examine how research in tropical biology and conservation is responding to accelerating socioecological change. Analyses of symposia, oral and poster presentations, and plenary sessions revealed three overarching messages. First, compound disturbances—such as interactions between land-use change and climate extremes—are increasingly reshaping tropical ecosystems and require integrative research and management approaches. Second, effective conservation and restoration depend on equity-centered frameworks that meaningfully engage Indigenous Peoples and local communities through collaborative governance and coproduced knowledge. Third, rapid methodological innovation—from microbiome studies to artificial intelligence and remote sensing—continues to expand analytical capacity, although its transformative potential depends upon socially grounded and place-based contexts. The meeting also highlighted science–action linkages, exemplified by the “Declaration on the Social–Ecological Impacts of Agave Monocultures for Mezcal Production” and ATBC's carbon offset initiative developed with CORENCHI, a community-led civil association conserving tropical cloud forests in Oaxaca. Although challenges remain, ATBC 2025 illustrated the evolving role of ATBC conferences as platforms for integrative, action-oriented science to advance conservation and sustainability in the tropics.
{"title":"Integrating Diverse Approaches, Actors, and Local Knowledge: Lessons From the 61st ATBC Meeting","authors":"Miguel Martínez-Ramos, Iván A. Ortíz-Rodríguez, Mariana Soto-Rueda, Ellen Andresen, Martha Bonilla-Moheno, Karina Boege, Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez, Quetzalcóalt Orozco-Ramírez, Ek del Val, Daniel Auliz-Ortíz, Susana Alejandre-Ortíz, Gladys I. Manzanero-Medina, Marco A. Vásquez-Dávila, Lúcia G. Lohmann","doi":"10.1111/btp.70288","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.70288","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Annual meetings of the Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation (ATBC) provide a window into emerging research priorities, conceptual shifts, and methodological advances in tropical biology and conservation. Here, we synthesize lessons and outcomes from the 61st ATBC Annual Meeting (ATBC 2025) held in Oaxaca, México, and situate them within the broader trajectory of ATBC conferences to identify continuities, emerging directions, and gaps. ATBC 2025 convened 1161 participants from 63 countries, providing a timely platform to examine how research in tropical biology and conservation is responding to accelerating socioecological change. Analyses of symposia, oral and poster presentations, and plenary sessions revealed three overarching messages. First, compound disturbances—such as interactions between land-use change and climate extremes—are increasingly reshaping tropical ecosystems and require integrative research and management approaches. Second, effective conservation and restoration depend on equity-centered frameworks that meaningfully engage Indigenous Peoples and local communities through collaborative governance and coproduced knowledge. Third, rapid methodological innovation—from microbiome studies to artificial intelligence and remote sensing—continues to expand analytical capacity, although its transformative potential depends upon socially grounded and place-based contexts. The meeting also highlighted science–action linkages, exemplified by the “Declaration on the Social–Ecological Impacts of Agave Monocultures for Mezcal Production” and ATBC's carbon offset initiative developed with CORENCHI, a community-led civil association conserving tropical cloud forests in Oaxaca. Although challenges remain, ATBC 2025 illustrated the evolving role of ATBC conferences as platforms for integrative, action-oriented science to advance conservation and sustainability in the tropics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8982,"journal":{"name":"Biotropica","volume":"58 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/btp.70288","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149258451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Francisco Maldonado Vargas, Mónica Moraes R, Sissi Lozada-Gobilard
Urban environments can generate substantial spatial and temporal variation in pollinator assemblages, floral traits, and resource availability, yet how plant reproduction is maintained under such heterogeneous conditions remains poorly understood, particularly in tropical cities. In Nicotiana glauca (Solanaceae), floral traits and pollinator assemblages vary among natural populations, but information from urban environments is lacking. We investigated pollination dynamics and reproductive success of N. glauca across a heterogeneous urban landscape in the high tropical Andes by integrating flower visitation, floral trait variation, functional morphology, and reproductive output. Flower visitation varied strongly among visitor groups, times of day, and urban regions. Hummingbirds were the only legitimate pollinators, whereas bees acted exclusively as nectar robbers. We report Colibri coruscans and Elliotomyia chionogaster as pollinators of N. glauca for the first time. Despite pronounced spatial and temporal variation in floral traits and visitor assemblages, including complete spatial turnover between hummingbird species, fruit set remained consistently high (> 90%) across all urban regions. No fruits were produced in pollinator-excluded flowers, suggesting dependence on animal-mediated pollination. Although flower tube length generally exceeded hummingbird bill length, both species appeared functionally compatible with the flowers and carried pollen on their beaks during visitation. Our results show that N. glauca maintains high reproductive success across heterogeneous urban environments, through hummingbird-mediated pollination, highlighting the resilience of some plant–pollinator interactions in rapidly urbanizing tropical landscapes.
{"title":"Flower Visitation, Floral Traits, and Reproduction of Nicotiana glauca (Solanaceae) in an Urban Landscape","authors":"Francisco Maldonado Vargas, Mónica Moraes R, Sissi Lozada-Gobilard","doi":"10.1111/btp.70290","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.70290","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Urban environments can generate substantial spatial and temporal variation in pollinator assemblages, floral traits, and resource availability, yet how plant reproduction is maintained under such heterogeneous conditions remains poorly understood, particularly in tropical cities. In <i>Nicotiana glauca</i> (Solanaceae), floral traits and pollinator assemblages vary among natural populations, but information from urban environments is lacking. We investigated pollination dynamics and reproductive success of <i>N. glauca</i> across a heterogeneous urban landscape in the high tropical Andes by integrating flower visitation, floral trait variation, functional morphology, and reproductive output. Flower visitation varied strongly among visitor groups, times of day, and urban regions. Hummingbirds were the only legitimate pollinators, whereas bees acted exclusively as nectar robbers. We report <i>Colibri coruscans</i> and <i>Elliotomyia chionogaster</i> as pollinators of <i>N. glauca</i> for the first time. Despite pronounced spatial and temporal variation in floral traits and visitor assemblages, including complete spatial turnover between hummingbird species, fruit set remained consistently high (> 90%) across all urban regions. No fruits were produced in pollinator-excluded flowers, suggesting dependence on animal-mediated pollination. Although flower tube length generally exceeded hummingbird bill length, both species appeared functionally compatible with the flowers and carried pollen on their beaks during visitation. Our results show that <i>N. glauca</i> maintains high reproductive success across heterogeneous urban environments, through hummingbird-mediated pollination, highlighting the resilience of some plant–pollinator interactions in rapidly urbanizing tropical landscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8982,"journal":{"name":"Biotropica","volume":"58 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/btp.70290","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149258514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}