首页 > 最新文献
paperpass

Expert Opinion on Drug Safety最新文献

英文 中文
Long-term safety of treatment of hemophilia A: a comprehensive review. 血友病A治疗的长期安全性:一项综合综述。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-10-03 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2026.2742174
Johnny Mahlangu

Introduction: Hemophilia A is an inherited bleeding disorder caused by factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency, resulting in recurrent bleeding and progressive joint damage. Treatment has expanded beyond FVIII replacement to extended-half-life products, non-factor therapies, rebalancing agents, and gene therapy. These advances improve outcomes but introduce distinct long-term safety considerations.

Areas covered: This review evaluates long-term safety evidence from pivotal trials, extension studies, real-world registries, and recent international congress reports. It examines standard- and extended-half-life FVIII concentrates, efanesoctocog alfa, emicizumab, emerging rebalancing agents targeting natural anticoagulant pathways, and adeno-associated virus vector-based gene therapies.

Expert opinion: Established hemophilia A treatments generally have favorable long-term safety profiles and reduce treatment burden; however, mature safety data remain limited for newer agents. Inhibitor development remains the principal complication of FVIII replacement. Non-factor and rebalancing therapies carry potential thrombotic risks requiring appropriate monitoring. Gene therapy may provide durable FVIII expression after a single administration but raises concerns regarding hepatotoxicity, durability of expression, and uncertain long-term effects. Continued pharmacovigilance and individualized treatment selection are therefore essential as therapeutic options expand.

A型血友病是一种由因子VIII (FVIII)缺乏引起的遗传性出血性疾病,以反复出血和进行性关节损伤为特征。在过去的二十年中,治疗策略已经从FVIII替代疗法扩展到包括延长半衰期产品、非因素疗法、再平衡剂和基因疗法。这些进步改善了临床结果,但也引入了需要仔细评估的长期安全性考虑。覆盖区域:本综述总结了目前a型血友病治疗领域的长期安全性数据,评估了来自关键临床试验、扩展研究、现实世界登记和最近国际大会报告的证据,以评估标准半衰期和延长半衰期FVIII浓缩物、efanesococcog alfa、非因子疗法(如emicizumab)、新兴的靶向天然抗凝途径的再平衡药物的安全性。以及基于腺相关病毒载体的基因疗法。专家意见:A型血友病治疗在现有的治疗方法中显示出良好的长期安全性,并显著减轻了治疗负担,尽管最近引入的药物的成熟的长期安全性数据仍然有限。抑制剂的发展仍然是FVIII替代疗法的主要并发症,而非因子和再平衡疗法具有潜在的血栓形成风险,需要仔细监测。基因治疗在单次给药后提供了持久的FVIII表达,但引起了对肝毒性、表达持久性和长期安全性的担忧。随着治疗选择的不断扩大,持续的药物警戒和个体化治疗选择仍然是必不可少的。
{"title":"Long-term safety of treatment of hemophilia A: a comprehensive review.","authors":"Johnny Mahlangu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2026.2742174","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2026.2742174","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hemophilia A is an inherited bleeding disorder caused by factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency, resulting in recurrent bleeding and progressive joint damage. Treatment has expanded beyond FVIII replacement to extended-half-life products, non-factor therapies, rebalancing agents, and gene therapy. These advances improve outcomes but introduce distinct long-term safety considerations.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review evaluates long-term safety evidence from pivotal trials, extension studies, real-world registries, and recent international congress reports. It examines standard- and extended-half-life FVIII concentrates, efanesoctocog alfa, emicizumab, emerging rebalancing agents targeting natural anticoagulant pathways, and adeno-associated virus vector-based gene therapies.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Established hemophilia A treatments generally have favorable long-term safety profiles and reduce treatment burden; however, mature safety data remain limited for newer agents. Inhibitor development remains the principal complication of FVIII replacement. Non-factor and rebalancing therapies carry potential thrombotic risks requiring appropriate monitoring. Gene therapy may provide durable FVIII expression after a single administration but raises concerns regarding hepatotoxicity, durability of expression, and uncertain long-term effects. Continued pharmacovigilance and individualized treatment selection are therefore essential as therapeutic options expand.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149074164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-world data analysis of topotecan in combination with Bevacizumab or CycloPhosphamide in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database. FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中拓扑替康联合贝伐单抗或环磷酰胺的真实数据分析。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-02 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2488240
Huihui Chen, Guobiao Zhuang, Shihao Hong, Jing Wu

Background: The main purpose of this study is to observe and detect adverse reactions to the combination of topotecan, bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide, to learn more about possible adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and to help doctors make the right medication decisions and treatment plans.

Research design and methods: Adverse event signals were detected and quantified using data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System using reporting ratios, proportions of reports (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Networks (BCPN), and empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM). Subgroup analyses were performed to compare adverse events associated with topotecan alone.

Results: The analysis of FAERS data revealed a total of 1,789 primary suspected adverse events (PS AEs) linked to topotecan. The Weibull shape parameter (β) for females was lower than for males across all age groups, indicating a potentially higher susceptibility to the adverse effects of topotecan in female patients.

Conclusions: This study proved several expected and new adverse drug reactions associated with the combination of topotecan, bevacizumab, and cyclophosphamide. While some ADRs, such as neutropenia and anemia, align with the known adverse profile of topotecan, the detection of novel signals, including potential gender-based differences in drug response, warrants further investigation.

背景:本研究的主要目的是观察和检测拓扑替康、贝伐单抗和环磷酰胺联合用药的不良反应,了解可能发生的药物不良反应(adr),帮助医生做出正确的用药决策和治疗方案。研究设计和方法:不良事件信号的检测和量化使用来自美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统的数据,使用报告比率、报告比例(PRR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPN)和经验贝叶斯几何平均(EBGM)。进行亚组分析以比较单独使用拓扑替康相关的不良事件。结果:FAERS数据分析显示,共有1,789例主要疑似不良事件(PS ae)与拓扑替康相关。在所有年龄组中,女性的Weibull形状参数(β)低于男性,表明女性患者对拓扑替康不良反应的潜在易感性更高。结论:本研究证实了与拓扑替康、贝伐单抗和环磷酰胺联合使用相关的几种预期和新的药物不良反应。虽然一些不良反应,如中性粒细胞减少症和贫血,与拓扑替康已知的不良反应一致,但新信号的检测,包括药物反应的潜在性别差异,值得进一步研究。
{"title":"Real-world data analysis of topotecan in combination with Bevacizumab or CycloPhosphamide in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.","authors":"Huihui Chen, Guobiao Zhuang, Shihao Hong, Jing Wu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2488240","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2488240","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The main purpose of this study is to observe and detect adverse reactions to the combination of topotecan, bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide, to learn more about possible adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and to help doctors make the right medication decisions and treatment plans.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Adverse event signals were detected and quantified using data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System using reporting ratios, proportions of reports (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Networks (BCPN), and empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM). Subgroup analyses were performed to compare adverse events associated with topotecan alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of FAERS data revealed a total of 1,789 primary suspected adverse events (PS AEs) linked to topotecan. The Weibull shape parameter (β) for females was lower than for males across all age groups, indicating a potentially higher susceptibility to the adverse effects of topotecan in female patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study proved several expected and new adverse drug reactions associated with the combination of topotecan, bevacizumab, and cyclophosphamide. While some ADRs, such as neutropenia and anemia, align with the known adverse profile of topotecan, the detection of novel signals, including potential gender-based differences in drug response, warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1857-1868"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143763307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmacovigilance study and genetic target prediction analysis of FDA adverse event reports (FAERS) for drug-induced sinusitis. 药物性鼻窦炎FDA不良事件报告(FAERS)的药物警戒研究和遗传靶标预测分析。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2484474
Enze Wang, Yingxuan Sun, He Zhao, Zhiwei Cao

Background: Drug-induced sinusitis has been widely reported as an adverse drug reaction in recent years, yet the pharmacogenetic mechanisms and risk factors associated with sinusitis remain elusive.

Objective: We aimed to identify the major drugs reported in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) in relation to sinusitis and to analyze their pharmacogenetic mechanisms through drug target analysis.

Methods: We conducted a review of the publicly available FAERS database from 2004 to the third quarter of 2023. We extracted genetic tools corresponding to each drug, utilized colocalization analysis, Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, and cross-tissue drug target analysis to predict the impact of drug targets on sinusitis.

Results: Following the validation of drug-related risks, a total of 13 medications were ultimately identified, including TNF inhibitors: pomalidomide (ROR: 14.77), certolizumab pegol(ROR: 8.21), etanercept (ROR: 7.961), lenalidomide (ROR: 6.998), adalimumab (ROR: 6.677), infliximab (ROR: 3.939); C4B-targeted drugs: human immunoglobulin G (ROR:3.846) and other risk drugs were commonly reported. Co-localization analysis and MR analysis suggests associations between TNF, C4B, and LTA and sinusitis.

Conclusion: We demonstrated the risk of sinusitis associated with 13 drugs, including pomalidomide, and the impact of TNF and C4B drugs on sinusitis, which provides guidance for the use of related drugs and the prevention of sinusitis.

背景:近年来,药物性鼻窦炎作为一种药物不良反应被广泛报道,但其相关的药理学机制和危险因素尚不清楚。目的:我们旨在识别美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)中报道的与鼻窦炎相关的主要药物,并通过药物靶点分析分析其药效学机制。方法:我们对2004年至2023年第三季度公开的FAERS数据库进行了回顾。我们提取了每种药物对应的遗传工具,利用共定位分析、孟德尔随机化(MR)分析和跨组织药物靶点分析来预测药物靶点对鼻窦炎的影响。结果:在对药物相关风险进行验证后,最终确定了13种药物,包括TNF抑制剂:波马度胺(ROR: 14.77)、赛妥珠单抗佩果(ROR: 8.21)、依那西普(ROR: 7.961)、来那度胺(ROR: 6.998)、阿达木单抗(ROR: 6.677)、英夫利昔单抗(ROR: 3.939);c4b靶向药物:人免疫球蛋白G (ROR:3.846)等高危药物较多报道。共定位分析和MR分析提示TNF、C4B和LTA与鼻窦炎之间存在关联。结论:我们论证了包括泊马度胺在内的13种药物与鼻窦炎相关的风险,以及TNF和C4B药物对鼻窦炎的影响,为相关药物的使用和鼻窦炎的预防提供指导。
{"title":"Pharmacovigilance study and genetic target prediction analysis of FDA adverse event reports (FAERS) for drug-induced sinusitis.","authors":"Enze Wang, Yingxuan Sun, He Zhao, Zhiwei Cao","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2484474","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2484474","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-induced sinusitis has been widely reported as an adverse drug reaction in recent years, yet the pharmacogenetic mechanisms and risk factors associated with sinusitis remain elusive.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to identify the major drugs reported in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) in relation to sinusitis and to analyze their pharmacogenetic mechanisms through drug target analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a review of the publicly available FAERS database from 2004 to the third quarter of 2023. We extracted genetic tools corresponding to each drug, utilized colocalization analysis, Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, and cross-tissue drug target analysis to predict the impact of drug targets on sinusitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the validation of drug-related risks, a total of 13 medications were ultimately identified, including TNF inhibitors: pomalidomide (ROR: 14.77), certolizumab pegol(ROR: 8.21), etanercept (ROR: 7.961), lenalidomide (ROR: 6.998), adalimumab (ROR: 6.677), infliximab (ROR: 3.939); C4B-targeted drugs: human immunoglobulin G (ROR:3.846) and other risk drugs were commonly reported. Co-localization analysis and MR analysis suggests associations between TNF, C4B, and LTA and sinusitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated the risk of sinusitis associated with 13 drugs, including pomalidomide, and the impact of TNF and C4B drugs on sinusitis, which provides guidance for the use of related drugs and the prevention of sinusitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1997-2005"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143699638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Peripheral neuropathies induced by BRAF+MEK inhibitor combinations: a real-world study based on FAERS database 2011-2022. BRAF+MEK抑制剂联合诱导的周围神经病变:基于FAERS数据库2011-2022的现实世界研究
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-09 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2529428
Yuting Wang, Jingping Zheng, Zhenpo Zhang, Haiyan Mai, Ling Su

Background: BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAFi+MEKi) like may cause peripheral neuropathies (PN). This study analyzes FAERS data to assess PN signals across BRAFi+MEKi combinations.

Research design and methods: Disproportionality analysis was conducted to quantify the signals of BRAFi+MEKi-associated PN on FAERS database from January 2011 to December 2022. Additionally, we examined the onset times and prognosis of BRAFi+MEKi-associated PN.

Results: A total of 268 reports of BRAFi+MEKi-associated PN were identified in the study, with a median age range of 60.00 to 69.00 years. All three combination therapies exhibited positive signals for PN, and notably, Encorafenib and Binimetinib (E+B) displayed the strongest association with PN (ROR 3.05[2.47,3.76], IC1.57[1.26]). The associations between PN and different BRAFi+MEKi combinations remained persisted in the gender and age stratification analysis, with all three combination therapies showing an elevated number of disproportionality signals in males compared to females.

Conclusion: According to our findings, BRAFi+MEKi-associated PN tends to occur several months after initiation and may lead to serious outcomes. Male sex is more likely to be a risk factor associated with PN. Prompt identification and intervention for BRAFi+MEKi-associated PN are crucial, and additional fundamental research is required to validate the underlying mechanism as observed in our study.

背景:BRAF/MEK抑制剂(BRAFi+MEKi)样可引起周围神经病变(PN)。本研究通过分析FAERS数据来评估BRAFi+MEKi组合的PN信号。研究设计和方法:2011年1月至2022年12月,对FAERS数据库中BRAFi+ meki相关PN信号进行歧化分析。此外,我们检查了BRAFi+ meki相关PN的发病时间和预后。结果:本研究共发现了268例BRAFi+ meki相关PN,中位年龄范围为60.00 ~ 69.00岁。所有三种联合治疗均显示PN阳性信号,值得注意的是,恩科非尼和比尼美替尼(E+B)与PN的相关性最强(ROR 3.05[2.47,3.76], IC1.57[1.26])。在性别和年龄分层分析中,PN和不同BRAFi+MEKi组合之间的关联仍然存在,与女性相比,所有三种联合疗法在男性中显示出更高数量的歧化信号。结论:根据我们的研究结果,BRAFi+ meki相关的PN往往发生在发病后几个月,并可能导致严重的后果。男性更有可能成为与PN相关的风险因素。及时识别和干预BRAFi+ meki相关PN至关重要,需要进一步的基础研究来验证我们研究中观察到的潜在机制。
{"title":"Peripheral neuropathies induced by BRAF+MEK inhibitor combinations: a real-world study based on FAERS database 2011-2022.","authors":"Yuting Wang, Jingping Zheng, Zhenpo Zhang, Haiyan Mai, Ling Su","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2529428","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2529428","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAFi+MEKi) like may cause peripheral neuropathies (PN). This study analyzes FAERS data to assess PN signals across BRAFi+MEKi combinations.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Disproportionality analysis was conducted to quantify the signals of BRAFi+MEKi-associated PN on FAERS database from January 2011 to December 2022. Additionally, we examined the onset times and prognosis of BRAFi+MEKi-associated PN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 268 reports of BRAFi+MEKi-associated PN were identified in the study, with a median age range of 60.00 to 69.00 years. All three combination therapies exhibited positive signals for PN, and notably, Encorafenib and Binimetinib (E+B) displayed the strongest association with PN (ROR 3.05[2.47,3.76], IC1.57[1.26]). The associations between PN and different BRAFi+MEKi combinations remained persisted in the gender and age stratification analysis, with all three combination therapies showing an elevated number of disproportionality signals in males compared to females.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to our findings, BRAFi+MEKi-associated PN tends to occur several months after initiation and may lead to serious outcomes. Male sex is more likely to be a risk factor associated with PN. Prompt identification and intervention for BRAFi+MEKi-associated PN are crucial, and additional fundamental research is required to validate the underlying mechanism as observed in our study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1927-1934"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144559642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Refractory immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a multiorgan management review. 与免疫检查点抑制剂治疗相关的难治性免疫相关不良事件(irAes):多器官管理综述
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-19 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2026.2659253
Maria Julia Moura, Anirudha Chatterjee, Sharada Wali, Devin R Garza, Hamza Salim, Jarrett Rong, Raakhi Menon, Faraz Jafri, Andres Urias Rivera, Rachel Mortan, Nicolas L Palaskas, Kerry L Reynolds, Rebecca K Leaf, Nupur Kikani, Anusha Thomas, Hao Chi Zhang, Lan Sun Wang, Sudhakar Tummala, Nagham Al-Zubidi, Ajay Sheshadri, Ala Abudayyeh, Yuanteng Li Jeff, Yinghong Wang

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment of multiple malignancies and significantly increased survival; however, by enhancing antitumor immunity, they can also cause off-target immune-related adverse events (irAEs), some of which become refractory to standard first-line corticosteroids. Refractory irAEs (r-irAEs) require timely recognition and personalized, organ-specific escalation strategies based on toxicity severity and mechanistic insights.

Areas covered: In this narrative review, we synthesize current evidence across organ systems on the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnostic evaluation, and management of r-irAEs, with a particular focus on second- and third-line immunosuppressive options. We summarize findings from retrospective cohorts, prospective studies, guideline statements, and high-quality case series relevant to steroid-refractory irAEs and highlight practical considerations for escalation. The literature search was performed in PubMed and Embase for publications from January 2010 through August 2025.

Expert opinion: Tailored treatment strategies and structured escalation algorithms are needed to optimize outcomes for patients with r-irAEs. Integration of emerging biomarkers, endoscopic and histologic findings, and tumor microenvironment features may facilitate earlier recognition of steroid-refractory disease and more individualized escalation of immunosuppression.

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已经改变了多种恶性肿瘤的治疗方法,并显著提高了生存率;然而,通过增强抗肿瘤免疫,它们也可能引起脱靶免疫相关不良事件(irAEs),其中一些对标准的一线皮质类固醇难以治愈。难治性irAEs (r-irAEs)需要及时识别和基于毒性严重程度和机制的个性化、器官特异性升级策略。涵盖领域:在这篇叙述性综述中,我们综合了目前关于r-irAEs的流行病学、临床特征、诊断评估和管理的跨器官系统证据,特别关注二线和三线免疫抑制选择。我们总结了回顾性队列、前瞻性研究、指南声明和与类固醇难治性irae相关的高质量病例系列的发现,并强调了升级的实际考虑。文献检索在PubMed和Embase中进行,检索时间为2010年1月至2025年8月。专家意见:需要量身定制的治疗策略和结构化的升级算法来优化r-irAEs患者的预后。整合新出现的生物标志物、内窥镜和组织学发现以及肿瘤微环境特征可能有助于更早地识别类固醇难治性疾病和更个体化的免疫抑制升级。
{"title":"Refractory immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a multiorgan management review.","authors":"Maria Julia Moura, Anirudha Chatterjee, Sharada Wali, Devin R Garza, Hamza Salim, Jarrett Rong, Raakhi Menon, Faraz Jafri, Andres Urias Rivera, Rachel Mortan, Nicolas L Palaskas, Kerry L Reynolds, Rebecca K Leaf, Nupur Kikani, Anusha Thomas, Hao Chi Zhang, Lan Sun Wang, Sudhakar Tummala, Nagham Al-Zubidi, Ajay Sheshadri, Ala Abudayyeh, Yuanteng Li Jeff, Yinghong Wang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2026.2659253","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2026.2659253","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment of multiple malignancies and significantly increased survival; however, by enhancing antitumor immunity, they can also cause off-target immune-related adverse events (irAEs), some of which become refractory to standard first-line corticosteroids. Refractory irAEs (r-irAEs) require timely recognition and personalized, organ-specific escalation strategies based on toxicity severity and mechanistic insights.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this narrative review, we synthesize current evidence across organ systems on the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnostic evaluation, and management of r-irAEs, with a particular focus on second- and third-line immunosuppressive options. We summarize findings from retrospective cohorts, prospective studies, guideline statements, and high-quality case series relevant to steroid-refractory irAEs and highlight practical considerations for escalation. The literature search was performed in PubMed and Embase for publications from January 2010 through August 2025.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Tailored treatment strategies and structured escalation algorithms are needed to optimize outcomes for patients with r-irAEs. Integration of emerging biomarkers, endoscopic and histologic findings, and tumor microenvironment features may facilitate earlier recognition of steroid-refractory disease and more individualized escalation of immunosuppression.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1835-1848"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147697749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dementia-related adverse events associated with direct oral anticoagulants use: a real-world, pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database. 与直接口服抗凝剂使用相关的痴呆相关不良事件:基于FAERS数据库的真实世界药物警戒研究
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-10 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2490847
Hanxu Zhang, Mengya Li, Wei Liu, Hengjie Yuan

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are commonly used to prevent and treat thromboembolic diseases. This study aimed to assess and compare dementia related adverse events (AEs) associated with DOACs.

Research design and methods: AEs related to DOACs from January 2014 to June 2023 were extracted from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Disproportionality analysis methods, including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network, and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker, were used to evaluate the association between DOACs and dementia-related AEs.

Results: There were 12,692,968 AEs reported in FAERS after deduplication. Among these, 165, 206, 1574, and 12 dementia-related AEs that were attributed to dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively. Apixaban showed the strongest association with dementia-related AEs (ROR 7.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.27-8.06), while rivaroxaban had the lowest ROR (0.95, 95%CI 0.83-1.09). Women exhibited higher RORs for all DOACs, with apixaban showing the most significant correlation. Subgroup analysis indicated a significant link between apixaban and dementia, dementia Alzheimer's type and senile dementia.

Conclusions: Apixaban appears most associated with dementia-related AEs among DOACs, whereas rivaroxaban poses a lower risk. Further research is needed to validate these findings through large-scale prospective studies.

背景:直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)通常用于预防和治疗血栓栓塞性疾病。本研究旨在评估和比较DOACs相关的痴呆相关不良事件(ae)。研究设计和方法:从FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中提取2014年1月至2023年6月与DOACs相关的ae。歧化分析方法,包括报告比值比(ROR)、比例报告比、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络和多项目伽玛泊松收缩器,用于评估DOACs与痴呆相关ae之间的关系。结果:FAERS重复数据删除后共报告12692968例ae。其中,165例、206例、1574例和12例与痴呆相关的ae分别归因于达比加群、利伐沙班、阿哌沙班和依多沙班。阿哌沙班与痴呆相关ae的相关性最强(ROR 7.66, 95%可信区间(CI) 7.27-8.06),而利伐沙班的ROR最低(0.95,95%CI 0.83-1.09)。女性在所有doac中均表现出较高的RORs,其中阿哌沙班表现出最显著的相关性。亚组分析显示阿哌沙班与痴呆、阿尔茨海默氏型痴呆和老年性痴呆之间存在显著联系。结论:在doac中,阿哌沙班与痴呆相关的ae最相关,而利伐沙班的风险较低。需要进一步的研究来通过大规模的前瞻性研究来验证这些发现。
{"title":"Dementia-related adverse events associated with direct oral anticoagulants use: a real-world, pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.","authors":"Hanxu Zhang, Mengya Li, Wei Liu, Hengjie Yuan","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2490847","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2490847","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are commonly used to prevent and treat thromboembolic diseases. This study aimed to assess and compare dementia related adverse events (AEs) associated with DOACs.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>AEs related to DOACs from January 2014 to June 2023 were extracted from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Disproportionality analysis methods, including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network, and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker, were used to evaluate the association between DOACs and dementia-related AEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 12,692,968 AEs reported in FAERS after deduplication. Among these, 165, 206, 1574, and 12 dementia-related AEs that were attributed to dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively. Apixaban showed the strongest association with dementia-related AEs (ROR 7.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.27-8.06), while rivaroxaban had the lowest ROR (0.95, 95%CI 0.83-1.09). Women exhibited higher RORs for all DOACs, with apixaban showing the most significant correlation. Subgroup analysis indicated a significant link between apixaban and dementia, dementia Alzheimer's type and senile dementia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Apixaban appears most associated with dementia-related AEs among DOACs, whereas rivaroxaban poses a lower risk. Further research is needed to validate these findings through large-scale prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1869-1878"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143993069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A real-world pharmacovigilance case/non-case study of FDA adverse event reporting system events for mannitol. FDA甘露醇不良事件报告系统事件的真实药物警戒案例/非案例研究。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2492742
Zhi Jin, Yu Liu, Zongren Zhao

Background: Mannitol, an osmotic diuretic, is widely used to treat edema, intracranial hypertension, and cerebral edema. This study analyzed mannitol-related adverse events (AEs) using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) data to identify potential safety signals.

Research design and methods: A retrospective pharmacovigilance study was conducted using FAERS data from Q1 2013 to Q4 2023. Signal detection algorithms, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR), were employed to identify and evaluate mannitol-related AEs. The analysis focused on the frequency, severity, and clinical relevance of reported AEs.

Results: Among 39,061,894 reports, 1,014 mentioned mannitol. Common AEs included increased intracranial pressure, hyperosmolar state, hyperchloremia, and hypernatremia. 80% of AEs fell under 'renal and urinary disorders' (295 cases), 'skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders' (371 cases). Specific preferred terms (PTs) linked with mannitol included 'hyperosmolar state', (ROR = 665.98 (95% CI: 272.28-1628.95), PRR = 664.53 (95% CI: 269.75-1637.1)), 'hyperchloremia,' 'hypernatremia' (ROR = 25.18 (95% CI: 17.66-35.9), PRR = 24.85 (95% CI: 17.46-35.36)).

Conclusions: This study underscores the need for vigilant monitoring of mannitol use. Further research is required to understand the mechanisms behind unexpected AEs and establish a comprehensive safety profile.

背景:甘露醇是一种渗透性利尿剂,被广泛用于治疗水肿、颅内高压和脑水肿。本研究使用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据分析甘露醇相关不良事件(ae),以识别潜在的安全信号。研究设计和方法:采用2013年第一季度至2023年第四季度的FAERS数据进行回顾性药物警戒研究。信号检测算法,包括报告优势比(ROR)和比例报告比(PRR),用于识别和评估甘露醇相关ae。分析的重点是报道的ae的频率、严重程度和临床相关性。结果:在39,061,894份报告中,有1,014份报告涉及甘露醇。常见的不良反应包括颅内压升高、高渗状态、高氯血症和高钠血症。80%的ae属于“肾脏和泌尿系统疾病”(295例),“皮肤和皮下组织疾病”(371例)。与甘露醇相关的特定首选术语(PTs)包括“高渗状态”(ROR = 665.98 (95% CI: 272.28-1628.95), PRR = 664.53 (95% CI: 269.75-1637.1)),“高氯血症”,“高钠血症”(ROR = 25.18 (95% CI: 17.66-35.9), PRR = 24.85 (95% CI: 17.46-35.36))。结论:本研究强调了对甘露醇使用进行警惕监测的必要性。需要进一步研究以了解意外ae背后的机制并建立全面的安全性概况。
{"title":"A real-world pharmacovigilance case/non-case study of FDA adverse event reporting system events for mannitol.","authors":"Zhi Jin, Yu Liu, Zongren Zhao","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2492742","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2492742","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mannitol, an osmotic diuretic, is widely used to treat edema, intracranial hypertension, and cerebral edema. This study analyzed mannitol-related adverse events (AEs) using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) data to identify potential safety signals.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A retrospective pharmacovigilance study was conducted using FAERS data from Q1 2013 to Q4 2023. Signal detection algorithms, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR), were employed to identify and evaluate mannitol-related AEs. The analysis focused on the frequency, severity, and clinical relevance of reported AEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 39,061,894 reports, 1,014 mentioned mannitol. Common AEs included increased intracranial pressure, hyperosmolar state, hyperchloremia, and hypernatremia. 80% of AEs fell under 'renal and urinary disorders' (295 cases), 'skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders' (371 cases). Specific preferred terms (PTs) linked with mannitol included 'hyperosmolar state', (ROR = 665.98 (95% CI: 272.28-1628.95), PRR = 664.53 (95% CI: 269.75-1637.1)), 'hyperchloremia,' 'hypernatremia' (ROR = 25.18 (95% CI: 17.66-35.9), PRR = 24.85 (95% CI: 17.46-35.36)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the need for vigilant monitoring of mannitol use. Further research is required to understand the mechanisms behind unexpected AEs and establish a comprehensive safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1899-1906"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143974600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of diroximel fumarate data for patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis using related adverse events from the FDA adverse reporting system. 利用FDA不良反应报告系统的相关不良事件分析复发型多发性硬化症患者的富马酸地洛昔美尔数据。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2488318
Jing-Ya Yang, Sheng-Zhu Sun, Yi-Yan Sun, Tian-Qi Zuo, Xiao-Tong Li, Lei-Yong Zhao, Hong-Yun Wu, Wei Peng

Background: Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is an oral fumarate used to treat relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS). This study comprehensively analyzed the adverse events (AEs) associated with DRF for treating RMS based on data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Research design and methods: This study collected data on AEs associated with DRF treatment of RMS from the FAERS database between 2019 and 2024. We used reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) for signal detection.

Results: This study collected 7,944,554 AE reports, of which 7,868 were associated with DRF. A total of 120 preferred terms (PTs) were included in the analysis, relating to 27 system organ classes (SOCs). This study identified several clinically significant new potential AEs, including decreased immune responsiveness (n = 26, ROR 4.45, PRR 4.45, IC 2.15, EBGM 4.43), female breast cancer (n = 50, ROR 4.07, PRR 4.07, IC 2.02, EBGM 4.05), transient blindness (n = 19, ROR 7.27, PRR 7.26, IC 2.85, EBGM 7.21) and others.

Conclusions: Our study identified several potentially important AEs that were not mentioned in the DRF instructions. However, further epidemiologic studies are needed to validate these findings.

背景:富马酸地洛昔梅尔(DRF)是一种口服富马酸,用于治疗复发型多发性硬化症(RMS)。本研究基于FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的数据,全面分析了与DRF治疗RMS相关的不良事件(ae)。研究设计和方法:本研究收集了2019年至2024年FAERS数据库中与RMS的DRF治疗相关的ae数据。我们使用报告比值比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)和多项目伽玛泊松收缩器(MGPS)进行信号检测。结果:本研究收集了7,944,554例AE报告,其中7,868例与DRF相关。共有120个优选术语(PTs)被纳入分析,涉及27个系统器官类别(soc)。本研究发现了几种具有临床意义的新的潜在ae,包括免疫反应性降低(n = 26, ROR 4.45, PRR 4.45, IC 2.15, EBGM 4.43),女性乳腺癌(n = 50, ROR 4.07, PRR 4.07, IC 2.02, EBGM 4.05),短暂性失明(n = 19, ROR 7.27, PRR 7.26, IC 2.85, EBGM 7.21)等。结论:我们的研究确定了DRF说明书中未提及的几个潜在的重要ae。然而,需要进一步的流行病学研究来验证这些发现。
{"title":"Analysis of diroximel fumarate data for patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis using related adverse events from the FDA adverse reporting system.","authors":"Jing-Ya Yang, Sheng-Zhu Sun, Yi-Yan Sun, Tian-Qi Zuo, Xiao-Tong Li, Lei-Yong Zhao, Hong-Yun Wu, Wei Peng","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2488318","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2488318","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is an oral fumarate used to treat relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS). This study comprehensively analyzed the adverse events (AEs) associated with DRF for treating RMS based on data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This study collected data on AEs associated with DRF treatment of RMS from the FAERS database between 2019 and 2024. We used reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) for signal detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study collected 7,944,554 AE reports, of which 7,868 were associated with DRF. A total of 120 preferred terms (PTs) were included in the analysis, relating to 27 system organ classes (SOCs). This study identified several clinically significant new potential AEs, including decreased immune responsiveness (<i>n</i> = 26, ROR 4.45, PRR 4.45, IC 2.15, EBGM 4.43), female breast cancer (<i>n</i> = 50, ROR 4.07, PRR 4.07, IC 2.02, EBGM 4.05), transient blindness (<i>n</i> = 19, ROR 7.27, PRR 7.26, IC 2.85, EBGM 7.21) and others.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study identified several potentially important AEs that were not mentioned in the DRF instructions. However, further epidemiologic studies are needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1849-1856"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143763306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of adverse events induced by fluconazole based on FAERS database. 基于FAERS数据库的氟康唑不良事件分析。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-10 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2490837
Tang Su, Li Jianglin, Su Si, Liu Xin

Background: Fluconazole, a widely used antifungal agent, has been associated with various adverse events (AEs). This study aimed to analyze the safety profiles of fluconazole using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to provide insights for its safe use.

Research design and methods: Fluconazole-related AEs from 2004 to 2024Q2 were extracted from the FAERS database. The Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) method was employed to detect and analyze safety signals. Additionally, the impact of COVID-19 on fluconazole safety was also examined.

Results: A total of 7,720 AEs were identified, with 40.3% being serious. The most common AEs involved skin, gastrointestinal, and administration site reactions. High doses of fluconazole were linked to increased teratogenic risks. Weekly dosing regimens and doses below 200 mg/day were associated with fewer severe AEs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a notable rise in reports of drug inefficacy and hepatic/renal damage. Additionally, 45 new adverse reactions were identified.

Conclusions: The study highlights the importance of monitoring liver, kidney, and cardiovascular functions during fluconazole use, especially in high-risk populations. The findings underscore the need for careful dosing and consideration of drug interactions, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, to ensure safe and effective use of fluconazole.

背景:氟康唑是一种广泛使用的抗真菌药物,与各种不良事件(ae)有关。本研究旨在利用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库分析氟康唑的安全性概况,为其安全使用提供见解。研究设计与方法:从FAERS数据库中提取2004 - 2024Q2的氟康唑相关ae。采用报告优势比(ROR)法检测和分析安全信号。此外,还研究了COVID-19对氟康唑安全性的影响。结果:共发现不良反应7720例,其中严重不良反应40.3%。最常见的不良反应包括皮肤、胃肠道和给药部位的反应。高剂量氟康唑与致畸风险增加有关。每周给药方案和低于200毫克/天的剂量与较少的严重不良反应相关。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,药物无效和肝/肾损害的报告显著增加。此外,还发现了45个新的不良反应。结论:本研究强调了在氟康唑使用期间监测肝、肾和心血管功能的重要性,特别是在高危人群中。研究结果强调,需要谨慎给药并考虑药物相互作用,特别是在COVID-19大流行期间,以确保氟康唑的安全有效使用。
{"title":"Analysis of adverse events induced by fluconazole based on FAERS database.","authors":"Tang Su, Li Jianglin, Su Si, Liu Xin","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2490837","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2490837","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluconazole, a widely used antifungal agent, has been associated with various adverse events (AEs). This study aimed to analyze the safety profiles of fluconazole using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to provide insights for its safe use.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Fluconazole-related AEs from 2004 to 2024Q2 were extracted from the FAERS database. The Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) method was employed to detect and analyze safety signals. Additionally, the impact of COVID-19 on fluconazole safety was also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7,720 AEs were identified, with 40.3% being serious. The most common AEs involved skin, gastrointestinal, and administration site reactions. High doses of fluconazole were linked to increased teratogenic risks. Weekly dosing regimens and doses below 200 mg/day were associated with fewer severe AEs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a notable rise in reports of drug inefficacy and hepatic/renal damage. Additionally, 45 new adverse reactions were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights the importance of monitoring liver, kidney, and cardiovascular functions during fluconazole use, especially in high-risk populations. The findings underscore the need for careful dosing and consideration of drug interactions, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, to ensure safe and effective use of fluconazole.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1879-1887"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143810816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety of SGLT2 inhibitors for patients with type 2 diabetes: where are we now? SGLT2抑制剂对2型糖尿病患者的安全性:进展如何?
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-30 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2026.2666186
André J Scheen

Introduction: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) remain underused in clinical practice, one of the reasons may be the fear of adverse events which have been emphasized during the first years of use. This comprehensive review aims to give an update on the safety and tolerability profile of SGLT2is.

Areas covered: An extensive literature search identified randomized controlled trials, observational cohort studies and pharmacovigilance reports that investigated the safety of SGLT2is in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), with or without comorbidities or presenting at-risk conditions.

Expert opinion: Some adverse events pointed out initially have been confirmed, especially a higher risk of genital infections, though not the initial fear of urinary tract infections. A euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis remains exceptional in patients with T2D. Volume depletion is a rare event that may be anticipated. Of note, several severe adverse events that led to warnings by regulatory agencies have not been confirmed in further studies: bone fractures, lower-limb amputations, severe perineal infections, acute renal injury. The safety profile of SGLT2is appears globally reassuring even in special at-risk populations. However, data remain rather scarce in patients with severe comorbidities and in very old or frail people, so that caution use is classically recommended.

钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2is)在临床实践中仍未得到充分应用,其中一个原因可能是对不良事件的恐惧,这在使用的头几年一直被强调。本综述旨在对SGLT2is的安全性和耐受性进行更新。涵盖领域:广泛的文献检索确定了随机对照试验、观察性队列研究和药物警戒报告,这些报告调查了SGLT2is在2型糖尿病(T2D)患者中的安全性,无论有无合并症或存在危险状况。专家意见:最初指出的一些不良事件已经得到证实,特别是生殖器感染的风险较高,虽然不是最初害怕的尿路感染。糖尿病酮症酸中毒在t2dm患者中仍然是罕见的。容量耗竭是可以预见的罕见事件。值得注意的是,一些引起监管机构警告的严重不良事件尚未在进一步的研究中得到证实:骨折、下肢截肢、严重会阴感染、急性肾损伤。SGLT2is的安全性在全球范围内令人安心,即使在特殊风险人群中也是如此。然而,严重合并症患者和年老体弱者的数据仍然相当缺乏,因此传统上建议谨慎使用。
{"title":"Safety of SGLT2 inhibitors for patients with type 2 diabetes: where are we now?","authors":"André J Scheen","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2026.2666186","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2026.2666186","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) remain underused in clinical practice, one of the reasons may be the fear of adverse events which have been emphasized during the first years of use. This comprehensive review aims to give an update on the safety and tolerability profile of SGLT2is.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>An extensive literature search identified randomized controlled trials, observational cohort studies and pharmacovigilance reports that investigated the safety of SGLT2is in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), with or without comorbidities or presenting at-risk conditions.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Some adverse events pointed out initially have been confirmed, especially a higher risk of genital infections, though not the initial fear of urinary tract infections. A euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis remains exceptional in patients with T2D. Volume depletion is a rare event that may be anticipated. Of note, several severe adverse events that led to warnings by regulatory agencies have not been confirmed in further studies: bone fractures, lower-limb amputations, severe perineal infections, acute renal injury. The safety profile of SGLT2is appears globally reassuring even in special at-risk populations. However, data remain rather scarce in patients with severe comorbidities and in very old or frail people, so that caution use is classically recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1819-1833"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147766835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
﹀
mjeditor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1