Pub Date : 2026-10-16Epub Date: 2026-08-22DOI: 10.1002/aur.70340
Devon N. Gangi, Chandni Parikh, Monique Moore Hill, Shyeena Maqbool, Rachel Ni, Simon Dvorak, Gregory S. Young, Sally Ozonoff
Autism screening aids in early detection and diagnosis. Several screeners are available for toddlers 16 months and older, but there is little data on the accuracy of screening measures used in the first year of life. A community sample (N = 1641) completed three screeners—M-CHAT-R, ITC, VIRSA—online at 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months of age (including exploratory use of M-CHAT-R prior to 16 months). At 36 months, outcomes of ASD or Non-ASD were determined by tele-evaluation and outcome surveys. Psychometric properties were assessed for all screeners at all ages, both used individually and in combination. When used in the first year of life (6–12 months), psychometric properties were in the poor range, with area under the curve (AUC) < 0.70 for all three screeners, whether used in isolation or combination. At 18 and 24 months, the M-CHAT-R and ITC outperformed the VIRSA, with psychometric properties in the fair range (AUC 0.70–0.79) used in isolation and the good range (AUC ≥ 0.80) when used in combination. Using the M-CHAT-R and ITC at more than one age in the second year also fell in the good range. This study, using procedures to address limitations of prior screening studies and follow screen-negative cases, found that none of the three screeners had adequate psychometric properties in the first year. At 18 and 24 months, findings supported the use of multiple screeners, either in combination or longitudinally, for best prediction of autism diagnosis.
{"title":"Autism Screening in the First Year and Beyond: Comparison of Multiple Measures","authors":"Devon N. Gangi, Chandni Parikh, Monique Moore Hill, Shyeena Maqbool, Rachel Ni, Simon Dvorak, Gregory S. Young, Sally Ozonoff","doi":"10.1002/aur.70340","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aur.70340","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Autism screening aids in early detection and diagnosis. Several screeners are available for toddlers 16 months and older, but there is little data on the accuracy of screening measures used in the first year of life. A community sample (<i>N</i> = 1641) completed three screeners—M-CHAT-R, ITC, VIRSA—online at 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months of age (including exploratory use of M-CHAT-R prior to 16 months). At 36 months, outcomes of ASD or Non-ASD were determined by tele-evaluation and outcome surveys. Psychometric properties were assessed for all screeners at all ages, both used individually and in combination. When used in the first year of life (6–12 months), psychometric properties were in the poor range, with area under the curve (AUC) < 0.70 for all three screeners, whether used in isolation or combination. At 18 and 24 months, the M-CHAT-R and ITC outperformed the VIRSA, with psychometric properties in the fair range (AUC 0.70–0.79) used in isolation and the good range (AUC ≥ 0.80) when used in combination. Using the M-CHAT-R and ITC at more than one age in the second year also fell in the good range. This study, using procedures to address limitations of prior screening studies and follow screen-negative cases, found that none of the three screeners had adequate psychometric properties in the first year. At 18 and 24 months, findings supported the use of multiple screeners, either in combination or longitudinally, for best prediction of autism diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"19 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13577608/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148802281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-10-16Epub Date: 2026-08-17DOI: 10.1002/aur.70347
Nerea Blanco-Martínez, Daniel González-Devesa, Silvia Varela, Rocío Carballo-Afonso, Carlos Ayán-Pérez
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is frequently associated with motor difficulties that may affect daily functioning, participation in physical activity, and developmental outcomes. Although motor impairments have been widely reported in this population, comparative evidence against typically developing (TD) peers remains fragmented across studies and assessment tools. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine whether children and adolescents with ASD show lower motor competence than TD peers and to identify the most affected motor domains. A systematic search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus up to December 10, 2025. Studies were eligible if they included children or adolescents with ASD and TD controls and assessed motor competence using standardized instruments. A total of 42 studies involving 3142 participants were included. The most frequently used tools were the Movement Assessment Battery for Children, the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, and the Test of Gross Motor Development. Across studies, children and adolescents with ASD consistently showed poorer performance than TD peers in manual dexterity, aiming and catching, balance, locomotor skills, and object control. Meta-analytic findings also indicated that participants with ASD had greater odds of presenting motor difficulty and being classified within the at-risk range. Despite heterogeneity and methodological limitations, the overall evidence supports a broad pattern of lower motor competence in ASD. These findings reinforce the importance of early motor assessment and targeted intervention in clinical and educational contexts.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)通常与运动困难有关,运动困难可能影响日常功能、身体活动的参与和发育结果。尽管运动障碍在这一人群中已被广泛报道,但在研究和评估工具中,与典型发育(TD)同龄人的比较证据仍然是碎片化的。这项系统回顾和荟萃分析旨在研究自闭症儿童和青少年是否表现出比TD同龄人更低的运动能力,并确定受影响最大的运动域。系统检索截止到2025年12月10日的Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed和SPORTDiscus。如果研究纳入了患有ASD和TD的儿童或青少年,并使用标准化仪器评估运动能力,则研究是合格的。共纳入42项研究,涉及3142名参与者。最常用的工具是儿童运动评估测试、布鲁林克斯-奥塞列茨基运动能力测试和大肌肉运动发展测试。在所有研究中,患有自闭症的儿童和青少年在手灵巧性、瞄准和接球、平衡、运动技能和物体控制方面的表现一直不如患有自闭症的同龄人。荟萃分析结果还表明,患有自闭症谱系障碍的参与者表现出运动困难的几率更大,并被归类为高危范围。尽管存在异质性和方法上的局限性,但总体证据支持ASD患者运动能力低下的广泛模式。这些发现加强了早期运动评估和有针对性干预在临床和教育环境中的重要性。
{"title":"Impaired Motor Competence in Children and Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Evidence From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Nerea Blanco-Martínez, Daniel González-Devesa, Silvia Varela, Rocío Carballo-Afonso, Carlos Ayán-Pérez","doi":"10.1002/aur.70347","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aur.70347","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is frequently associated with motor difficulties that may affect daily functioning, participation in physical activity, and developmental outcomes. Although motor impairments have been widely reported in this population, comparative evidence against typically developing (TD) peers remains fragmented across studies and assessment tools. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine whether children and adolescents with ASD show lower motor competence than TD peers and to identify the most affected motor domains. A systematic search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus up to December 10, 2025. Studies were eligible if they included children or adolescents with ASD and TD controls and assessed motor competence using standardized instruments. A total of 42 studies involving 3142 participants were included. The most frequently used tools were the Movement Assessment Battery for Children, the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, and the Test of Gross Motor Development. Across studies, children and adolescents with ASD consistently showed poorer performance than TD peers in manual dexterity, aiming and catching, balance, locomotor skills, and object control. Meta-analytic findings also indicated that participants with ASD had greater odds of presenting motor difficulty and being classified within the at-risk range. Despite heterogeneity and methodological limitations, the overall evidence supports a broad pattern of lower motor competence in ASD. These findings reinforce the importance of early motor assessment and targeted intervention in clinical and educational contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"19 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aur.70347","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148802305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-10-16Epub Date: 2026-08-21DOI: 10.1002/aur.70352
Ashith Tripathi, Raj Kumar, Krishan Kumar
{"title":"Methodological Considerations for Interpreting a Short Eye-Tracking Paradigm for Autism Screening","authors":"Ashith Tripathi, Raj Kumar, Krishan Kumar","doi":"10.1002/aur.70352","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aur.70352","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"19 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148802330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}