Pub Date : 2026-04-17DOI: 10.1007/s10029-026-03679-7
E Pélissier, J-P Cossa, P Ngo, A Valenti
{"title":"Comment to: Parainguinal or Spigelian hernia: a clinically important distinction.","authors":"E Pélissier, J-P Cossa, P Ngo, A Valenti","doi":"10.1007/s10029-026-03679-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-026-03679-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147716952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-17DOI: 10.1007/s10029-026-03663-1
Gert Van Der Velde, Timothy Gros, Mathias Allaeys, Pieter Dries, Frederik Berrevoet
{"title":"PVDF versus polypropylene large pore mesh for open incisional hernia repair - a case control matched analysis.","authors":"Gert Van Der Velde, Timothy Gros, Mathias Allaeys, Pieter Dries, Frederik Berrevoet","doi":"10.1007/s10029-026-03663-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-026-03663-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147716563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-17DOI: 10.1007/s10029-026-03642-6
Kryspin Mitura, Michal Romanczuk, Laura Kacprzak, Krystian Kisielewski, Lidia Mitura, Piotr Niecikowski, Piotr Konrad Leszczynski, Orest Lerchuk, Orest Chemerys, Volodymyr Khomyak
{"title":"A traction suture for abdominal wall closure in large incisional hernias: a prospective analysis of the \"suitcase technique\" - a simple horizontal offloading z-suture for gradual myofascial approximation.","authors":"Kryspin Mitura, Michal Romanczuk, Laura Kacprzak, Krystian Kisielewski, Lidia Mitura, Piotr Niecikowski, Piotr Konrad Leszczynski, Orest Lerchuk, Orest Chemerys, Volodymyr Khomyak","doi":"10.1007/s10029-026-03642-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-026-03642-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147698530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-17DOI: 10.1007/s10029-026-03660-4
Gabriela Lyons, Raquel Nogueira, Sofia Wagemaker Viana, Maria Fernanda Andrade, Vitor Neves, Rodrigo Ferraz Galhego, Natalia Pascotini, Diego Laurentino Lima
{"title":"What is the evidence for abdominal and pelvic floor muscle training to treat diastasis recti abdominis postpartum? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and trial sequential analysis.","authors":"Gabriela Lyons, Raquel Nogueira, Sofia Wagemaker Viana, Maria Fernanda Andrade, Vitor Neves, Rodrigo Ferraz Galhego, Natalia Pascotini, Diego Laurentino Lima","doi":"10.1007/s10029-026-03660-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-026-03660-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147716561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-17DOI: 10.1007/s10029-026-03659-x
Hao Xu, Wei Zou, Kangpeng Zheng, Boxiang Li
Objective: To evaluate the differences in quality of life at 5 years postoperatively between laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) and Lichtenstein tension-free repair for adult patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia, with a primary focus on EuraHS-QoL scale scores and an exploration of long-term outcomes including chronic postoperative pain, recurrence rates, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction.
Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort analysis. Adult patients who underwent TAPP or Lichtenstein repair for primary unilateral inguinal hernia between January 2015 and December 2020 were included. Patients were categorized into a TAPP group (n = 300) and a Lichtenstein group (n = 200) based on the surgical approach. The primary outcome was the quality of life score at 5 years postoperatively, assessed using the EuraHS-QoL scale across three domains: pain, activity restriction, and cosmetic appearance. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of chronic postoperative pain, hernia recurrence rate, postoperative complications, time to functional recovery (e.g., return to daily activities and work), and subjective satisfaction. Multivariate regression models were used to control for confounding factors, and sensitivity analysis was performed using propensity score matching (PSM).
Results: The median follow-up duration was 62 months (IQR: 60-66). The TAPP group demonstrated a significantly better total EuraHS-QoL score [median 2.0 (IQR: 1.0-4.0)] compared to the Lichtenstein group [median 3.0 (IQR: 2.0-5.0)] (P < 0.001), with particularly pronounced differences in the activity restriction and cosmetic appearance domains (P < 0.01). The TAPP group had a lower incidence of chronic postoperative pain (12.0% vs. 20.5%, P = 0.006), faster functional recovery (time to return to daily activities: 6 days vs. 8 days, P < 0.001), and higher satisfaction scores (8.8 ± 1.1 vs. 7.9 ± 1.4, P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in recurrence rates or overall complication rates. The findings remained consistent after multivariate regression and PSM analysis.
Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis, both TAPP and Lichtenstein repair provided favorable long-term quality of life. While initial unadjusted comparisons suggested a total score advantage for TAPP, this was not maintained in the matched sensitivity analysis. TAPP demonstrated benefits in reduced chronic pain and faster functional recovery, without increasing recurrence. These findings support the consideration of TAPP as a viable option in suitable patients, though they should be interpreted in light of the study's retrospective design and require prospective validation.
{"title":"Differences in Long-term Quality of Life Assessed by the EuraHS-QoL Scale between Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair and Lichtenstein Tension-Free Repair for Primary Unilateral Inguinal Hernia.","authors":"Hao Xu, Wei Zou, Kangpeng Zheng, Boxiang Li","doi":"10.1007/s10029-026-03659-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-026-03659-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the differences in quality of life at 5 years postoperatively between laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) and Lichtenstein tension-free repair for adult patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia, with a primary focus on EuraHS-QoL scale scores and an exploration of long-term outcomes including chronic postoperative pain, recurrence rates, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective cohort analysis. Adult patients who underwent TAPP or Lichtenstein repair for primary unilateral inguinal hernia between January 2015 and December 2020 were included. Patients were categorized into a TAPP group (n = 300) and a Lichtenstein group (n = 200) based on the surgical approach. The primary outcome was the quality of life score at 5 years postoperatively, assessed using the EuraHS-QoL scale across three domains: pain, activity restriction, and cosmetic appearance. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of chronic postoperative pain, hernia recurrence rate, postoperative complications, time to functional recovery (e.g., return to daily activities and work), and subjective satisfaction. Multivariate regression models were used to control for confounding factors, and sensitivity analysis was performed using propensity score matching (PSM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up duration was 62 months (IQR: 60-66). The TAPP group demonstrated a significantly better total EuraHS-QoL score [median 2.0 (IQR: 1.0-4.0)] compared to the Lichtenstein group [median 3.0 (IQR: 2.0-5.0)] (P < 0.001), with particularly pronounced differences in the activity restriction and cosmetic appearance domains (P < 0.01). The TAPP group had a lower incidence of chronic postoperative pain (12.0% vs. 20.5%, P = 0.006), faster functional recovery (time to return to daily activities: 6 days vs. 8 days, P < 0.001), and higher satisfaction scores (8.8 ± 1.1 vs. 7.9 ± 1.4, P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in recurrence rates or overall complication rates. The findings remained consistent after multivariate regression and PSM analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this retrospective analysis, both TAPP and Lichtenstein repair provided favorable long-term quality of life. While initial unadjusted comparisons suggested a total score advantage for TAPP, this was not maintained in the matched sensitivity analysis. TAPP demonstrated benefits in reduced chronic pain and faster functional recovery, without increasing recurrence. These findings support the consideration of TAPP as a viable option in suitable patients, though they should be interpreted in light of the study's retrospective design and require prospective validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147716934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-17DOI: 10.1007/s10029-026-03675-x
Younis Al-Mufargi, Mohammed Al Subhi, Mohammed Al-Yousufi, Abdulwahab Alomar, Wael Arba, Mohammed Al-Sibani
{"title":"Fascial closure versus non-closure of laparoscopic port sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Younis Al-Mufargi, Mohammed Al Subhi, Mohammed Al-Yousufi, Abdulwahab Alomar, Wael Arba, Mohammed Al-Sibani","doi":"10.1007/s10029-026-03675-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-026-03675-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147716065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-17DOI: 10.1007/s10029-026-03639-1
Eric Mungai, Felix Oyania, Mvuyo Sikhondze, Hussein Iman, Daniel Atwine
{"title":"Outcomes of pediatric inguinal hernias at a tertiary hospital in South-Western Uganda.","authors":"Eric Mungai, Felix Oyania, Mvuyo Sikhondze, Hussein Iman, Daniel Atwine","doi":"10.1007/s10029-026-03639-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-026-03639-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147716545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-17DOI: 10.1007/s10029-026-03677-9
Gabriela Lyons, Sofia Wagemaker Viana, Vitor Dos Santos Neves, Caroline Daleaste Wilmsen, Raquel Nogueira, Leandro Totti Cavazzola, Vedra Augenstein, Flavio Malcher, Diego L Lima
Introduction: Hernias are among the most common surgical conditions worldwide. However, access to optimal treatment remains disproportionately distributed. Socioeconomic disparities play a critical role in determining whether patients receive timely surgical intervention, access to minimally invasive techniques, or suffer from postoperative complications due to delayed or suboptimal care. This study aims to evaluate the impact of socioeconomic disparities on the treatment of ventral hernia repair.
Methods: This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted using MEDLINE/Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and LILACS, from inception until March 2026 without any filter applied. A search strategy was created using the MeSH terms. Our inclusion criteria comprise studies related to socioeconomic disparities in ventral hernia repair within the United States. Due to heterogeneity in study designs, socioeconomic variables, and outcome definitions, a meta-analysis was not feasible, and findings were synthesized using a narrative synthesis. A qualitative assessment of included studies was made using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, ROBINS-I.
Results: A total of 28 studies were included, encompassing 2,096,513 patients with ventral hernia. Most were retrospective cohorts, with sample sizes ranging from a few hundred to over 665,000 patients. Across studies, patients with government funded insurance (Medicaid or Medicare) generally experienced higher rates of complications, readmissions, and recurrences compared to commercial insured patients, although the magnitude of association varied. Odds ratios demonstrated increased risks of wound complications, readmission, and recurrence among government funded insured and uninsured patients, while commercial insured and higher-income patients were more likely to undergo advanced surgical approaches and had shorter hospital length of stay. Some studies also highlighted socioeconomic and racial disparities, with vulnerable populations and minority groups showing disproportionately higher complication rates and different patterns of insurance coverage.
Conclusion: This systematic study demonstrates significant racial and socioeconomic disparities in ventral hernia repair. Government funded insurance holders or lower incomers, faced higher complication rates, more emergent presentations, and worse outcomes, including increased mortality and readmissions. Moreover, they usually have less access to minimally invasive and robotic techniques. These inequities highlight systemic barriers in healthcare access.
疝是世界上最常见的外科疾病之一。然而,获得最佳治疗的机会仍然分布不均。社会经济差异在决定患者是否及时接受手术干预、获得微创技术或因延迟或次优护理而遭受术后并发症方面发挥着关键作用。本研究旨在评估社会经济差异对腹疝修补治疗的影响。方法:本系统评价遵循PRISMA指南进行。我们使用MEDLINE/Pubmed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和LILACS进行了全面的检索,从成立到2026年3月,没有使用任何过滤器。使用MeSH术语创建了一个搜索策略。我们的纳入标准包括与美国腹疝修补术中社会经济差异相关的研究。由于研究设计、社会经济变量和结果定义的异质性,荟萃分析不可行,研究结果采用叙事综合法进行综合。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具ROBINS-I对纳入的研究进行定性评估。结果:共纳入28项研究,包括2,096,513例腹疝患者。大多数是回顾性队列,样本量从几百到665,000多名患者不等。在所有研究中,与商业保险患者相比,政府资助保险(医疗补助或医疗保险)患者通常经历更高的并发症、再入院率和复发率,尽管相关性的程度各不相同。优势比表明,在政府资助的参保和未参保患者中,伤口并发症、再入院和复发的风险增加,而商业参保和高收入患者更有可能接受先进的手术方法,住院时间更短。一些研究还强调了社会经济和种族差异,弱势群体和少数群体的并发症发生率高得不成比例,保险覆盖模式也不同。结论:本系统研究显示腹疝修补术中存在显著的种族和社会经济差异。政府资助的保险持有人或低收入者面临更高的并发症率,更多的紧急表现和更糟糕的结果,包括死亡率和再入院率的增加。此外,他们通常很少有机会获得微创和机器人技术。这些不平等突出了获得医疗保健方面的系统性障碍。
{"title":"The impact of socioeconomic status in hernia treatment: a qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Gabriela Lyons, Sofia Wagemaker Viana, Vitor Dos Santos Neves, Caroline Daleaste Wilmsen, Raquel Nogueira, Leandro Totti Cavazzola, Vedra Augenstein, Flavio Malcher, Diego L Lima","doi":"10.1007/s10029-026-03677-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-026-03677-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hernias are among the most common surgical conditions worldwide. However, access to optimal treatment remains disproportionately distributed. Socioeconomic disparities play a critical role in determining whether patients receive timely surgical intervention, access to minimally invasive techniques, or suffer from postoperative complications due to delayed or suboptimal care. This study aims to evaluate the impact of socioeconomic disparities on the treatment of ventral hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted using MEDLINE/Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and LILACS, from inception until March 2026 without any filter applied. A search strategy was created using the MeSH terms. Our inclusion criteria comprise studies related to socioeconomic disparities in ventral hernia repair within the United States. Due to heterogeneity in study designs, socioeconomic variables, and outcome definitions, a meta-analysis was not feasible, and findings were synthesized using a narrative synthesis. A qualitative assessment of included studies was made using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, ROBINS-I.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 studies were included, encompassing 2,096,513 patients with ventral hernia. Most were retrospective cohorts, with sample sizes ranging from a few hundred to over 665,000 patients. Across studies, patients with government funded insurance (Medicaid or Medicare) generally experienced higher rates of complications, readmissions, and recurrences compared to commercial insured patients, although the magnitude of association varied. Odds ratios demonstrated increased risks of wound complications, readmission, and recurrence among government funded insured and uninsured patients, while commercial insured and higher-income patients were more likely to undergo advanced surgical approaches and had shorter hospital length of stay. Some studies also highlighted socioeconomic and racial disparities, with vulnerable populations and minority groups showing disproportionately higher complication rates and different patterns of insurance coverage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic study demonstrates significant racial and socioeconomic disparities in ventral hernia repair. Government funded insurance holders or lower incomers, faced higher complication rates, more emergent presentations, and worse outcomes, including increased mortality and readmissions. Moreover, they usually have less access to minimally invasive and robotic techniques. These inequities highlight systemic barriers in healthcare access.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147716589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}