首页 > 最新文献
paperpass

CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians最新文献

英文 中文
Metastasis-directed radiation therapy may improve progression-free survival in patients with oligometastatic solid tumors 转移性放射治疗可能改善少转移性实体瘤患者的无进展生存期
IF 685.2 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-08-19 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70098
Carrie Printz
<p>In recent years, scientists have learned that patients with a limited number of metastases (i.e., oligometastatic cancers) experience improved progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes with the addition of stereotactic ablative radiosurgery directed to those metastases. These findings were demonstrated by the phase 2, randomized SABR-COMET trial (doi:10.1200/JCO.20.00818).</p><p>Although SABR-COMET assessed patients with many different cancers, a new phase 2 study, EXTEND, sought to determine which patients with specific cancers would benefit from a similar type of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) approach in combination with standard-of-care (SOC) systemic therapy.</p><p>Findings indicated that adding MDT radiation therapy to SOC for oligometastatic disease improved PFS for patients with pancreatic, prostate, and other cancers. However, results for breast and kidney cancers were inconclusive.</p><p>The study was published in the <i>Journal of Clinical Oncology</i> (doi:10.1200/JCO-25-02856).</p><p>The multicenter, phase 2 EXTEND trial randomized patients to MDT plus SOC or SOC alone in one of six histology-specific baskets: breast, pancreas, kidney, two prostate baskets, and one “other” basket. PFS was the primary endpoint. Exploratory endpoints were ctDNA and immune profiling.</p><p>Eligible patients had one to five metastases, had received no more than four prior lines of systemic therapy for metastatic disease, and had a diagnosis within one of 12 specified histologies.</p><p>Between 2018 and 2023, 350 patients were randomized, and 334 were analyzed: MDT plus SOC (<i>n</i> = 166) and SOC (<i>n</i> = 168). MDT could include radiotherapy, resection, or ablation. Radiotherapy was used as MDT for 98% of metastases (370 of 379). At a median follow-up of 53 months, PFS was significantly longer with MDT plus SOC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41–0.72; <i>p</i> < .001). PFS also improved when the prostate baskets were excluded (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40–0.89).</p><p>The pancreas, prostate, and “other” baskets had superior PFS with MDT plus SOC, but the breast and kidney baskets were inconclusive.</p><p>Patients with detectable ctDNA at enrollment had shorter PFS and overall survival. Conversely, if ctDNA clearance occurred 3 months after enrollment, survival rates were improved. Findings also showed that patients treated with MDT plus SOC had improved clearance of ctDNA. The authors noted that these findings point to the important role that the addition of MDT may play in treating oligometastatic cancer.</p><p>In addition, immune activation induced by MDT plus SOC was most pronounced among baskets with superior PFS, and this indicates another area that warrants investigation.</p><p>Because pancreatic and prostate cancers showed the greatest promise with MDT plus SOC, researchers have initiated the phase 3 EXPAND trial in pancreatic cancer. Other independent research efforts are underway in prostate cancer. Findings in the “other” basket also
近年来,科学家们已经了解到,有限数量的转移(即少转移性癌症)患者在针对这些转移灶的立体定向消融放射手术的基础上,可以改善无进展生存(PFS)结果。这些发现得到了2期随机SABR-COMET试验的证实(doi:10.1200/JCO.20.00818)。尽管SABR-COMET评估了许多不同癌症的患者,但一项新的2期研究EXTEND试图确定哪些特定癌症患者将受益于类似类型的转移导向治疗(MDT)方法与标准治疗(SOC)系统治疗相结合。研究结果表明,在低转移性疾病的SOC治疗中加入MDT放疗可改善胰腺癌、前列腺癌和其他癌症患者的PFS。然而,乳腺癌和肾癌的研究结果尚无定论。该研究发表在《临床肿瘤学杂志》上(doi:10.1200/JCO-25-02856)。多中心2期EXTEND试验将患者随机分为六个组织学特异性组:乳腺、胰腺、肾脏、两个前列腺组和一个“其他”组。PFS是主要终点。探索性终点是ctDNA和免疫谱。符合条件的患者有1 - 5个转移灶,既往接受过不超过4种转移性疾病的全身治疗,并且在12种特定组织学中有一种诊断。2018年至2023年间,350例患者被随机分组,其中334例进行了分析:MDT + SOC (n = 166)和SOC (n = 168)。MDT包括放疗、切除或消融。放疗作为MDT治疗98%的转移瘤(379例中的370例)。在中位随访53个月时,MDT加SOC的PFS明显更长(风险比[HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41-0.72; p &lt; 0.001)。排除前列腺篮子后,PFS也得到改善(HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40-0.89)。胰腺、前列腺和“其他”组的PFS优于MDT + SOC组,但乳腺和肾脏组的PFS不确定。入组时可检测到ctDNA的患者PFS和总生存期较短。相反,如果ctDNA清除在入组后3个月发生,生存率提高。研究结果还显示,接受MDT + SOC治疗的患者ctDNA清除率提高。作者指出,这些发现指出,MDT的添加可能在治疗少转移性癌症中发挥重要作用。此外,MDT + SOC诱导的免疫激活在PFS优越的篮子中最为明显,这表明另一个值得研究的领域。由于胰腺癌和前列腺癌显示出MDT + SOC的最大前景,研究人员已经启动了胰腺癌的3期EXPAND试验。前列腺癌方面的其他独立研究也在进行中。“其他”篮子的研究结果也为未来对MDT治疗头颈部和妇科癌症的研究提供了证据。超过50%的研究参与者接受了立体定向辐射。Marquez博士指出,这种治疗提供了更集中、更高的剂量,被认为可以最大限度地提高完全根除肿瘤的可能性。作为一名经常治疗乳腺癌的临床医生,她指出,乳腺癌的研究结果令人失望,但并不完全令人惊讶,因为其他研究也有类似的结果。在两组研究中,PFS大约为24个月。“这并不是因为乳腺癌对辐射没有反应——我们有很好的局部控制,”Marquez博士说。“这更多地与他们随后的疾病传播有关,尽管我们可能只在成像上看到一两个部位,但可能还有更多我们还看不到的部位。”然而,她对胰腺癌的结果感到鼓舞,胰腺癌的生长速度更快,也更致命。Marquez博士说:“如果你看看胰腺癌,标准治疗的平均进展月数是2.5个月,而添加MDT的平均进展月数是10.5个月,这是一个显著的改善。”她还对ctDNA的发现感兴趣,因为它可以帮助科学家更好地了解哪些患者可能从MDT的增加中受益。同样,EXTEND研究的作者指出了发现生物标志物的重要性,这些生物标志物可以识别谁最有可能对MDT有反应。在赞扬这项研究的设计的同时,Marquez博士补充说,鉴于相当健康的人群,研究结果应该在背景下考虑。她说:“总的来说,这是一组非常精选的患者,他们的转移性疾病很少,而且之前没有接受过很多治疗。”“平均年龄在60岁到72岁之间,所以你已经挑选了一组相当不错的患者。 EXTEND的作者警告说,在临床试验之外的临床实践中不要常规使用MDT,并补充说,篮子设计似乎适用于未来的低转移性和低进展性疾病的研究。
{"title":"Metastasis-directed radiation therapy may improve progression-free survival in patients with oligometastatic solid tumors","authors":"Carrie Printz","doi":"10.3322/caac.70098","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.70098","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;In recent years, scientists have learned that patients with a limited number of metastases (i.e., oligometastatic cancers) experience improved progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes with the addition of stereotactic ablative radiosurgery directed to those metastases. These findings were demonstrated by the phase 2, randomized SABR-COMET trial (doi:10.1200/JCO.20.00818).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although SABR-COMET assessed patients with many different cancers, a new phase 2 study, EXTEND, sought to determine which patients with specific cancers would benefit from a similar type of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) approach in combination with standard-of-care (SOC) systemic therapy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Findings indicated that adding MDT radiation therapy to SOC for oligometastatic disease improved PFS for patients with pancreatic, prostate, and other cancers. However, results for breast and kidney cancers were inconclusive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was published in the &lt;i&gt;Journal of Clinical Oncology&lt;/i&gt; (doi:10.1200/JCO-25-02856).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The multicenter, phase 2 EXTEND trial randomized patients to MDT plus SOC or SOC alone in one of six histology-specific baskets: breast, pancreas, kidney, two prostate baskets, and one “other” basket. PFS was the primary endpoint. Exploratory endpoints were ctDNA and immune profiling.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Eligible patients had one to five metastases, had received no more than four prior lines of systemic therapy for metastatic disease, and had a diagnosis within one of 12 specified histologies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Between 2018 and 2023, 350 patients were randomized, and 334 were analyzed: MDT plus SOC (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 166) and SOC (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 168). MDT could include radiotherapy, resection, or ablation. Radiotherapy was used as MDT for 98% of metastases (370 of 379). At a median follow-up of 53 months, PFS was significantly longer with MDT plus SOC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41–0.72; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; .001). PFS also improved when the prostate baskets were excluded (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40–0.89).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The pancreas, prostate, and “other” baskets had superior PFS with MDT plus SOC, but the breast and kidney baskets were inconclusive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Patients with detectable ctDNA at enrollment had shorter PFS and overall survival. Conversely, if ctDNA clearance occurred 3 months after enrollment, survival rates were improved. Findings also showed that patients treated with MDT plus SOC had improved clearance of ctDNA. The authors noted that these findings point to the important role that the addition of MDT may play in treating oligometastatic cancer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In addition, immune activation induced by MDT plus SOC was most pronounced among baskets with superior PFS, and this indicates another area that warrants investigation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Because pancreatic and prostate cancers showed the greatest promise with MDT plus SOC, researchers have initiated the phase 3 EXPAND trial in pancreatic cancer. Other independent research efforts are underway in prostate cancer. Findings in the “other” basket also ","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"76 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":685.2,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70098","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148784614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to “Serious mental illness and cancer: A call to action for equitable care” 更正“严重精神疾病和癌症:呼吁采取行动争取公平护理”
IF 685.2 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-07-30 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70101

McFarland D, Bergerot C, Bidstrup P, et al. Serious mental illness and cancer: a call to action for equitable care. CA Cancer J Clin. 2026;e70095. doi:10.3322/caac.70095

An author’s first name was misspelled in the original publication. The sixth author’s name should read Shahrzad Zamani.

The authors apologize for this error.

McFarland D, Bergerot C, Bidstrup P,等。严重精神疾病和癌症:呼吁采取行动争取公平护理。中华肿瘤杂志,2009;01 - 01。doi: 10.3322 /民航总局。一位作者的名字在原出版物中拼错了。第六位作者的名字应该是Shahrzad Zamani。作者为这个错误道歉。
{"title":"Correction to “Serious mental illness and cancer: A call to action for equitable care”","authors":"","doi":"10.3322/caac.70101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.70101","url":null,"abstract":"<p>McFarland D, Bergerot C, Bidstrup P, et al. Serious mental illness and cancer: a call to action for equitable care. <i>CA Cancer J Clin</i>. 2026;e70095. doi:10.3322/caac.70095</p><p>An author’s first name was misspelled in the original publication. The sixth author’s name should read Shahrzad Zamani.</p><p>The authors apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"76 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":685.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70101","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148616821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Accurate data as the foundation of equitable cancer control: Lessons from global cancer statistics 2024 and the complexity of ovarian cancer 准确的数据作为公平癌症控制的基础:来自2024年全球癌症统计的教训和卵巢癌的复杂性
IF 685.2 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-07-17 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70096
Christina R. Washington MD, Kathleen N. Moore MD, MS, Isabelle L. Ray-Coquard MD, PhD
<p>In this issue of <i>CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians</i>, Sung and colleagues present global cancer statistics 2024, the latest in the GLOBOCAN series produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.<span><sup>1</sup></span> They estimate 20.6 million new cancer cases and 9.8 million cancer deaths worldwide in 2024, equivalent to one in five people developing cancer in their lifetime, and project that the annual burden will reach 31.5 million cases by 2050, a 53% increase driven largely by population growth and aging.<span><sup>1</sup></span> The largest proportional increases will fall on low Human Development Index (HDI) and medium-HDI countries, <i>where the number of new cases is projected to roughly double</i>. The value of these figures for setting screening, prevention, and treatment policy depends on the accuracy of the data used to generate them. This accuracy is weakest in parts of the world where the cancer burden is projected to grow fastest.</p><p>Sung and colleagues are explicit about this limitation. They note that only about one in three countries reports high-quality incidence data to the International Agency for Research on Cancer's Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, whereas only one in four countries reports high-quality national mortality data to the World Health Organization.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Population-based cancer registries (PBCRs) capture a small fraction of the population across much of sub-Saharan Africa and Asia, and national vital statistics systems frequently suffer from incomplete coverage and from reliance on nonspecific causes of death that must be statistically redistributed.<span><sup>2, 3</sup></span> Therefore, the 2024 estimates are best understood as a synthesis of observed data, short-term prediction, and modeled mortality-to-incidence ratios, largely extrapolated from data collected before 2020.<span><sup>1</sup></span> The robustness of that synthesis varies widely by region, and this variability can affect the global estimates on which policymakers, funders, and clinicians base their decisions.</p><p>These limitations have practical consequences. When the two principal global frameworks, GLOBOCAN and the Global Burden of Disease Study, disagree on basic questions such as which cancer is most commonly diagnosed worldwide, the discrepancy arises from differences in data processing, modeling strategy, and the redistribution of ill-defined mortality codes rather than from differences in underlying biology.<span><sup>1, 4</sup></span> Most registries also lack individual-level data on socioeconomic status, a key surrogate for the social determinants that drive much of the variation in incidence and outcome, and this limits how meaningfully registry data can be translated into targeted intervention.</p><p>Global cancer statistics 2024 illustrates why data annotation beyond only incidence and mortality matters. The report documents a marked decoupling of incidence and mortality by HD
在本期CA中:在《临床医生癌症杂志》上,Sung及其同事发表了2024年全球癌症统计数据,这是国际癌症研究机构制作的GLOBOCAN系列的最新数据。他们估计,到2024年,全球将有2060万新癌症病例和980万癌症死亡病例,相当于五分之一的人在一生中患上癌症,并预计到2050年,年度负担将达到3150万例,主要受人口增长和老龄化的推动,这一数字将增加53%增长比例最大的将是低人类发展指数和中等人类发展指数国家,这些国家的新病例数预计将增加约一倍。这些数据对于制定筛查、预防和治疗政策的价值取决于用于生成这些数据的数据的准确性。在世界上预计癌症负担增长最快的地区,这种准确性最弱。Sung和他的同事明确指出了这一限制。他们指出,只有大约三分之一的国家向国际癌症五大洲癌症发病率研究机构报告高质量的发病率数据,而只有四分之一的国家向世界卫生组织报告高质量的国家死亡率数据。1基于人口的癌症登记(pbcr)只覆盖了撒哈拉以南非洲和亚洲大部分地区的一小部分人口。国家生命统计系统经常存在不完全覆盖和依赖非特定死亡原因的问题,这些原因必须在统计上重新分配。2,3因此,最好将2024年的估计值理解为观察数据、短期预测和模拟死亡率与发病率的综合,主要是从2020年之前收集的数据推断出来的。1这种综合的稳健性因地区而异,这种可变性可能影响决策者、资助者和临床医生根据其做出决定的全球估计值。这些限制产生了实际后果。当两个主要的全球框架GLOBOCAN和全球疾病负担研究在诸如世界范围内最常诊断哪种癌症等基本问题上存在分歧时,这种差异源于数据处理、建模策略和重新分配定义不清的死亡率代码方面的差异,而不是源于潜在生物学方面的差异。1,4大多数登记也缺乏个人层面的社会经济地位数据,而社会经济地位是驱动发病率和结果变化的社会决定因素的关键替代因素,这限制了将登记数据转化为有针对性干预的有意义方式。2024年全球癌症统计数据说明了为什么数据注释不仅仅是发病率和死亡率重要。报告记录了人类发展指数对发病率和死亡率的显著影响。前列腺癌发病率在HDI高的国家比HDI低的国家高出近三倍(34.9比13.1 / 100000),但死亡率是相当的(7.4比6.9);在高HDI环境中,乳腺癌发病率明显更高(54.1 vs. 33.6),但低HDI国家的死亡率更高(14.7 vs. 11.7)这些差距反映的是生存和可及性方面的差异,而不是疾病生物学方面的差异,对这些差异的解释需要关于诊断、治疗阶段和护理及时性的数据,而大多数登记处没有收集这些数据。最近的一项全球调查表明,只有不到三分之二的pbcr公布了生存结果,甚至更少公布捕获阶段、治疗、生物标志物或社会经济因素,这一差距在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)最为明显。如果Sung及其同事所描述的局限性适用于所有癌症,那么对于本质上难以诊断、分类和治疗的恶性肿瘤,这种局限性就被放大了。上皮性卵巢癌就是一个明显的例子。在2024年的全球癌症统计数据中,它的发病率仅排在第18位,但在女性癌症死亡中所占的比例不成比例,估计2024年约有33万新发病例和20.3万例死亡。这是所有实体瘤中死亡率和发病率最高的肿瘤之一。1,6其诊断、组织学和治疗的复杂性有助于解释为什么报告的准确性如此难以实现。没有有效的筛选试验;大约80%的患者通常在出现几个月的非特异性症状后出现晚期疾病,而且各国卫生系统之间和全球卫生系统之间进行初步诊断评估的门槛差别很大诊断方法的不同会导致注册表所能记录的内容的不同。上皮性卵巢癌不仅仅是一种疾病,而是几种不同的组织学和越来越多的分子亚型,其分布在世界各地各不相同。这一点很重要,因为这些不同的亚型具有不同的分子特征、起源和预后。 在一些登记处,将卵巢癌重新分类为起源于输卵管的癌症已使卵巢癌发病率明显下降,但并非全部。这增加了对发病率趋势的一些困惑。此外,透明细胞癌和黏液癌等亚型在地理和种族患病率上有所不同。透明细胞癌在东亚的病例中所占的份额比在西方人群中要大得多,然而大多数登记并不能可靠地区分亚型临床试验中的中心专家病理审查证实,只有少数局部诊断的粘液性卵巢癌,这表明错误分类如何从源头上破坏了发病率和生存率统计数据。也许数据复杂性最大的领域与癌症管理及其文档相关。卵巢癌患者的最佳护理需要专门的手术,BRCA1/BRCA2和同源重组缺乏状态的分子检测,免疫组织化学标记物的增加以及维持治疗的获得,这些在大多数低收入国家都是稀缺的由于缺乏组织学特异性的自然历史数据,使得对罕见亚型的新疗法的调节阈值定义不清,而且在没有可靠的基线统计数据的情况下难以确定。这些数据差距与《2024年全球癌症统计》报告的生存差异一致。报告显示,随着人类发展指数的增加,患癌症的累积风险急剧上升,而死亡的风险却没有上升,这种模式反映了早期发现和治疗的不同途径,就像暴露的不同一样,但没有反映内在生物学上的差异SURVCAN-3基准研究(非洲、亚洲和南美洲的癌症生存项目)发现,在包括卵巢癌在内的许多癌症中,低HDI和极高HDI设置之间的3年生存差距为20-50个百分点,只有在统一的预后差的癌症中才相对公平由于Sung和他的同事们预测,在人类发展指数较低的国家,病例的相对增加幅度最大,而且这些国家的登记数据最不完整,因此,未来病例的增加可能包括不成比例的亚型,这些亚型目前登记不足,因此未得到充分认识。这是全球统计数据尚未具备的数据缺口,但对于制定政策和评估在人口层面提供适当护理的能力至关重要。VENUSCANCER项目是一个更强大的注册表的例子,以及它如何推动更多基于数据的政策决策。VENUSCANCER分析了来自39个国家超过275,000名女性的个人记录,记录了从诊断到治疗的时间差异很大,从上皮性卵巢癌诊断到手术的中位间隔在一些低收入国家超过4个月,而在高收入国家则不到1个月大多数登记处没有收集这种及时性指标,但它使2024年全球癌症统计中的发病率和死亡率计数能够转化为能力规划。全球癌症统计报告在利用成熟的登记合作时最为可靠,包括欧洲癌症登记网络、中国国家癌症登记项目、非洲癌症登记网络和SURVCAN生存数据库将其扩展到这些丰富而完善的项目之外,需要对pbcr进行持续投资,特别是在中低收入国家。据估计,在几个低收入国家,人口水平的癌症登记费用仅为每人1-2美分。然而,与大多数高收入国家相比,大约只有25%的低收入国家拥有PBCR数据。3,9登记还需要扩展到基本的发病率和死亡率之外,以捕获分期、治疗、组织学亚型、生物标志物和分子结果以及社会经济和合并症数据,并得到对病理学家、超声医师和数据管理人员的投资的支持,因为准确的诊断和准确的数据都依赖于他们。3.5在可行的情况下,统一GLOBOCAN和全球疾病负担研究之间的方法,将减少决策者之间的混淆,同时保留方法多样性所提供的独立交叉核查。与此同时,罕见亚型的监管基准应该鼓励跨群体、跨国合作和跨组织学的预先计划分析,这是最近成立的《柳叶刀》卵巢癌委员会(Lancet Commission on Ovarian Cancer)的核心议程,该委员会旨在从多个注册和数据库中获取新数据,以推动以股权为重点的改革。《2024年全球癌症统计》提供了至关重要的基准数据,并明确说明了数据的异质性对
{"title":"Accurate data as the foundation of equitable cancer control: Lessons from global cancer statistics 2024 and the complexity of ovarian cancer","authors":"Christina R. Washington MD,&nbsp;Kathleen N. Moore MD, MS,&nbsp;Isabelle L. Ray-Coquard MD, PhD","doi":"10.3322/caac.70096","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.70096","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;In this issue of &lt;i&gt;CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians&lt;/i&gt;, Sung and colleagues present global cancer statistics 2024, the latest in the GLOBOCAN series produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; They estimate 20.6 million new cancer cases and 9.8 million cancer deaths worldwide in 2024, equivalent to one in five people developing cancer in their lifetime, and project that the annual burden will reach 31.5 million cases by 2050, a 53% increase driven largely by population growth and aging.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The largest proportional increases will fall on low Human Development Index (HDI) and medium-HDI countries, &lt;i&gt;where the number of new cases is projected to roughly double&lt;/i&gt;. The value of these figures for setting screening, prevention, and treatment policy depends on the accuracy of the data used to generate them. This accuracy is weakest in parts of the world where the cancer burden is projected to grow fastest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sung and colleagues are explicit about this limitation. They note that only about one in three countries reports high-quality incidence data to the International Agency for Research on Cancer's Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, whereas only one in four countries reports high-quality national mortality data to the World Health Organization.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Population-based cancer registries (PBCRs) capture a small fraction of the population across much of sub-Saharan Africa and Asia, and national vital statistics systems frequently suffer from incomplete coverage and from reliance on nonspecific causes of death that must be statistically redistributed.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2, 3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Therefore, the 2024 estimates are best understood as a synthesis of observed data, short-term prediction, and modeled mortality-to-incidence ratios, largely extrapolated from data collected before 2020.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The robustness of that synthesis varies widely by region, and this variability can affect the global estimates on which policymakers, funders, and clinicians base their decisions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These limitations have practical consequences. When the two principal global frameworks, GLOBOCAN and the Global Burden of Disease Study, disagree on basic questions such as which cancer is most commonly diagnosed worldwide, the discrepancy arises from differences in data processing, modeling strategy, and the redistribution of ill-defined mortality codes rather than from differences in underlying biology.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1, 4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Most registries also lack individual-level data on socioeconomic status, a key surrogate for the social determinants that drive much of the variation in incidence and outcome, and this limits how meaningfully registry data can be translated into targeted intervention.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Global cancer statistics 2024 illustrates why data annotation beyond only incidence and mortality matters. The report documents a marked decoupling of incidence and mortality by HD","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"76 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":685.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70096","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148467528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global cancer statistics 2024: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 34 cancers in 186 countries 2024年全球癌症统计:GLOBOCAN估计全球186个国家34种癌症的发病率和死亡率。
IF 685.2 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-07-08 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70090
Hyuna Sung PhD, Adalberto M. Filho PhD, Mathieu Laversanne Msc, Jacques Ferlay ME, Rebecca L. Siegel MPH, Isabelle Soerjomataram MD, MSc, PhD, Ahmedin Jemal DVM, PhD, Freddie Bray BSc, MSc, PhD

This article provides updated global cancer statistics for the year 2024 based on the GLOBOCAN estimates of the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The authors describe national cancer incidence and mortality by world region and the Human Development Index and predict the burden in 2050 based on demographic trends. In 2024, an estimated 20.6 million new cancer cases (19.5 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) and 9.8 million deaths (9.7 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) occurred worldwide, equivalent to one in five people developing cancer during their lifetime and one in nine men and one in 13 women dying from the disease. Lung cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer, responsible for almost 2.6 million new cases (12.8%), followed by female breast (11.8%), colorectal (9.9%), prostate (7.5%), and stomach (4.7%) cancer. Lung cancer is also the leading cause of cancer death, with an estimated 1.9 million deaths (19.1%), followed by colorectal (9.4%), liver (7.5%), female breast (7.1%), and stomach (6.6%) cancer. Incidence rates vary four- to five-fold across regions, with the highest rates found in Australia/New Zealand (men, 477 per 100,000; women, 396 per 100,000), whereas mortality rates differ two-fold, with elevated rates in Eastern Europe for men (158 per 100,000) and Melanesia for women (108 per 100,000). The incidence burden is predicted to reach 34.4 million by 2050, up 67% from 2024, with the largest proportional increases in lower Human Development Index countries. Although global variation in cancer profiles demands a nuanced approach to cancer control at national and regional levels, primary prevention must be at the forefront, including intensified efforts to reduce tobacco use, prevent infections, lower alcohol consumption and excess body weight, and increase physical activity.

本文根据国际癌症研究机构的GLOBOCAN估计,提供了2024年最新的全球癌症统计数据。作者描述了世界各地区和人类发展指数的国家癌症发病率和死亡率,并根据人口趋势预测了2050年的负担。2024年,全球估计有2060万新发癌症病例(1950万例不包括非黑色素瘤皮肤癌)和980万例死亡(970万例不包括非黑色素瘤皮肤癌),相当于五分之一的人在其一生中患上癌症,九分之一的男性和13分之一的女性死于该疾病。肺癌是最常见的癌症,约有260万新发病例(12.8%),其次是女性乳腺癌(11.8%)、结直肠癌(9.9%)、前列腺癌(7.5%)和胃癌(4.7%)。肺癌也是癌症死亡的主要原因,估计有190万人死亡(19.1%),其次是结直肠癌(9.4%)、肝癌(7.5%)、女性乳腺癌(7.1%)和胃癌(6.6%)。各区域的发病率相差四到五倍,最高的是澳大利亚/新西兰(男性,每10万人477人;女性,每10万人396人),而死亡率相差两倍,东欧男性(每10万人158人)和美拉尼西亚女性(每10万人108人)的死亡率较高。预计到2050年,发病率负担将达到3440万,比2024年增加67%,其中人类发展指数较低的国家增幅最大。尽管全球癌症概况的差异要求在国家和区域各级采取细致入微的癌症控制方法,但一级预防必须放在首位,包括加强努力减少烟草使用,预防感染,减少饮酒和超重,以及增加身体活动。
{"title":"Global cancer statistics 2024: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 34 cancers in 186 countries","authors":"Hyuna Sung PhD,&nbsp;Adalberto M. Filho PhD,&nbsp;Mathieu Laversanne Msc,&nbsp;Jacques Ferlay ME,&nbsp;Rebecca L. Siegel MPH,&nbsp;Isabelle Soerjomataram MD, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Ahmedin Jemal DVM, PhD,&nbsp;Freddie Bray BSc, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.3322/caac.70090","DOIUrl":"10.3322/caac.70090","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article provides updated global cancer statistics for the year 2024 based on the GLOBOCAN estimates of the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The authors describe national cancer incidence and mortality by world region and the Human Development Index and predict the burden in 2050 based on demographic trends. In 2024, an estimated 20.6 million new cancer cases (19.5 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) and 9.8 million deaths (9.7 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) occurred worldwide, equivalent to one in five people developing cancer during their lifetime and one in nine men and one in 13 women dying from the disease. Lung cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer, responsible for almost 2.6 million new cases (12.8%), followed by female breast (11.8%), colorectal (9.9%), prostate (7.5%), and stomach (4.7%) cancer. Lung cancer is also the leading cause of cancer death, with an estimated 1.9 million deaths (19.1%), followed by colorectal (9.4%), liver (7.5%), female breast (7.1%), and stomach (6.6%) cancer. Incidence rates vary four- to five-fold across regions, with the highest rates found in Australia/New Zealand (men, 477 per 100,000; women, 396 per 100,000), whereas mortality rates differ two-fold, with elevated rates in Eastern Europe for men (158 per 100,000) and Melanesia for women (108 per 100,000). The incidence burden is predicted to reach 34.4 million by 2050, up 67% from 2024, with the largest proportional increases in lower Human Development Index countries. Although global variation in cancer profiles demands a nuanced approach to cancer control at national and regional levels, primary prevention must be at the forefront, including intensified efforts to reduce tobacco use, prevent infections, lower alcohol consumption and excess body weight, and increase physical activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"76 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":685.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70090","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148402980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Serious mental illness and cancer: A call to action for equitable care 严重精神疾病和癌症:呼吁采取行动争取公平护理。
IF 685.2 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-07-03 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70095
Daniel McFarland DO, MS, Cristiane Bergerot PhD, Pernille Bidstrup PhD, Miri Cohen PhD, Paul D’Alton PhD, Shahrzhad Zamani DO, Louise Mullen MSc, Michelle Riba MD, MS, Luigi Grassi MD, Kelly Irwin MD, MPH

Cancer advances are not distributed equitably among many segments of the population. Specifically, individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) face compounded disparities in cancer detection, treatment, and survival. SMI, characterized by conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and severe major depression, is associated with significant functional impairment and a two-to-three-decade reduction in life expectancy. Patients with SMI encounter unique challenges when navigating cancer care, including fragmented care pathways, less access to cancer therapeutics, limited psychosocial support, stigma, heightened vulnerability to diagnostic overshadowing where symptoms are attributed to their psychiatric rather than a medical or oncologic condition, and underrepresentation in therapeutic clinical trials. This review explores the intersection of SMI and cancer care starting with the conceptual background and its importance related to cancer outcomes and the delivery of ethical care to highlight unmet needs and a multitude of barriers. The paper proposes practical recommendations to improve cancer care for individuals with SMI who develop cancer including adopting the collaborative care model, enhancing psychosocial and psychiatric integration in oncology settings, and addressing biases inherent in clinician training. Interventions targeting individual, interpersonal, health system, and policy levels are essential to comprehensively mitigating disparities and developing durable cancer delivery strategies. Equitable cancer care for patients with SMI is both a moral imperative and a cornerstone of advancing social justice in oncology. Thus, there is a critical need to prioritize the translation of research advances, to close the gap in cancer outcomes and mortality, and to improve patient outcomes and wellbeing.

癌症的进展在许多人群中分配不均。具体来说,患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的个体在癌症检测、治疗和生存方面面临着复杂的差异。重度精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和严重重度抑郁症是重度精神分裂症的特征,与严重的功能障碍和预期寿命减少二至三十年有关。重度精神障碍患者在接受癌症治疗时面临着独特的挑战,包括支离破碎的治疗途径、获得癌症治疗的机会较少、有限的社会心理支持、污名化、更容易受到诊断阴影的影响(症状归因于精神疾病而非医学或肿瘤疾病),以及在治疗性临床试验中的代表性不足。这篇综述探讨了SMI和癌症治疗的交叉,从概念背景及其与癌症结局和伦理治疗的重要性开始,以突出未满足的需求和众多障碍。本文提出了切实可行的建议,包括采用协作治疗模式,加强肿瘤环境中的社会心理和精神病学整合,以及解决临床医生培训中固有的偏见。针对个人、人际、卫生系统和政策层面的干预措施对于全面减轻差距和制定持久的癌症递送战略至关重要。对重度精神障碍患者进行公平的癌症治疗既是一种道德要求,也是促进肿瘤社会公正的基石。因此,迫切需要优先考虑研究进展的转化,缩小癌症结局和死亡率之间的差距,并改善患者的结局和福祉。
{"title":"Serious mental illness and cancer: A call to action for equitable care","authors":"Daniel McFarland DO, MS,&nbsp;Cristiane Bergerot PhD,&nbsp;Pernille Bidstrup PhD,&nbsp;Miri Cohen PhD,&nbsp;Paul D’Alton PhD,&nbsp;Shahrzhad Zamani DO,&nbsp;Louise Mullen MSc,&nbsp;Michelle Riba MD, MS,&nbsp;Luigi Grassi MD,&nbsp;Kelly Irwin MD, MPH","doi":"10.3322/caac.70095","DOIUrl":"10.3322/caac.70095","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cancer advances are not distributed equitably among many segments of the population. Specifically, individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) face compounded disparities in cancer detection, treatment, and survival. SMI, characterized by conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and severe major depression, is associated with significant functional impairment and a two-to-three-decade reduction in life expectancy. Patients with SMI encounter unique challenges when navigating cancer care, including fragmented care pathways, less access to cancer therapeutics, limited psychosocial support, stigma, heightened vulnerability to diagnostic overshadowing where symptoms are attributed to their psychiatric rather than a medical or oncologic condition, and underrepresentation in therapeutic clinical trials. This review explores the intersection of SMI and cancer care starting with the conceptual background and its importance related to cancer outcomes and the delivery of ethical care to highlight unmet needs and a multitude of barriers. The paper proposes practical recommendations to improve cancer care for individuals with SMI who develop cancer including adopting the collaborative care model, enhancing psychosocial and psychiatric integration in oncology settings, and addressing biases inherent in clinician training. Interventions targeting individual, interpersonal, health system, and policy levels are essential to comprehensively mitigating disparities and developing durable cancer delivery strategies. Equitable cancer care for patients with SMI is both a moral imperative and a cornerstone of advancing social justice in oncology. Thus, there is a critical need to prioritize the translation of research advances, to close the gap in cancer outcomes and mortality, and to improve patient outcomes and wellbeing.</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"76 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":685.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70095","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148373657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: From fatal to curable 结外自然杀伤/ t细胞淋巴瘤:从致命到可治愈
IF 685.2 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-06-29 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70094
Jie Xiong MD, PhD, Yok-Lam Kwong MD, Laurence de Leval MD, PhD, Shu-Nan Qi MD, Choon Kiat Ong PhD, Philippe Gaulard MD, Arnaud Jaccard MD, Steven M. Horwitz MD, Ye-Xiong Li MD, Sai-Juan Chen MD, PhD, Ritsuro Suzuki MD, Won Seog Kim MD, Wei-Li Zhao MD, PhD

Extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTCL) is one of the most aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas characterized by NK-cell or T-cell origins, a geographic prevalence in Asian and South American populations, and Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection. ENKTCL used to be a fatal disease upon treatment with anthracycline-containing chemotherapies. However, the treatment paradigms for ENKTCL have evolved; consequently, patients have achieved significantly improved clinical outcomes. Today, combined-modality therapies co-targeting genomic instability and metabolic vulnerability comprise the standard of care for early stage ENKTCL, whereas therapies that include targeting of immune and metabolic dysregulation are the backbone of treatment for advanced-stage ENKTCL. New agents targeting surface antigens, oncogenic signaling pathways, and EBV are under investigation and have demonstrated promising responses. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is beneficial when used in therapy-responsive, high-risk patients and ENKTCL-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, but it is not recommended for early stage ENKTCL. Although nearly 80% of patients with newly diagnosed ENKTCL achieve long-term survival, treatment of relapsed/refractory ENKTCL is critical. Because it is now understood that EBV infection has a major role in disease progression, a deeper understanding of EBV-associated oncogenesis and alterations in the tumor microenvironment foster the development of novel therapeutic strategies, such as cellular therapies and vaccines targeting EBV. Future multicenter collaborations worldwide will be needed to further optimize mechanism-based treatment in the era of precision medicine, paving a curative pathway for this once fatal disease.

结外自然杀伤(NK)/ t细胞淋巴瘤(ENKTCL)是最具侵袭性的非霍奇金淋巴瘤之一,其特征是NK细胞或t细胞起源,在亚洲和南美人群中流行,并感染eb病毒(EBV)。ENKTCL曾经是一种使用含蒽环类药物化疗治疗的致命疾病。然而,ENKTCL的治疗模式已经发生了变化;因此,患者取得了显著改善的临床结果。目前,针对基因组不稳定性和代谢易损性的联合疗法构成了早期ENKTCL的标准治疗,而针对免疫和代谢失调的疗法是晚期ENKTCL治疗的支柱。针对表面抗原、致癌信号通路和EBV的新药物正在研究中,并已显示出有希望的反应。造血干细胞移植在治疗反应性、高危患者和ENKTCL相关的噬血细胞淋巴组织细胞增多症中是有益的,但不推荐用于早期ENKTCL。尽管近80%的新诊断ENKTCL患者实现了长期生存,但复发/难治性ENKTCL的治疗至关重要。由于现在已经了解EBV感染在疾病进展中起主要作用,因此对EBV相关的肿瘤发生和肿瘤微环境改变的更深入了解有助于开发新的治疗策略,例如针对EBV的细胞疗法和疫苗。未来世界范围内的多中心合作将需要在精准医学时代进一步优化基于机制的治疗,为这种曾经致命的疾病铺平一条治愈之路。
{"title":"Extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: From fatal to curable","authors":"Jie Xiong MD, PhD,&nbsp;Yok-Lam Kwong MD,&nbsp;Laurence de Leval MD, PhD,&nbsp;Shu-Nan Qi MD,&nbsp;Choon Kiat Ong PhD,&nbsp;Philippe Gaulard MD,&nbsp;Arnaud Jaccard MD,&nbsp;Steven M. Horwitz MD,&nbsp;Ye-Xiong Li MD,&nbsp;Sai-Juan Chen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Ritsuro Suzuki MD,&nbsp;Won Seog Kim MD,&nbsp;Wei-Li Zhao MD, PhD","doi":"10.3322/caac.70094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.70094","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTCL) is one of the most aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas characterized by NK-cell or T-cell origins, a geographic prevalence in Asian and South American populations, and Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection. ENKTCL used to be a fatal disease upon treatment with anthracycline-containing chemotherapies. However, the treatment paradigms for ENKTCL have evolved; consequently, patients have achieved significantly improved clinical outcomes. Today, combined-modality therapies co-targeting genomic instability and metabolic vulnerability comprise the standard of care for early stage ENKTCL, whereas therapies that include targeting of immune and metabolic dysregulation are the backbone of treatment for advanced-stage ENKTCL. New agents targeting surface antigens, oncogenic signaling pathways, and EBV are under investigation and have demonstrated promising responses. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is beneficial when used in therapy-responsive, high-risk patients and ENKTCL-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, but it is not recommended for early stage ENKTCL. Although nearly 80% of patients with newly diagnosed ENKTCL achieve long-term survival, treatment of relapsed/refractory ENKTCL is critical. Because it is now understood that EBV infection has a major role in disease progression, a deeper understanding of EBV-associated oncogenesis and alterations in the tumor microenvironment foster the development of novel therapeutic strategies, such as cellular therapies and vaccines targeting EBV. Future multicenter collaborations worldwide will be needed to further optimize mechanism-based treatment in the era of precision medicine, paving a curative pathway for this once fatal disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"76 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":685.2,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70094","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148343063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Study finds ovarian cancer survivors who are BRCA carriers have a relatively low risk of breast cancer 研究发现,携带BRCA基因的卵巢癌幸存者患乳腺癌的风险相对较低。
IF 685.2 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-06-22 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70084
Carrie Printz
<p>Women with <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> genetic mutations (<i>BRCA</i> carriers) face high risks of developing both breast and ovarian/fallopian tube cancers; however, scientists do not know if risk-reducing mastectomy should be recommended to this group after an ovarian cancer diagnosis.</p><p>Because <i>BRCA</i> carriers have an estimated lifetime breast cancer risk of 70%, many opt for this surgery even when they have no personal cancer history.</p><p>A new study provides further data on this decision for <i>BRCA</i> carriers who are diagnosed with ovarian cancer. It appears in the <i>Journal of Clinical Oncology</i> (doi:10.1200/JCO-25-01648).</p><p>Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines do not provide separate recommendations for <i>BRCA</i> carriers who have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer and those who have not, according to Dallas Reed, MD, chief of clinical genetics at Tufts Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts.</p><p>Instead, guidelines suggest counseling all <i>BRCA1</i> carriers either to undergo yearly screening mammograms, breast examinations, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or to undergo risk-reducing double mastectomy. Patients must make the ultimate decision of how to proceed based on a variety of individual factors.</p><p>“It’s really helpful to have data like these to show what happens to <i>BRCA1</i> or <i>2</i> patients and whether there are differences among the cohorts that we diagnose,” she says.</p><p>Researchers identified 960 participants with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in <i>BRCA1</i> or <i>BRCA2</i>, a diagnosis of ovarian cancer, and no other cancer history or risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy. The 814 <i>BRCA1</i> carriers and 146 <i>BRCA2</i> carriers were followed for incident breast cancer from either the date of their ovarian cancer diagnosis or the date of the baseline questionnaire, whichever was later.</p><p>The study compared 5-, 10-, and 15-year cumulative breast cancer risks for women with ovarian cancer and an age-matched set of control women without ovarian cancer.</p><p>After a mean follow-up of 4.9 years, 41 women (4.3%) developed breast cancer at a mean age at diagnosis of 57.5 years (range, 39–74 years). Actuarial cumulative breast cancer risks after ovarian cancer were 4.4%, 8.9%, and 11.5% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Three deaths related to breast cancer occurred in the study.</p><p>The actuarial cumulative risks of breast cancer for the 741 age-matched <i>BRCA</i> carriers without ovarian cancer were 20.9%, 38.6%, and 47.2% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. The hazard ratio for breast cancer after an ovarian cancer diagnosis versus no ovarian cancer was 0.18 (95% CI, 0.12–0.27; <i>p</i> < .0001).</p><p>The annual risk of breast cancer after an ovarian cancer diagnosis was 0.9%, which was significantly lower than the 4.1% risk observed in age-matched <i>BRCA</i> carriers without an ovarian cancer diagnosis.</p><p>The age of breast cance
BRCA1和BRCA2基因突变的女性(BRCA携带者)患乳腺癌和卵巢癌/输卵管癌的风险很高;然而,科学家们不知道是否应该在卵巢癌诊断后向这一群体推荐降低风险的乳房切除术。由于BRCA携带者一生中患乳腺癌的风险估计为70%,许多人即使没有个人癌症病史也会选择这种手术。一项新的研究为诊断为卵巢癌的BRCA携带者的决定提供了进一步的数据。它出现在临床肿瘤学杂志(doi:10.1200/JCO-25-01648)。根据马萨诸塞州波士顿塔夫茨医学中心临床遗传学主任Dallas Reed医学博士的说法,目前的国家综合癌症网络指南并没有为被诊断为卵巢癌的BRCA携带者和未被诊断为卵巢癌的人提供单独的建议。相反,指南建议对所有BRCA1携带者进行咨询,要么每年进行乳房x光检查、乳房检查和磁共振成像(MRI),要么进行降低风险的双侧乳房切除术。患者必须根据各种个体因素做出如何进行治疗的最终决定。她说:“有这样的数据来显示BRCA1或2患者发生了什么,以及我们诊断的队列之间是否存在差异,这真的很有帮助。”研究人员确定了960名参与者,他们具有BRCA1或BRCA2的致病性/可能致病性变异,诊断为卵巢癌,没有其他癌症病史或降低风险的双侧乳房切除术。814名BRCA1携带者和146名BRCA2携带者从卵巢癌诊断之日或基线问卷调查之日(以较晚者为准)开始随访乳腺癌事件。该研究比较了5年、10年和15年卵巢癌女性和年龄匹配的无卵巢癌对照女性患乳腺癌的累积风险。在平均4.9年的随访后,41名女性(4.3%)在诊断时的平均年龄为57.5岁(范围39-74岁)时患上乳腺癌。卵巢癌发生后5年、10年和15年的累计乳腺癌风险分别为4.4%、8.9%和11.5%。研究中发生了3例与乳腺癌相关的死亡。741名年龄匹配的无卵巢癌BRCA携带者在5年、10年和15年时的乳腺癌精算累积风险分别为20.9%、38.6%和47.2%。诊断为卵巢癌后患乳腺癌与未诊断为卵巢癌的风险比为0.18 (95% CI, 0.12-0.27; p &lt; 0.0001)。卵巢癌诊断后乳腺癌的年风险为0.9%,显著低于年龄匹配的未诊断为卵巢癌的BRCA携带者的4.1%。有卵巢癌病史的女性与没有卵巢癌病史的女性相比,乳腺癌诊断年龄延迟。平均年龄分别为57.5岁和53.3岁。作者得出结论,在这一人群中,常规的、降低风险的乳房切除术是不必要的,MRI和/或乳房x光检查是一个现实的选择。他们补充说,由于乳腺癌的风险随着年龄的增长而增加,对于那些长期存活的人来说,手术是一种选择。里德博士说,目前的数据还不足以得出临床医生不应该推荐降低风险的手术的结论。她指出,临床与患者的对话涉及大量数据和风险百分比,这些新发现可以添加到讨论中。“但我也认为,讨论研究的局限性也很重要,”她说。“我们还没有将这些观点纳入指导方针,但希望它能激发更大的群体来获得更明确的信息。”里德博士说,这项研究包括10年和15年的随访,平均随访时间为5年,通常不足以得出强有力的结论。她指出,除了患者的年龄和家族史外,临床医生在提出建议时还应考虑先前的影像学和活检结果。她说:“这始终是一个更微妙的对话的一部分,我认为我们不会告诉任何BRCA携带者,他们在患卵巢癌后不应该接受双乳切除术。”她指出,研究人员需要更多地了解不同类型的患者是否应该接受不同的咨询。例如,BRCA2研究组的乳腺癌发病率远低于BRCA1携带者;里德博士说,这表明他们的风险可能是不同的,需要进一步的调查。她指出了多种可能的原因,为什么在卵巢癌诊断后,BRCA携带者患乳腺癌的风险似乎更低。首先,摘除卵巢和输卵管可以显著降低患乳腺癌的风险。 其次,患有卵巢癌的女性接受铂类化疗,这可能同时针对早期乳腺癌细胞。Carmen Calfa医学博士是佛罗里达州迈阿密的癌症生存和支持护理研究所-西尔维斯特综合癌症中心的社区外展副主任和医学主任,他说,这项研究为协助个性化决策和精确预防提供了有价值的额外数据。这可能是为这一群体制定推荐指南的第一步。她说:“大多数时候,这些生殖系突变的患者不仅对第一次癌症,而且对他们可能患的其他癌症都有很大的焦虑和恐惧。”“下意识的反应是在降低风险方面做得更多,以便尽可能长寿。”然而,Calfa博士指出,结果表明,这些患者可以考虑在卵巢癌诊断后至少前5年接受监测。不过,她强调,这个决定是因人而异的。例如,如果一名患者在35岁时被诊断出患有卵巢癌,而现在已经40岁了,她可能不想再接受30年的严密监视,因为她知道自己患乳腺癌的风险很高。她说:“对一些患者来说,15年内11%的风险‘微不足道’,而另一些患者可能认为这个数字很大。”幸运的是,这个决定并不需要立即做出,Calfa博士补充道。“我们建议患者不要惊慌,要考虑他们的个人风险、家庭风险和生活优先事项,并对他们想要如何处理这些问题有战略眼光。”
{"title":"Study finds ovarian cancer survivors who are BRCA carriers have a relatively low risk of breast cancer","authors":"Carrie Printz","doi":"10.3322/caac.70084","DOIUrl":"10.3322/caac.70084","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Women with &lt;i&gt;BRCA1&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;BRCA2&lt;/i&gt; genetic mutations (&lt;i&gt;BRCA&lt;/i&gt; carriers) face high risks of developing both breast and ovarian/fallopian tube cancers; however, scientists do not know if risk-reducing mastectomy should be recommended to this group after an ovarian cancer diagnosis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Because &lt;i&gt;BRCA&lt;/i&gt; carriers have an estimated lifetime breast cancer risk of 70%, many opt for this surgery even when they have no personal cancer history.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A new study provides further data on this decision for &lt;i&gt;BRCA&lt;/i&gt; carriers who are diagnosed with ovarian cancer. It appears in the &lt;i&gt;Journal of Clinical Oncology&lt;/i&gt; (doi:10.1200/JCO-25-01648).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines do not provide separate recommendations for &lt;i&gt;BRCA&lt;/i&gt; carriers who have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer and those who have not, according to Dallas Reed, MD, chief of clinical genetics at Tufts Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Instead, guidelines suggest counseling all &lt;i&gt;BRCA1&lt;/i&gt; carriers either to undergo yearly screening mammograms, breast examinations, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or to undergo risk-reducing double mastectomy. Patients must make the ultimate decision of how to proceed based on a variety of individual factors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“It’s really helpful to have data like these to show what happens to &lt;i&gt;BRCA1&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;2&lt;/i&gt; patients and whether there are differences among the cohorts that we diagnose,” she says.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Researchers identified 960 participants with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in &lt;i&gt;BRCA1&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;BRCA2&lt;/i&gt;, a diagnosis of ovarian cancer, and no other cancer history or risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy. The 814 &lt;i&gt;BRCA1&lt;/i&gt; carriers and 146 &lt;i&gt;BRCA2&lt;/i&gt; carriers were followed for incident breast cancer from either the date of their ovarian cancer diagnosis or the date of the baseline questionnaire, whichever was later.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study compared 5-, 10-, and 15-year cumulative breast cancer risks for women with ovarian cancer and an age-matched set of control women without ovarian cancer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;After a mean follow-up of 4.9 years, 41 women (4.3%) developed breast cancer at a mean age at diagnosis of 57.5 years (range, 39–74 years). Actuarial cumulative breast cancer risks after ovarian cancer were 4.4%, 8.9%, and 11.5% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Three deaths related to breast cancer occurred in the study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The actuarial cumulative risks of breast cancer for the 741 age-matched &lt;i&gt;BRCA&lt;/i&gt; carriers without ovarian cancer were 20.9%, 38.6%, and 47.2% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. The hazard ratio for breast cancer after an ovarian cancer diagnosis versus no ovarian cancer was 0.18 (95% CI, 0.12–0.27; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; .0001).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The annual risk of breast cancer after an ovarian cancer diagnosis was 0.9%, which was significantly lower than the 4.1% risk observed in age-matched &lt;i&gt;BRCA&lt;/i&gt; carriers without an ovarian cancer diagnosis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The age of breast cance","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"76 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":685.2,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70084","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148292615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Data support longer recurrence-free survival with nivolumab than with ipilimumab for stage III or IV melanoma 数据支持nivolumab比ipilimumab治疗III期或IV期黑色素瘤的无复发生存期更长。
IF 685.2 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-06-22 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70085
Carrie Printz
<p>Adjuvant treatment of patients with a high recurrence risk of resectable stage III or IV melanoma is the recommended standard of care. Therapies include nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and ipilimumab for all patients with melanoma and dabrafenib plus trametinib for patients with melanomas that harbor the BRAF V600 mutation.</p><p>In 2017, the CheckMate 238 trial showed that adjuvant nivolumab was superior to ipilimumab in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis–free survival in patients with resected stage IIIB–C or stage IV melanoma. Nivolumab also was shown to have a more favorable safety profile.</p><p>The final analysis of CheckMate 238 with a minimum follow-up of 9 years supports a sustained finding of longer RFS with nivolumab compared to ipilimumab.</p><p>“After the initial results of CheckMate 238 became available, we knew that nivolumab was the superior therapy in these patients, but this longer-term follow up gives us additional information on how to manage them as well as confirms persistence of the therapy’s benefits,” says Bartosz Chmielowski, MD, PhD, a health sciences clinical professor of medicine in the Division of Hematology–Oncology at the University of California Los Angeles.</p><p>CheckMate 238 was a phase 3, randomized trial with results previously published in <i>The New England Journal of Medicine</i> (doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1709030). Between March 30 and November 30, 2015, 906 patients, aged 15 years or older, were randomly assigned to receive either nivolumab or ipilimumab. All participants had completely resected stage IIIB–C or IV melanoma.</p><p>The primary endpoint was RFS. Scans were not required after 60 months, and RFS was determined by investigator reports of recurrence or a new primary lesion. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. In patients with stage 3 melanoma, distant metastasis–free survival was an exploratory endpoint.</p><p>Since the original trial results, researchers also have gathered new data for guiding treatment, including information on the first sites of distant recurrence, subsequent systemic therapy, and the time from randomization to progression during next-line systemic therapy. Moreover, they have conducted post hoc analyses of the probability of death from melanoma.</p><p>At a minimum follow-up of 9 years, the median duration of RFS was 61.1 months with nivolumab and 24.2 months with ipilimumab (hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63–0.90). The 9-year RFS rates were 44% and 37%, respectively.</p><p>The median distant metastasis–free survival for patients with stage III melanoma was more than 9 years with nivolumab and 83.8 months with ipilimumab, with 9-year survival rates of 54% and 48%, respectively (hazard ratio for distant metastasis or death, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65–1.00). The median OS was more than 9 years in both trial groups, with 9-year survival rates of 69% in the nivolumab group and 65% in the ipilimumab group (hazard ratio fo
可切除的III期或IV期黑色素瘤高复发风险患者的辅助治疗是推荐的护理标准。治疗方法包括针对所有黑色素瘤患者的nivolumab、pembrolizumab和ipilimumab,以及针对含有BRAF V600突变的黑色素瘤患者的dabrafenib + trametinib。2017年,CheckMate 238试验显示,在切除的IIIB-C期或IV期黑色素瘤患者中,辅助nivolumab在无复发生存(RFS)和无远处转移生存方面优于伊匹单抗。Nivolumab也被证明具有更有利的安全性。CheckMate 238的最终分析与至少9年的随访相比,支持纳武单抗比伊匹单抗具有更长的RFS。“在CheckMate 238的初步结果公布后,我们知道尼武单抗是这些患者的最佳治疗方法,但长期随访为我们提供了如何管理这些患者的额外信息,并证实了该疗法的益处的持久性,”加州大学洛杉矶分校血液肿瘤学部门的健康科学临床医学教授Bartosz Chmielowski医学博士说。CheckMate 238是一项3期随机试验,其结果先前发表在《新英格兰医学杂志》(doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1709030)上。在2015年3月30日至11月30日期间,906名15岁或以上的患者被随机分配接受nivolumab或ipilimumab治疗。所有参与者都完全切除了IIIB-C期或IV期黑色素瘤。主要终点为RFS。60个月后不需要扫描,RFS由研究人员报告的复发或新的原发病变来确定。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)和安全性。在3期黑色素瘤患者中,无远处转移生存期是一个探索性终点。自最初的试验结果以来,研究人员还收集了指导治疗的新数据,包括远处复发的第一个部位的信息,随后的全身治疗,以及从随机到下一步全身治疗进展的时间。此外,他们还对黑色素瘤的死亡概率进行了事后分析。在至少9年的随访中,纳武单抗组RFS的中位持续时间为61.1个月,伊匹单抗组为24.2个月(复发或死亡的风险比为0.76;95% CI为0.63-0.90)。9年的RFS率分别为44%和37%。nivolumab组III期黑色素瘤患者的中位无远处转移生存期为9年以上,ipilimumab组为83.8个月,9年生存率分别为54%和48%(远处转移或死亡的危险比为0.81;95% CI为0.65-1.00)。两个试验组的中位总生存期均超过9年,纳武单抗组的9年生存率为69%,伊匹单抗组的9年生存率为65%(死亡风险比0.88;95% CI, 0.69-1.11)。尼武单抗组9年黑色素瘤死亡率为26%,伊匹单抗组为30%(风险比0.87;95% CI, 0.67-1.13)。纳武单抗组37.3%的患者接受后续治疗,伊匹单抗组44.6%的患者接受后续治疗。在4年的数据库锁定后,没有新的不良事件数据与两种治疗相关。一项回顾性分析不支持最近的一种观点,即治疗给药的时间(上午与下午)可能很重要。研究人员证实了nivolumab与ipilimumab在RFS方面的长期治疗优势以及较少的不良事件。他们指出,这项研究揭示了更多关于患者复发和死亡的数据,包括一些已经停止治疗8年的患者。因此,他们指出需要进行持续监测。此外,他们呼吁进一步研究在治疗过程中免疫治疗的时机(即,是否应该是新辅助,辅助,或两者兼而有之)。Chmielowski博士说:“我们所有癌症治疗的主要目标是让人们活得更长,但第二个目标也是非常重要的,那就是如果我们不能帮助他们活得更长,确保他们的生活质量良好或得到改善。”他补充说,根据初步试验之前的结果,临床医生更倾向于pd -1阻断抗体(例如,纳武单抗或派姆单抗)而不是伊匹单抗。他还强调,新的数据表明长期监测黑色素瘤患者的重要性。虽然最初的试验结果显示51%的患者在第5年没有复发,但另外7%的纳武单抗患者在第9年出现复发。“你仍然需要保持警惕,”他说。“我们真的不知道我们应该做多少成像研究,但你至少要让病人意识到,如果他们感到新的肿块或肿块,或者有任何新的症状,这可能与他们多年前患的黑色素瘤有关。” Chmielowski博士指出了黑色素瘤治疗的新进展,包括新辅助免疫疗法的使用。该疗法仅适用于术前已知患有III期疾病的患者;即在体格检查或基线影像学检查中发现病理淋巴结。在这个患者群体中,新辅助免疫治疗优于辅助治疗。这只有在外科医生和内科肿瘤学家密切合作的情况下才能实现。研究人员还在开发一种个性化疫苗,可能会进一步提高pd -1阻断抗体的活性。
{"title":"Data support longer recurrence-free survival with nivolumab than with ipilimumab for stage III or IV melanoma","authors":"Carrie Printz","doi":"10.3322/caac.70085","DOIUrl":"10.3322/caac.70085","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Adjuvant treatment of patients with a high recurrence risk of resectable stage III or IV melanoma is the recommended standard of care. Therapies include nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and ipilimumab for all patients with melanoma and dabrafenib plus trametinib for patients with melanomas that harbor the BRAF V600 mutation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In 2017, the CheckMate 238 trial showed that adjuvant nivolumab was superior to ipilimumab in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis–free survival in patients with resected stage IIIB–C or stage IV melanoma. Nivolumab also was shown to have a more favorable safety profile.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The final analysis of CheckMate 238 with a minimum follow-up of 9 years supports a sustained finding of longer RFS with nivolumab compared to ipilimumab.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“After the initial results of CheckMate 238 became available, we knew that nivolumab was the superior therapy in these patients, but this longer-term follow up gives us additional information on how to manage them as well as confirms persistence of the therapy’s benefits,” says Bartosz Chmielowski, MD, PhD, a health sciences clinical professor of medicine in the Division of Hematology–Oncology at the University of California Los Angeles.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CheckMate 238 was a phase 3, randomized trial with results previously published in &lt;i&gt;The New England Journal of Medicine&lt;/i&gt; (doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1709030). Between March 30 and November 30, 2015, 906 patients, aged 15 years or older, were randomly assigned to receive either nivolumab or ipilimumab. All participants had completely resected stage IIIB–C or IV melanoma.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The primary endpoint was RFS. Scans were not required after 60 months, and RFS was determined by investigator reports of recurrence or a new primary lesion. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. In patients with stage 3 melanoma, distant metastasis–free survival was an exploratory endpoint.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since the original trial results, researchers also have gathered new data for guiding treatment, including information on the first sites of distant recurrence, subsequent systemic therapy, and the time from randomization to progression during next-line systemic therapy. Moreover, they have conducted post hoc analyses of the probability of death from melanoma.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At a minimum follow-up of 9 years, the median duration of RFS was 61.1 months with nivolumab and 24.2 months with ipilimumab (hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63–0.90). The 9-year RFS rates were 44% and 37%, respectively.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The median distant metastasis–free survival for patients with stage III melanoma was more than 9 years with nivolumab and 83.8 months with ipilimumab, with 9-year survival rates of 54% and 48%, respectively (hazard ratio for distant metastasis or death, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65–1.00). The median OS was more than 9 years in both trial groups, with 9-year survival rates of 69% in the nivolumab group and 65% in the ipilimumab group (hazard ratio fo","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"76 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":685.2,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70085","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148292659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Radiation therapy, cytogenetic prognostication, novel systemic chemotherapy, and patient perspective in an adult with choroidal melanoma 成人脉络膜黑色素瘤的放射治疗、细胞遗传学预后、新型全身化疗和患者观点。
IF 232.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-06-10 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70091
Kevin Card MD, Rizwan Haq MD, PhD, John Mignano MD, PhD, Shilpa J. Desai MD
<p>LF was followed with stable ocular tumor measurements and resolution of her serous retinal detachment until July 27, 2023. Her fundus photography then showed tumor growth at the superior aspect of the lesion (Figure 3A) without obvious increase in thickness of the original mass (Figure 3B). The patient was offered enucleation, repeat GKSRS, or plaque brachytherapy (PBT). She elected to repeat GKSRS, which was completed on August 13, 2023. At that time, the area of recurrent choroidal melanoma had a volume of approximately 0.34 mL (Figure 4). GKSRS treatment delivered a dose of 20 Gy to the 50% isodose line using a plan consisting of seven isocenters, which encompassed the entire lesion volume.</p><p>Given the high risk of metastasis associated with choroidal melanoma, she was followed annually with surveillance abdominal MRI. In October 2023, three lesions on the liver (1.3, 0.8, and 0.5 cm) were detected, and liver biopsy confirmed the presence of liver metastases. Several treatment options were considered, but she ultimately was enrolled in a clinical trial combining darovasertib and crizotinib because of promising results (see Medical oncology perspective, below). This option was also influenced by the restriction of this clinical trial to the front-line setting. She was not eligible for treatment with tebenafusp because human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotype did not reveal HLA-A*02:01. She began treatment with IDE196 (darovasertib) along with crizotinib, which she generally tolerated despite some nausea and lower extremity edema, both of which resolved.</p><p>After the repeat GKSRS, her ocular tumor measurements were again stable until August 8, 2024, when another area of tumor extension was noted at the superotemporal edge of the original tumor (Figure 5A), with ultrasound demonstrating thickness of the extension at 2.70 mm (Figure 5B). We again discussed enucleation, repeat GKSRS, or PBT. Observation was not an option because, without local control, the ocular melanoma would continue to grow, leading to a blind and painful eye. Therefore, despite visual acuity of 20/30, the patient elected for enucleation. She underwent enucleation of the right eye on September 9, 2024. Tissue pathology showed epithelioid cell melanoma, which extended to the anterior ciliary body without involvement of the sclera or the optic nerve (Figure 6A,B).</p><p>LF currently uses an ocular prosthesis in place of the right eye. Repeat MRI of the abdomen in January 2026 showed progression of her liver metastasis and a rising circulating tumor DNA tumor fraction after relative stability since October 2023 on darovasertib and crizotinib. Scans show no evidence of extrahepatic disease, thus she has been referred for consideration of liver-directed therapy.</p><p>Rizwan Haq reports grants/contracts from Delcath; personal/consulting fees from Delcath, Immunocore, and Pfizer, and support for other professional activities from Pfizer outside the submitted work. The remaini
LF随访后,稳定的眼部肿瘤测量和浆液性视网膜脱离消退,直到2023年7月27日。眼底摄影显示病灶上方肿瘤生长(图3A),原始肿块厚度未明显增加(图3B)。给予患者去核、重复GKSRS或斑块近距离治疗(PBT)。她选择重复GKSRS,于2023年8月13日完成。此时,脉络膜黑色素瘤复发区体积约为0.34 mL(图4)。GKSRS治疗使用由7个等中心组成的计划,将20 Gy的剂量传递到50%等剂量线上,包括整个病变体积。鉴于与脉络膜黑色素瘤相关的高转移风险,她每年接受腹部MRI监测。2023年10月,肝脏3处病变(1.3 cm、0.8 cm、0.5 cm),肝活检证实肝转移。考虑了几种治疗方案,但由于有希望的结果,她最终参加了darovasertib和crizotinib的临床试验(见下文的医学肿瘤学观点)。这一选择也受到该临床试验对一线环境的限制的影响。由于人类白细胞抗原(HLA)基因型未显示HLA- a *02:01,患者不适合用tebenafusp治疗。她开始使用IDE196 (darovasertib)和克唑替尼治疗,尽管有恶心和下肢水肿,但她一般耐受,这两种症状都消失了。重复GKSRS后,患者的眼部肿瘤测量再次稳定,直到2024年8月8日,在原肿瘤的颞上边缘发现另一个肿瘤扩展区域(图5A),超声显示肿瘤扩展厚度为2.70 mm(图5B)。我们再次讨论了去核、重复GKSRS或PBT。观察不是一种选择,因为如果没有局部控制,眼部黑色素瘤会继续生长,导致眼睛失明和疼痛。因此,尽管视力为20/30,患者还是选择了摘除。她于2024年9月9日接受了右眼眼球摘除手术。组织病理学显示上皮样细胞黑色素瘤,其延伸至前睫状体,但未累及巩膜或视神经(图6A,B)。LF目前使用眼假体代替右眼。2026年1月腹部重复MRI显示肝转移进展,循环肿瘤DNA肿瘤分数上升,自2023年10月服用darovasertib和crizotinib后相对稳定。扫描显示没有肝外疾病的证据,因此她已被推荐考虑肝脏定向治疗。Rizwan Haq在Delcath报道拨款/合同;Delcath、Immunocore和辉瑞的个人/咨询费,以及辉瑞在提交的工作之外的其他专业活动的支持。其余作者没有披露任何利益冲突。
{"title":"Radiation therapy, cytogenetic prognostication, novel systemic chemotherapy, and patient perspective in an adult with choroidal melanoma","authors":"Kevin Card MD,&nbsp;Rizwan Haq MD, PhD,&nbsp;John Mignano MD, PhD,&nbsp;Shilpa J. Desai MD","doi":"10.3322/caac.70091","DOIUrl":"10.3322/caac.70091","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;LF was followed with stable ocular tumor measurements and resolution of her serous retinal detachment until July 27, 2023. Her fundus photography then showed tumor growth at the superior aspect of the lesion (Figure 3A) without obvious increase in thickness of the original mass (Figure 3B). The patient was offered enucleation, repeat GKSRS, or plaque brachytherapy (PBT). She elected to repeat GKSRS, which was completed on August 13, 2023. At that time, the area of recurrent choroidal melanoma had a volume of approximately 0.34 mL (Figure 4). GKSRS treatment delivered a dose of 20 Gy to the 50% isodose line using a plan consisting of seven isocenters, which encompassed the entire lesion volume.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Given the high risk of metastasis associated with choroidal melanoma, she was followed annually with surveillance abdominal MRI. In October 2023, three lesions on the liver (1.3, 0.8, and 0.5 cm) were detected, and liver biopsy confirmed the presence of liver metastases. Several treatment options were considered, but she ultimately was enrolled in a clinical trial combining darovasertib and crizotinib because of promising results (see Medical oncology perspective, below). This option was also influenced by the restriction of this clinical trial to the front-line setting. She was not eligible for treatment with tebenafusp because human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotype did not reveal HLA-A*02:01. She began treatment with IDE196 (darovasertib) along with crizotinib, which she generally tolerated despite some nausea and lower extremity edema, both of which resolved.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;After the repeat GKSRS, her ocular tumor measurements were again stable until August 8, 2024, when another area of tumor extension was noted at the superotemporal edge of the original tumor (Figure 5A), with ultrasound demonstrating thickness of the extension at 2.70 mm (Figure 5B). We again discussed enucleation, repeat GKSRS, or PBT. Observation was not an option because, without local control, the ocular melanoma would continue to grow, leading to a blind and painful eye. Therefore, despite visual acuity of 20/30, the patient elected for enucleation. She underwent enucleation of the right eye on September 9, 2024. Tissue pathology showed epithelioid cell melanoma, which extended to the anterior ciliary body without involvement of the sclera or the optic nerve (Figure 6A,B).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;LF currently uses an ocular prosthesis in place of the right eye. Repeat MRI of the abdomen in January 2026 showed progression of her liver metastasis and a rising circulating tumor DNA tumor fraction after relative stability since October 2023 on darovasertib and crizotinib. Scans show no evidence of extrahepatic disease, thus she has been referred for consideration of liver-directed therapy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rizwan Haq reports grants/contracts from Delcath; personal/consulting fees from Delcath, Immunocore, and Pfizer, and support for other professional activities from Pfizer outside the submitted work. The remaini","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"76 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":232.4,"publicationDate":"2026-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70091","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148209364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systemic amyloid light-chain amyloidosis beyond ANDROMEDA: Diagnostic challenges and therapeutic updates 仙女座菌株以外的系统性淀粉样蛋白轻链淀粉样变性:诊断挑战和治疗更新。
IF 232.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-06-08 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70092
Xia Wu MD, Heather Landau MD, Jennifer E. Liu MD, Yihan Cao MD, Raymond L. Comenzo MD

Systemic immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis is a rare but life-threatening plasma cell disorder characterized by the production of misfolded monoclonal light chains that deposit as amyloid fibrils, leading to pathologic tissue remodeling and progressive multiorgan dysfunction. Despite substantial therapeutic advances, delayed diagnosis remains common because of nonspecific presentations and the need for coordinated hematologic, pathologic, and organ-specific evaluation. The introduction of daratumumab-based regimens has transformed frontline therapy, whereas advances in cytogenetic profiling, measurable residual disease assessment, and transplantation strategies have informed risk-adapted management. Emerging treatments, including BCL-2–targeted therapy, bispecific antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, and possibly fibril-directed approaches, further expand the therapeutic landscape. This review summarizes contemporary concepts in the pathobiology, diagnosis, and management of systemic light-chain amyloidosis, with an emphasis on practical diagnostic algorithms, evolving response assessment, and remaining challenges in achieving durable organ recovery and sustained survival.

系统性免疫球蛋白轻链淀粉样变性是一种罕见但危及生命的浆细胞疾病,其特征是产生错误折叠的单克隆轻链,以淀粉样原纤维沉积,导致病理性组织重塑和进行性多器官功能障碍。尽管治疗取得了实质性进展,但由于非特异性表现和需要协调的血液学、病理学和器官特异性评估,延迟诊断仍然很常见。基于daratumumab的方案的引入改变了一线治疗,而细胞遗传学分析、可测量的残留疾病评估和移植策略的进步为风险适应管理提供了信息。新兴的治疗方法,包括bcl -2靶向治疗、双特异性抗体、嵌合抗原受体t细胞治疗,以及可能的原纤维定向治疗,进一步扩大了治疗领域。本文综述了系统性轻链淀粉样变性的病理生物学、诊断和管理方面的当代概念,重点介绍了实用的诊断算法、不断发展的反应评估以及实现持久器官恢复和持续生存的剩余挑战。
{"title":"Systemic amyloid light-chain amyloidosis beyond ANDROMEDA: Diagnostic challenges and therapeutic updates","authors":"Xia Wu MD,&nbsp;Heather Landau MD,&nbsp;Jennifer E. Liu MD,&nbsp;Yihan Cao MD,&nbsp;Raymond L. Comenzo MD","doi":"10.3322/caac.70092","DOIUrl":"10.3322/caac.70092","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Systemic immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis is a rare but life-threatening plasma cell disorder characterized by the production of misfolded monoclonal light chains that deposit as amyloid fibrils, leading to pathologic tissue remodeling and progressive multiorgan dysfunction. Despite substantial therapeutic advances, delayed diagnosis remains common because of nonspecific presentations and the need for coordinated hematologic, pathologic, and organ-specific evaluation. The introduction of daratumumab-based regimens has transformed frontline therapy, whereas advances in cytogenetic profiling, measurable residual disease assessment, and transplantation strategies have informed risk-adapted management. Emerging treatments, including BCL-2–targeted therapy, bispecific antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, and possibly fibril-directed approaches, further expand the therapeutic landscape. This review summarizes contemporary concepts in the pathobiology, diagnosis, and management of systemic light-chain amyloidosis, with an emphasis on practical diagnostic algorithms, evolving response assessment, and remaining challenges in achieving durable organ recovery and sustained survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":"76 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":232.4,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3322/caac.70092","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148203531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
﹀
mjeditor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1