Leon Richter, João Dias-Ferreira, Gustavo Campos Ramos, DiyaaElDin Ashour
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are shaped by a complex interplay with immune mechanisms. In particular, the distinct roles of antigen-specific T cell mechanisms are emerging as critical determinants across a broad spectrum of conditions, ranging from atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and myocarditis. Because these T cell responses are fundamentally driven by antigen recognition of cardiovascular antigens, understanding T cell clonal dynamics via accessing T cell receptor (TCR) repertoires might provide valuable mechanistic insights for developing targeted diagnostic and therapeutic immunomodulatory approaches in cardiology. In this review, we discuss T cell-dependent mechanisms and TCR clonal dynamics across various CVD. Moreover, by curating public bulk and single-cell TCR datasets across different etiologies, we present a first-in-class adaptive immune receptor database in cardiovascular diseases (CVD-TCR database). The discussions and resources herein presented seek to promote an integrated understanding of tissue-specific immune mechanisms across different CVD, facilitate the identification of shared clonotypes and motifs, and provide a framework for computational modeling of TCR repertoires across the CVD spectrum.
{"title":"T Cell Receptor Repertoires Across the Continuum of Vascular, Myocardial, and Age-Related Diseases","authors":"Leon Richter, João Dias-Ferreira, Gustavo Campos Ramos, DiyaaElDin Ashour","doi":"10.1111/imr.70125","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imr.70125","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are shaped by a complex interplay with immune mechanisms. In particular, the distinct roles of antigen-specific T cell mechanisms are emerging as critical determinants across a broad spectrum of conditions, ranging from atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and myocarditis. Because these T cell responses are fundamentally driven by antigen recognition of cardiovascular antigens, understanding T cell clonal dynamics via accessing T cell receptor (TCR) repertoires might provide valuable mechanistic insights for developing targeted diagnostic and therapeutic immunomodulatory approaches in cardiology. In this review, we discuss T cell-dependent mechanisms and TCR clonal dynamics across various CVD. Moreover, by curating public bulk and single-cell TCR datasets across different etiologies, we present a first-in-class adaptive immune receptor database in cardiovascular diseases (CVD-TCR database). The discussions and resources herein presented seek to promote an integrated understanding of tissue-specific immune mechanisms across different CVD, facilitate the identification of shared clonotypes and motifs, and provide a framework for computational modeling of TCR repertoires across the CVD spectrum.</p>","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"339 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2026-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13092144/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147715358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Dendritic cells (DC) represent the key link between innate and adaptive immune systems, combining direct recognition of pathogens through pattern recognition receptors such as Toll-like receptors (TLR) and the ensuing orchestration of immune responses through cytokine secretion and antigen presentation to T cells. The foundational view of DC lineage considered it composed of several discrete entities (subsets): conventional or classical DC (cDC) that represent specialized antigen-presenting cells (APC), and plasmacytoid DC (pDC) that excel at the production of type I interferon (IFN-I) and other cytokines. In turn, cDC comprise two distinct subsets: type 1 cDC (cDC1) that are capable of IL-12 production and antigen-cross presentation, and type 2 cDC (cDC2) that efficiently present MHC II-restricted antigens to T helper (T<sub>H</sub>) cells.</p><p>The advent of modern technologies such as high-dimensional immunophenotyping, single-cell transcriptomics and lineage tracing added remarkable depth to the above-mentioned view of DC. The three main subsets turned out to be local peaks of a broad spectrum of DC subsets and states, with heterogeneity observed between species (e.g., unique DC-like cells in teleost fish); between tissues (e.g., distinct DC types in the intestine); between subsets (e.g., transitional DC or tDC with features of both pDC and cDC2); and within subsets (e.g., Notch-dependent vs. Notch-independent cDC2). The heterogeneity within populations appears to have multiple sources: some of it may arise from different developmental origins, while some may be generated by tissue-derived signals and environmental cues. In parallel to these new insights into DC populations, studies of the last two decades have revealed a greatly expanded horizon of DC functions. These include insights into DC contribution to T<sub>H</sub> differentiation during anti-microbial responses, to the maintenance of natural regulatory T cells (T<sub>reg</sub>) in the steady state, and to the induction of T<sub>reg</sub> by commensals and food antigens. Moreover, the essential role of DC in nearly all pathological conditions has been rapidly coming into focus: examples include the aberrant activation of DC in autoimmune diseases, the induction of anti-tumor responses by DC and its subversion by tumors, and the hypofunctional state of DC in persistent infections and inflammation.</p><p>Thus, the field is facing exciting yet difficult challenges: to match the emerging heterogeneity of DC populations to their apparently diverse functions, to establish a clear genetic basis of the resulting relationships, and to reconcile functional DC subsets between experimental animals and humans. This volume attempts to highlight the current status of these efforts by featuring 19 reviews from leading laboratories. They are grouped as described below, according to the “stage” of the DC life cycle: from development and subset specification, to migration and maturation, to function
{"title":"Dendritic Cell Heterogeneity Tailored to Their Function","authors":"Boris Reizis","doi":"10.1111/imr.70123","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imr.70123","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dendritic cells (DC) represent the key link between innate and adaptive immune systems, combining direct recognition of pathogens through pattern recognition receptors such as Toll-like receptors (TLR) and the ensuing orchestration of immune responses through cytokine secretion and antigen presentation to T cells. The foundational view of DC lineage considered it composed of several discrete entities (subsets): conventional or classical DC (cDC) that represent specialized antigen-presenting cells (APC), and plasmacytoid DC (pDC) that excel at the production of type I interferon (IFN-I) and other cytokines. In turn, cDC comprise two distinct subsets: type 1 cDC (cDC1) that are capable of IL-12 production and antigen-cross presentation, and type 2 cDC (cDC2) that efficiently present MHC II-restricted antigens to T helper (T<sub>H</sub>) cells.</p><p>The advent of modern technologies such as high-dimensional immunophenotyping, single-cell transcriptomics and lineage tracing added remarkable depth to the above-mentioned view of DC. The three main subsets turned out to be local peaks of a broad spectrum of DC subsets and states, with heterogeneity observed between species (e.g., unique DC-like cells in teleost fish); between tissues (e.g., distinct DC types in the intestine); between subsets (e.g., transitional DC or tDC with features of both pDC and cDC2); and within subsets (e.g., Notch-dependent vs. Notch-independent cDC2). The heterogeneity within populations appears to have multiple sources: some of it may arise from different developmental origins, while some may be generated by tissue-derived signals and environmental cues. In parallel to these new insights into DC populations, studies of the last two decades have revealed a greatly expanded horizon of DC functions. These include insights into DC contribution to T<sub>H</sub> differentiation during anti-microbial responses, to the maintenance of natural regulatory T cells (T<sub>reg</sub>) in the steady state, and to the induction of T<sub>reg</sub> by commensals and food antigens. Moreover, the essential role of DC in nearly all pathological conditions has been rapidly coming into focus: examples include the aberrant activation of DC in autoimmune diseases, the induction of anti-tumor responses by DC and its subversion by tumors, and the hypofunctional state of DC in persistent infections and inflammation.</p><p>Thus, the field is facing exciting yet difficult challenges: to match the emerging heterogeneity of DC populations to their apparently diverse functions, to establish a clear genetic basis of the resulting relationships, and to reconcile functional DC subsets between experimental animals and humans. This volume attempts to highlight the current status of these efforts by featuring 19 reviews from leading laboratories. They are grouped as described below, according to the “stage” of the DC life cycle: from development and subset specification, to migration and maturation, to function","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"339 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imr.70123","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147669275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christina Michalaki, Minahil Sharjeel, Jennifer E. Cowan
The thymic medulla is essential for establishing central tolerance, orchestrating the development of a diverse yet self-tolerant T cell repertoire, and preventing autoimmunity. This process is primarily mediated through interactions between developing thymocytes and antigen-presenting cells, including thymic epithelial cells (TECs) and dendritic cells (DCs), with additional regulatory contributions from endothelial cells, mesenchymal cells, and macrophages. Despite its critical role, the complexity of late-stage thymocyte development and the dynamics of their medullary residency remain incompletely understood. Recent advances in single-cell, epigenomic, and transcriptomic technologies have begun to reveal previously unappreciated layers of cellular and molecular heterogeneity within the thymic medulla throughout life. In this review, we explore how the medulla shapes the fate of both conventional and non-conventional T cells, examine the diversity of thymocyte populations it supports, and discuss how this specialized microenvironment adapts during aging and regeneration.
{"title":"From Development to Aging: Dynamic Roles of the Thymic Medulla in T Cell Biology","authors":"Christina Michalaki, Minahil Sharjeel, Jennifer E. Cowan","doi":"10.1111/imr.70118","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imr.70118","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The thymic medulla is essential for establishing central tolerance, orchestrating the development of a diverse yet self-tolerant T cell repertoire, and preventing autoimmunity. This process is primarily mediated through interactions between developing thymocytes and antigen-presenting cells, including thymic epithelial cells (TECs) and dendritic cells (DCs), with additional regulatory contributions from endothelial cells, mesenchymal cells, and macrophages. Despite its critical role, the complexity of late-stage thymocyte development and the dynamics of their medullary residency remain incompletely understood. Recent advances in single-cell, epigenomic, and transcriptomic technologies have begun to reveal previously unappreciated layers of cellular and molecular heterogeneity within the thymic medulla throughout life. In this review, we explore how the medulla shapes the fate of both conventional and non-conventional T cells, examine the diversity of thymocyte populations it supports, and discuss how this specialized microenvironment adapts during aging and regeneration.</p>","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"339 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13062478/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147637403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>A decade ago, I published a seminal review with Katie Flanagan in <i>Nature Reviews Immunology</i> entitled “Sex differences in immune responses” [<span>1</span>], making the case that sex is a fundamental biological variable shaping innate and adaptive immunity across the lifespan and across diverse species, highlighting that these differences are dynamic and evolutionarily conserved. That 2016 paper synthesized the hormonal and genetic mechanisms underlying immunological differences between males and females, documented their consequences for autoimmune disease, infectious disease, malignancy, and vaccine responses, and issued a call that the field of immunology, which at the time ranked last among 10 biological disciplines in reporting the sex of animal or human subjects in published research [<span>2</span>], needed to take sex seriously as a variable in experimental design, analysis, and clinical translation. The paper arrived at a pivotal moment, coinciding with the 2016 formal implementation of the NIH policy mandating the consideration of sex as a biological variable in preclinical research [<span>3</span>].</p><p>A decade later this special issue of <i>Immunological Reviews</i> allows for us to highlight the transformation that has occurred. What was once a field of study on the periphery of immunology has become more central in defining immunological mechanisms of health and disease. Some of the mechanisms that were broadly outlined in 2016 have since been elaborated. For example, the epigenetic architecture of X-chromosome inactivation and escape has been mapped in immune cells, the pleiotropic and context-dependent effects of estrogens, androgens, and progesterone on virtually every arm of immunity has been established, the role of the microbiome in sex differences in the immune phenotype, and the sex-differential gene expression programs that operate within individual immune cell populations to mediate responses to disease states and treatments have been documented. These mechanistic advances have been matched by a growing clinical and epidemiological literature demonstrating that immunological sex differences have consequences across a diverse range of human diseases. The field has grown substantially, and the present collection reflects both the depth and the breadth of that growth.</p><p>This special issue of <i>Immunological Reviews</i>, titled <i>Sex Differences in Immunity</i>, brings together 15 reviews that collectively advance our understanding of the biological mechanisms that cause sex differences in immunity with implications for a broad spectrum of human diseases. The contributors span genetics, immunology, infectious disease, pulmonology, oncology, autoimmunity, transplantation medicine, neuroscience, and reproductive biology, reflecting the field's recognition that sex as a biological variable is fundamental in immunology research with implications for medicine and public health. These papers collectively confirm th
{"title":"Introduction: Sex as a Biological Variable in Immunity","authors":"Sabra L. Klein","doi":"10.1111/imr.70122","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imr.70122","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A decade ago, I published a seminal review with Katie Flanagan in <i>Nature Reviews Immunology</i> entitled “Sex differences in immune responses” [<span>1</span>], making the case that sex is a fundamental biological variable shaping innate and adaptive immunity across the lifespan and across diverse species, highlighting that these differences are dynamic and evolutionarily conserved. That 2016 paper synthesized the hormonal and genetic mechanisms underlying immunological differences between males and females, documented their consequences for autoimmune disease, infectious disease, malignancy, and vaccine responses, and issued a call that the field of immunology, which at the time ranked last among 10 biological disciplines in reporting the sex of animal or human subjects in published research [<span>2</span>], needed to take sex seriously as a variable in experimental design, analysis, and clinical translation. The paper arrived at a pivotal moment, coinciding with the 2016 formal implementation of the NIH policy mandating the consideration of sex as a biological variable in preclinical research [<span>3</span>].</p><p>A decade later this special issue of <i>Immunological Reviews</i> allows for us to highlight the transformation that has occurred. What was once a field of study on the periphery of immunology has become more central in defining immunological mechanisms of health and disease. Some of the mechanisms that were broadly outlined in 2016 have since been elaborated. For example, the epigenetic architecture of X-chromosome inactivation and escape has been mapped in immune cells, the pleiotropic and context-dependent effects of estrogens, androgens, and progesterone on virtually every arm of immunity has been established, the role of the microbiome in sex differences in the immune phenotype, and the sex-differential gene expression programs that operate within individual immune cell populations to mediate responses to disease states and treatments have been documented. These mechanistic advances have been matched by a growing clinical and epidemiological literature demonstrating that immunological sex differences have consequences across a diverse range of human diseases. The field has grown substantially, and the present collection reflects both the depth and the breadth of that growth.</p><p>This special issue of <i>Immunological Reviews</i>, titled <i>Sex Differences in Immunity</i>, brings together 15 reviews that collectively advance our understanding of the biological mechanisms that cause sex differences in immunity with implications for a broad spectrum of human diseases. The contributors span genetics, immunology, infectious disease, pulmonology, oncology, autoimmunity, transplantation medicine, neuroscience, and reproductive biology, reflecting the field's recognition that sex as a biological variable is fundamental in immunology research with implications for medicine and public health. These papers collectively confirm th","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"339 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imr.70122","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147626636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shannon E. Dunn, Nuria Alvarez-Sanchez, Lawrence Steinman
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a T helper (Th) cell-mediated disease that targets central nervous system (CNS) white matter. This disease affects three times more females than males. For many years, the etiology of MS was not well understood and the exact nature of the autoimmune reaction was speculative. It has now become clear that MS is a rare complication of Epstein–Barr Virus (EBV) infection and that the virus induces an EBV nuclear antigen (EBNA-1)-specific T and B cell response that is cross-reactive against a number of CNS antigens including Glial cell-associated membrane protein (GlialCAM), Anoctamin-2 (Ano-2), myelin basic protein (MBP), and alpha-B-crystallin (CRYAB). Recent studies have clarified the involvement of the major human leukocyte antigen (HLA) MS risk haplotype, HLA-DR15, in sustaining autoreactive T cell responses and its interaction with EBV. Here, we overview this literature through the lens that MS is a disease that affects females more than males. We describe how EBV seroprevalence and the incidence of infectious mononucleosis are greater in females during the early teen years, a period of increased MS susceptibility. We overview how females with MS develop greater levels of EBNA-1-cross-reactive autoantibodies and show greater myelin-specific T helper 1 (Th1) cells in peripheral blood. Finally, we provide evidence that EBV-infected B cells may achieve a greater state of latency in females and discuss how this may perpetuate CNS autoimmunity. At the same time, our literature search identified many missed opportunities to learn about sex differences in MS. Our hope is that this review will motivate researchers in the future to disaggregate data by sex to accelerate discoveries in this disease.
{"title":"Why Is MS a More Frequent Complication of EBV Infection in Females?","authors":"Shannon E. Dunn, Nuria Alvarez-Sanchez, Lawrence Steinman","doi":"10.1111/imr.70115","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imr.70115","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a T helper (Th) cell-mediated disease that targets central nervous system (CNS) white matter. This disease affects three times more females than males. For many years, the etiology of MS was not well understood and the exact nature of the autoimmune reaction was speculative. It has now become clear that MS is a rare complication of Epstein–Barr Virus (EBV) infection and that the virus induces an EBV nuclear antigen (EBNA-1)-specific T and B cell response that is cross-reactive against a number of CNS antigens including Glial cell-associated membrane protein (GlialCAM), Anoctamin-2 (Ano-2), myelin basic protein (MBP), and alpha-B-crystallin (CRYAB). Recent studies have clarified the involvement of the major human leukocyte antigen (HLA) MS risk haplotype, HLA-DR15, in sustaining autoreactive T cell responses and its interaction with EBV. Here, we overview this literature through the lens that MS is a disease that affects females more than males. We describe how EBV seroprevalence and the incidence of infectious mononucleosis are greater in females during the early teen years, a period of increased MS susceptibility. We overview how females with MS develop greater levels of EBNA-1-cross-reactive autoantibodies and show greater myelin-specific T helper 1 (Th1) cells in peripheral blood. Finally, we provide evidence that EBV-infected B cells may achieve a greater state of latency in females and discuss how this may perpetuate CNS autoimmunity. At the same time, our literature search identified many missed opportunities to learn about sex differences in MS. Our hope is that this review will motivate researchers in the future to disaggregate data by sex to accelerate discoveries in this disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"339 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13040526/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147588992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abigail L. Tierney, Wallace P. Bezerra, Stephanie C. Eisenbarth, Adam Williams
Food allergen-specific IgE can cause significant pathology, yet the pathways that generate pathogenic, high-affinity IgE remain incompletely understood. Increasing evidence suggests that IgE responses arise from the integration of multiple, and sometimes opposing, T cell–derived cues. T follicular helper (Tfh) cells shape affinity maturation within germinal centers and likely coordinate class switching, while tissue-resident Th2 cells amplify local inflammation and potentially reinforce IgE production. Distinct Tfh subsets, characterized by differential production of IL-4 and IL-13, may further determine whether IgE responses remain low-affinity or mature into high-affinity antibodies capable of driving anaphylaxis. At the same time, regulatory populations—including regulatory T (Treg) cells and T follicular regulatory (Tfr) cells—impose restraints that can dampen or redirect humoral immunity. Early-life antigen exposure may tip this balance toward durable tolerance or toward progressive diversification of pathogenic IgE. Together, these mixed signals from helper, regulatory, and innate-like T cells likely determine the magnitude, affinity, and clinical impact of IgE responses. In this review, we explore how these intersecting pathways collectively regulate IgE immunity.
{"title":"Mixed Signals: T Cells as Architects of IgE Immunity","authors":"Abigail L. Tierney, Wallace P. Bezerra, Stephanie C. Eisenbarth, Adam Williams","doi":"10.1111/imr.70119","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imr.70119","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Food allergen-specific IgE can cause significant pathology, yet the pathways that generate pathogenic, high-affinity IgE remain incompletely understood. Increasing evidence suggests that IgE responses arise from the integration of multiple, and sometimes opposing, T cell–derived cues. T follicular helper (Tfh) cells shape affinity maturation within germinal centers and likely coordinate class switching, while tissue-resident Th2 cells amplify local inflammation and potentially reinforce IgE production. Distinct Tfh subsets, characterized by differential production of IL-4 and IL-13, may further determine whether IgE responses remain low-affinity or mature into high-affinity antibodies capable of driving anaphylaxis. At the same time, regulatory populations—including regulatory T (Treg) cells and T follicular regulatory (Tfr) cells—impose restraints that can dampen or redirect humoral immunity. Early-life antigen exposure may tip this balance toward durable tolerance or toward progressive diversification of pathogenic IgE. Together, these mixed signals from helper, regulatory, and innate-like T cells likely determine the magnitude, affinity, and clinical impact of IgE responses. In this review, we explore how these intersecting pathways collectively regulate IgE immunity.</p>","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"339 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13039283/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147588977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>The thymus represents a unique biological factory, crafting T cells that are both self-tolerant and capable of defending against pathogens. In this issue of <i>Immunological Reviews</i>, 11 leading experts provide an up-to-date synthesis of the molecular and cellular networks that orchestrate T cell development and selection, induce central tolerance, sustain thymic homeostasis and enable regeneration across the lifespan.</p><p>For the past two decades, our understanding of central tolerance has been largely shaped by studies focused heavily on Aire<sup>+</sup> medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs). These specialized stromal cells express nearly 90% of the coding genome, allowing presentation of an exceptionally broad repertoire of tissue-specific antigens (TSAs) [<span>1-4</span>]. This paradigm established promiscuous gene expression (PGE) as the dominant mechanism by which self-reactive thymocytes are either purged by clonal deletion [<span>4</span>] or diverted into the Foxp3<sup>+</sup> T regulatory (Treg) lineage in the thymus [<span>5</span>] (Figure 1a).</p><p>Yet, several recent advances have decisively moved the field beyond an Aire-centric framework of thymic tolerance. Specifically, the recent identification of thymic mimetic cells has revealed an additional (and largely Aire-independent) layer of self-representation within the thymus [<span>6-8</span>]. Notably, many of these mimetic populations arise developmentally from Aire<sup>+</sup> mTECs that, under the control of tissue-specifying transcription factors, undergo programmed differentiation into specialized epithelial identities. These subsets further expand the self-antigen landscape beyond classical PGE by emulating large and complex tissue identities. Most prominently, they resemble cell types that form mucosal barriers (e.g., tuft-like, microfold-like, enterocyte-like, ionocyte-like, and cilia-like TECs), as well as cells of the skin (corneocyte-like TECs), muscle (myocyte-like TECs), and (neuro)endocrine tissues (endocrine-like TECs) (Figure 1a). Functionally, TEC mimetics are not only critical for induction of self-tolerance to these tissues, but were also shown to execute distinct functional programs that shape thymic homeostasis and cellular dynamics [<span>6, 9, 10</span>].</p><p>In parallel, accumulating evidence has uncovered a striking and unexpected feature of thymic physiology—the presence of constitutively active inflammatory circuits, most prominently tonic type-I interferon signaling [<span>11-13</span>]. This phenomenon, now conceptualized as “thymflammation” challenges the traditional view of the thymus as an immunologically quiescent organ [<span>14</span>]. Although its full physiological significance is still unfolding, it is increasingly clear that this intrinsic inflammatory tone is instrumental for establishing tolerance to inflammation-associated self-antigens (ISAs) (Figure 1b) and for coordinating intercellular crosstalk within the thymic niche
{"title":"Reframing Thymic Biology: From AIRE to Mimetics, Thymflammation, Regeneration, and Beyond","authors":"Jakub Abramson","doi":"10.1111/imr.70121","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imr.70121","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The thymus represents a unique biological factory, crafting T cells that are both self-tolerant and capable of defending against pathogens. In this issue of <i>Immunological Reviews</i>, 11 leading experts provide an up-to-date synthesis of the molecular and cellular networks that orchestrate T cell development and selection, induce central tolerance, sustain thymic homeostasis and enable regeneration across the lifespan.</p><p>For the past two decades, our understanding of central tolerance has been largely shaped by studies focused heavily on Aire<sup>+</sup> medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs). These specialized stromal cells express nearly 90% of the coding genome, allowing presentation of an exceptionally broad repertoire of tissue-specific antigens (TSAs) [<span>1-4</span>]. This paradigm established promiscuous gene expression (PGE) as the dominant mechanism by which self-reactive thymocytes are either purged by clonal deletion [<span>4</span>] or diverted into the Foxp3<sup>+</sup> T regulatory (Treg) lineage in the thymus [<span>5</span>] (Figure 1a).</p><p>Yet, several recent advances have decisively moved the field beyond an Aire-centric framework of thymic tolerance. Specifically, the recent identification of thymic mimetic cells has revealed an additional (and largely Aire-independent) layer of self-representation within the thymus [<span>6-8</span>]. Notably, many of these mimetic populations arise developmentally from Aire<sup>+</sup> mTECs that, under the control of tissue-specifying transcription factors, undergo programmed differentiation into specialized epithelial identities. These subsets further expand the self-antigen landscape beyond classical PGE by emulating large and complex tissue identities. Most prominently, they resemble cell types that form mucosal barriers (e.g., tuft-like, microfold-like, enterocyte-like, ionocyte-like, and cilia-like TECs), as well as cells of the skin (corneocyte-like TECs), muscle (myocyte-like TECs), and (neuro)endocrine tissues (endocrine-like TECs) (Figure 1a). Functionally, TEC mimetics are not only critical for induction of self-tolerance to these tissues, but were also shown to execute distinct functional programs that shape thymic homeostasis and cellular dynamics [<span>6, 9, 10</span>].</p><p>In parallel, accumulating evidence has uncovered a striking and unexpected feature of thymic physiology—the presence of constitutively active inflammatory circuits, most prominently tonic type-I interferon signaling [<span>11-13</span>]. This phenomenon, now conceptualized as “thymflammation” challenges the traditional view of the thymus as an immunologically quiescent organ [<span>14</span>]. Although its full physiological significance is still unfolding, it is increasingly clear that this intrinsic inflammatory tone is instrumental for establishing tolerance to inflammation-associated self-antigens (ISAs) (Figure 1b) and for coordinating intercellular crosstalk within the thymic niche","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"339 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imr.70121","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147580011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}