首页 > 最新文献

Pulmonary Therapy最新文献

英文 中文
Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Sleep Disorders in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停和睡眠障碍。
IF 3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-07 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00299-x
Mai Nguyen-Thi-Phuong, Mai Nguyen-Thi-Thanh, Robert Joel Goldberg, Hoa L Nguyen, An Dao-Thi-Minh, Sy Duong-Quy

Introduction: Sleep disorders are common yet often underdiagnosed in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). These disturbances can exacerbate ADHD symptoms and negatively affect cognitive, emotional, and behavioral functioning. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and other sleep disorders in children with ADHD using standardized diagnostic criteria and to identify associated clinical and behavioral factors.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 629 children aged 6-12 years (mean age: 7.8 ± 1.5 years) who were diagnosed with ADHD. Sleep disturbances were assessed using the Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ), the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ), and respiratory polygraphy. Sleep disorders were classified on the basis of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Third Edition (ICSD-3). Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify associated risk factors.

Results: Sleep disorders were diagnosed in 70.0% of children with ADHD. The most common disorders were insomnia (40.2%), OSA (23.4%), parasomnias (27.8%), restless legs syndrome (10.5%), and delayed sleep-wake phase disorder (4.8%). The inattentive ADHD subtype, psychiatric comorbidities, tonsil and adenoid hypertrophy, iron-deficiency anemia, and sleep-related behaviors in children with ADHD were significantly associated with sleep disturbances.

Conclusions: Sleep disorders are highly prevalent and diverse in children with ADHD. Early identification and targeted management of sleep disturbances, particularly OSA and insomnia, are essential to improving sleep quality and optimizing ADHD outcomes. Routine sleep screening should be integrated into clinical ADHD evaluations. Graphical abstract available for this article.

睡眠障碍在患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童中很常见,但往往未被充分诊断。这些干扰会加剧ADHD症状,并对认知、情绪和行为功能产生负面影响。本研究旨在用标准化的诊断标准描述ADHD儿童中阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)和其他睡眠障碍的患病率,并确定相关的临床和行为因素。方法:对629例6 ~ 12岁(平均7.8±1.5岁)诊断为ADHD的儿童进行横断面研究。使用儿童睡眠习惯问卷(CSHQ)、儿童睡眠问卷(PSQ)和呼吸测谎仪对睡眠障碍进行评估。根据国际睡眠障碍分类第三版(ICSD-3)对睡眠障碍进行分类。采用多因素logistic回归分析确定相关危险因素。结果:70.0%的ADHD患儿被诊断为睡眠障碍。最常见的障碍是失眠(40.2%)、OSA(23.4%)、睡眠异常(27.8%)、不宁腿综合征(10.5%)和睡眠-觉醒延迟障碍(4.8%)。ADHD儿童的注意力不集中亚型、精神合并症、扁桃体和腺样体肥大、缺铁性贫血和睡眠相关行为与睡眠障碍显著相关。结论:睡眠障碍在ADHD儿童中非常普遍且多样。早期识别和有针对性地管理睡眠障碍,特别是阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停和失眠,对于改善睡眠质量和优化ADHD结果至关重要。常规睡眠筛查应纳入临床ADHD评估。本文提供图形摘要。
{"title":"Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Sleep Disorders in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.","authors":"Mai Nguyen-Thi-Phuong, Mai Nguyen-Thi-Thanh, Robert Joel Goldberg, Hoa L Nguyen, An Dao-Thi-Minh, Sy Duong-Quy","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00299-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41030-025-00299-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sleep disorders are common yet often underdiagnosed in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). These disturbances can exacerbate ADHD symptoms and negatively affect cognitive, emotional, and behavioral functioning. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and other sleep disorders in children with ADHD using standardized diagnostic criteria and to identify associated clinical and behavioral factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on 629 children aged 6-12 years (mean age: 7.8 ± 1.5 years) who were diagnosed with ADHD. Sleep disturbances were assessed using the Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ), the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ), and respiratory polygraphy. Sleep disorders were classified on the basis of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Third Edition (ICSD-3). Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sleep disorders were diagnosed in 70.0% of children with ADHD. The most common disorders were insomnia (40.2%), OSA (23.4%), parasomnias (27.8%), restless legs syndrome (10.5%), and delayed sleep-wake phase disorder (4.8%). The inattentive ADHD subtype, psychiatric comorbidities, tonsil and adenoid hypertrophy, iron-deficiency anemia, and sleep-related behaviors in children with ADHD were significantly associated with sleep disturbances.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sleep disorders are highly prevalent and diverse in children with ADHD. Early identification and targeted management of sleep disturbances, particularly OSA and insomnia, are essential to improving sleep quality and optimizing ADHD outcomes. Routine sleep screening should be integrated into clinical ADHD evaluations. Graphical abstract available for this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"423-441"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373571/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144576159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Evolution of the Indwelling Pleural Catheter. 胸腔留置导尿管的发展。
IF 3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-20 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00300-7
Abdulla Baguneid, Thisarana Wijayaratne, Avinash Aujayeb, Rakesh Panchal

An indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) is a valuable tool in the management of pleural effusions, allowing drainage strategies to be tailored to match patient-centred goals. Previously, IPCs were primarily utilised in malignant pleural effusion (MPE) in the presence of non-expandable lung (NEL) or after the failure of chemical pleurodesis. Several studies have compared IPC to intercostal chest drain (ICD) with talc pleurodesis (TP), as well as different drainage regimens, resulting in a transition of practice. Continued developments have led to novel adjuncts, such as digital drainage, which allow controlled flow rates. The emerging field of intrapleural therapy in MPE is gaining attention as a potential new treatment modality, possibly increasing the scope of IPCs further. This article will provide a narrative review of the role of IPCs and will be based on published evidence to date and highlight the importance of an individualised, patient-centred care approach.

留置胸膜导管(IPC)是管理胸膜积液的一种有价值的工具,允许根据以患者为中心的目标量身定制引流策略。以前,IPCs主要用于恶性胸腔积液(MPE)中存在的非扩张性肺(NEL)或化学胸膜切除术失败后。一些研究比较了IPC与肋间胸腔引流(ICD)和滑石粉胸膜固定术(TP),以及不同的引流方案,导致了实践的过渡。随着技术的不断发展,出现了新型的辅助装置,如数字排水装置,可以控制流量。作为一种潜在的新治疗方式,胸膜内治疗在MPE中的新兴领域正受到关注,可能进一步扩大IPCs的范围。本文将以迄今已发表的证据为基础,对IPCs的作用进行叙述性回顾,并强调个性化、以患者为中心的护理方法的重要性。
{"title":"The Evolution of the Indwelling Pleural Catheter.","authors":"Abdulla Baguneid, Thisarana Wijayaratne, Avinash Aujayeb, Rakesh Panchal","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00300-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41030-025-00300-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) is a valuable tool in the management of pleural effusions, allowing drainage strategies to be tailored to match patient-centred goals. Previously, IPCs were primarily utilised in malignant pleural effusion (MPE) in the presence of non-expandable lung (NEL) or after the failure of chemical pleurodesis. Several studies have compared IPC to intercostal chest drain (ICD) with talc pleurodesis (TP), as well as different drainage regimens, resulting in a transition of practice. Continued developments have led to novel adjuncts, such as digital drainage, which allow controlled flow rates. The emerging field of intrapleural therapy in MPE is gaining attention as a potential new treatment modality, possibly increasing the scope of IPCs further. This article will provide a narrative review of the role of IPCs and will be based on published evidence to date and highlight the importance of an individualised, patient-centred care approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"519-533"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373602/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144333802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-World Use of MART in Moderate-Severe Asthma: Results from the Italian WAMP Survey among Healthcare Professionals and Patients. MART在中重度哮喘中的实际应用:来自意大利WAMP对医疗保健专业人员和患者的调查结果。
IF 3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-04 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00310-5
Fulvio Braido, Matteo Bonini, Walter Castellani, Andrea Claudio Comel, Francesco Paolo Lombardo, Antonio Spanevello, Alessandro Vatrella, Marco Contoli

Introduction: Moderate-severe asthma affects a significant proportion of patients and poses challenges in symptom control and exacerbation prevention. The preferred track 1 endorsed by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recommendations offers a single-inhaler approach combining inhaled corticosteroids and formoterol for both maintenance and symptom relief (maintenance and reliever therapy; MART). However, MART's real-world adoption remains suboptimal and concerns regarding its correct implementation persist. "What About MART Posology" (WAMP) survey assessed the knowledge and clinical application of MART among Italian healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients.

Methods: WAMP was a cross-sectional, web-based survey conducted among 1000 Italian HCPs and 400 patients with moderate-severe asthma. HCPs answered questions regarding treatment preferences, adherence to GINA recommendations and MART implementation. Patients reported on their therapeutic regimens, inhaler use, and adherence behaviors.

Results: Most HCPs demonstrated awareness of GINA recommendations. Pulmonologists (73.6%) and allergists (62.0%) reported favoring track 1, while general practitioners (GPs) showed greater variability (55.1%). Most of HCPs reported the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)-formoterol, according to the MART approach, to manage moderate-severe asthma. GPs reported that approximately 45.5% of moderate-severe patients with asthma treated with ICS-formoterol inhaled therapy were also prescribed short-acting β2-agonists (SABA). Among patients, ICS-formoterol was the most reported regimen (59.7%), despite only 21.6% adhered to the MART approach correctly. Triple therapy was preferred for patients with recurrent exacerbations, yet its adoption was lower than expected.

Conclusions: The WAMP survey suggests a strong awareness of GINA track 1 among Italian HCPs. MART was widely implemented, particularly by specialists; patient data supported these findings. Gaps in education on MART's dual function persist though. Targeted training for HCPs and improved patient education are essential to optimize asthma management and adherence to evidence-based strategies.

简介:中重度哮喘影响了相当大比例的患者,对症状控制和恶化预防提出了挑战。全球哮喘倡议(GINA)推荐的首选轨道1提供了一种单吸入器方法,将吸入皮质类固醇和福莫特罗联合用于维持和症状缓解(维持和缓解治疗;集市)。然而,MART在现实世界的采用仍然不是最优的,并且对其正确实现的关注仍然存在。“关于MART Posology”(WAMP)调查评估了意大利医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)和患者中MART的知识和临床应用。方法:WAMP是一项基于网络的横断面调查,在1000名意大利HCPs和400名中重度哮喘患者中进行。医护人员回答了有关治疗偏好、遵守GINA建议和MART实施的问题。患者报告了他们的治疗方案、吸入器的使用和依从性行为。结果:大多数HCPs对GINA建议有所了解。肺科医生(73.6%)和过敏症专家(62.0%)报告倾向于1路,而全科医生(gp)表现出更大的变异性(55.1%)。根据MART方法,大多数HCPs报告使用吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)-福莫特罗来管理中重度哮喘。全科医生报告说,大约45.5%的中重度哮喘患者接受了ics -福莫特罗吸入治疗,同时也开了短效β2激动剂(SABA)。在患者中,ics -福莫特罗是报告最多的方案(59.7%),尽管只有21.6%的患者正确地坚持了MART方法。三联疗法是复发性加重患者的首选,但其采用率低于预期。结论:WAMP调查表明,意大利HCPs对GINA 1轨道有很强的认识。MART得到广泛实施,特别是由专家实施;患者数据支持这些发现。然而,在MART双重功能方面的教育差距仍然存在。对医护人员进行有针对性的培训和改进患者教育对于优化哮喘管理和坚持循证策略至关重要。
{"title":"Real-World Use of MART in Moderate-Severe Asthma: Results from the Italian WAMP Survey among Healthcare Professionals and Patients.","authors":"Fulvio Braido, Matteo Bonini, Walter Castellani, Andrea Claudio Comel, Francesco Paolo Lombardo, Antonio Spanevello, Alessandro Vatrella, Marco Contoli","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00310-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41030-025-00310-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Moderate-severe asthma affects a significant proportion of patients and poses challenges in symptom control and exacerbation prevention. The preferred track 1 endorsed by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recommendations offers a single-inhaler approach combining inhaled corticosteroids and formoterol for both maintenance and symptom relief (maintenance and reliever therapy; MART). However, MART's real-world adoption remains suboptimal and concerns regarding its correct implementation persist. \"What About MART Posology\" (WAMP) survey assessed the knowledge and clinical application of MART among Italian healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>WAMP was a cross-sectional, web-based survey conducted among 1000 Italian HCPs and 400 patients with moderate-severe asthma. HCPs answered questions regarding treatment preferences, adherence to GINA recommendations and MART implementation. Patients reported on their therapeutic regimens, inhaler use, and adherence behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most HCPs demonstrated awareness of GINA recommendations. Pulmonologists (73.6%) and allergists (62.0%) reported favoring track 1, while general practitioners (GPs) showed greater variability (55.1%). Most of HCPs reported the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)-formoterol, according to the MART approach, to manage moderate-severe asthma. GPs reported that approximately 45.5% of moderate-severe patients with asthma treated with ICS-formoterol inhaled therapy were also prescribed short-acting β2-agonists (SABA). Among patients, ICS-formoterol was the most reported regimen (59.7%), despite only 21.6% adhered to the MART approach correctly. Triple therapy was preferred for patients with recurrent exacerbations, yet its adoption was lower than expected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WAMP survey suggests a strong awareness of GINA track 1 among Italian HCPs. MART was widely implemented, particularly by specialists; patient data supported these findings. Gaps in education on MART's dual function persist though. Targeted training for HCPs and improved patient education are essential to optimize asthma management and adherence to evidence-based strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"475-489"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373597/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144785148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Practical Approach to Pleural Infection. 胸膜感染的实用治疗方法。
IF 3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-25 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00308-z
Steven J Smith, Benjamin J Pippard

Pleural infection encompasses a spectrum of disease that can present significant challenges in clinical practice. Despite better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and microbiology, outcomes for patients remain poor. The use of antibiotics and chest tube drainage continue to be the mainstay of treatment, with surgery often reserved for those not responding to initial medical therapy. However, at present, the optimal management strategy for individual patients-including the role of early surgical and/or intrapleural therapy-is not clear. In this article, we provide an overview of the pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of pleural infection, highlighting current concepts and key practice points to aid the reader in caring for this important and often complex group of patients.

胸膜感染包括一系列疾病,可以在临床实践中提出重大挑战。尽管对潜在的病理生理学和微生物学有了更好的了解,但患者的预后仍然很差。使用抗生素和胸管引流仍然是治疗的主要方法,对于那些最初药物治疗无效的患者,通常保留手术治疗。然而,目前,对于个体患者的最佳管理策略——包括早期手术和/或胸腔内治疗的作用——尚不清楚。在这篇文章中,我们概述了胸膜感染的病理生理、诊断和治疗,强调了当前的概念和关键的实践要点,以帮助读者照顾这一重要而复杂的患者群体。
{"title":"A Practical Approach to Pleural Infection.","authors":"Steven J Smith, Benjamin J Pippard","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00308-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41030-025-00308-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pleural infection encompasses a spectrum of disease that can present significant challenges in clinical practice. Despite better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and microbiology, outcomes for patients remain poor. The use of antibiotics and chest tube drainage continue to be the mainstay of treatment, with surgery often reserved for those not responding to initial medical therapy. However, at present, the optimal management strategy for individual patients-including the role of early surgical and/or intrapleural therapy-is not clear. In this article, we provide an overview of the pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of pleural infection, highlighting current concepts and key practice points to aid the reader in caring for this important and often complex group of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"535-551"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373619/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144718352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS): Implications for the Clinician. 电子尼古丁输送系统(ENDS):对临床医生的启示。
IF 3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-14 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00305-2
Jean-Guillaume Starnini, Giulio Natalello, Federico Nigroli, Chiara Diana, Elena Bargagli, Andrea Sisto Melani

The evidence that tobacco cigarettes are harmful to the health of smokers led to the introduction of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) as a safer alternative. ENDS, which include electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) and heated tobacco products (battery-operated devices that heat a liquid and produce an aerosol), are portable, cheap, easy-to-use, self-powered devices, and resemble tobacco cigarettes. After an overview of the toxicological, clinical, and epidemiological implications associated with the increasingly widespread use of ENDS, this narrative paper evaluates their role as a smoking cessation aid. Randomized controlled trials show that e-cigs can help in achieving cigarette smoking cessation, but their role in real life is still debated. There is no clear association in current smokers between the prevalence of e-cig use and overall quit rates. Although ENDS are not Food and Drug Administration (FDA)- and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved for quitting, they are one of the most widely utilized pharmacological support devices for smoking cessation. Physicians should ask for ENDS use and amount at each visit, be able to advise on how to manage ENDS as an aid for quitting, encourage vapers not to continue their use indefinitely, and explain how to stop ENDS.

有证据表明,香烟对吸烟者的健康有害,因此引入了电子尼古丁输送系统(ENDS),作为一种更安全的替代品。包括电子烟(e-cigs)和加热烟草产品(电池驱动的加热液体并产生气溶胶的设备)在内的终端是便携式、廉价、易于使用、自供电的设备,与烟草香烟相似。在概述了与ENDS日益广泛使用相关的毒理学、临床和流行病学影响之后,本文评估了它们作为戒烟辅助工具的作用。随机对照试验表明,电子烟有助于戒烟,但它们在现实生活中的作用仍存在争议。在当前吸烟者中,电子烟使用的流行程度与总体戒烟率之间没有明确的联系。尽管ENDS没有被美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准用于戒烟,但它们是戒烟中最广泛使用的药物支持设备之一。医生应该在每次就诊时询问ENDS的使用和用量,能够就如何管理ENDS作为戒烟辅助提供建议,鼓励吸烟者不要无限期地继续使用,并解释如何停止使用ENDS。
{"title":"Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS): Implications for the Clinician.","authors":"Jean-Guillaume Starnini, Giulio Natalello, Federico Nigroli, Chiara Diana, Elena Bargagli, Andrea Sisto Melani","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00305-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41030-025-00305-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The evidence that tobacco cigarettes are harmful to the health of smokers led to the introduction of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) as a safer alternative. ENDS, which include electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) and heated tobacco products (battery-operated devices that heat a liquid and produce an aerosol), are portable, cheap, easy-to-use, self-powered devices, and resemble tobacco cigarettes. After an overview of the toxicological, clinical, and epidemiological implications associated with the increasingly widespread use of ENDS, this narrative paper evaluates their role as a smoking cessation aid. Randomized controlled trials show that e-cigs can help in achieving cigarette smoking cessation, but their role in real life is still debated. There is no clear association in current smokers between the prevalence of e-cig use and overall quit rates. Although ENDS are not Food and Drug Administration (FDA)- and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved for quitting, they are one of the most widely utilized pharmacological support devices for smoking cessation. Physicians should ask for ENDS use and amount at each visit, be able to advise on how to manage ENDS as an aid for quitting, encourage vapers not to continue their use indefinitely, and explain how to stop ENDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"387-404"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373594/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144626972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Study Design and Rationale for the PHINDER Study: Pulmonary Hypertension Screening in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease for Earlier Detection. PHINDER研究的研究设计和基本原理:早期发现间质性肺病患者的肺动脉高压筛查。
IF 3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-25 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00307-0
Tejaswini Kulkarni, David A Zisman, Oksana A Shlobin, David G Kiely, Maral DerSarkissian, Eric Shen, Kevin M Maher, Meredith Broderick, Mary Beth Scholand

Introduction: A common complication of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is pulmonary hypertension (PH), which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and worsened quality of life. In ILD, evaluating for PH is recommended prior to lung transplantation. However, this is not standardized or routinely performed in earlier stages of ILD, and guidelines lack an evidence-based approach for PH screening in this population. Furthermore, right-heart catheterization (RHC) access can be limited in many settings. The objective of PHINDER (Pulmonary Hypertension Screening in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease for Earlier Detection) is to prospectively develop screening strategies for PH in patients with ILD.

Methods: PHINDER is a prospective, non-interventional study that will enroll approximately 200 patients with ILD treated in a variety of settings in the United States (community centers, academic institutions, etc.). Patients must be diagnosed with ILD by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and must not have a previously reported mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) > 20 mmHg. To enrich the population for PH, patients must meet additional criteria on Pulmonary Function Tests, HRCT, signs/symptoms, 6-min walk test, or echocardiography. Patients will undergo a variety of routine ILD clinical assessments. Lastly, patients receive a RHC to assess for PH, defined as mPAP > 20 mmHg with pulmonary arterial wedge pressure ≤ 15 mmHg and a pulmonary vascular resistance > 2 Wood Units. All treatment decisions are at the discretion of the provider and not influenced by study participation.

Planned outcomes: Following study completion, statistical tools will be used to derive a practical model for a screening algorithm using the variables identified in the study as most predictive of PH in patients with ILD.

Conclusions: Using a previously developed list of clinical assessments from PH and ILD experts, the PHINDER study aims to be the first prospectively enrolled study to evaluate prognostic screening strategies that can be used to develop an algorithm to predict the risk of PH in patients with ILD.

Trail registration: NCT05776225.

简介:肺间质性疾病(ILD)的常见并发症是肺动脉高压(PH),它与发病率和死亡率增加以及生活质量恶化有关。对于ILD,建议在肺移植前评估PH值。然而,在ILD的早期阶段,这并不是标准化的或常规的,并且指南缺乏在这一人群中进行PH筛查的循证方法。此外,在许多情况下,右心导管(RHC)的使用可能受到限制。PHINDER(早期发现间质性肺病患者的肺动脉高压筛查)的目的是前瞻性地制定ILD患者的PH筛查策略。方法:PHINDER是一项前瞻性、非介入性研究,将招募约200名在美国不同环境(社区中心、学术机构等)接受治疗的ILD患者。患者必须通过高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)诊断为ILD,且既往报告的平均肺动脉压(mPAP)不得低于20 mmHg。为了丰富PH人群,患者必须满足肺功能测试、HRCT、体征/症状、6分钟步行测试或超声心动图的附加标准。患者将接受各种常规ILD临床评估。最后,患者接受RHC评估PH,定义为mPAP > 20 mmHg,肺动脉楔压≤15 mmHg,肺血管阻力>2 Wood Units。所有的治疗决定都由提供者自行决定,不受参与研究的影响。计划结果:研究完成后,统计工具将使用研究中确定的最能预测ILD患者PH的变量,推导出一个实用的筛选算法模型。结论:PHINDER研究使用先前开发的PH和ILD专家的临床评估列表,旨在成为第一个前瞻性入组研究,以评估预后筛查策略,可用于开发预测ILD患者PH风险的算法。Trail registration: NCT05776225。
{"title":"Study Design and Rationale for the PHINDER Study: Pulmonary Hypertension Screening in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease for Earlier Detection.","authors":"Tejaswini Kulkarni, David A Zisman, Oksana A Shlobin, David G Kiely, Maral DerSarkissian, Eric Shen, Kevin M Maher, Meredith Broderick, Mary Beth Scholand","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00307-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41030-025-00307-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A common complication of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is pulmonary hypertension (PH), which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and worsened quality of life. In ILD, evaluating for PH is recommended prior to lung transplantation. However, this is not standardized or routinely performed in earlier stages of ILD, and guidelines lack an evidence-based approach for PH screening in this population. Furthermore, right-heart catheterization (RHC) access can be limited in many settings. The objective of PHINDER (Pulmonary Hypertension Screening in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease for Earlier Detection) is to prospectively develop screening strategies for PH in patients with ILD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PHINDER is a prospective, non-interventional study that will enroll approximately 200 patients with ILD treated in a variety of settings in the United States (community centers, academic institutions, etc.). Patients must be diagnosed with ILD by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and must not have a previously reported mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) > 20 mmHg. To enrich the population for PH, patients must meet additional criteria on Pulmonary Function Tests, HRCT, signs/symptoms, 6-min walk test, or echocardiography. Patients will undergo a variety of routine ILD clinical assessments. Lastly, patients receive a RHC to assess for PH, defined as mPAP > 20 mmHg with pulmonary arterial wedge pressure ≤ 15 mmHg and a pulmonary vascular resistance > 2 Wood Units. All treatment decisions are at the discretion of the provider and not influenced by study participation.</p><p><strong>Planned outcomes: </strong>Following study completion, statistical tools will be used to derive a practical model for a screening algorithm using the variables identified in the study as most predictive of PH in patients with ILD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a previously developed list of clinical assessments from PH and ILD experts, the PHINDER study aims to be the first prospectively enrolled study to evaluate prognostic screening strategies that can be used to develop an algorithm to predict the risk of PH in patients with ILD.</p><p><strong>Trail registration: </strong>NCT05776225.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"491-501"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373579/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144708578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of CFTR Modulators on Longitudinal Cystic Fibrosis Survival and Mortality: Review and Secondary Analysis. CFTR调节剂对纵向囊性纤维化生存和死亡率的影响:回顾和二次分析。
IF 3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-11 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00303-4
Jaime L Rubin, Craig McKinnon, Gabriel Ghizzi Pedra, Devon A Morgan, Kimberly Zweig, Theodore G Liou

Introduction: Cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator modulators (CFTRm) have transformed CF care, shifting treatment from only managing symptoms to also addressing the underlying defects that cause CF. CFTRm first entered clinical practice in 2012 and was followed by additional CFTRm combinations-including the approval of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) in 2019-which treats most CF genotypes.

Methods: We identified peer-reviewed literature for a narrative review (January 1990 to January 2025) describing longitudinal trends in CF survival and age of death and assessing the influence of CFTRm, particularly ELX/TEZ/IVA. To supplement the existing literature, a secondary analysis of historical, longitudinal trends in the United States CF Foundation Patient Registry (U.S. CFFPR, 1990-2023) was conducted using recent available data.

Results: Quantitative data from published studies show that the median age of survival and death increased over time but with varying magnitudes across regions. Most cohort and registry-based studies were conducted in settings where CFTRm were not yet widely available, limiting the evaluation of CFTRm effects on survival trends over time. In the secondary U.S. CFFPR analysis, the median survival age increased from 29.0 years in 1990 to 38.6 years in 2012 prior to the introduction of CFTRm and to 68.0 years in 2023, demonstrating substantial improvement following the introduction of CFTRm. Linear regression analyses showed gains in median survival age increased from 0.48 years per year prior to CFTRm to 4.79 years per year after approval of ELX/TEZ/IVA in 2019.

Conclusions: Study results provide initial evidence of the impact of CFTRm to meaningfully improve survival. Longer-term follow-up data across geographies will provide a deeper understanding of the full impact of CFTRm on predicted CF survival and mortality.

囊性纤维化(CF)跨膜传导调节剂(CFTRm)已经改变了CF的治疗方式,将治疗从仅仅控制症状转变为解决导致CF的潜在缺陷。CFTRm于2012年首次进入临床实践,随后又有更多的CFTRm组合,包括elexaftor /tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA)于2019年获得批准,可治疗大多数CF基因型。方法:我们选取同行评审的文献进行叙述性回顾(1990年1月至2025年1月),描述CF生存率和死亡年龄的纵向趋势,并评估CFTRm的影响,特别是ELX/TEZ/IVA。为了补充现有文献,我们使用最新的可用数据对美国CF基金会患者登记处(U.S. cfpr, 1990-2023)的历史纵向趋势进行了二次分析。结果:已发表研究的定量数据表明,生存和死亡的中位年龄随着时间的推移而增加,但不同地区的幅度不同。大多数队列和基于登记的研究是在CFTRm尚未广泛应用的情况下进行的,这限制了CFTRm对长期生存趋势影响的评估。在美国cfpr的二次分析中,中位生存年龄从1990年的29.0岁增加到2012年CFTRm引入前的38.6岁,到2023年增加到68.0岁,显示了CFTRm引入后的显著改善。线性回归分析显示,中位生存年龄的增加从CFTRm前的每年0.48岁增加到2019年批准ELX/TEZ/IVA后的每年4.79岁。结论:研究结果提供了CFTRm显著提高生存率的初步证据。跨地域的长期随访数据将更深入地了解CFTRm对预测的CF生存和死亡率的全面影响。
{"title":"Impact of CFTR Modulators on Longitudinal Cystic Fibrosis Survival and Mortality: Review and Secondary Analysis.","authors":"Jaime L Rubin, Craig McKinnon, Gabriel Ghizzi Pedra, Devon A Morgan, Kimberly Zweig, Theodore G Liou","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00303-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41030-025-00303-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator modulators (CFTRm) have transformed CF care, shifting treatment from only managing symptoms to also addressing the underlying defects that cause CF. CFTRm first entered clinical practice in 2012 and was followed by additional CFTRm combinations-including the approval of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) in 2019-which treats most CF genotypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified peer-reviewed literature for a narrative review (January 1990 to January 2025) describing longitudinal trends in CF survival and age of death and assessing the influence of CFTRm, particularly ELX/TEZ/IVA. To supplement the existing literature, a secondary analysis of historical, longitudinal trends in the United States CF Foundation Patient Registry (U.S. CFFPR, 1990-2023) was conducted using recent available data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative data from published studies show that the median age of survival and death increased over time but with varying magnitudes across regions. Most cohort and registry-based studies were conducted in settings where CFTRm were not yet widely available, limiting the evaluation of CFTRm effects on survival trends over time. In the secondary U.S. CFFPR analysis, the median survival age increased from 29.0 years in 1990 to 38.6 years in 2012 prior to the introduction of CFTRm and to 68.0 years in 2023, demonstrating substantial improvement following the introduction of CFTRm. Linear regression analyses showed gains in median survival age increased from 0.48 years per year prior to CFTRm to 4.79 years per year after approval of ELX/TEZ/IVA in 2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study results provide initial evidence of the impact of CFTRm to meaningfully improve survival. Longer-term follow-up data across geographies will provide a deeper understanding of the full impact of CFTRm on predicted CF survival and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"365-386"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373600/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144619858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Strategies for the Prevention and Management of Respiratory Infections in Patients at High Risk in the UAE: A Cross-Disciplinary Position Paper. 预防和管理阿联酋高危患者呼吸道感染的策略:一份跨学科立场文件。
IF 3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-19 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00304-3
Abdullah Shehab, Huda Al Dhanhani, Omar Alhammadi, Mohamed Badi Hassan, Mohamed Farghaly, Ahmed Hassoun, Bassam Mahboub, Mona Tahlak, Reem Faisal Abutayeh, Hammam Haridy, Ashraf Hassanien, Jean Joury, Humaid O Al-Shamsi

Respiratory infections are a major cause of mortality among young children and adults, particularly the elderly or those with underlying medical conditions. Many respiratory infections, including influenza, COVID-19, pneumococcal disease, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), have available vaccines and antiviral agents. However, vaccine coverage rates remain low. Experts representing a broad spectrum of medical specialties from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) made evidence-based recommendations on treating patients considered high risk for respiratory infections, highlighting gaps in current practices and suggesting strategies for improved communication between healthcare professionals and patients. To effectively manage respiratory infections, the experts emphasized the importance of adhering to guidelines, considering all vaccines and antiviral treatments, and strictly following vaccination schedules. Early testing upon recognition of symptoms was also encouraged. Improving vaccine uptake was considered crucial and could be achieved by educating patients about disease prevention through vaccines and the role of antiviral treatments for COVID-19. Addressing knowledge gaps and combating vaccine hesitancy among both patients and healthcare professionals were also essential steps. Recommendations for future initiatives include healthcare professionals educating the public on precautionary measures to reduce the spread of respiratory infections. Additionally, the experts agreed that clinical management guidelines for chronic diseases should be updated to include preventative strategies such as vaccines, prophylaxis, and counselling. Monitoring the performance of healthcare facilities using key performance indicators is also recommended to ensure effective management and continuous improvement of vaccination programs. Patient populations in the UAE who are considered at high risk of serious disease from respiratory infections have diverse medical needs and may access healthcare across a wide range of settings and specialisms. Therefore, it is vital that all healthcare professionals across specialisms who may engage with these individuals are able to provide appropriate advice on managing the risk through vaccination, prompt testing, and treatments as needed.

呼吸道感染是幼儿和成人,特别是老年人或有基础疾病的人死亡的一个主要原因。许多呼吸道感染,包括流感、COVID-19、肺炎球菌病和呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV),都有可用的疫苗和抗病毒药物。然而,疫苗覆盖率仍然很低。代表阿拉伯联合酋长国(阿联酋)广泛医学专业的专家就治疗被认为有呼吸道感染高风险的患者提出了基于证据的建议,强调了目前做法中的差距,并提出了改善卫生保健专业人员与患者之间沟通的战略。为了有效管理呼吸道感染,专家们强调了遵守指南、考虑所有疫苗和抗病毒治疗以及严格遵守疫苗接种时间表的重要性。还鼓励在发现症状后进行早期检测。提高疫苗吸收率被认为至关重要,可以通过教育患者通过疫苗预防疾病和COVID-19抗病毒治疗的作用来实现。解决患者和保健专业人员之间的知识差距和消除疫苗犹豫也是必不可少的步骤。建议今后采取的措施包括卫生保健专业人员教育公众采取预防措施,以减少呼吸道感染的传播。此外,专家们一致认为,应更新慢性病临床管理指南,以包括疫苗、预防和咨询等预防战略。还建议使用关键绩效指标监测卫生保健设施的绩效,以确保疫苗接种计划的有效管理和持续改进。在阿联酋,被认为因呼吸道感染而罹患严重疾病风险很高的患者群体有各种各样的医疗需求,可以在各种环境和专业中获得医疗保健服务。因此,至关重要的是,所有可能与这些人接触的专业医疗保健专业人员都能够提供适当的建议,通过接种疫苗、及时检测和必要的治疗来管理风险。
{"title":"Strategies for the Prevention and Management of Respiratory Infections in Patients at High Risk in the UAE: A Cross-Disciplinary Position Paper.","authors":"Abdullah Shehab, Huda Al Dhanhani, Omar Alhammadi, Mohamed Badi Hassan, Mohamed Farghaly, Ahmed Hassoun, Bassam Mahboub, Mona Tahlak, Reem Faisal Abutayeh, Hammam Haridy, Ashraf Hassanien, Jean Joury, Humaid O Al-Shamsi","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00304-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41030-025-00304-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Respiratory infections are a major cause of mortality among young children and adults, particularly the elderly or those with underlying medical conditions. Many respiratory infections, including influenza, COVID-19, pneumococcal disease, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), have available vaccines and antiviral agents. However, vaccine coverage rates remain low. Experts representing a broad spectrum of medical specialties from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) made evidence-based recommendations on treating patients considered high risk for respiratory infections, highlighting gaps in current practices and suggesting strategies for improved communication between healthcare professionals and patients. To effectively manage respiratory infections, the experts emphasized the importance of adhering to guidelines, considering all vaccines and antiviral treatments, and strictly following vaccination schedules. Early testing upon recognition of symptoms was also encouraged. Improving vaccine uptake was considered crucial and could be achieved by educating patients about disease prevention through vaccines and the role of antiviral treatments for COVID-19. Addressing knowledge gaps and combating vaccine hesitancy among both patients and healthcare professionals were also essential steps. Recommendations for future initiatives include healthcare professionals educating the public on precautionary measures to reduce the spread of respiratory infections. Additionally, the experts agreed that clinical management guidelines for chronic diseases should be updated to include preventative strategies such as vaccines, prophylaxis, and counselling. Monitoring the performance of healthcare facilities using key performance indicators is also recommended to ensure effective management and continuous improvement of vaccination programs. Patient populations in the UAE who are considered at high risk of serious disease from respiratory infections have diverse medical needs and may access healthcare across a wide range of settings and specialisms. Therefore, it is vital that all healthcare professionals across specialisms who may engage with these individuals are able to provide appropriate advice on managing the risk through vaccination, prompt testing, and treatments as needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"405-421"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373577/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144668190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Diagnostic Approach to Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. 恶性胸膜间皮瘤的诊断方法。
IF 3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-11 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00301-6
Avinash Aujayeb, Philippe Astoul

In this concise article, we give a current overview of the practical approach to diagnosing pleural mesothelioma (PM). PM is a rare, incurable, aggressive cancer almost exclusively related to previous asbestos exposure. We begin by outlining the general approach to pleural malignancy. The focus then shifts to pleural mesothelioma (PM), with discussions on cytological analyses, a direct-to-thoracoscopy approach, specialist services, and future directions. This narrative review aims to provide an updated, practical overview of current and emerging diagnostic strategies.

在这篇简明的文章中,我们给出了诊断胸膜间皮瘤(PM)的实用方法的当前概述。PM是一种罕见的,无法治愈的,侵袭性的癌症,几乎完全与以前的石棉暴露有关。我们首先概述胸膜恶性肿瘤的一般方法。然后重点转移到胸膜间皮瘤(PM),讨论细胞学分析,直接胸腔镜方法,专家服务和未来的方向。这篇叙述性综述的目的是提供一个最新的,实用的概述当前和新兴的诊断策略。
{"title":"A Diagnostic Approach to Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.","authors":"Avinash Aujayeb, Philippe Astoul","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00301-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41030-025-00301-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this concise article, we give a current overview of the practical approach to diagnosing pleural mesothelioma (PM). PM is a rare, incurable, aggressive cancer almost exclusively related to previous asbestos exposure. We begin by outlining the general approach to pleural malignancy. The focus then shifts to pleural mesothelioma (PM), with discussions on cytological analyses, a direct-to-thoracoscopy approach, specialist services, and future directions. This narrative review aims to provide an updated, practical overview of current and emerging diagnostic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"503-517"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373620/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144267201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinically Important Improvements and Disease Stability with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in the ELLITHE Trial: A Post Hoc Responder Analysis. 在ELLITHE试验中,糠酸氟替卡松/乌莫替尼/维兰特罗每日一次单吸入三联疗法的临床重要改善和疾病稳定性:事后反应分析
IF 3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-13 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-025-00306-1
Kai-Michael Beeh, Karl Scheithe, Heike Schmutzler, Saskia Krüger

Introduction: Responder analyses provide information about characteristics associated with therapeutic benefits. Short-term responses may predict long-term benefits. We evaluated responders, clinically important improvement (CII), disease stability (DS), and the relation of short- to long-term responses in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in ELLITHE.

Methods: ELLITHE was a multicenter, open-label, non-interventional effectiveness study between 2020 and 2022 evaluating the effects of treatment initiation with once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy (odSITT) FF/UMEC/VI (100/62.5/25 µg via ELLIPTA) on COPD Assessment Test (CAT), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and exacerbations over 12 months. Post hoc responder analyses for CAT (≥ 2 units improvement), FEV1 (≥ 100 ml change), and exacerbations (no event) were performed. Composite endpoints CII and DS (CII = response to at least two outcomes; DS = absence of clinically important deterioration for all outcomes) were also evaluated.

Results: A total of 786 patients had available data for any analysis. At study completion, 53.3% of patients were CAT, 36.7% FEV1, and 90.2% exacerbation responders, with 22.1% responding to all outcomes; 64.3% had a CII, and 52.7% showed DS. CII and DS were more frequent in subjects with higher baseline CAT score, and DS in patients  on prior ICS/LABA therapy (all p < 0.05). Early (3 months) CAT, FEV1 and CII response strongly predicted respective responses at study end (odds ratios = OR ranging from 6.3 to 7.4), and DS (OR from 3.0 to 4.2). In the patient subset with available baseline eosinophil counts, response was generally similar at < 150 versus ≥ 150 cells/μl.

Conclusions: Despite overlapping responses to single and composite outcomes with odSITT, individual patterns support a multidimensional approach to evaluate benefits in COPD. Responders had higher baseline CAT scores and frequency of prior dual therapies. Short-term responses of FEV1 and/or CAT were reasonable predictors of long-term responses, including DS. DS was achievable for the majority of patients and may represent a useful outcome for future COPD research and management.

应答者分析提供了与治疗益处相关的特征信息。短期反应可能预示长期利益。我们在ELLITHE中评估了慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的应答者、临床重要改善(CII)、疾病稳定性(DS)以及短期和长期反应的关系。方法:ELLITHE是一项2020年至2022年期间的多中心、开放标签、非介入性有效性研究,评估每日一次单吸入器三合一治疗(odSITT) FF/UMEC/VI(100/62.5/25µg通过ELLIPTA)对COPD评估测试(CAT)、1s用力呼气量(FEV1)和12个月加重的影响。对CAT(改善≥2个单位)、FEV1(改变≥100 ml)和加重(无事件)进行事后反应分析。复合终点CII和DS (CII =对至少两个结局的反应;还评估了DS(无临床重要恶化的所有结果)。结果:共有786例患者可用于任何分析。研究完成时,53.3%的患者为CAT, 36.7%为FEV1, 90.2%为急性加重应答者,其中22.1%对所有结果均有反应;64.3%为CII, 52.7%为DS。在基线CAT评分较高的受试者中,CII和DS更常见,而在先前接受ICS/LABA治疗的患者中,DS(所有的p 1和CII反应强烈预测了研究结束时各自的反应(比值比= OR范围从6.3到7.4)和DS (OR范围从3.0到4.2)。在基线嗜酸性粒细胞计数可用的患者亚组中,反应大致相似:结论:尽管odSITT对单一和复合结果的反应重叠,但个体模式支持多维方法来评估COPD的益处。应答者有较高的基线CAT评分和先前双重治疗的频率。FEV1和/或CAT的短期反应是包括DS在内的长期反应的合理预测指标。对于大多数患者来说,退行性椎体滑移是可以实现的,这可能是未来COPD研究和管理的有用结果。
{"title":"Clinically Important Improvements and Disease Stability with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in the ELLITHE Trial: A Post Hoc Responder Analysis.","authors":"Kai-Michael Beeh, Karl Scheithe, Heike Schmutzler, Saskia Krüger","doi":"10.1007/s41030-025-00306-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41030-025-00306-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Responder analyses provide information about characteristics associated with therapeutic benefits. Short-term responses may predict long-term benefits. We evaluated responders, clinically important improvement (CII), disease stability (DS), and the relation of short- to long-term responses in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in ELLITHE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ELLITHE was a multicenter, open-label, non-interventional effectiveness study between 2020 and 2022 evaluating the effects of treatment initiation with once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy (odSITT) FF/UMEC/VI (100/62.5/25 µg via ELLIPTA) on COPD Assessment Test (CAT), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>), and exacerbations over 12 months. Post hoc responder analyses for CAT (≥ 2 units improvement), FEV<sub>1</sub> (≥ 100 ml change), and exacerbations (no event) were performed. Composite endpoints CII and DS (CII = response to at least two outcomes; DS = absence of clinically important deterioration for all outcomes) were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 786 patients had available data for any analysis. At study completion, 53.3% of patients were CAT, 36.7% FEV<sub>1</sub>, and 90.2% exacerbation responders, with 22.1% responding to all outcomes; 64.3% had a CII, and 52.7% showed DS. CII and DS were more frequent in subjects with higher baseline CAT score, and DS in patients  on prior ICS/LABA therapy (all p < 0.05). Early (3 months) CAT, FEV<sub>1</sub> and CII response strongly predicted respective responses at study end (odds ratios = OR ranging from 6.3 to 7.4), and DS (OR from 3.0 to 4.2). In the patient subset with available baseline eosinophil counts, response was generally similar at < 150 versus ≥ 150 cells/μl.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite overlapping responses to single and composite outcomes with odSITT, individual patterns support a multidimensional approach to evaluate benefits in COPD. Responders had higher baseline CAT scores and frequency of prior dual therapies. Short-term responses of FEV<sub>1</sub> and/or CAT were reasonable predictors of long-term responses, including DS. DS was achievable for the majority of patients and may represent a useful outcome for future COPD research and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20919,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"443-459"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373607/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144619857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Pulmonary Therapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1