Strain-level identification of each microbe is crucial for understanding its role in the host. Most of the existing tools have primarily been evaluated on human metagenomic datasets, whereas the plant microbiome exhibits greater diversity and complexity and thus poses a challenge in the strain-level resolution of individual microbes. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive benchmarking of available reference-based tools for strain-level resolution of the plant microbiome. We evaluated seven tools on various performance parameters, like computational requirements, F1-score and relative abundances using synthetic datasets comprising microbes known to have strong associations with plants as well as real plant microbiome datasets. Our results demonstrated a better performance of StrainScan on the synthetic data, achieving higher F1-score and more accurate relative abundance estimates as compared to other tools, but its performance declined gradually with increasing strain diversity. However, StrainGE and StrainScan exhibited competitive performance on real plant metagenome data. Overall, though StrainGE exhibited better performance, it was more computationally expensive. However, StrainScan performed better in detecting low-abundance strains. Our findings suggest the comparative suitability of the available tools for the strain-level analysis of plant metagenome data and highlight the need for the development of more efficient and accurate taxonomic classifiers capable of handling the complex plant metagenome data while maintaining computational efficiency.
{"title":"Benchmarking of Reference-Based Tools for Strain-Level Resolution of Plant Microbiome","authors":"Rishav Sahil, Mukesh Jain","doi":"10.1111/1755-0998.70197","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1755-0998.70197","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Strain-level identification of each microbe is crucial for understanding its role in the host. Most of the existing tools have primarily been evaluated on human metagenomic datasets, whereas the plant microbiome exhibits greater diversity and complexity and thus poses a challenge in the strain-level resolution of individual microbes. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive benchmarking of available reference-based tools for strain-level resolution of the plant microbiome. We evaluated seven tools on various performance parameters, like computational requirements, F1-score and relative abundances using synthetic datasets comprising microbes known to have strong associations with plants as well as real plant microbiome datasets. Our results demonstrated a better performance of StrainScan on the synthetic data, achieving higher F1-score and more accurate relative abundance estimates as compared to other tools, but its performance declined gradually with increasing strain diversity. However, StrainGE and StrainScan exhibited competitive performance on real plant metagenome data. Overall, though StrainGE exhibited better performance, it was more computationally expensive. However, StrainScan performed better in detecting low-abundance strains. Our findings suggest the comparative suitability of the available tools for the strain-level analysis of plant metagenome data and highlight the need for the development of more efficient and accurate taxonomic classifiers capable of handling the complex plant metagenome data while maintaining computational efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":211,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology Resources","volume":"26 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13550808/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148904702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sebastian Sonnenberg, Thapasya Vijayan, Christina Rupprecht, Yoko Philipina Krenn, Melissa Gruber, Hannah Dorfer, Gerald Kwikiriza, Harald Meimberg, Manuel Curto
Genotyping by amplicon sequencing (GBAS) is a relatively low-cost approach for generating genotypic data compared with established genomic methods, making it highly scalable and particularly suitable for large-scale genetic monitoring projects. However, most existing analytical pipelines are either marker-specific, insufficiently scalable, or lacking efficient data management systems for the long-term integration of genotypic information, limiting the full potential of GBAS. Here, we address this gap by introducing GBAS-GUI (https://github.com/sonnenbe-dot/GBAS-GUI), a pipeline capable of generating GBAS-based genotypic data for a wide variety of loci at scale. GBAS-GUI integrates a graphical user interface with multiple checkpoints to improve accessibility and robustness. It implements multiprocessing architecture and a relational database that links genotypic data with associated sample metadata to enhance scalability and data management. The pipeline further enables marker screening through automated calculation of polymorphism information content (PIC) and implements a strategy to recover homologous genotypic information from paralogous loci with non-overlapping amplicon length ranges. Using multiple empirical datasets, we demonstrate substantial improvements in processing speed, database management and handling artefacts related to co-amplification of unspecific regions and duplicates of the same genomic region. We further show that incorporating the full sequence information captured by an amplicon increases marker information content beyond what is achievable with length-based genotyping alone and expands the analytical versatility of GBAS. Overall, GBAS-GUI provides a robust, scalable and versatile framework that unlocks the potential of GBAS for large-scale population genetic and phylogeographic studies.
{"title":"Upscaling Genotyping by Amplicon Sequencing With GBAS-GUI","authors":"Sebastian Sonnenberg, Thapasya Vijayan, Christina Rupprecht, Yoko Philipina Krenn, Melissa Gruber, Hannah Dorfer, Gerald Kwikiriza, Harald Meimberg, Manuel Curto","doi":"10.1111/1755-0998.70198","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1755-0998.70198","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Genotyping by amplicon sequencing (GBAS) is a relatively low-cost approach for generating genotypic data compared with established genomic methods, making it highly scalable and particularly suitable for large-scale genetic monitoring projects. However, most existing analytical pipelines are either marker-specific, insufficiently scalable, or lacking efficient data management systems for the long-term integration of genotypic information, limiting the full potential of GBAS. Here, we address this gap by introducing GBAS-GUI (https://github.com/sonnenbe-dot/GBAS-GUI), a pipeline capable of generating GBAS-based genotypic data for a wide variety of loci at scale. GBAS-GUI integrates a graphical user interface with multiple checkpoints to improve accessibility and robustness. It implements multiprocessing architecture and a relational database that links genotypic data with associated sample metadata to enhance scalability and data management. The pipeline further enables marker screening through automated calculation of polymorphism information content (PIC) and implements a strategy to recover homologous genotypic information from paralogous loci with non-overlapping amplicon length ranges. Using multiple empirical datasets, we demonstrate substantial improvements in processing speed, database management and handling artefacts related to co-amplification of unspecific regions and duplicates of the same genomic region. We further show that incorporating the full sequence information captured by an amplicon increases marker information content beyond what is achievable with length-based genotyping alone and expands the analytical versatility of GBAS. Overall, GBAS-GUI provides a robust, scalable and versatile framework that unlocks the potential of GBAS for large-scale population genetic and phylogeographic studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":211,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology Resources","volume":"26 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13544635/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148890492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elena Baños, Clara Ras Segura, Erik J. De Boer, Andrew B. Cundy, Xavier Turon Barrera, Sandra Nogué, Luke E. Holman, Marc Rius
Replication is central to most experimental and sampling designs, increasing inferential power and capturing fine-scale data heterogeneity. However, its importance remains poorly evaluated in some ecological and evolutionary settings. This is the case of metabarcoding studies using DNA recovered from sedimentary archives, in which biological signals integrate ecological information through depositional and burial processes, yet are commonly inferred from a single sediment core per site. Here, we evaluated the effect of different types of replication using sedimentary DNA metabarcoding data from two genetic markers (mitochondrial COI and nuclear 18S) using a nested sampling design. The design included three intertidal sites, three spatially separated sediment cores per site (biological replicates), two sediment horizons per core, and eight PCR (technical) replicates per sediment sample. Variance partitioning showed that site identity and sediment age group together explained > 70% of the variation in beta diversity, indicating that among-site spatial and stratigraphic differences were the dominant drivers of community composition. PERMANOVA likewise identified non-significant effects of biological replication. Among PCR replicates from the same sediment sample, richness varied substantially, whereas Shannon diversity was more consistent. Despite this variability, differences in community composition among technical replicates remained smaller than those associated with biological replication or site identity, indicating a limited influence on broader ecological patterns. Community composition was highly similar among replicate cores within sites, consistent with stratigraphic coherence. These results indicate limited within-site heterogeneity and suggest that, under stratigraphically coherent conditions, increasing biological replication may provide little additional information, whereas enhancing technical replication and stratigraphic resolution can improve ecological inference from sedimentary DNA metabarcoding datasets.
{"title":"Getting to the Core of the Matter—Assessing the Role of Replication in Metabarcoding-Based sedaDNA","authors":"Elena Baños, Clara Ras Segura, Erik J. De Boer, Andrew B. Cundy, Xavier Turon Barrera, Sandra Nogué, Luke E. Holman, Marc Rius","doi":"10.1111/1755-0998.70200","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1755-0998.70200","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Replication is central to most experimental and sampling designs, increasing inferential power and capturing fine-scale data heterogeneity. However, its importance remains poorly evaluated in some ecological and evolutionary settings. This is the case of metabarcoding studies using DNA recovered from sedimentary archives, in which biological signals integrate ecological information through depositional and burial processes, yet are commonly inferred from a single sediment core per site. Here, we evaluated the effect of different types of replication using sedimentary DNA metabarcoding data from two genetic markers (mitochondrial COI and nuclear 18S) using a nested sampling design. The design included three intertidal sites, three spatially separated sediment cores per site (biological replicates), two sediment horizons per core, and eight PCR (technical) replicates per sediment sample. Variance partitioning showed that site identity and sediment age group together explained > 70% of the variation in beta diversity, indicating that among-site spatial and stratigraphic differences were the dominant drivers of community composition. PERMANOVA likewise identified non-significant effects of biological replication. Among PCR replicates from the same sediment sample, richness varied substantially, whereas Shannon diversity was more consistent. Despite this variability, differences in community composition among technical replicates remained smaller than those associated with biological replication or site identity, indicating a limited influence on broader ecological patterns. Community composition was highly similar among replicate cores within sites, consistent with stratigraphic coherence. These results indicate limited within-site heterogeneity and suggest that, under stratigraphically coherent conditions, increasing biological replication may provide little additional information, whereas enhancing technical replication and stratigraphic resolution can improve ecological inference from sedimentary DNA metabarcoding datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":211,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology Resources","volume":"26 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13542785/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148885668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yi-Xuan Li, Yanjie Zhang, Qi Dai, Chong Chen, Crispin T. S. Little, Moriaki Yasuhara, Yusuke Yokoyama, Jack Chi-Ho Ip, Jian-Wen Qiu
Target capture is widely used to enrich endogenous DNA from calcium phosphate skeletal material in vertebrates, but its performance on calcium carbonate hard parts widely produced by invertebrates remains poorly understood. Here, we compared DNA recovery from four fresh and 12 ancient (eight radiocarbon-dated to 1671–1135 years old before present) deep-sea vesicomyid clam shells, including species Archivesica marissinica, A. nanshaensis and A. okutanii, using whole-genome sequencing (WGS) or target capture of ultraconserved elements (UCEs). WGS achieved 16.65% on-target read recovery of UCEs from fresh soft tissue, but < 1% from shell specimens. By contrast, UCE capture in the same specimen increased on-target reads by up to 155-fold, reaching 29.84% in fresh shells and up to 72-fold, reaching 19.89% in ancient shells. Target capture of UCEs recovered 142–1001 loci per sample compared to 0–230 with WGS alone. Ancient shells of A. marissinica and A. okutanii, based on reads mapped with bwa-mem2 and bbmap, exhibited characteristic post-mortem DNA damage signals, with average 5′-end C-to-T misincorporation rates of 3.46% and 15.97%, respectively, exceeding the levels observed in fresh A. marissinica shells (maximum 1.24%). UCE-based phylogenetic reconstructions incorporating shell ancient DNA recovered two major clades within Pliocardiinae, consistent with published phylogenomic trees. Together, these findings demonstrate that target-capture enrichment enables effective recovery of highly degraded DNA from ancient mollusc shells and supports robust phylogenetic inference at the intrageneric scale, expanding the utility of shells—one of the most abundant invertebrate remains—for evolutionary, biogeographic and conservation studies.
{"title":"Target Capture of Ancient Shell DNA Enables Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Deep-Sea Molluscs","authors":"Yi-Xuan Li, Yanjie Zhang, Qi Dai, Chong Chen, Crispin T. S. Little, Moriaki Yasuhara, Yusuke Yokoyama, Jack Chi-Ho Ip, Jian-Wen Qiu","doi":"10.1111/1755-0998.70199","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.70199","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Target capture is widely used to enrich endogenous DNA from calcium phosphate skeletal material in vertebrates, but its performance on calcium carbonate hard parts widely produced by invertebrates remains poorly understood. Here, we compared DNA recovery from four fresh and 12 ancient (eight radiocarbon-dated to 1671–1135 years old before present) deep-sea vesicomyid clam shells, including species <i>Archivesica marissinica</i>, <i>A. nanshaensis</i> and <i>A. okutanii</i>, using whole-genome sequencing (WGS) or target capture of ultraconserved elements (UCEs). WGS achieved 16.65% on-target read recovery of UCEs from fresh soft tissue, but < 1% from shell specimens. By contrast, UCE capture in the same specimen increased on-target reads by up to 155-fold, reaching 29.84% in fresh shells and up to 72-fold, reaching 19.89% in ancient shells. Target capture of UCEs recovered 142–1001 loci per sample compared to 0–230 with WGS alone. Ancient shells of <i>A. marissinica</i> and <i>A. okutanii</i>, based on reads mapped with bwa-mem2 and bbmap, exhibited characteristic post-mortem DNA damage signals, with average 5′-end C-to-T misincorporation rates of 3.46% and 15.97%, respectively, exceeding the levels observed in fresh <i>A. marissinica</i> shells (maximum 1.24%). UCE-based phylogenetic reconstructions incorporating shell ancient DNA recovered two major clades within Pliocardiinae, consistent with published phylogenomic trees. Together, these findings demonstrate that target-capture enrichment enables effective recovery of highly degraded DNA from ancient mollusc shells and supports robust phylogenetic inference at the intrageneric scale, expanding the utility of shells—one of the most abundant invertebrate remains—for evolutionary, biogeographic and conservation studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":211,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology Resources","volume":"26 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2026-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1755-0998.70199","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148860197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jared A. Grummer, Eric C. Anderson, Gordon Luikart
Hybridization is ubiquitous throughout the tree of life. Its presence in genetic datasets often violates model assumptions or leads to erroneous inferences. Nonetheless, few parentage assignment methods have been developed that account for hybridization or admixture, particularly in non-model systems. Here, we describe a novel method of parentage analysis, MixedUpParents, that accounts for hybridization by using species-diagnostic single nucleotide polymorphisms while accounting for mixed ancestry within discrete genomic segments. We test MixedUpParents alongside other parentage assignment programs through simulations to assess assignment accuracy in scenarios with and without hybridization. Our simulations included a range of parameter values, including missing genotypes, migration (hybridization) rates and proportions of un-sampled individuals. Simulation results showed that in all scenarios with admixture, MixedUpParents outperformed the other parentage methods tested and performed well for parent–offspring assignment even when only one parent is sampled. In the best cases, MixedUpParents achieved