首页 > 最新文献

Khirurgiya最新文献

英文 中文
[Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional endoscopic abdominal surgeries in the Russian Federation: a systematic review and meta-analysis]. [俄罗斯联邦机器人辅助和传统内窥镜腹部手术的比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析]。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202605191
T V Nechay, S I Panin, A G Yuldashev, S E Tolstopyatov, M P Postolov, A V Sazhin

Objective: To compare the results of robot-assisted (RA) and laparoscopic (LA) technologies in abdominal surgery in Russian surgical practice.

Material and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with methodological recommendations of the Russian Ministry of Health and the Cochrane guidelines. Considering heterogeneity of primary study designs, we did not determine the overall effect of meta-analysis. Differences were presented for each study. The review continues the 2021 study and updates data using similar inclusion criteria and approaches to meta-analysis.

Results: The number of studies devoted to abdominal robotic surgery has increased since 2020. Controlled non-randomized trials comprised 96%. Predominant area of research was oncological coloproctology. Duration of robotic surgeries varied from 113 to 665 min, laparoscopic surgeries - from 91 to 427 min. Differences in favor of shorter laparoscopic surgery were significant in half of the studies. The incidence of intraoperative complications in robotic interventions varied from 0% to 13%, in laparoscopic interventions - from 0% to 30%. There was a tendency to less blood loss in robotic interventions. Comparison of inpatient treatment, postoperative complications (0-56% after robotic interventions, 1-70.6% after laparoscopic surgeries) and mortality (0-8.7% after robotic surgery and 0-11.8% after laparoscopic interventions) did not reveal significant differences.

Conclusion: At the modern stage of robotic surgery in the Russian Federation, differences between robotic and traditional laparoscopic interventions are not significant in abdominal surgery. Further researches with higher methodological quality are needed due to low evidence base.

目的:比较俄罗斯外科实践中机器人辅助(RA)与腹腔镜(LA)技术在腹部手术中的应用效果。材料和方法:根据俄罗斯卫生部的方法学建议和Cochrane指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。考虑到主要研究设计的异质性,我们没有确定meta分析的总体效果。每个研究都有不同之处。该综述延续了2021年的研究,并使用与meta分析相似的纳入标准和方法更新了数据。结果:自2020年以来,致力于腹部机器人手术的研究数量有所增加。对照非随机试验占96%。主要研究领域为肿瘤直肠病学。机器人手术的时间从113分钟到665分钟不等,腹腔镜手术的时间从91分钟到427分钟不等。在一半的研究中,赞成较短腹腔镜手术的差异是显著的。机器人干预术中并发症的发生率从0%到13%不等,腹腔镜干预术中并发症的发生率从0%到30%不等。机器人干预有减少失血的趋势。住院治疗、术后并发症(机器人干预后0-56%,腹腔镜手术后1-70.6%)和死亡率(机器人手术后0-8.7%,腹腔镜干预后0-11.8%)比较无显著差异。结论:在俄罗斯联邦机器人手术的现代阶段,机器人与传统腹腔镜干预在腹部手术中的差异不显著。由于证据基础不足,需要进一步提高方法质量的研究。
{"title":"[Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional endoscopic abdominal surgeries in the Russian Federation: a systematic review and meta-analysis].","authors":"T V Nechay, S I Panin, A G Yuldashev, S E Tolstopyatov, M P Postolov, A V Sazhin","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202605191","DOIUrl":"10.17116/hirurgia202605191","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the results of robot-assisted (RA) and laparoscopic (LA) technologies in abdominal surgery in Russian surgical practice.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with methodological recommendations of the Russian Ministry of Health and the Cochrane guidelines. Considering heterogeneity of primary study designs, we did not determine the overall effect of meta-analysis. Differences were presented for each study. The review continues the 2021 study and updates data using similar inclusion criteria and approaches to meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of studies devoted to abdominal robotic surgery has increased since 2020. Controlled non-randomized trials comprised 96%. Predominant area of research was oncological coloproctology. Duration of robotic surgeries varied from 113 to 665 min, laparoscopic surgeries - from 91 to 427 min. Differences in favor of shorter laparoscopic surgery were significant in half of the studies. The incidence of intraoperative complications in robotic interventions varied from 0% to 13%, in laparoscopic interventions - from 0% to 30%. There was a tendency to less blood loss in robotic interventions. Comparison of inpatient treatment, postoperative complications (0-56% after robotic interventions, 1-70.6% after laparoscopic surgeries) and mortality (0-8.7% after robotic surgery and 0-11.8% after laparoscopic interventions) did not reveal significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At the modern stage of robotic surgery in the Russian Federation, differences between robotic and traditional laparoscopic interventions are not significant in abdominal surgery. Further researches with higher methodological quality are needed due to low evidence base.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 5","pages":"91-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147983791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Principles of early diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia. A prognostic scale]. 急性肠系膜缺血的早期诊断原则。[预测量表]。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202608143
A A Pankratov, E K Sharov, I V Matkov, D A Mamonov, D A Safronov, B I Plyusnin

Objective: To identify key clinical, laboratory, and instrumental predictors and develop a prognostic scale for acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) to optimize early diagnosis.

Material and methods: A prospective, cross-sectional, single-center study was performed between 2016 and 2024. Inclusion criteria: age ≥ 18 years, suspected or diagnosed AMI during surgery or autopsy.

Results: Prognostic scale is based on relative contribution of predictors. The model demonstrates very good discriminatory ability with AUC 0.832.

Conclusion: Thus, the proposed diagnostic algorithm brings us closer to solving the problem of patient selection for in-depth radiological diagnosis in resource-limited emergency hospitals. Implementation of this algorithm in clinical practice will standardize diagnostic process for acute mesenteric ischemia, reduce the time to diagnosis, and initiate timely treatment. This is critical for improving the outcomes of this life-threatening condition.

目的:确定急性肠系膜缺血(AMI)的关键临床、实验室和仪器预测指标,并制定预后量表以优化早期诊断。材料和方法:在2016年至2024年间进行了一项前瞻性、横断面、单中心研究。纳入标准:年龄≥18岁,在手术或尸检中怀疑或诊断为AMI。结果:以预测因子的相对贡献度为评分标准。该模型具有很好的判别能力,AUC为0.832。结论:由此提出的诊断算法使我们更接近于解决资源有限的急诊医院进行放射深度诊断的患者选择问题。该算法在临床实践中的实施,将规范急性肠系膜缺血的诊断流程,减少诊断时间,及时启动治疗。这对于改善这种危及生命的疾病的预后至关重要。
{"title":"[Principles of early diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia. A prognostic scale].","authors":"A A Pankratov, E K Sharov, I V Matkov, D A Mamonov, D A Safronov, B I Plyusnin","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202608143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202608143","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify key clinical, laboratory, and instrumental predictors and develop a prognostic scale for acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) to optimize early diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective, cross-sectional, single-center study was performed between 2016 and 2024. Inclusion criteria: age ≥ 18 years, suspected or diagnosed AMI during surgery or autopsy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prognostic scale is based on relative contribution of predictors. The model demonstrates very good discriminatory ability with AUC 0.832.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thus, the proposed diagnostic algorithm brings us closer to solving the problem of patient selection for in-depth radiological diagnosis in resource-limited emergency hospitals. Implementation of this algorithm in clinical practice will standardize diagnostic process for acute mesenteric ischemia, reduce the time to diagnosis, and initiate timely treatment. This is critical for improving the outcomes of this life-threatening condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 8","pages":"43-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148798889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Surgery for recurrent benign tracheoesophageal fistula]. 复发性良性气管食管瘘的手术治疗。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202602136
V D Parshin, M A Rusakov, M A Gasanov, A V Parshin, M A Ursov, D D Serpukhin, V V Parshin

Objective: To optimize diagnosis and treatment methods for recurrent TEF based on analysis of extensive clinical experience; to propose preventive strategies reducing postoperative complications.

Material and methods: Treatment outcomes were analyzed in 115 patients with TEF between 2004 and 2023. Of these, 40 (34.8%) ones underwent redo surgeries after previous failed fistula closure. There were 69 surgical interventions including third-time surgeries in 7 patients with repeated recurrences. TEF associated with tracheal cicatricial stenosis (TCS) in 29 (48.3%) cases necessitated concomitant surgical approaches. Treatment method was determined by characteristics of previous interventions and clinical situation.

Results: No mortality was recorded. The most common postoperative complications were purulent-inflammatory processes. Key risk factors for recurrence were TEF associated with TCS and persistent tracheostomy after tracheoplasty with T-tube. Redo surgical interventions, 3-fold attempts of fistula closure, led to complete recovery in some cases.

Conclusion: The study confirms feasibility of radical treatment for recurrent TEF, even in case of significant anatomical and functional alterations. Original strategies for prevention of recurrence and refined surgical indications enhance treatment efficacy. These data can be used to improve clinical guidelines aimed at reducing recurrence rates and achieving better long-term outcomes.

目的:在分析大量临床经验的基础上,优化复发性TEF的诊治方法;提出减少术后并发症的预防策略。材料和方法:分析2004年至2023年间115例TEF患者的治疗结果。其中,40例(34.8%)患者在先前瘘管闭合失败后接受了重做手术。反复复发7例,共69次手术干预,其中第三次手术。29例(48.3%)TEF合并气管瘢痕狭窄(TCS)需要合并手术入路。根据以往干预措施的特点和临床情况确定治疗方法。结果:无死亡记录。最常见的术后并发症是脓性炎症过程。复发的关键危险因素是与TCS相关的TEF和t管气管成形术后的持续气管造口。重做手术干预,三次尝试关闭瘘管,导致一些病例完全恢复。结论:本研究证实了根治性治疗复发性TEF的可行性,即使在解剖和功能发生重大改变的情况下。独创的预防复发策略和完善的手术指征提高了治疗效果。这些数据可用于改进旨在降低复发率和实现更好的长期预后的临床指南。
{"title":"[Surgery for recurrent benign tracheoesophageal fistula].","authors":"V D Parshin, M A Rusakov, M A Gasanov, A V Parshin, M A Ursov, D D Serpukhin, V V Parshin","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202602136","DOIUrl":"10.17116/hirurgia202602136","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To optimize diagnosis and treatment methods for recurrent TEF based on analysis of extensive clinical experience; to propose preventive strategies reducing postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Treatment outcomes were analyzed in 115 patients with TEF between 2004 and 2023. Of these, 40 (34.8%) ones underwent redo surgeries after previous failed fistula closure. There were 69 surgical interventions including third-time surgeries in 7 patients with repeated recurrences. TEF associated with tracheal cicatricial stenosis (TCS) in 29 (48.3%) cases necessitated concomitant surgical approaches. Treatment method was determined by characteristics of previous interventions and clinical situation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No mortality was recorded. The most common postoperative complications were purulent-inflammatory processes. Key risk factors for recurrence were TEF associated with TCS and persistent tracheostomy after tracheoplasty with T-tube. Redo surgical interventions, 3-fold attempts of fistula closure, led to complete recovery in some cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study confirms feasibility of radical treatment for recurrent TEF, even in case of significant anatomical and functional alterations. Original strategies for prevention of recurrence and refined surgical indications enhance treatment efficacy. These data can be used to improve clinical guidelines aimed at reducing recurrence rates and achieving better long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 2","pages":"36-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146228908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Endoscopic diagnostic and treatment methods for abdominal trauma]. 【腹部外伤的内镜诊治方法】。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202602151
A K Botirov, J A Botirov, A Z Otaquziev, U D Usmonov, S Sh Egamov, Sh A Ziyayev, S M Yahyoev, Z B Solijonov

Objective: To improve surgical treatment of abdominal trauma using endoscopic surgical methods.

Material and methods: The study enrolled 87 patients with abdominal organ injuries. All patients were divided into two groups depending on surgical approach: group 1 - traditional surgical treatment, group 2 - advanced strategy based on endoscopic surgical methods.

Conclusion: Endoscopic technologies for abdominal trauma reduce the incidence of open diagnostic surgeries, postoperative morbidity and length of hospital-stay.

目的:提高内窥镜手术治疗腹部创伤的水平。材料和方法:本研究纳入87例腹部器官损伤患者。所有患者根据手术入路分为两组:1组为传统手术治疗,2组为基于内镜手术方法的先进策略。结论:内镜技术治疗腹部创伤可降低开放性诊断手术的发生率、术后发病率和住院时间。
{"title":"[Endoscopic diagnostic and treatment methods for abdominal trauma].","authors":"A K Botirov, J A Botirov, A Z Otaquziev, U D Usmonov, S Sh Egamov, Sh A Ziyayev, S M Yahyoev, Z B Solijonov","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202602151","DOIUrl":"10.17116/hirurgia202602151","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To improve surgical treatment of abdominal trauma using endoscopic surgical methods.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study enrolled 87 patients with abdominal organ injuries. All patients were divided into two groups depending on surgical approach: group 1 - traditional surgical treatment, group 2 - advanced strategy based on endoscopic surgical methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endoscopic technologies for abdominal trauma reduce the incidence of open diagnostic surgeries, postoperative morbidity and length of hospital-stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 2","pages":"51-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146228748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Effectiveness of autologous cells of stromal-vascular fraction of adipose tissue depending on transplantation method for skin grafting in patients with extensive deep burns]. [脂肪组织基质血管部分自体细胞移植在大面积深度烧伤患者植皮中的效果]。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202602163
A A Alekseev, K A Filimonov, T A Astrelina, I V Kobzeva, A E Bobrovnikov, S S Khromina, I A Chekmareva, V S Demidova

Objective: To analyze different methods for autologous transplantation of stromal-vascular fraction of adipose tissue combined with skin grafting with split-thickness skin graft 1:6 in patients with extensive deep burns.

Material and methods: Open comparative controlled prospective study was devoted to results of autologous skin grafting with split-thickness skin graft 1:6 and autologous cells of stromal-vascular fraction of adipose tissue. Patients were divided into 4 groups depending on transplantation method: injection, aerosol, combined (aerosol+injection) and comparison group (standard skin grafting with split-thickness perforated transplants).

There were 43 cases. Inclusion criteria: age 18-65 years, total area of skin burn 10-60% of body surface area, deep burn 10-45% of body surface area. Autologous skin grafting was performed on 10-15% of body surface area. Clinical, laboratory, cytological and histological methods were used to evaluate postoperative outcomes.

Results: Combined (injection+aerosol) transplantation method was followed by significantly earlier engraftment (by 5 days, 9.9 ±0.7 days in the main group and 14.5±0.88 days in the control group, Student's t test 3.518) and reduction of postoperative complications to 6% (in the control group 27%).

Conclusion: Analysis of biotechnological methods for surgical treatment of patients with extensive deep burns showed the effectiveness of combined (aerosol+injection) transplantation and skin grafting with split-thickness skin graft. This approach reduced skin recovery time and incidence of postoperative complications.

目的:分析广泛深度烧伤患者自体脂肪组织间质血管部分移植结合1:6裂皮植皮的不同方法。材料与方法:开放性比较对照前瞻性研究,采用裂厚皮1:6移植自体皮肤与脂肪组织基质-血管部分自体细胞移植的结果。根据移植方式将患者分为注射组、气雾剂组、联合(气雾剂+注射)组和对照组(标准植皮加裂厚穿孔移植)4组。共43例。纳入标准:年龄18-65岁,皮肤烧伤总面积占体表面积10-60%,深度烧伤面积占体表面积10-45%。自体皮肤移植面积为体表面积的10-15%。采用临床、实验室、细胞学和组织学方法评价术后结果。结果:采用(注射+气雾剂)联合移植法可显著缩短移植时间(5 d,主组9.9±0.7 d,对照组14.5±0.88 d, Student’st检验3.518),术后并发症减少6%(对照组27%)。结论:应用生物技术方法对大面积深度烧伤患者进行手术治疗分析,显示了(雾化+注射)联合植皮及裂皮植皮的有效性。该方法减少了皮肤恢复时间和术后并发症的发生率。
{"title":"[Effectiveness of autologous cells of stromal-vascular fraction of adipose tissue depending on transplantation method for skin grafting in patients with extensive deep burns].","authors":"A A Alekseev, K A Filimonov, T A Astrelina, I V Kobzeva, A E Bobrovnikov, S S Khromina, I A Chekmareva, V S Demidova","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202602163","DOIUrl":"10.17116/hirurgia202602163","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze different methods for autologous transplantation of stromal-vascular fraction of adipose tissue combined with skin grafting with split-thickness skin graft 1:6 in patients with extensive deep burns.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Open comparative controlled prospective study was devoted to results of autologous skin grafting with split-thickness skin graft 1:6 and autologous cells of stromal-vascular fraction of adipose tissue. Patients were divided into 4 groups depending on transplantation method: injection, aerosol, combined (aerosol+injection) and comparison group (standard skin grafting with split-thickness perforated transplants).</p><p><p>There were 43 cases. Inclusion criteria: age 18-65 years, total area of skin burn 10-60% of body surface area, deep burn 10-45% of body surface area. Autologous skin grafting was performed on 10-15% of body surface area. Clinical, laboratory, cytological and histological methods were used to evaluate postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Combined (injection+aerosol) transplantation method was followed by significantly earlier engraftment (by 5 days, 9.9 ±0.7 days in the main group and 14.5±0.88 days in the control group, Student's t test 3.518) and reduction of postoperative complications to 6% (in the control group 27%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Analysis of biotechnological methods for surgical treatment of patients with extensive deep burns showed the effectiveness of combined (aerosol+injection) transplantation and skin grafting with split-thickness skin graft. This approach reduced skin recovery time and incidence of postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 2","pages":"63-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146228751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Trial sequential analysis in evaluation of clinical guidelines (midline incisional hernia model)]. [评价临床指南(中线切口疝模型)的试验序列分析]。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202604191
S I Panin, T V Nechay, A V Sazhin, A Fingerhut, A N Akinchits, A A Kuznetsov, S N Kulaev, A V Puzikova, D V Perevoshchikov

Objective: To evaluate the methodology of Trial Sequential Analysis as a tool for developing and critically appraising of clinical guidelines on the model of midline ventral hernias.

Material and methods: Systematic searching for international guidelines on the management of ventral hernias was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 01, 2023. Searching depth was 5 years. Quality of systematic reviews was assessed using a Critical Appraisal Sheet from the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. TSA was performed using Copenhagen Trial Unit (Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Denmark) software. We analyzed sensitivity of models using relative risk reduction rates.

Results: We analyzed 3 international guidelines on the management of primary and incisional ventral hernias: the International Endohernia Society (IEHS, 2019), the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES, 2016), and the European Hernia Society (EHS, 2023). Systematic reviews in all guidelines had high quality. The IEHS (2019) and SAGES (2016) guidelines synthesized evidence without meta-analytical processing, whereas the EHS (2023) guideline incorporated meta-analysis. Our supplementary TSA calculations demonstrated that EHS (2023) guideline evidence base is sufficiently powered to identify diabetes mellitus and surgical site infection as key risk factors of incisional hernia following midline laparotomy. Alloplastic mesh appeared to be a preventive factor against hernia recurrence compared with suture repair. Nonetheless, optimal mesh placement technique remains inconclusive.

Conclusion: To ensure necessary evidence base for updated guidelines on midline ventral hernias, further protocol studies are needed, including international collaboration. An alternative option for achieving a larger sample size, but with lower evidence base, could be research of surgical registries.

目的:评价试验序列分析的方法学,作为制定和批判性评价中线腹疝模型临床指南的工具。材料和方法:系统检索截至2023年5月1日的PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus、Web of Science、CINAHL和Cochrane Library数据库中关于腹疝管理的国际指南。搜索深度为5年。系统评价的质量使用牛津循证医学中心的关键评价表进行评估。TSA使用哥本哈根试验单元(丹麦临床干预研究中心)软件进行。我们使用相对风险降低率来分析模型的敏感性。结果:我们分析了3个关于原发性和切口腹疝治疗的国际指南:国际腹疝学会(IEHS, 2019)、美国胃肠和内镜外科医生学会(SAGES, 2016)和欧洲疝学会(EHS, 2023)。所有指南的系统评价均具有高质量。IEHS(2019)和SAGES(2016)指南在没有荟萃分析处理的情况下合成了证据,而EHS(2023)指南则纳入了荟萃分析。我们的补充TSA计算表明,EHS(2023)指南证据基础足以确定糖尿病和手术部位感染是剖腹中线手术后切口疝的关键危险因素。与缝合修补术相比,同种异体补片是预防疝复发的重要因素。然而,最佳网格放置技术仍然没有定论。结论:为了确保更新的中线腹疝指南有必要的证据基础,需要进一步的方案研究,包括国际合作。实现更大样本量但证据基础较低的另一种选择可能是外科登记研究。
{"title":"[Trial sequential analysis in evaluation of clinical guidelines (midline incisional hernia model)].","authors":"S I Panin, T V Nechay, A V Sazhin, A Fingerhut, A N Akinchits, A A Kuznetsov, S N Kulaev, A V Puzikova, D V Perevoshchikov","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202604191","DOIUrl":"10.17116/hirurgia202604191","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the methodology of Trial Sequential Analysis as a tool for developing and critically appraising of clinical guidelines on the model of midline ventral hernias.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Systematic searching for international guidelines on the management of ventral hernias was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 01, 2023. Searching depth was 5 years. Quality of systematic reviews was assessed using a Critical Appraisal Sheet from the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. TSA was performed using Copenhagen Trial Unit (Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Denmark) software. We analyzed sensitivity of models using relative risk reduction rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 3 international guidelines on the management of primary and incisional ventral hernias: the International Endohernia Society (IEHS, 2019), the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES, 2016), and the European Hernia Society (EHS, 2023). Systematic reviews in all guidelines had high quality. The IEHS (2019) and SAGES (2016) guidelines synthesized evidence without meta-analytical processing, whereas the EHS (2023) guideline incorporated meta-analysis. Our supplementary TSA calculations demonstrated that EHS (2023) guideline evidence base is sufficiently powered to identify diabetes mellitus and surgical site infection as key risk factors of incisional hernia following midline laparotomy. Alloplastic mesh appeared to be a preventive factor against hernia recurrence compared with suture repair. Nonetheless, optimal mesh placement technique remains inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To ensure necessary evidence base for updated guidelines on midline ventral hernias, further protocol studies are needed, including international collaboration. An alternative option for achieving a larger sample size, but with lower evidence base, could be research of surgical registries.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 4","pages":"91-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147783162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Endovascular repair for a ruptured tuberculous thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm and secondary lumbar spondylitis]. [血管内修复破裂的结核性胸腹主动脉瘤和继发性腰椎脊柱炎]。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202604181
M A Chernyavskiy, A G Vanyurkin, E V Verkhovskaya, I N Danilov, E V Shlyakhto

Tuberculous spondylitis and psoas abscess secondary to mycotic thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm are extremely rare. This life-threatening condition requires surgical treatment after diagnosis. Treatment of these patients involves specific antibacterial therapy combined with total resection of infected tissues and vascular reconstruction. At the same time, the most optimal surgical tactics in these patients is unclear. We present a 65-year-old male patient with tuberculous ostitis of L2-L4 vertebrae and right-sided psoas abscess secondary to 6-month-old ruptured mycotic thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The main complaint at admission was severe lumbar pain. For diagnostic purposes, the patient underwent removal of right-sided retroperitoneal lesion with subsequent histological examination of tissues. Typical signs of tuberculosis infection required anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy. A month later, the patient underwent endovascular aortic repair due to infrarenal aortic enlargement and saccular protrusion of aortic wall within its bifurcation. Pain syndrome decreased after surgery. Postoperative CT revealed shrinkage of paraaortic hematoma and reduction of infrarenal aortic diameter. After 6 months, CT angiography confirmed pulsatile blood flow through the stented visceral arteries without endoleaks. Destruction zones of L2-L4 vertebrae decreased. This case demonstrates the possibility of endovascular treatment of a patient with ruptured mycotic thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with secondary tuberculous spondylitis and psoas abscess. This technique seems to be an acceptable alternative to open aortic repair in elderly comorbid patients.

结核性脊柱炎和腰肌脓肿继发于真菌性胸腹主动脉瘤是非常罕见的。这种危及生命的疾病在诊断后需要手术治疗。这些患者的治疗包括特异性抗菌治疗结合全切除感染组织和血管重建。同时,这些患者的最佳手术策略尚不清楚。我们报告一位65岁男性患者,因6个月大的真菌性胸腹主动脉瘤破裂而继发于L2-L4椎骨结核性口炎及右侧腰肌脓肿。入院时的主要主诉是严重的腰痛。为了诊断目的,患者切除了右侧腹膜后病变,并对组织进行了组织学检查。典型的结核感染征象需要抗结核化疗。1个月后,患者因肾下主动脉肿大及分叉处主动脉壁囊状突出行血管内主动脉修复术。手术后疼痛症状减轻。术后CT显示主动脉旁血肿缩小,肾下主动脉直径减小。6个月后,CT血管造影证实搏动性血流通过支架内的内脏动脉,无内漏。L2-L4椎体破坏区减少。这个病例显示了血管内治疗的可能性,病人的破裂真菌胸腹主动脉瘤继发性结核性脊柱炎和腰肌脓肿。这项技术似乎是一种可接受的替代开放主动脉修复在老年合并症患者。
{"title":"[Endovascular repair for a ruptured tuberculous thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm and secondary lumbar spondylitis].","authors":"M A Chernyavskiy, A G Vanyurkin, E V Verkhovskaya, I N Danilov, E V Shlyakhto","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202604181","DOIUrl":"10.17116/hirurgia202604181","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tuberculous spondylitis and psoas abscess secondary to mycotic thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm are extremely rare. This life-threatening condition requires surgical treatment after diagnosis. Treatment of these patients involves specific antibacterial therapy combined with total resection of infected tissues and vascular reconstruction. At the same time, the most optimal surgical tactics in these patients is unclear. We present a 65-year-old male patient with tuberculous ostitis of L2-L4 vertebrae and right-sided psoas abscess secondary to 6-month-old ruptured mycotic thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The main complaint at admission was severe lumbar pain. For diagnostic purposes, the patient underwent removal of right-sided retroperitoneal lesion with subsequent histological examination of tissues. Typical signs of tuberculosis infection required anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy. A month later, the patient underwent endovascular aortic repair due to infrarenal aortic enlargement and saccular protrusion of aortic wall within its bifurcation. Pain syndrome decreased after surgery. Postoperative CT revealed shrinkage of paraaortic hematoma and reduction of infrarenal aortic diameter. After 6 months, CT angiography confirmed pulsatile blood flow through the stented visceral arteries without endoleaks. Destruction zones of L2-L4 vertebrae decreased. This case demonstrates the possibility of endovascular treatment of a patient with ruptured mycotic thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with secondary tuberculous spondylitis and psoas abscess. This technique seems to be an acceptable alternative to open aortic repair in elderly comorbid patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 4","pages":"81-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147783554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Modern diagnostic and treatment approach for colonic diverticulitis in the Russian Federation: survey of specialists]. [俄罗斯联邦结肠憩室炎的现代诊断和治疗方法:专家调查]。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia20260415
T V Nechay, O A Smirnova, A E Tyagunov, L L Gusev, S N Kulaev, A G Yuldashev, A O Atroshchenko, Zh S Semenov, A V Sazhin

Objective: Investigation of the causes of differences between current and recommended therapeutic and diagnostic tactics for colon diverticulitis (CD).

Material and methods: An anonymous online survey was conducted from 01.2023 for 60 days. The participants received an information letter and a link to an online questionnaire. Demographic indicators, the level of self-esteem, sources of motivation in decision-making, diagnostic and therapeutic tactics were studied. The respondent's probability of choosing a specific treatment tactic was estimated in scores from 0 to 10.

Results: 377 respondents from the Russian Federation participated: 56 (14.9%) coloproctologists (CP), 299 (79.4%) general surgeons (GS), 22 who did not specify a specialty. The majority (46/56, 82.1%) of CP rate their knowledge of the problem as excellent and good, among GS the corresponding proportion is 199 (66.5%) (p=0.02). When making decisions, respondents were most often guided by professional experience (Me 8, Q1-Q3 6-10), methods adopted in the clinic (Me 8, Q1-Q3 5-10) and Russian guidelines (Me 9, Q1-Q3 7-10). A weak relationship was found between reliance on personal experience and the level of self-esteem (r=0.188, p<0.001), as well as the number of colorectal resections performed per year (r=0.242, p<0.001) and between reliance on national recommendations and the level of knowledge on the diagnosis and treatment of CD (r=0.223, p<0.001). Nineteen (5%) respondents for Hinchey IA and 91 (24%) respondents for Hinchey IB-II choose colon resection. In Hinchey III, non-operating specialists choose tactics that are inconsistent with the guidelines (lavage) (p<0.001). For Hinchey IV 35 (9.3%) respondents also offered non-radical treatment options. There is no consensus on issues not covered by guidelines.

Conclusion: There is low adherence to the existing recommendations that leads to significant differences in the approaches practiced by respondents from different cohorts. Further research is needed to fill in the gaps found and update the guidelines accordingly.

目的:探讨当前与推荐的结肠憩室炎(CD)治疗诊断策略差异的原因。材料与方法:自2023年1月1日起进行为期60天的匿名在线调查。参与者收到一封信息信和一份在线问卷的链接。研究了人口指标、自尊水平、决策动机来源、诊断和治疗策略。受访者选择特定治疗策略的概率以0到10的分数估计。结果:来自俄罗斯联邦的377名受访者参与了调查:56名(14.9%)直肠科医生(CP), 299名(79.4%)普通外科医生(GS), 22名未指定专业。大多数CP(46/56, 82.1%)认为自己对问题的认识是优秀和良好,GS中相应比例为199 (66.5%)(p=0.02)。在做决定时,受访者最常受到专业经验(Me 8, Q1-Q3 6-10)、临床采用的方法(Me 8, Q1-Q3 5-10)和俄罗斯指南(Me 9, Q1-Q3 7-10)的指导。对个人经验的依赖程度与自尊水平之间存在微弱的关系(r=0.188, pr=0.242, pr=0.223, ppp)。结论:对现有建议的依从性较低,导致不同队列的被调查者在实践方法方面存在显著差异。需要进一步的研究来填补发现的空白,并相应地更新指南。
{"title":"[Modern diagnostic and treatment approach for colonic diverticulitis in the Russian Federation: survey of specialists].","authors":"T V Nechay, O A Smirnova, A E Tyagunov, L L Gusev, S N Kulaev, A G Yuldashev, A O Atroshchenko, Zh S Semenov, A V Sazhin","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia20260415","DOIUrl":"10.17116/hirurgia20260415","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Investigation of the causes of differences between current and recommended therapeutic and diagnostic tactics for colon diverticulitis (CD).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey was conducted from 01.2023 for 60 days. The participants received an information letter and a link to an online questionnaire. Demographic indicators, the level of self-esteem, sources of motivation in decision-making, diagnostic and therapeutic tactics were studied. The respondent's probability of choosing a specific treatment tactic was estimated in scores from 0 to 10.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>377 respondents from the Russian Federation participated: 56 (14.9%) coloproctologists (CP), 299 (79.4%) general surgeons (GS), 22 who did not specify a specialty. The majority (46/56, 82.1%) of CP rate their knowledge of the problem as excellent and good, among GS the corresponding proportion is 199 (66.5%) (<i>p</i>=0.02). When making decisions, respondents were most often guided by professional experience (Me 8, Q<sub>1</sub>-Q<sub>3</sub> 6-10), methods adopted in the clinic (Me 8, Q<sub>1</sub>-Q<sub>3</sub> 5-10) and Russian guidelines (Me 9, Q<sub>1</sub>-Q<sub>3</sub> 7-10). A weak relationship was found between reliance on personal experience and the level of self-esteem (<i>r</i>=0.188, <i>p</i><0.001), as well as the number of colorectal resections performed per year (<i>r</i>=0.242, <i>p</i><0.001) and between reliance on national recommendations and the level of knowledge on the diagnosis and treatment of CD (<i>r</i>=0.223, <i>p</i><0.001). Nineteen (5%) respondents for Hinchey IA and 91 (24%) respondents for Hinchey IB-II choose colon resection. In Hinchey III, non-operating specialists choose tactics that are inconsistent with the guidelines (lavage) (<i>p</i><0.001). For Hinchey IV 35 (9.3%) respondents also offered non-radical treatment options. There is no consensus on issues not covered by guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is low adherence to the existing recommendations that leads to significant differences in the approaches practiced by respondents from different cohorts. Further research is needed to fill in the gaps found and update the guidelines accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 4","pages":"5-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147783646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Comprehensive left ventricular outflow tract reconstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy]. 肥厚性心肌病的左室流出道综合重建。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202606129
A V Lysenko, Yu S Gilevskaya, G I Salagaev, Yu V Belov

Objective: To describe the concept of comprehensive left ventricular outflow tract reconstruction based on eliminating all obstructive mechanisms.

Material and methods: The authors analyzed own experience of left ventricular outflow tract reconstruction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (over 400 surgeries).

Results: Complex left ventricular outflow tract reconstruction involves resection of interventricular septum and correction of papillary muscles, chordae tendineae and accessory muscle bundles. The described approach demonstrates high efficacy and safety and can be considered a modern standard.

Conclusion: A personalized approach based on precise myectomy allows for optimal hemodynamic outcomes with minimal risk of complications.

目的:阐述在消除所有梗阻机制的基础上进行左心室流出道全面重建的概念。材料与方法:作者分析了自己在肥厚性心肌病患者左室流出道重建中的经验(400余例)。结果:复杂的左室流出道重建包括切除室间隔和纠正乳头肌、腱索和副肌束。所描述的方法显示出高效率和安全性,可以被认为是一个现代标准。结论:基于精确骨髓切除术的个体化方法可以获得最佳的血流动力学结果和最小的并发症风险。
{"title":"[Comprehensive left ventricular outflow tract reconstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy].","authors":"A V Lysenko, Yu S Gilevskaya, G I Salagaev, Yu V Belov","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202606129","DOIUrl":"10.17116/hirurgia202606129","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the concept of comprehensive left ventricular outflow tract reconstruction based on eliminating all obstructive mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The authors analyzed own experience of left ventricular outflow tract reconstruction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (over 400 surgeries).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complex left ventricular outflow tract reconstruction involves resection of interventricular septum and correction of papillary muscles, chordae tendineae and accessory muscle bundles. The described approach demonstrates high efficacy and safety and can be considered a modern standard.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A personalized approach based on precise myectomy allows for optimal hemodynamic outcomes with minimal risk of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 6","pages":"29-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148259813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Jejunum segment interposition after total proximal gastrectomy (by the 70th anniversary of the Merendino-Dillard procedure)]. [全胃近端切除术后空肠段间位(Merendino-Dillard手术70周年)]。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202607166
D V Ruchkin, V A Kozlov, P I Nazariev

Objective: To evaluate safety and efficacy of jejunum segment interposition after proximal gastric resection.

Material and methods: There were 80 jejunum segment interpositions after proximal gastric resection in 2012-2023. Primary subtotal proximal gastric resection was performed in 70 (87.5%) patients, resection of esophagogastrostomy in 9 (11.2%), gastric bypass surgery - in 1 (1.3%). The indications for surgery were cancer in 66 (82.5%) patients, recurrence of cancer in esophagogastrostomy - 2 (2.5%), postgastrectomy diseases - 12 (15.0%). Mean age of patients was 62 years. There were 51 (63.8%) men and 29 (36.2%) women.

Results: In early postoperative period, 8 (10.0%) patients developed complications. Failure of esophagojejunostomy occurred in 5 (6.3%) cases, subdiaphragmatic abscess - in 1 (1.3%) patient. Another (1.3%) patient had jejunum insert necrosis that required its extirpation and direct esophagogastrostomy. One (1.3%) patient died from non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia with intestinal necrosis on the 3rd day after surgery. There were no long-term specific complications related to jejunum segment. Reflux esophagitis was recorded in 2 (3.6%) out of 56 patients.

Conclusion: Jejunum segment interposition after proximal gastric resection is a relatively safe technique preventing severe reflux esophagitis.

目的:评价胃近端切除术后空肠段介入术的安全性和有效性。材料与方法:2012-2023年胃近端切除术后空肠段间置80例。70例(87.5%)患者行胃近端次全切除术,9例(11.2%)患者行食管胃造口术,1例(1.3%)患者行胃旁路手术。手术指征为肿瘤66例(82.5%),食管胃造口术后肿瘤复发2例(2.5%),胃切除术后疾病12例(15.0%)。患者平均年龄62岁。男性51人(63.8%),女性29人(36.2%)。结果:术后早期出现并发症8例(10.0%)。食管空肠吻合术失败5例(6.3%),膈下脓肿1例(1.3%)。另一名(1.3%)患者有空肠插入物坏死,需要将其切除并直接进行食管胃造口术。1例(1.3%)患者术后第3天死于非闭塞性肠系膜缺血伴肠坏死。无空肠段相关的长期特异性并发症。56例患者中有2例(3.6%)发生反流性食管炎。结论:胃近端切除术后空肠段介入术是一种相对安全的预防严重反流性食管炎的技术。
{"title":"[Jejunum segment interposition after total proximal gastrectomy (by the 70th anniversary of the Merendino-Dillard procedure)].","authors":"D V Ruchkin, V A Kozlov, P I Nazariev","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202607166","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202607166","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate safety and efficacy of jejunum segment interposition after proximal gastric resection.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>There were 80 jejunum segment interpositions after proximal gastric resection in 2012-2023. Primary subtotal proximal gastric resection was performed in 70 (87.5%) patients, resection of esophagogastrostomy in 9 (11.2%), gastric bypass surgery - in 1 (1.3%). The indications for surgery were cancer in 66 (82.5%) patients, recurrence of cancer in esophagogastrostomy - 2 (2.5%), postgastrectomy diseases - 12 (15.0%). Mean age of patients was 62 years. There were 51 (63.8%) men and 29 (36.2%) women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In early postoperative period, 8 (10.0%) patients developed complications. Failure of esophagojejunostomy occurred in 5 (6.3%) cases, subdiaphragmatic abscess - in 1 (1.3%) patient. Another (1.3%) patient had jejunum insert necrosis that required its extirpation and direct esophagogastrostomy. One (1.3%) patient died from non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia with intestinal necrosis on the 3<sup>rd</sup> day after surgery. There were no long-term specific complications related to jejunum segment. Reflux esophagitis was recorded in 2 (3.6%) out of 56 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Jejunum segment interposition after proximal gastric resection is a relatively safe technique preventing severe reflux esophagitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 7","pages":"66-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148608182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Khirurgiya
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1